Recommended Resting-State fMRI Acquisition and Preprocessing Steps for Preoperative Mapping of Language and Motor and Visual Areas in Adult and Pediatric Patients with Brain Tumors and Epilepsy

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Leuthardt EC,
   3. Guzman G,
   4. Bandt SK, et al

   . Integration of resting state functional MRI into clinical practice: a large single institution experience. PLoS One 2018;13:e0198349 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0198349 pmid:29933375

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   2. Kumar VA,
   3. Heiba IM,
   4. Prabhu SS, et al

   . The role of resting-state functional MRI for clinical preoperative language mapping. Cancer Imaging 2020;20:47 doi:10.1186/s40644-020-00327-w pmid:32653026

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   2. Maknojia S,
   3. Churchill NW,
   4. Schweizer TA, et al

   . Resting state fMRI: going through the motions. Front Neurosci 2019;13:825 doi:10.3389/fnins.2019.00825 pmid:31456656

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   2. Huijbers W,
   3. Van Dijk KR,
   4. Boenniger MM, et al

   . Less head motion during MRI under task than resting-state conditions. Neuroimage 2017;147:111–20 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.12.002 pmid:27919751

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. Black DF,
   3. Vachha B,
   4. Mian A, et al

   . American Society of Functional Neuroradiology-recommended fMRI paradigm algorithms for presurgical language assessment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:E65–73 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5345 pmid:28860215

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   2. Niederberger M,
   3. Spranger J

   . Delphi technique in health sciences: a map. Front Public Health 2020;8:457 doi:10.3389/fpubh.2020.00457 pmid:33072683

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. Birn RM,
   3. Molloy EK,
   4. Patriat R, et al

   . The effect of scan length on the reliability of resting-state fMRI connectivity estimates. Neuroimage 2013;83:550–58 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.099 pmid:23747458

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   2. Abdul Wahab NS,
   3. Yahya N,
   4. Yusoff AN, et al

   . Effects of different scan duration on brain effective connectivity among default mode network nodes. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022;12:12 doi:10.3390/diagnostics12051277 pmid:35626432

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. Van Dijk KR,
   3. Hedden T,
   4. Venkataraman A, et al

   . Intrinsic functional connectivity as a tool for human connectomics: theory, properties, and optimization. J Neurophysiol 2010;103:297–321 doi:10.1152/jn.00783.2009 pmid:19889849

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    2. Vakamudi K,
    3. Posse S,
    4. Jung R, et al

    . Real-time presurgical resting-state fMRI in patients with brain tumors: quality control and comparison with task-fMRI and intraoperative mapping. Hum Brain Mapp 2020;41:797–814 doi:10.1002/hbm.24840 pmid:31692177

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    2. Patriat R,
    3. Molloy EK,
    4. Meier TB, et al

    . The effect of resting condition on resting-state fMRI reliability and consistency: a comparison between resting with eyes open, closed, and fixated. Neuroimage 2013;78:463–73 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.013 pmid:23597935

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    2. Allen EA,
    3. Damaraju E,
    4. Eichele T, et al

    . EEG signatures of dynamic functional network connectivity states. Brain Topogr 2018;31:101–16 doi:10.1007/s10548-017-0546-2 pmid:28229308

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Tagliazucchi E,
    3. Laufs H

    . Decoding wakefulness levels from typical fMRI resting-state data reveals reliable drifts between wakefulness and sleep. Neuron 2014;82:695–708 doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2014.03.020 pmid:24811386

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Wang J,
    3. Han J,
    4. Nguyen VT, et al

    . Improving the test-retest reliability of resting state fMRI by removing the impact of sleep. Front Neurosci 2017;11:249 doi:10.3389/fnins.2017.00249 pmid:28533739

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Agcaoglu O,
    3. Wilson TW,
    4. Wang YP, et al

    . Resting state connectivity differences in eyes open versus eyes closed conditions. Hum Brain Mapp 2019;40:2488–98 doi:10.1002/hbm.24539 pmid:30720907

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. Zou Q,
    3. Miao X,
    4. Liu D, et al

    . Reliability comparison of spontaneous brain activities between BOLD and CBF contrasts in eyes-open and eyes-closed resting states. Neuroimage 2015;121:91–10 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.07.044 pmid:26226087

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Costumero V,
    3. Bueichekú E,
    4. Adrián-Ventura J, et al

    . Opening or closing eyes at rest modulates the functional connectivity of V1 with default and salience networks. Sci Rep 2020;10:9137 doi:10.1038/s41598-020-66100-y pmid:32499585

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Wei J,
    3. Chen T,
    4. Li C, et al

    . Eyes-open and eyes-closed resting states with opposite brain activity in sensorimotor and occipital regions: multidimensional evidences from machine learning perspective. Front Hum Neurosci 2018;12:422 doi:10.3389/fnhum.2018.00422 pmid:30405376

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    2. Wang Z,
    3. Liu J,
    4. Zhong N, et al

    . Changes in the brain intrinsic organization in both on-task state and post-task resting state. Neuroimage 2012;62:394–407 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.04.051 pmid:22569542

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    2. Tung KC,
    3. Uh J,
    4. Mao D, et al

    . Alterations in resting functional connectivity due to recent motor task. Neuroimage 2013;78:316–24 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.006 pmid:23583747

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. 21.↵
    2. Feinberg DA,
    3. Moeller S,
    4. Smith SM, et al

    . Multiplexed echo planar imaging for sub-second whole brain FMRI and fast diffusion imaging. PLoS One 2010;5:e15710 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0015710 pmid:21187930

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    2. Smith SM,
    3. Beckmann CF,
    4. Andersson J, et al

    ; WU-Minn HCP Consortium. Resting-state fMRI in the Human Connectome Project. Neuroimage 2013;80:144–68 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.039 pmid:23702415

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. 23.↵
    2. Voets NL,
    3. Plaha P,
    4. Parker Jones O, et al

    . Presurgical localization of the primary sensorimotor cortex in gliomas: when is resting state FMRI beneficial and sufficient? Clin Neuroradiol 2021;31:245–56 doi:10.1007/s00062-020-00879-1 pmid:32274518

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    2. Parker D,
    3. Liu X,
    4. Razlighi QR

    . Optimal slice timing correction and its interaction with fMRI parameters and artifacts. Med Image Anal 2017;35:434–45 doi:10.1016/j.media.2016.08.006 pmid:27589578

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    2. Birn RM,
    3. Diamond JB,
    4. Smith MA, et al

    . Separating respiratory-variation-related fluctuations from neuronal-activity-related fluctuations in fMRI. Neuroimage 2006;31:1536–48 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.02.048 pmid:16632379

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
26. 26.↵
    2. Lin FH,
    3. Nummenmaa A,
    4. Witzel T, et al

    . Physiological noise reduction using volumetric functional magnetic resonance inverse imaging. Hum Brain Mapp 2012;33:2815–30 doi:10.1002/hbm.21403 pmid:21954026

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    2. Caballero-Gaudes C,
    3. Reynolds RC

    . Methods for cleaning the BOLD fMRI signal. Neuroimage 2017;154:128–49 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.12.018 pmid:27956209

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    2. Glover GH,
    3. Li TQ,
    4. Ress D

    . Image-based method for retrospective correction of physiological motion effects in fMRI: RETROICOR. Magn Reson Med 2000;44:162–67 doi:10.1002/1522-2594(200007)44:1<162::AID-MRM23>3.0.CO;2-E pmid:10893535

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
29. 29.↵
    2. Behzadi Y,
    3. Restom K,
    4. Liau J, et al

    . A component based noise correction method (CompCor) for BOLD and perfusion based fMRI. Neuroimage 2007;37:90–101 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.04.042 pmid:17560126

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
30. 30.↵
    2. Golestani AM,
    3. Chen JJ

    . Performance of temporal and spatial independent component analysis in identifying and removing low-frequency physiological and motion effects in resting-state fMRI. Front Neurosci 2022;16:867243 doi:10.3389/fnins.2022.867243 pmid:35757543

    CrossRefPubMed
31. 31.↵
    2. Power JD,
    3. Plitt M,
    4. Laumann TO, et al

    . Sources and implications of whole-brain fMRI signals in humans. Neuroimage 2017;146:609–25 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.09.038 pmid:27751941

    CrossRefPubMed
32. 32.↵
    2. Frank LR,
    3. Buxton RB,
    4. Wong EC

    . Estimation of respiration-induced noise fluctuations from undersampled multislice fMRI data. Magn Reson Med 2001;45:635–44 doi:10.1002/mrm.1086 pmid:11283992

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
33. 33.↵
    2. Naganawa S,
    3. Nihashi T,
    4. Fukatsu H, et al

    . Pre-surgical mapping of primary motor cortex by functional MRI at 3 T: effects of intravenous administration of Gd-DTPA. Eur Radiol 2004;14:112–14 doi:10.1007/s00330-003-2147-6 pmid:14600780

    CrossRefPubMed
34. 34.↵
    2. Vachha B,
    3. Huang SY

    . MRI with ultrahigh field strength and high-performance gradients: challenges and opportunities for clinical neuroimaging at 7 T and beyond. Eur Radiol Exp 2021;5:35 doi:10.1186/s41747-021-00216-2 pmid:34435246

    CrossRefPubMed
35. 35.↵
    2. Garcia-Eulate R,
    3. Garcia-Garcia D,
    4. Dominguez PD, et al

    . Functional bold MRI: advantages of the 3 T vs. the 1.5 T. Clin Imaging 2011;35:236–41 doi:10.1016/j.clinimag.2010.07.003 pmid:21513865

    CrossRefPubMed
36. 36.↵
    2. Krasnow B,
    3. Tamm L,
    4. Greicius MD, et al

    . Comparison of fMRI activation at 3 and 1.5 T during perceptual, cognitive, and affective processing. Neuroimage 2003;18:813–26 doi:10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00002-8 pmid:12725758

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
37. 37.↵
    2. Gorgolewski KJ,
    3. Mendes N,
    4. Wilfling D, et al

    . A high resolution 7-Tesla resting-state fMRI test-retest dataset with cognitive and physiological measures. Sci Data 2015;2:140054 doi:10.1038/sdata.2014.54 pmid:25977805

    CrossRefPubMed
38. 38.↵
    2. Bianciardi M,
    3. Fukunaga M,
    4. van Gelderen P, et al

    . Sources of functional magnetic resonance imaging signal fluctuations in the human brain at rest: a 7 T study. Magn Reson Imaging 2009;27:1019–29 doi:10.1016/j.mri.2009.02.004 pmid:19375260

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
39. 39.↵
    2. Jiang A,
    3. Kennedy DN,
    4. Baker JR, et al

    . Motion detection and correction in functional MR imaging. Human Brain Mapping 1995;3:224–35 doi:10.1002/hbm.460030306

    CrossRefWeb of Science
40. 40.↵
    2. Jo HJ,
    3. Gotts SJ,
    4. Reynolds RC, et al

    . Effective preprocessing procedures virtually eliminate distance-dependent motion artifacts in resting state FMRI. J Appl Math 2013;2013:10.1155/2013/935154 doi:10.1155/2013/935154 pmid:24415902

    CrossRefPubMed
41. 41.↵
    2. Power JD,
    3. Barnes KA,
    4. Snyder AZ, et al

    . Spurious but systematic correlations in functional connectivity MRI networks arise from subject motion. Neuroimage 2012;59:2142–54 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.018 pmid:22019881

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
42. 42.↵
    2. Oakes TR,
    3. Johnstone T,
    4. Ores Walsh KS, et al

    . Comparison of fMRI motion correction software tools. Neuroimage 2005;28:529–43 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.05.058 pmid:16099178

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
43. 43.↵
    2. Beall EB,
    3. Lowe MJ

    . SimPACE: generating simulated motion corrupted BOLD data with synthetic-navigated acquisition or the development and evaluation of SLOMOCO: a new, highly effective slicewise motion correction. Neuroimage 2014;101:21–34 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.06.038 pmid:24969568

    CrossRefPubMed
44. 44.↵
    2. Johnstone T,
    3. Ores Walsh KS,
    4. Greischar LL, et al

    . Motion correction and the use of motion covariates in multiple-subject fMRI analysis. Hum Brain Mapp 2006;27:779–88 doi:10.1002/hbm.20219 pmid:16456818

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
45. 45.↵
    2. Woods RP,
    3. Cherry SR,
    4. Mazziotta JC

    . Rapid automated algorithm for aligning and reslicing PET images. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1992;16:620–33 doi:10.1097/00004728-199207000-00024 pmid:1629424

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
46. 46.↵
    2. Woods RP,
    3. Mazziotta JC,
    4. Cherry SR

    . MRI-PET registration with automated algorithm. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1993;17:536–46 doi:10.1097/00004728-199307000-00004 pmid:8331222

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
47. 47.↵
    2. Friston KJ,
    3. Williams S,
    4. Howard R, et al

    . Movement-related effects in fMRI time-series. Magn Reson Med 1996;35:346–55 doi:10.1002/mrm.1910350312 pmid:8699946

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
48. 48.↵
    2. Sladky R,
    3. Friston KJ,
    4. Tröstl J, et al

    . Slice-timing effects and their correction in functional MRI. Neuroimage 2011;58:588–94 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.06.078 pmid:21757015

    CrossRefPubMed
49. 49.↵
    2. Parker DB,
    3. Razlighi QR

    . The benefit of slice timing correction in common fMRI preprocessing pipelines. Front Neurosci 2019;13:821 doi:10.3389/fnins.2019.00821 pmid:31551667

    CrossRefPubMed
50. 50.↵
    2. Poldrack RM,
    3. Mumford JA,
    4. Nichols TE

    . Handbook of Functional MRI Data Analysis. Cambridge University Press; 2011
51. 51.↵
    2. Simmons A,
    3. Tofts PS,
    4. Barker GJ, et al

    . Sources of intensity nonuniformity in spin echo images at 1.5 T. Magn Reson Med 1994;32:121–28 doi:10.1002/mrm.1910320117 pmid:8084227

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
52. 52.↵
    2. Patel AX,
    3. Kundu P,
    4. Rubinov M, et al

    . A wavelet method for modeling and despiking motion artifacts from resting-state fMRI time series. Neuroimage 2014;95:287–304 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.03.012 pmid:24657353

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
53. 53.↵
    2. Power JD,
    3. Plitt M,
    4. Kundu P, et al

    . Temporal interpolation alters motion in fMRI scans: Magnitudes and consequences for artifact detection. PLoS One 2017;12:e0182939 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0182939 pmid:28880888

    CrossRefPubMed
54. 54.↵
    2. Tanabe J,
    3. Miller D,
    4. Tregellas J, et al

    . Comparison of detrending methods for optimal fMRI preprocessing. Neuroimage 2002;15:902–07 doi:10.1006/nimg.2002.1053 pmid:11906230

    CrossRefPubMed
55. 55.↵
    2. Kopel R,
    3. Sladky R,
    4. Laub P, et al

    . No time for drifting: comparing performance and applicability of signal detrending algorithms for real-time fMRI. Neuroimage 2019;191:421–29 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.02.058 pmid:30818024

    CrossRefPubMed
56. 56.↵
    2. Muschelli J,
    3. Nebel MB,
    4. Caffo BS, et al

    . Reduction of motion-related artifacts in resting state fMRI using aCompCor. Neuroimage 2014;96:22–35 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.03.028 pmid:24657780

    CrossRefPubMed
57. 57.↵
    2. Middlebrooks EH,
    3. Frost CJ,
    4. Tuna IS, et al

    . Reduction of motion artifacts and noise using independent component analysis in task-based functional MRI for preoperative planning in patients with brain tumor. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:336–42 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4996 pmid:28056453

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
58. 58.↵
    2. Hallquist MN,
    3. Hwang K,
    4. Luna B

    . The nuisance of nuisance regression: spectral misspecification in a common approach to resting-state fMRI preprocessing reintroduces noise and obscures functional connectivity. Neuroimage 2013;82:208–25 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.116 pmid:23747457

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
59. 59.↵
    2. Power JD,
    3. Mitra A,
    4. Laumann TO, et al

    . Methods to detect, characterize, and remove motion artifact in resting state fMRI. Neuroimage 2014;84:320–41 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.08.048 pmid:23994314

    CrossRefPubMed
60. 60.↵
    2. Fox MD,
    3. Zhang D,
    4. Snyder AZ, et al

    . The global signal and observed anticorrelated resting state brain networks. J Neurophysiol 2009;101:3270–83 doi:10.1152/jn.90777.2008 pmid:19339462

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
61. 61.
    2. Aguirre GK,
    3. Zarahn E,
    4. D'Esposito M

    . The inferential impact of global signal covariates in functional neuroimaging analyses. Neuroimage 1998;8:302–06 doi:10.1006/nimg.1998.0367 pmid:9758743

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
62. 62.↵
    2. Macey PM,
    3. Macey KE,
    4. Kumar R, et al

    . A method for removal of global effects from fMRI time series. Neuroimage 2004;22:360–66 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.12.042 pmid:15110027

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
63. 63.↵
    2. Scholvinck ML,
    3. Maier A,
    4. Ye FQ, et al

    . Neural basis of global resting-state fMRI activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010;107:10238–43 doi:10.1073/pnas.0913110107 pmid:20439733

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
64. 64.↵
    2. Yan CG,
    3. Cheung B,
    4. Kelly C, et al

    . A comprehensive assessment of regional variation in the impact of head micromovements on functional connectomics. Neuroimage 2013;76:183–201 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.03.004 pmid:23499792

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
65. 65.↵
    2. Satterthwaite TD,
    3. Wolf DH,
    4. Loughead J, et al

    . Impact of in-scanner head motion on multiple measures of functional connectivity: relevance for studies of neurodevelopment in youth. Neuroimage 2012;60:623–32 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.12.063 pmid:22233733

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
66. 66.↵
    2. Power JD,
    3. Plitt M,
    4. Gotts SJ, et al

    . Ridding fMRI data of motion-related influences: Removal of signals with distinct spatial and physical bases in multiecho data. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2018;115:E2105–14 doi:10.1073/pnas.1720985115 pmid:29440410

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
67. 67.↵
    2. Lowe MJ,
    3. Mock BJ,
    4. Sorenson JA

    . Functional connectivity in single and multislice echoplanar imaging using resting-state fluctuations. Neuroimage 1998;7:119–32 doi:10.1006/nimg.1997.0315 pmid:9558644

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
68. 68.↵
    2. Vincent JL,
    3. Snyder AZ,
    4. Fox MD, et al

    . Coherent spontaneous activity identifies a hippocampal-parietal memory network. J Neurophysiol 2006;96:3517–31 doi:10.1152/jn.00048.2006 pmid:16899645

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
69. 69.↵
    2. Joel SE,
    3. Caffo BS,
    4. van Zijl PC, et al

    . On the relationship between seed-based and ICA-based measures of functional connectivity. Magn Reson Med 2011;66:644–57 doi:10.1002/mrm.22818 pmid:21394769

    CrossRefPubMed
70. 70.↵
    2. Chai XJ,
    3. Castañón AN,
    4. Ongür D, et al

    . Anticorrelations in resting state networks without global signal regression. Neuroimage 2012;59:1420–28 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.08.048 pmid:21889994

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
71. 71.↵
    2. Anderson JS,
    3. Druzgal TJ,
    4. Lopez-Larson M, et al

    . Network anticorrelations, global regression, and phase-shifted soft tissue correction. Hum Brain Mapp 2011;32:919–34 doi:10.1002/hbm.21079 pmid:20533557

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
72. 72.↵
    2. Murphy K,
    3. Birn RM,
    4. Handwerker DA, et al

    . The impact of global signal regression on resting state correlations: are anti-correlated networks introduced? Neuroimage 2009;44:893–905 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.09.036 pmid:18976716

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
73. 73.↵
    2. Gotts SJ,
    3. Saad ZS,
    4. Jo HJ, et al

    . The perils of global signal regression for group comparisons: a case study of autism spectrum disorders. Front Hum Neurosci 2013;7:356 doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00356 pmid:23874279

    CrossRefPubMed
74. 74.↵
    2. Hahamy A,
    3. Calhoun V,
    4. Pearlson G, et al

    . Save the global: global signal connectivity as a tool for studying clinical populations with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Brain Connect 2014;4:395–403 doi:10.1089/brain.2014.0244 pmid:24923194

    CrossRefPubMed
75. 75.↵
    2. Murphy K,
    3. Fox MD

    . Towards a consensus regarding global signal regression for resting state functional connectivity MRI. Neuroimage 2017;154:169–73 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.11.052 pmid:27888059

    CrossRefPubMed
76. 76.↵
    2. Wee CY,
    3. Yap PT,
    4. Denny K, et al

    . Resting-state multi-spectrum functional connectivity networks for identification of MCI patients. PLoS One 2012;7:e37828 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0037828 pmid:22666397

    CrossRefPubMed
77. 77.↵
    2. Shirer WR,
    3. Jiang H,
    4. Price CM, et al

    . Optimization of rs-fMRI pre-processing for enhanced signal-noise separation, test-retest reliability, and group discrimination. Neuroimage 2015;117:67–79 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.05.015 pmid:25987368

    CrossRefPubMed
78. 78.↵
    2. Risk BB,
    3. Murden RJ,
    4. Wu J, et al

    . Which multiband factor should you choose for your resting-state fMRI study? Neuroimage 2021;234:117965 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.117965 pmid:33744454

    CrossRefPubMed
79. 79.↵
    2. Van Dijk KR,
    3. Sabuncu MR,
    4. Buckner RL

    . The influence of head motion on intrinsic functional connectivity MRI. Neuroimage 2012;59:431–38 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.07.044 pmid:21810475

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
80. 80.↵
    2. Alakorkko T,
    3. Saarimaki H,
    4. Glerean E, et al

    . Effects of spatial smoothing on functional brain networks. Eur J Neurosci 2017;46:2471–80 doi:10.1111/ejn.13717 pmid:28922510

    CrossRefPubMed
81. 81.↵
    2. Mikl M,
    3. Marecek R,
    4. Hlustik P, et al

    . Effects of spatial smoothing on fMRI group inferences. Magn Reson Imaging 2008;26:490–503 doi:10.1016/j.mri.2007.08.006 pmid:18060720

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
82. 82.↵
    2. Kokkonen SM,
    3. Nikkinen J,
    4. Remes J, et al

    . Preoperative localization of the sensorimotor area using independent component analysis of resting-state fMRI. Magn Reson Imaging 2009;27:733–40 doi:10.1016/j.mri.2008.11.002 pmid:19110394

    CrossRefPubMed
83. 83.↵
    2. Huang H,
    3. Ding Z,
    4. Mao D, et al

    . PreSurgMapp: a MATLAB Toolbox for presurgical mapping of eloquent functional areas based on task-related and resting-state functional MRI. Neuroinformatics 2016;14:421–38 doi:10.1007/s12021-016-9304-y pmid:27221107

    CrossRefPubMed
84. 84.↵
    2. Friston KJ,
    3. Holmes AP,
    4. Poline JB, et al

    . Analysis of fMRI time-series revisited. Neuroimage 1995;2:45–53 doi:10.1006/nimg.1995.1007 pmid:9343589

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
85. 85.↵
    2. Ball T,
    3. Breckel TP,
    4. Mutschler I, et al

    . Variability of fMRI-response patterns at different spatial observation scales. Hum Brain Mapp 2012;33:1155–71 doi:10.1002/hbm.21274 pmid:21404370

    CrossRefPubMed
86. 86.↵
    2. Pajula J,
    3. Tohka J

    . Effects of spatial smoothing on inter-subject correlation based analysis of FMRI. Magn Reson Imaging 2014;32:1114–24 doi:10.1016/j.mri.2014.06.001 pmid:24970023

    CrossRefPubMed