Clinical Improvement after Shunt Surgery in Patients with Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Can Be Quantified by Diffusion Tensor Imaging

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Adams RD,
   2. Fisher CM,
   3. Hakim S, et al

   . Symptomatic occult hydrocephalus with “normal” cerebrospinal-fluid pressure. A treatable syndrome. N Engl J Med 1965;273:117–26 doi:10.1056/NEJM196507152730301 pmid:14303656

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   1. Nakajima M,
   2. Yamada S,
   3. Miyajima M

   ; Research Committee of Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus, et al. Guidelines for management of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (third edition): endorsed by the Japanese Society of Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2021;61:63–97 doi:10.2176/nmc.st.2020-0292 pmid:33455998

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Malm J,
   2. Graff-Radford NR,
   3. Ishikawa M, et al

   . Influence of comorbidities in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus—research and clinical care. A report of the ISHCSF task force on comorbidities in INPH. Fluids Barriers CNS 2013;10:22 doi:10.1186/2045-8118-10-22

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Giordan E,
   2. Palandri G,
   3. Lanzino G, et al

   . Outcomes and complications of different surgical treatments for idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurosurg 2019;131:1024–36 doi:10.3171/2018.5.JNS1875 pmid:30497150

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Grazzini I,
   2. Venezia D,
   3. Cuneo GL, et al

   . The role of diffusion tensor imaging in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a literature review. Neuroradiol J 2021;34:55–69 doi:10.1177/1971400920975153 pmid:33263494

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Lock C,
   2. Toh EMS,
   3. Keong NC, et al

   . Structural volumetric and periodic table DTI patterns in complex normal pressure hydrocephalus—toward the principles of a translational taxonomy. Front Hum Neurosci 2024;18:1188533 doi:10.3389/fnhum.2024.1188533 pmid:38545518

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. O’Donnell LJ,
   2. Westin C-F

   . An introduction to diffusion tensor image analysis. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2011;22:185–96 doi:10.1016/j.nec.2010.12.004 pmid:21435570

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Sedlák V,
   2. Bubeníková A,
   3. Skalický P, et al

   . Diffusion tensor imaging helps identify shunt-responsive normal pressure hydrocephalus patients among probable iNPH cohort. Neurosurg Rev 2023;46:173 doi:10.1007/s10143-023-02078-1

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Boon AJ,
   2. Tans JT,
   3. Delwel EJ, et al

   . The Dutch normal-pressure hydrocephalus study. How to select patients for shunting? An analysis of four diagnostic criteria. Surg Neurol 2000;53:201–07 doi:10.1016/s0090-3019(00)00182-8 pmid:10773249

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    1. Charlson ME,
    2. Pompei P,
    3. Ales KL, et al

    . A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 1987;40:373–83 doi:10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8 pmid:3558716

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    1. Bowie CR,
    2. Harvey PD

    . Administration and interpretation of the Trail Making Test. Nat Protoc 2006;1:2277–81 doi:10.1038/nprot.2006.390 pmid:17406468

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Bezdicek O,
    2. Motak L,
    3. Axelrod BN, et al

    . Czech version of the Trail Making Test: normative data and clinical utility. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 2012;27:906–14 doi:10.1093/arclin/acs084 pmid:23027441

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Kapur N

    . Neuropsychological Assessment, Fourth Edition. J Neurol 2005;252:1290–91 doi:10.1007/s00415-005-0003-0

    CrossRef
14. 14.↵
    1. Rey A

    . L’Examen Clinique en Psychologie. 2nd ed. Presses Universitaires de France; 1964.
15. 15.↵
    1. Zhang X,
    2. Lv L,
    3. Min G, et al

    . Overview of the complex figure test and its clinical application in neuropsychiatric disorders, including copying and recall. Front Neurol 2021;12:680474 doi:10.3389/fneur.2021.680474 pmid:34531812

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Jenkinson M,
    2. Beckmann CF,
    3. Behrens TEJ, et al

    . FSL. NeuroImage 2012;62:782–90 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.015 pmid:21979382

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    1. Smith SM,
    2. Jenkinson M,
    3. Woolrich MW, et al

    . Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. NeuroImage 2004;23 Suppl 1:S208–19 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.051 pmid:15501092

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Smith SM,
    2. Jenkinson M,
    3. Johansen-Berg H, et al

    . Tract-based spatial statistics: voxelwise analysis of multi-subject diffusion data. NeuroImage 2006;31:1487–505 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.02.024 pmid:16624579

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. 19.↵
    1. Rueckert D,
    2. Sonoda LI,
    3. Hayes C, et al

    . Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1999;18:712–21 doi:10.1109/42.796284 pmid:10534053

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    1. Hořínek D,
    2. Štěpán-Buksakowska I,
    3. Szabó N, et al

    . Difference in white matter microstructure in differential diagnosis of normal pressure hydrocephalus and Alzheimer’s disease. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2016;140:52–59 doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2015.11.010 pmid:26646649

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Grasso G,
    2. Torregrossa F,
    3. Leone L, et al

    . Long-term efficacy of shunt therapy in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. World Neurosurg 2019;129:e458–63 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2019.05.183 pmid:31154105

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Ammar A

    1. Ammar A,
    2. Abbas F,
    3. Al Issawi W, et al

    . Idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus syndrome: is it understood? the comprehensive idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus theory (CiNPHT). In: Ammar A, ed. Hydrocephalus: What Do We Know? And What Do We Still Not Know? Springer-Verlag International Publishing; 2017:67–82 doi:10.1007/978-3-319-61304-8_5

    CrossRef
23. 23.↵
    1. Eleftheriou A,
    2. Blystad I,
    3. Tisell A, et al

    . Indication of thalamo-cortical circuit dysfunction in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a tensor imaging study. Sci Rep 2020;10:6148 doi:10.1038/s41598-020-63238-7

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Herbet G,
    2. Zemmoura I, et al

    . Functional anatomy of the inferior longitudinal fasciculus: from historical reports to current hypotheses. Front Neuroanat 2018;12:77 doi:10.3389/fnana.2018.00077 pmid:30283306

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    1. Ashtari M,
    2. Cottone J,
    3. Ardekani BA, et al

    . Disruption of white matter integrity in the inferior longitudinal fasciculus in adolescents with schizophrenia as revealed by fiber tractography. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2007;64:1270–80 doi:10.1001/archpsyc.64.11.1270 pmid:17984396

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
26. 26.↵
    1. Hoza D,
    2. Vlasák A,
    3. Hořínek D, et al

    . DTI-MRI biomarkers in the search for normal pressure hydrocephalus aetiology: a review. Neurosurg Rev 2015;38:239–244 44; discussion doi:10.1007/s10143-014-0584-0 pmid:25345377

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    1. Kim MJ,
    2. Seo SW,
    3. Lee KM, et al

    . Differential diagnosis of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus from other dementias using diffusion tensor imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:1496–503 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2531 pmid:21700790

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
28. 28.↵
    1. Israelsson H,
    2. Eklund A,
    3. Malm J, et al

    . Cerebrospinal fluid shunting improves long-term quality of life in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 2020;86:574–82 doi:10.1093/neuros/nyz297 pmid:31504827

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    1. Allali G,
    2. Laidet M,
    3. Armand S, et al

    . Apathy in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a marker of reversible gait disorders. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2018;33:735–42 doi:10.1002/gps.4847 pmid:29292530

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    1. Coenen VA,
    2. Schlaepfer TE,
    3. Sajonz B, et al

    . Tractographic description of major subcortical projection pathways passing the anterior limb of the internal capsule. Corticopetal organization of networks relevant for psychiatric disorders. Neuroimage Clin 2020;25:102165 doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102165 pmid:31954987

    CrossRefPubMed
31. 31.↵
    1. Rýdlo O,
    2. Bubeníková A,
    3. Häcklová K, et al

    . Comparison of decline in different cognitive domain in patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurg Rev 2024;47:167 doi:10.1007/s10143-024-02410-3

    CrossRefPubMed
32. 32.↵
    1. Peterson KA,
    2. Savulich G,
    3. Jackson D, et al

    . The effect of shunt surgery on neuropsychological performance in normal pressure hydrocephalus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurol 2016;263:1669–77 doi:10.1007/s00415-016-8097-0 pmid:27017344

    CrossRefPubMed
33. 33.↵
    1. Von Der Heide RJ,
    2. Skipper LM,
    3. Klobusicky E, et al

    . Dissecting the uncinate fasciculus: disorders, controversies and a hypothesis. Brain 2013;136:1692–707 doi:10.1093/brain/awt094 pmid:23649697

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
34. 34.↵
    1. Rolls ET

    . The cingulate cortex and limbic systems for emotion, action, and memory. Brain Struct Funct 2019;224:3001–18 doi:10.1007/s00429-019-01945-2 pmid:31451898

    CrossRefPubMed
35. 35.↵
    1. Paul LK,
    2. Erickson RL,
    3. Hartman JA, et al

    . Learning and memory in individuals with agenesis of the corpus callosum. Neuropsychologia 2016;86:183–92 doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.04.013 pmid:27091586

    CrossRefPubMed
36. 36.↵
    1. Makris N,
    2. Kennedy DN,
    3. McInerney S, et al

    . Segmentation of subcomponents within the superior longitudinal fascicle in humans: a quantitative, in vivo, DT-MRI study. Cereb Cortex 2005;15:854–69 doi:10.1093/cercor/bhh186 pmid:15590909

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
37. 37.↵
    1. Voineskos AN,
    2. Rajji TK,
    3. Lobaugh NJ, et al

    . Age-related decline in white matter tract integrity and cognitive performance: a DTI tractography and structural equation modeling study. Neurobiol Aging 2012;33:21–34 doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2010.02.009 pmid:20363050

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
38. 38.↵
    1. Tullberg M,
    2. Jensen C,
    3. Ekholm S, et al

    . Normal pressure hydrocephalus: vascular white matter changes on MR images must not exclude patients from shunt surgery. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001;22:1665–73

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
39. 39.↵
    1. Magistro D,
    2. Takeuchi H,
    3. Nejad KK, et al

    . The relationship between processing speed and regional white matter volume in healthy young people. PLoS One 2015;10:e0136386 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0136386 pmid:26397946

    CrossRefPubMed
40. 40.↵
    1. McDonald AP,
    2. D’Arcy RCN,
    3. Song X, et al

    . Functional MRI on executive functioning in aging and dementia: a scoping review of cognitive tasks. Aging Med (Milton) 2018;1:209–19 doi:10.1002/agm2.12037 pmid:31942499

    CrossRefPubMed
41. 41.↵
    1. Abdulrahman H,
    2. Hafdi M,
    3. Mutsaerts H, et al

    . Cerebral perfusion and the risk of cognitive decline and dementia in community dwelling older people. Cereb Circ Cogn Behav 2022;3:100125 doi:10.1016/j.cccb.2022.100125 pmid:36324415

    CrossRefPubMed
42. 42.↵
    1. Kang K,
    2. Jeong SY,
    3. Park K-S, et al

    . Distinct cerebral cortical perfusion patterns in idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Hum Brain Mapp 2023;44:269–79 doi:10.1002/hbm.25974 pmid:36102811

    CrossRefPubMed
43. 43.↵
    1. Tarnaris A,
    2. Toma AK,
    3. Pullen E, et al

    . Cognitive, biochemical, and imaging profile of patients suffering from idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Alzheimers Dement 2011;7:501–08 doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2011.01.003 pmid:21757406

    CrossRefPubMed