Automated Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Diagnosis via Artificial Intelligence–Based 3D T1 MRI Volumetric Analysis

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Nakajima M,
   2. Yamada S,
   3. Miyajima M, et al

   ; The research committee of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Guidelines for management of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: endorsed by the Japanese Society of Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2021;61:63–97 doi:10.2176/nmc.st.2020-0292 pmid:33455998

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Toma AK,
   2. Papadopoulos MC,
   3. Stapleton S, et al

   . Systematic review of the outcome of shunt surgery in idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2013;155:1977–80 doi:10.1007/s00701-013-1835-5 pmid:23975646

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Popal AM,
   2. Zhu Z,
   3. Guo X, et al

   . Outcomes of ventriculoperitoneal shunt in patients with idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus 2 years after surgery. Front Surg 2021;8:641561 doi:10.3389/fsurg.2021.641561 pmid:34869547

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Trungu S,
   2. Scollato A,
   3. Ricciardi L, et al

   . Clinical outcomes of shunting in normal pressure hydrocephalus: a multicenter prospective observational study. J Clin Med 2022;11:1286 doi:10.3390/jcm11051286 pmid:35268376

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Nassar BR,
   2. Lippa CF

   . Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a review for general practitioners. Gerontol Geriatr Med 2016;2:2333721416643702 doi:10.1177/2333721416643702 pmid:28138494

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Little MO

   . Reversible dementias. Clin Geriatr Med 2018;34:537–62 doi:10.1016/j.cger.2018.07.001 pmid:30336987

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Fällmar D,
   2. Andersson O,
   3. Kilander L, et al

   . Imaging features associated with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus have high specificity even when comparing with vascular dementia and atypical parkinsonism. Fluids Barriers CNS 2021;18:35 doi:10.1186/s12987-021-00270-3 pmid:34325703

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Molde K,
   2. Söderström L,
   3. Laurell K

   . Parkinsonian symptoms in normal pressure hydrocephalus: a population-based study. J Neurol 2017;264:2141–48 doi:10.1007/s00415-017-8598-5 pmid:28879446

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Serulle Y,
   2. Rusinek H,
   3. Kirov II, et al

   . Differentiating shunt-responsive normal pressure hydrocephalus from Alzheimer disease and normal aging: pilot study using automated MRI brain tissue segmentation. J Neurol 2014;261:1994–2002 doi:10.1007/s00415-014-7454-0 pmid:25082631

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    What is normal pressure hydrocephalus? https://www.hydroassoc.org/normal-pressure-hydrocephalus-2/. Accessed July 04, 2024
11. 11.↵
    1. Park H,
    2. Park C,
    3. Suh C, et al

    . Prognostic utility of disproportionately enlarged subarachnoid space hydrocephalus in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus treated with ventriculoperitoneal shunt surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2021;42:1429–36 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A7168 pmid:34045302

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    1. Park HY,
    2. Kim M,
    3. Suh CH, et al

    . Diagnostic performance and interobserver agreement of the callosal angle and Evans’ index in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 2021;31:5300–11 doi:10.1007/s00330-020-07555-5 pmid:33409775

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Hashimoto M,
    2. Ishikawa M,
    3. Mori E, et al

    ; Study of INPH on neurological improvement (SINPHONI). Diagnosis of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus is supported by MRI-based scheme: a prospective cohort study. Cerebrospinal Fluid Res 2010;7:18 doi:10.1186/1743-8454-7-18 pmid:21040519

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Ishii K,
    2. Kanda T,
    3. Harada A, et al

    . Clinical impact of the callosal angle in the diagnosis of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Eur Radiol 2008;18:2678–83 doi:10.1007/s00330-008-1044-4 pmid:18500524

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Yun SY,
    2. Choi KS,
    3. Suh CH, et al

    . Risk estimation for idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus: development and validation of a brain morphometry–based nomogram. Eur Radiol 2023;33:6145–56 doi:10.1007/s00330-023-09612-1 pmid:37059905

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Miskin N,
    2. Patel H,
    3. Franceschi AM, et al

    ; Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Diagnosis of normal-pressure hydrocephalus: use of traditional measures in the era of volumetric MR imaging. Radiology 2017;285:197–205 doi:10.1148/radiol.2017161216 pmid:28498794

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Irie R,
    2. Otsuka Y,
    3. Hagiwara A, et al

    . A novel deep learning approach with a 3D convolutional ladder network for differential diagnosis of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus and Alzheimer’s disease. Magn Reson Med Sci 2020;19:351–58 doi:10.2463/mrms.mp.2019-0106 pmid:31969525

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Borzage M,
    2. Saunders A,
    3. Hughes J, et al

    . The first examination of diagnostic performance of automated measurement of the callosal angle in 1856 elderly patients and volunteers indicates that 12.4% of exams met the criteria for possible normal pressure hydrocephalus. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2021;42:1942–48 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A7294 pmid:34620589

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    1. Cohen JF,
    2. Korevaar DA,
    3. Altman DG, et al

    . STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration. BMJ Open 2016;6:e012799 doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012799 pmid:28137831

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    1. Altman DG,
    2. Simera I,
    3. Hoey J, et al

    . EQUATOR: reporting guidelines for health research. Lancet 2008;371:1149–50 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60505-X pmid:18395566

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. 21.↵
    1. Collins GS,
    2. Reitsma JB,
    3. Altman DG, et al

    . Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement. Circulation 2015;131:211–19 doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.014508 pmid:25569120

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
22. 22.↵
    1. McKhann GM,
    2. Knopman DS,
    3. Chertkow H, et al

    . The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement 2011;7:263–69 doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.005 pmid:21514250

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. 23.↵
    1. Gibb W,
    2. Lees A

    . The relevance of the Lewy body to the pathogenesis of idiopathic Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1988;51:745–52 doi:10.1136/jnnp.51.6.745 pmid:2841426

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
24. 24.↵
    1. Evans WA

    . An encephalographic ratio for estimating ventricular enlargement and cerebral atrophy. Arch NeurPsych 1942;47:931–37 doi:10.1001/archneurpsyc.1942.02290060069004

    CrossRef
25. 25.↵
    1. Fischl B

    . FreeSurfer. Neuroimage 2012;62:774–81 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.021

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
26. 26.↵
    1. Jenkinson M,
    2. Beckmann CF,
    3. Behrens TE, et al

    . FSL. Neuroimage 2012;62:782–90 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.015 pmid:21979382

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
27. 27.↵
    1. Fonov VS,
    2. Evans AC,
    3. McKinstry RC, et al

    . Unbiased nonlinear average age-appropriate brain templates from birth to adulthood. Neuroimage 2009;47:S102 doi:10.1016/S1053-8119(09)70884-5

    CrossRef
28. 28.↵
    1. Liu Z,
    2. Lin Y,
    3. Cao Y, et al

    . Swin transformer: hierarchical vision transformer using shifted windows. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference Computer Vision. October 11–17, 2021:10012–22. Montreal, QC, Canada
29. 29.↵
    1. Suh PS,
    2. Jung W,
    3. Suh CH, et al

    . Development and validation of a deep learning-based automatic segmentation model for assessing intracranial volume: comparison with NeuroQuant, FreeSurfer, and SynthSeg. Front Neurol 2023;14:1334962 doi:10.3389/fneur.2023.1221892 pmid:37719763

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    1. Ardekani BA,
    2. Bachman AH

    . Model-based automatic detection of the anterior and posterior commissures on MRI scans. Neuroimage 2009;46:677–82 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.02.030 pmid:19264138

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
31. 31.↵
    1. Bradski G

    . The openCV library. Dr Dobb’s 2000;25:120–23. https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/CiteOpenCV.
32. 32.↵
    1. Pedregosa F,
    2. Varoquaux G,
    3. Gramfort A, et al

    . Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. The Journal of Machine Learning Research 2011;12:2825–30
33. 33.↵
    1. Vallat R

    . Pingouin: statistics in Python. JOSS 2018;3:1026 doi:10.21105/joss.01026

    CrossRef
34. 34.↵
    1. Chen T,
    2. Guestrin C

    . Xgboost: ascalable tree boosting system. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. August 13–17, 2016: 785–94. New York
35. 35.↵
    1. Pahwa B,
    2. Tayal A,
    3. Shukla A, et al

    . Utility of machine learning in the management of normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH): a systematic review. World Neurosurg 2023 Jun 24 [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2023.06.080 pmid:37356488

    CrossRefPubMed
36. 36.↵
    1. Rau A,
    2. Kim S,
    3. Yang S, et al

    . SVM-based normal pressure hydrocephalus detection. Clin Neuroradiol 2021;31:1029–35 doi:10.1007/s00062-020-00993-0 pmid:33496810

    CrossRefPubMed