Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping in Adults with Persistent Postconcussion Symptoms after Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: An Exploratory Study

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Champagne AS,
   2. Yao X,
   3. Mcfaull SR, et al

   . Self-reported concussions in Canada: a cross-sectional study. Heal Reports 2023;34:17–28
2. 2.↵
   1. Cancelliere C,
   2. Verville L,
   3. Stubbs JL, et al

   . Post-concussion symptoms and disability in adults with mild traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurotrauma 2023;40:1045–59 doi:10.1089/neu.2022.0185 pmid:36472218

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Hadanny A,
   2. Efrati S

   . Treatment of persistent post-concussion syndrome due to mild traumatic brain injury: current status and future directions. Expert Rev Neurother 2016;16:875–87 doi:10.1080/14737175.2016.1205487 pmid:27337294

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Gumus M,
   2. Santos A,
   3. Tartaglia MC

   . Diffusion and functional MRI findings and their relationship to behaviour in postconcussion syndrome: a scoping review. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2021;92:1259–70 doi:10.1136/jnnp-2021-326604 pmid:34635568

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   1. Giza CC,
   2. Hovda DA

   . The new neurometabolic cascade of concussion. Neurosurgery 2014;75(Suppl 4):S24–33 doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000000505 pmid:25232881

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Gozt A,
   2. Hellewell S,
   3. Ward PGD, et al

   . Emerging applications for quantitative susceptibility mapping in the detection of traumatic brain injury pathology. Neuroscience 2021;467:218–36 doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2021.05.030 pmid:34087394

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Chary K,
   2. Nissi MJ,
   3. Nykänen O, et al

   . Quantitative susceptibility mapping of the rat brain after traumatic brain injury. NMR Biomed 2021;34:1–15

   CrossRef
8. 8.↵
   1. Koch KM,
   2. Meier TB,
   3. Karr R, et al

   . Quantitative susceptibility mapping after sports-related concussion. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2018;39:1215–21 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5692 pmid:29880474

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   1. Koch KM,
   2. Nencka AS,
   3. Swearingen B, et al

   . Acute post-concussive assessments of brain tissue magnetism using magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurotrauma 2021;38:848–57 doi:10.1089/neu.2020.7322 pmid:33066712

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Sader N,
    2. Gobbi D,
    3. Goodyear B, et al

    ; Pediatric Emergency Research Canada A-CAP study team. Can quantitative susceptibility mapping help diagnose and predict recovery of concussion in children? An A-CAP study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2023;94:227–35 doi:10.1136/jnnp-2022-329487 pmid:36517039

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    1. Kay T,
    2. Harrington DE,
    3. Adams R

    . American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine, Head Injury Interdisciplinary Special Interest Group. Definition of mild traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil 1993;8:86–87

    CrossRef
12. 12.↵
    World Health Organization. The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders: Diagnostic Criteria for Research. Geneva: 1993.
13. 13.↵
    1. Mercier LJ,
    2. Fung TS,
    3. Harris AD, et al

    . Improving symptom burden in adults with persistent post-concussive symptoms: a randomized aerobic exercise trial protocol. BMC Neurol 2020;20:46 doi:10.1186/s12883-020-1622-x

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Leddy JJ,
    2. Willer B

    . Use of graded exercise testing in concussion and return-to-activity management. Curr Sports Med Rep 2013;12:370–76 doi:10.1249/JSR.0000000000000008 pmid:24225521

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Salluzzi M,
    2. Gobbi DG,
    3. McLean DA, et al

    . Cerebra-QSM: an application for exploring quantitative susceptibility mapping algorithms. In: International Society for Magnetic Resonanace in Medicine 25th Annual Meeting; 2017:3822
16. 16.↵
    1. Naji N,
    2. Gee M,
    3. Jickling GC, et al

    . Quantifying cerebral microbleeds using quantitative susceptibility mapping from magnetization-prepared rapid gradient-echo. NMR Biomed 2024;37:e5139–15 doi:10.1002/nbm.5139 pmid:38465729

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Sharma B,
    2. Beaudin AE,
    3. Cox E, et al

    . Brain iron content in cerebral amyloid angiopathy using quantitative susceptibility mapping. Front Neurosci 2023;17:1139988 doi:10.3389/fnins.2023.1139988 pmid:37139529

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. McCreary CR,
    2. Salluzzi M,
    3. Andersen LB, et al

    . Calgary Normative Study: design of a prospective longitudinal study to characterise potential quantitative MR biomarkers of neurodegeneration over the adult lifespan. BMJ Open 2020;10:e038120 doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038120 pmid:32792445

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    1. Smith SM

    . Fast robust automated brain extraction. Hum Brain Mapp 2002;17:143–55 doi:10.1002/hbm.10062 pmid:12391568

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    1. Abdul-Rahman HS,
    2. Gdeisat MA,
    3. Burton DR, et al

    . Fast and robust three-dimensional best path phase unwrapping algorithm. Appl Opt 2007;46:6623–35 doi:10.1364/ao.46.006623 pmid:17846656

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Sun H,
    2. Wilman AH

    . Background field removal using spherical mean value filtering and Tikhonov regularization. Magn Reson Med 2014;71:1151–57 doi:10.1002/mrm.24765 pmid:23666788

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Bilgic B,
    2. Fan AP,
    3. Polimeni JR, et al

    . Fast quantitative susceptibility mapping with L1-regularization and automatic parameter selection. Magn Reson Med 2014;72:1444–59 doi:10.1002/mrm.25029 pmid:24259479

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Jenkinson M,
    2. Bannister PR,
    3. Brady JM, et al

    . Improved optimisation for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images. Neuroimage 2002;17:825–41 doi:10.1006/nimg.2002.1132

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
24. 24.↵
    1. Desikan RS,
    2. Ségonne F,
    3. Fischl B, et al

    . An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest. Neuroimage 2006;31:968–80 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.021 pmid:16530430

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
25. 25.↵
    1. Hua K,
    2. Zhang J,
    3. Wakana S, et al

    . Tract probability maps in stereotaxic spaces: analyses of white matter anatomy and tract-specific quantification. Neuroimage 2008;39:336–47 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.07.053

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
26. 26.↵
    R Core Team. (2020) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/
27. 27.↵
    1. Fehily B,
    2. Fitzgerald M

    . Repeated mild traumatic brain injury: potential mechanisms of damage. Cell Transplant 2017;26:1131–55 doi:10.1177/0963689717714092 pmid:28933213

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    1. Gard A,
    2. Vedung F,
    3. Piehl F, et al

    . Cerebrospinal fluid levels of neuroinflammatory biomarkers are increased in athletes with persistent post-concussive symptoms following sports-related concussion. J Neuroinflammation 2023;20:189 doi:10.1186/s12974-023-02864-0 pmid:37592277

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    1. Sun Y,
    2. Bai L,
    3. Niu X, et al

    . Elevated serum levels of inflammation-related cytokines in mild traumatic brain injury are associated with cognitive performance. Front Neurol 2019;10:1120–29 doi:10.3389/fneur.2019.01120 pmid:31708858

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    1. Asturias A,
    2. Knoblauch T,
    3. Rodriguez A, et al

    . Diffusion in the corpus callosum predicts persistence of clinical symptoms after mild traumatic brain injury, a multi-scanner study. Front Neuroimaging 2023;2:1153115 doi:10.3389/fnimg.2023.1153115 pmid:38025312

    CrossRefPubMed
31. 31.↵
    1. Solomito MJ,
    2. Reuman H,
    3. Wang DH

    . Sex differences in concussion: a review of brain anatomy, function, and biomechanical response to impact. Brain Inj 2019;33:105–10 doi:10.1080/02699052.2018.1542507 pmid:30403884

    CrossRefPubMed
32. 32.↵
    1. Ghodadra A,
    2. Alhilali L,
    3. Fakhran S

    . Principal component analysis of diffusion tensor images to determine white matter injury patterns underlying postconcussive headache. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:274–78 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4505 pmid:26405087

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
33. 33.↵
    1. Janelle F,
    2. Iorio-Morin C,
    3. D’amour S, et al

    . Superior longitudinal fasciculus: a review of the anatomical descriptions with functional correlates. Front Neurol 2022;13:794618 doi:10.3389/fneur.2022.794618 pmid:35572948

    CrossRefPubMed
34. 34.↵
    1. Danielli E,
    2. Simard N,
    3. DeMatteo CA, et al

    . A review of brain regions and associated post-concussion symptoms. Front Neurol 2023;14:1136367 doi:10.3389/fneur.2023.1136367 pmid:37602240

    CrossRefPubMed
35. 35.↵
    1. Knyazeva MG

    . Splenium of corpus callosum: patterns of interhemispheric interaction in children and adults. Neural Plast 2013;2013:639430 doi:10.1155/2013/639430 pmid:23577273

    CrossRefPubMed
36. 36.↵
    1. Leech R,
    2. Sharp DJ

    . The role of the posterior cingulate cortex in cognition and disease. Brain 2014;137:12–32 doi:10.1093/brain/awt162 pmid:23869106

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
37. 37.↵
    1. Gobbi C,
    2. Rocca MA,
    3. Pagani E, et al

    . Forceps minor damage and co-occurrence of depression and fatigue in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2014;20:1633–40 doi:10.1177/1352458514530022 pmid:24740370

    CrossRefPubMed
38. 38.↵
    1. Lu M,
    2. Yang C,
    3. Chu T, et al

    . Cerebral white matter changes in young healthy individuals with high trait anxiety: a tract-based spatial statistics study. Front Neurol 2018;9:704–08 doi:10.3389/fneur.2018.00704 pmid:30197621

    CrossRefPubMed
39. 39.↵
    1. Kenwood MM,
    2. Kalin NH,
    3. Barbas H

    . The prefrontal cortex, pathological anxiety, and anxiety disorders. Neuropsychopharmacology 2022;47:260–75 doi:10.1038/s41386-021-01109-z pmid:34400783

    CrossRefPubMed
40. 40.↵
    1. Shan ZY,
    2. Kwiatek R,
    3. Burnet R, et al

    . Medial prefrontal cortex deficits correlate with unrefreshing sleep in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. NMR Biomed 2017;30:1–9 doi:10.1002/nbm.3757

    CrossRefPubMed
41. 41.↵
    1. Yaldizli Ö,
    2. Glassl S,
    3. Sturm D, et al

    . Fatigue and progression of corpus callosum atrophy in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol 2011;258:2199–205 doi:10.1007/s00415-011-6091-0 pmid:21594686

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
42. 42.↵
    1. Sepulcre J,
    2. Masdeu JC,
    3. Goñi J, et al

    . Fatigue in multiple sclerosis is associated with the disruption of frontal and parietal pathways. Mult Scler 2009;15:337–44 doi:10.1177/1352458508098373 pmid:18987107

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science