Application of Spinal Subtraction and Bone Background Fusion CTA in the Accurate Diagnosis and Evaluation of Spinal Vascular Malformations

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Clarencon F,
   2. Di Maria F,
   3. Sourour NA, et al

   . Evaluation of intra-aortic CT angiography performances for the visualisation of spinal vascular malformations’ angioarchitecture. Eur Radiol 2016;26:3336–44 doi:10.1007/s00330-015-4204-3 pmid:26792429

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Zalewski NL,
   2. Rabinstein AA,
   3. Brinjikji W, et al

   . Unique gadolinium enhancement pattern in spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas. JAMA Neurol 2018;75:1542–45 doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.2605 pmid:30208378

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Jeng Y,
   2. Chen DY,
   3. Hsu HL, et al

   . Spinal dural arteriovenous fistula: imaging features and its mimics. Korean J Radiol 2015;16:1119–31 doi:10.3348/kjr.2015.16.5.1119 pmid:26357504

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Yu JX,
   2. Hong T,
   3. Krings T, et al

   . Natural history of spinal cord arteriovenous shunts: an observational study. Brain 2019;142:2265–75 doi:10.1093/brain/awz153 pmid:31211368

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Hunt R,
   2. Roberts RM,
   3. Mortimer AM

   . Spinal dural arteriovenous fistula: delay to radiological diagnosis and sources of radiological error. Clin Radiol 2018;73:835.e811–e816 doi:10.1016/j.crad.2018.05.010 pmid:29898828

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Jablawi F,
   2. Schubert GA,
   3. Dafotakis M, et al

   . Long-term outcome of patients with spinal dural arteriovenous fistula: the dilemma of delayed diagnosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2020;41:357–63 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A6372 pmid:31919141

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   1. Orru E,
   2. Mekabaty AE,
   3. Millan DS, et al

   . Removal of antiscatter grids for spinal digital subtraction angiography: dose reduction without loss of diagnostic value. Radiology 2020;295:390–96 doi:10.1148/radiol.2020191786 pmid:32125257

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Barreras P,
   2. Heck D,
   3. Greenberg B, et al

   . Analysis of 30 spinal angiograms falsely reported as normal in 18 patients with subsequently documented spinal vascular malformations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:1814–19 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5275 pmid:28729296

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   1. Tarabishy AR,
   2. Boo S,
   3. Rai A

   . Spinal dural fistula evaluation using 4-dimensional intra-aortic spinal CT angiography in a hybrid angiography suite. J Neuroradiol 2021;48:492–94 doi:10.1016/j.neurad.2020.12.006 pmid:33418055

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Lee CW,
    2. Huang A,
    3. Wang YH, et al

    . Intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas: diagnosis and evaluation with 64-detector row CT angiography. Radiology 2010;256:219–28 doi:10.1148/radiol.10091835 pmid:20574098

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    1. Grossberg JA,
    2. Howard BM,
    3. Saindane AM

    . The use of contrast-enhanced, time-resolved magnetic resonance angiography in cerebrovascular pathology. Neurosurg Focus 2019;47:E3 doi:10.3171/2019.9.FOCUS19627 pmid:31786556

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Kim AY,
    2. Khil EK,
    3. Choi I, et al

    . Spinal extradural arteriovenous fistula after lumbar epidural injection: CT angiographic diagnosis using 3D-volume rendering. Skeletal Radiol 2020;49:2073–79 doi:10.1007/s00256-020-03504-x pmid:32533205

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Brinjikji W,
    2. Colombo E,
    3. Cloft HJ, et al

    . Clinical and imaging characteristics of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas and spinal epidural arteriovenous fistulas. Neurosurgery 2021;88:666–73 doi:10.1093/neuros/nyaa492 pmid:33428765

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Lai PH,
    2. Weng MJ,
    3. Lee KW, et al

    . Multidetector CT angiography in diagnosing type I and type IVA spinal vascular malformations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:813–17 pmid:16611770

    PubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Yamamoto S,
    2. Kanaya H,
    3. Kim P

    . Spinal intraarterial computed tomography angiography as an effective adjunct for spinal angiography. J Neurosurg Spine 2015;23:360–67 doi:10.3171/2014.12.SPINE14584 pmid:26023900

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Kannath SK,
    2. Rajendran A,
    3. Thomas B, et al

    . Volumetric T2-weighted MRI improves the diagnostic accuracy of spinal vascular malformations: comparative analysis with a conventional MR study. J Neurointerv Surg 2019;11:1019–23 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014522 pmid:30842309

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    1. Ronald AA,
    2. Yao B,
    3. Winkelman RD, et al

    . Spinal dural arteriovenous fistula: diagnosis, outcomes, and prognostic factors. World Neurosurg 2020;144:e306–15 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2020.08.126 pmid:32858225

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Zhang HB,
    2. Zhai XL,
    3. Li L, et al

    . Imaging characteristics, misdiagnosis and microsurgical outcomes of patients with spinal dural arteriovenous fistula: a retrospective study of 32 patients. Ann Transl Med 2022;10:832 doi:10.21037/atm-22-3568 pmid:36034988

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Naylor RM,
    2. Topinka B,
    3. Rinaldo L, et al

    . Progressive myelopathy from a craniocervical junction dural arteriovenous fistula. Stroke 2021;52:e278–81 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.032552 pmid:33940952

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. Jablawi F,
    2. Mull M

    . The clinical value of venous drainage in patients with spinal dural arteriovenous fistula. J Neurol Sci 2019;397:50–54 doi:10.1016/j.jns.2018.12.024 pmid:30590341

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Donghai W,
    2. Ning Y,
    3. Peng Z, et al

    . The diagnosis of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2013;38:E546–53 doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31828a38c4 pmid:23380827

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Ma Y,
    2. Hong T,
    3. Chen S, et al

    . Steroid-associated acute clinical worsening and poor outcome in patients with spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas: a prospective cohort study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2020;45:E656–62 doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000003370 pmid:31923124

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Hsu JL,
    2. Cheng MY,
    3. Liao MF, et al

    . The etiologies and prognosis associated with spinal cord infarction. Ann Clin Transl Neurol 2019;6:1456–64 doi:10.1002/acn3.50840 pmid:31402616

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Aulbach P,
    2. Mucha D,
    3. Engellandt K, et al

    . Diagnostic impact of bone-subtraction ct angiography for patients with acute subarachnoid hemorrhage. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:236–43 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4497 pmid:26450538

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
25. 25.↵
    1. Shimoyama S,
    2. Nishii T,
    3. Watanabe Y, et al

    . Advantages of 70-kV CT angiography for the visualization of the Adamkiewicz artery: comparison with 120-kV imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:2399–405 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5372 pmid:28912277

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
26. 26.↵
    1. Lindenholz A,
    2. TerBrugge KG,
    3. van Dijk JM, et al

    . The accuracy and utility of contrast-enhanced MR angiography for localization of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas: the Toronto experience. Eur Radiol 2014;24:2885–94 doi:10.1007/s00330-014-3307-6 pmid:25015136

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    1. F, Knipe

    Deng F, Knipe H. Spinal vascular malformations. 2016. Radiopaedia Radiopaedia.org. Accessed October 18, 2023
28. 28.↵
    1. Kona MP,
    2. Buch K,
    3. Singh J, et al

    . Spinal vascular shunts: a patterned approach. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2021;42:2110–18 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A7312 pmid:34649916

    Abstract/FREE Full Text