Leveraging Physics-Based Synthetic MR Images and Deep Transfer Learning for Artifact Reduction in Echo-Planar Imaging

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Franz Schmitt MKS,
   2. Turner R

   . Echo-Planar Imaging: Theory, Technique, and Application. Springer-Verlag; 1998:179–200
2. 2.↵
   1. Buonocore MH,
   2. Gao L

   . Ghost artifact reduction for echo planar imaging using image phase correction. Magn Reson Med 1997;38:89–100 doi:10.1002/mrm.1910380114 pmid:9211384

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Chen N,
   2. Wyrwicz AM

   . Removal of EPI Nyquist ghost artifacts with two‐dimensional phase correction. Magn Reson Med 2004;51:1247–53 doi:10.1002/mrm.20097 pmid:15170846

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Bruder H,
   2. Fischer H,
   3. Reinfelder HE, et al

   . Image reconstruction for echo planar imaging with nonequidistant k‐space sampling. Magn Reson Med 1992;23:311–23 doi:10.1002/mrm.1910230211 pmid:1549045

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   1. Poser BA,
   2. Barth M,
   3. Goa PE, et al

   . Single‐shot echo‐planar imaging with Nyquist ghost compensation: interleaved dual echo with acceleration (IDEA) echo‐planar imaging (EPI). Magn Reson Med 2013;69:37–47 doi:10.1002/mrm.24222 pmid:22411762

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Bilgic B,
   2. Chatnuntawech I,
   3. Manhard MK, et al

   . Highly accelerated multishot echo planar imaging through synergistic machine learning and joint reconstruction. Magn Reson Med 2019;82:1343–58 doi:10.1002/mrm.27813 pmid:31106902

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Kawamura M,
   2. Tamada D,
   3. Funayama S, et al

   . Accelerated acquisition of high-resolution diffusion-weighted imaging of the brain with a multi-shot echo-planar sequence: deep-learning-based denoising. Magn Reson Med Sci 2021;20:99–105 doi:10.2463/mrms.tn.2019-0081 pmid:32147643

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Lee J,
   2. Han Y,
   3. Ryu JK, et al

   . k‐Space deep learning for reference‐free EPI ghost correction. Magn Reson Med 2019;82:2299–313 doi:10.1002/mrm.27896 pmid:31321809

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Cui L,
   2. Song Y,
   3. Wang Y, et al

   . Motion artifact reduction for magnetic resonance imaging with deep learning and k-space analysis. PloS one 2023;18:e0278668 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0278668 pmid:36603007

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Duong ST,
    2. Phung SL,
    3. Bouzerdoum A, et al

    . An unsupervised deep learning technique for susceptibility artifact correction in reversed phase-encoding EPI images. Magn Reson Imaging 2020;71:1–10 doi:10.1016/j.MRI.2020.04.004 pmid:32407764

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Hu Z,
    2. Wang Y,
    3. Zhang Z, et al

    . Distortion correction of single-shot EPI enabled by deep-learning. Neuroimage 2020;221:117170 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117170 pmid:32682096

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Luo G,
    2. Wang X,
    3. Blumenthal M, et al

    . Generative image priors for MRI Reconstruction Trained from Magnitude-Only Images. arXiv preprint 2023:230802340
13. 13.↵
    1. Constantinides CD,
    2. Weiss RG,
    3. Lee R, et al

    . Restoration of low resolution metabolic images with a priori anatomic information: 23Na MRI in myocardial infarction. Magn Reson Imaging 2000;18:461–71 doi:10.1016/s0730-725x(99)00145-9 pmid:10788724

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Haldar JP,
    2. Hernando D,
    3. Song SK, et al

    . Anatomically constrained reconstruction from noisy data. Magn Reson Med 2008;59:810–18 doi:10.1002/mrm.21536 pmid:18383297

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Ellingson BM,
    2. Bendszus M,
    3. Boxerman J, et al

    ; Jumpstarting Brain Tumor Drug Development Coalition Imaging Standardization Steering Committee. Consensus recommendations for a standardized brain tumor imaging protocol in clinical trials. Neuro Oncol 2015;17:1188–98 doi:10.1093/neuonc/nov095 pmid:26250565

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Truong TK,
    2. Clymer BD,
    3. Chakeres DW, et al

    . Three-dimensional numerical simulations of susceptibility-induced magnetic field inhomogeneities in the human head. Magn Reson Imaging 2002;20:759–70 doi:10.1016/s0730-725x(02)00601-x pmid:12591571

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Bouwman JG,
    2. Bakker CJG

    . Alias subtraction more efficient than conventional zero-padding in the Fourier-based calculation of the susceptibility induced perturbation of the magnetic field in MR. Magn Reson Med 2012;68:621–30 doi:10.1002/mrm.24343 pmid:22711589

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Zijlstra F,
    2. Bouwman JG,
    3. Braškutė I, et al

    . Fast Fourier-based simulation of off-resonance artifacts in steady-state gradient echo MRI applied to metal object localization. Magn Reson Med 2017;78:2035–41 doi:10.1002/mrm.26556 pmid:27928834

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Rong W,
    2. Li Z,
    3. Zhang W, et al

    . An improved CANNY edge detection algorithm. In: 2014 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation 2014:577–82
20. 20.↵
    1. Deriche R

    . Using Canny’s criteria to derive a recursively implemented optimal edge detector. Int J Comput Vision 1987;1:167–87 doi:10.1007/BF00123164

    CrossRef
21. 21.↵
    1. Isola P,
    2. Zhu JY,
    3. Zhou T, et al

    . Image-to-Image Translation with Conditional Adversarial Networks. In: 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2017:5967–76 doi:10.1109/CVPR.2017.632

    CrossRef
22. 22.↵
    1. He K,
    2. Zhang X,
    3. Ren S, et al

    . Deep residual learning for image recognition. In: 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2016:770–78 doi:10.1109/CVPR.2016.90

    CrossRef
23. 23.↵
    1. Alom MZ,
    2. Hasan M,
    3. Yakopcic C, et al

    . Recurrent residual convolutional neural network based on U-Net (R2U-Net) for medical image segmentation. 2018
24. 24.↵
    1. Oktay O,
    2. Schlemper J,
    3. Folgoc LL, et al

    . Attention u-net: learning where to look for the pancreas. arXiv preprint 2018:180403999
25. 25.↵
    1. Wang Z,
    2. Bovik AC,
    3. Sheikh HR, et al

    . Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Trans Image Process 2004;13:600–12 doi:10.1109/TIP.2003.819861

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
26. 26.↵
    1. Wang Z,
    2. Simoncelli EP,
    3. Bovik AC

    . Multiscale structural similarity for image quality assessment. In: The Thirty-Seventh Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems & Computers, 2003 2003:1398–1402
27. 27.↵
    1. Huttenlocher DP,
    2. Klanderman GA,
    3. Rucklidge WJ

    . Comparing images using the Hausdorff distance. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Machine Intell 1993;15:850–63 doi:10.1109/34.232073

    CrossRef
28. 28.↵
    1. Oshima S,
    2. Hagiwara A,
    3. Raymond C, et al

    . Change in volumetric tumor growth rate after cytotoxic therapy is predictive of overall survival in recurrent glioblastoma. Neurooncol Adv 2023;5:vdad084 doi:10.1093/noajnl/vdad084 pmid:37554221

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    1. Wen PY,
    2. Macdonald DR,
    3. Reardon DA, et al

    . Updated response assessment criteria for high-grade gliomas: response assessment in neuro-oncology working group. J Clin Oncol 2010;28:1963–72 doi:10.1200/JCO.2009.26.3541 pmid:20231676

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
30. 30.↵
    1. Cho NS,
    2. Hagiwara A,
    3. Sanvito F, et al

    . A multi-reader comparison of normal-appearing white matter normalization techniques for perfusion and diffusion MRI in brain tumors. Neuroradiology 2023;65:559–68 doi:10.1007/s00234-022-03072-y pmid:36301349

    CrossRefPubMed
31. 31.↵
    1. Ellingson BM,
    2. Kim E,
    3. Woodworth DC, et al

    . Diffusion MRI quality control and functional diffusion map results in ACRIN 6677/RTOG 0625: a multicenter, randomized, phase II trial of bevacizumab and chemotherapy in recurrent glioblastoma. Int J Oncol 2015;46:1883–92 doi:10.3892/ijo.2015.2891 pmid:25672376

    CrossRefPubMed
32. 32.↵
    1. Abayazeed AH,
    2. Abbassy A,
    3. Müeller M, et al

    . NS-HGlio: a generalizable and repeatable HGG segmentation and volumetric measurement AI algorithm for the longitudinal MRI assessment to inform RANO in trials and clinics. Neurooncol Adv 2023;5:vdac184 doi:10.1093/noajnl/vdac184 pmid:36685009

    CrossRefPubMed