Compressed Sensitivity Encoding Artificial Intelligence Accelerates Brain Metastasis Imaging by Optimizing Image Quality and Reducing Scan Time

References

1. ↵
   2. Kaufmann TJ,
   3. Smits M,
   4. Boxerman J, et al

   . Consensus recommendations for a standardized brain tumor imaging protocol for clinical trials in brain metastases. Neuro Oncol 2020;22:757–72 doi:10.1093/neuonc/noaa030 pmid:32048719

   CrossRefPubMed
2. ↵
   2. Li R,
   3. Guo Y,
   4. Zhao Z, et al

   . MRI-based two-stage deep learning model for automatic detection and segmentation of brain metastases. Eur Radiology 2023;33:3521–31 doi:10.1007/s00330-023-09420-7 pmid:36695903

   CrossRefPubMed
3. ↵
   2. Derks SH,
   3. van der Veldt AA,
   4. Smits M

   . Brain metastases: the role of clinical imaging. Br J Radiology 2022;95:20210944 doi:10.1259/bjr.20210944 pmid:34808072

   CrossRefPubMed
4. ↵
   2. Villanueva-Meyer JE,
   3. Mabray MC,
   4. Cha S

   . Current clinical brain tumor imaging. Neurosurgery 2017;81:397–415 doi:10.1093/neuros/nyx103 pmid:28486641

   CrossRefPubMed
5. ↵
   2. Kim D,
   3. Heo YJ,
   4. Jeong HW, et al

   . Usefulness of the delay alternating with nutation for tailored excitation pulse with T1-weighted sampling perfection with application-optimized contrasts using different flip angle evolution in the detection of cerebral metastases: Comparison with MPRAGE imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2019;40:1469–75 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A6158 pmid:31371358

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. ↵
   2. Langer CJ,
   3. Mehta MP

   . Current management of brain metastases, with a focus on systemic options. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:6207–19 doi:10.1200/JCO.2005.03.145 pmid:16135488

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. ↵
   2. Vranic JE,
   3. Cross NM,
   4. Wang Y, et al

   . Compressed sensing-sensitivity encoding (CS-SENSE) accelerated brain imaging: reduced scan time without reduced image quality. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2019;40:92–98 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5905 pmid:30523142

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. ↵
   2. Duan Y,
   3. Zhang J,
   4. Zhuo Z, et al

   . Accelerating brain 3D T1-weighted turbo field echo MRI using compressed sensing-sensitivity encoding (CS-SENSE). Eur J Radiology 2020;131:109255 doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109255 pmid:32920218

   CrossRefPubMed
9. ↵
   2. Sasi SD,
   3. Ramaniharan AK,
   4. Bhattacharjee R, et al

   . Evaluating feasibility of high resolution T1-perfusion MRI with whole brain coverage using compressed SENSE: Application to glioma grading. Eur J Radiology 2020;129:109049 doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109049 pmid:32464580

   CrossRefPubMed
10. ↵
    2. Boyarko AC,
    3. Dillman JR,
    4. Tkach JA, et al

    . Comparison of compressed SENSE and SENSE for quantitative liver MRI in children and young adults. Abdom Radiology (NY) 2021;46:4567–75 doi:10.1007/s00261-021-03092-x pmid:33893853

    CrossRefPubMed
11. ↵
    2. Cho SJ,
    3. Choi YJ,
    4. Chung SR, et al

    . High-resolution MRI using compressed sensing-sensitivity encoding (CS-SENSE) for patients with suspected neurovascular compression syndrome: comparison with the conventional SENSE parallel acquisition technique. Clin Radiology 2019;74:817.e9–e14 doi:10.1016/j.crad.2019.06.023 pmid:31362886

    CrossRefPubMed
12. ↵
    2. Hsiao A,
    3. Lustig M,
    4. Alley MT, et al

    . Evaluation of valvular insufficiency and shunts with parallel-imaging compressed-sensing 4D phase-contrast MR imaging with stereoscopic 3D velocity-fusion volume-rendered visualization. Radiology 2012;265:87–95 doi:10.1148/radiol.12120055 pmid:22923717

    CrossRefPubMed
13. ↵
    2. Knoll F,
    3. Zbontar J,
    4. Sriram A, et al

    . fastMRI: A publicly available raw k-Space and DICOM dataset of knee images for accelerated MR image reconstruction using machine learning. Radiology Artif Intell 2020;2:e190007 doi:10.1148/ryai.2020190007 pmid:32076662

    CrossRefPubMed
14. ↵
    2. Knoll F,
    3. Murrell T,
    4. Sriram A, et al

    . Advancing machine learning for MR image reconstruction with an open competition: Overview of the 2019 fastMRI challenge. Magn Reson Med 2020;84:3054–70 doi:10.1002/mrm.28338 pmid:32506658

    CrossRefPubMed
15. ↵
    2. Pezzotti N,
    3. Yousefi S,
    4. Elmahdy MS, et al

    . An adaptive intelligence algorithm for undersampled knee MRI reconstruction. IEEE Access 2020;8:204825–38 doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3034287

    CrossRef
16. ↵
    2. Foreman SC,
    3. Neumann J,
    4. Han J, et al

    . Deep learning-based acceleration of compressed sense MR imaging of the ankle. Eur Radiology 2022;32:8376–85 doi:10.1007/s00330-022-08919-9 pmid:35751695

    CrossRefPubMed
17. ↵
    2. Fervers P,
    3. Zaeske C,
    4. Rauen P, et al

    . Conventional and deep-learning-based image reconstructions of undersampled K-space data of the lumbar spine using compressed sensing in MRI: A comparative study on 20 subjects. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023;13:418 doi:10.3390/diagnostics13030418 pmid:36766523

    CrossRefPubMed
18. ↵
    2. Dratsch T,
    3. Siedek F,
    4. Zäske C, et al

    . Reconstruction of shoulder MRI using deep learning and compressed sensing: a validation study on healthy volunteers. Eur Radiology Exp 2023;7:66 doi:10.1186/s41747-023-00377-2 pmid:37880546

    CrossRefPubMed
19. ↵
    2. Ni M,
    3. He M,
    4. Yang Y, et al

    . Application research of AI-assisted compressed sensing technology in MRI scanning of the knee joint: 3D-MRI perspective. Eur Radiology 2023 doi:10.1007/s00330-023-10368-x pmid:37932390

    CrossRefPubMed
20. ↵
    2. Dietrich O,
    3. Raya JG,
    4. Reeder SB, et al

    . Measurement of signal-to-noise ratios in MR images: influence of multichannel coils, parallel imaging, and reconstruction filters. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007;26:375–85 doi:10.1002/jmri.20969 pmid:17622966

    CrossRefPubMed
21. ↵
    2. Kakeda S,
    3. Korogi Y,
    4. Hiai Y, et al

    . Detection of brain metastasis at 3T: comparison among SE, IR-FSE and 3D-GRE sequences. Eur Radiology 2007;17:2345–51 doi:10.1007/s00330-007-0599-9 pmid:17318603

    CrossRefPubMed
22. ↵
    2. Conklin J,
    3. Longo MGF,
    4. Cauley SF, et al

    . Validation of highly accelerated wave-CAIPI SWI compared with conventional SWI and T2*-weighted gradient recalled-echo for routine clinical brain MRI at 3T. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2019;40:2073–80 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A6295 pmid:31727749

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
23. ↵
    2. Chung MS,
    3. Yim Y,
    4. Sung JK, et al

    . CS-VIBE accelerates cranial nerve MR imaging for the diagnosis of facial neuritis: comparison of the diagnostic performance of post-contrast MPRAGE and CS-VIBE. Eur Radiology 2022;32:223–33 doi:10.1007/s00330-021-08102-6 pmid:34156555

    CrossRefPubMed
24. ↵
    2. Jin T,
    3. Zhang H,
    4. Liu X, et al

    . Enhancement degree of brain metastases: correlation analysis between enhanced T2 FLAIR and vascular permeability parameters of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Eur Radiology 2021;31:5595–604 doi:10.1007/s00330-020-07625-8 pmid:33847812

    CrossRefPubMed
25. ↵
    2. Ercan N,
    3. Gultekin S,
    4. Celik H, et al

    . Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced fluid-attenuated inversion recovery MR imaging of intracranial metastases. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:761–65 pmid:15140715

    PubMed
26. ↵
    2. Toledano-Massiah S,
    3. Sayadi A,
    4. de Boer R, et al

    . Accuracy of the compressed sensing accelerated 3D-FLAIR sequence for the detection of MS plaques at 3T. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2018;39:454–58 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5517 pmid:29348137

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
27. ↵
    2. Dieckmeyer M,
    3. Roy AG,
    4. Senapati J, et al

    . Effect of MRI acquisition acceleration via compressed sensing and parallel imaging on brain volumetry. MAGMA 2021;34:487–97 doi:10.1007/s10334-020-00906-9 pmid:33502667

    CrossRefPubMed
28. ↵
    2. Schlemper J,
    3. Caballero J,
    4. Hajnal JV, et al

    . A deep cascade of convolutional neural networks for dynamic MR image reconstruction. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2018;37:491–503 doi:10.1109/TMI.2017.2760978 pmid:29035212

    CrossRefPubMed
29. ↵
    2. Gu H,
    3. Yaman B,
    4. Moeller S, et al

    . Revisiting [Formula: see text]-wavelet compressed-sensing MRI in the era of deep learning. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2022;119:e2201062119 doi:10.1073/pnas.2201062119 pmid:35939712

    CrossRefPubMed
30. ↵
    2. Bash S,
    3. Wang L,
    4. Airriess C, et al

    . Deep learning enables 60% accelerated volumetric brain MRI while preserving quantitative performance: A prospective, multicenter, multireader trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2021;42:2130–37 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A7358 pmid:34824098

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
31. ↵
    2. Park JC,
    3. Park KJ,
    4. Park MY, et al

    . Fast T2-weighted imaging with deep learning-based reconstruction: Evaluation of image quality and diagnostic performance in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy. J Magn Reson Imaging 2022;55:1735–44 doi:10.1002/jmri.27992 pmid:34773449

    CrossRefPubMed
32. ↵
    2. Zhao Y,
    3. Peng C,
    4. Wang S, et al

    . The feasibility investigation of AI-assisted compressed sensing in kidney MR imaging: an ultra-fast T2WI imaging technology. BMC Med Imaging 2022;22:119 doi:10.1186/s12880-022-00842-1 pmid:35787673

    CrossRefPubMed
33. ↵
    2. Sheng RF,
    3. Zheng LY,
    4. Jin KP, et al

    . Single-breath-hold T2WI liver MRI with deep learning-based reconstruction: A clinical feasibility study in comparison to conventional multi-breath-hold T2WI liver MRI. Magn Reson Imaging 2021;81:75–81 doi:10.1016/j.mri.2021.06.014 pmid:34147594

    CrossRefPubMed
34. ↵
    2. Zhang N,
    3. Zhang H,
    4. Gao B, et al

    . 3D amide proton transfer weighted brain tumor imaging with compressed SENSE: Effects of different acceleration factors. Front Neurosci 2022;16:876587 doi:10.3389/fnins.2022.876587 pmid:35692419

    CrossRefPubMed