Deep Learning–Based Reconstruction of 3D T1 SPACE Vessel Wall Imaging Provides Improved Image Quality with Reduced Scan Times: A Preliminary Study

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Leao DJ,
   2. Agarwal A,
   3. Mohan S, et al

   . Intracranial vessel wall imaging: applications, interpretation, and pitfalls. Clin Radiol 2020;75:730–39 doi:10.1016/j.crad.2020.02.006 pmid:32197916

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Mandell DM,
   2. Mossa-Basha M,
   3. Qiao Y, et al

   ; Vessel Wall Imaging Study Group of the American Society of Neuroradiology. Intracranial Vessel Wall MRI: Principles and Expert Consensus Recommendations of the American Society of Neuroradiology. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:218–29 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4893 pmid:27469212

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   1. Mossa-Basha M,
   2. de Havenon A,
   3. Becker KJ, et al

   . Added value of vessel wall magnetic resonance imaging in the differentiation of moyamoya vasculopathies in a non-Asian cohort. Stroke 2016;47:1782–88 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.013320 pmid:27272486

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   1. Mossa-Basha M,
   2. Zhu C,
   3. Yuan C, et al

   . Survey of the American Society of Neuroradiology Membership on the Use and Value of Intracranial Vessel Wall MRI. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2022;43:951–57 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A7541 pmid:35710122

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   1. de Havenon A,
   2. Mossa-Basha M,
   3. Shah L, et al

   . High-resolution vessel wall MRI for the evaluation of intracranial atherosclerotic disease. Neuroradiology 2017;59:1193–202 doi:10.1007/s00234-017-1925-9 pmid:28942481

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Kang N,
   2. Qiao Y,
   3. Wasserman BA

   . Essentials for interpreting intracranial vessel wall MRI results: state of the art. Radiology 2021;300:492–505 doi:10.1148/radiol.2021204096 pmid:34313475

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Zhu C,
   2. Tian B,
   3. Chen L, et al

   . Accelerated whole brain intracranial vessel wall imaging using black blood fast spin echo with compressed sensing (CS-SPACE). MAGMA 2018;31:457–67 doi:10.1007/s10334-017-0667-3 pmid:29209856

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Sannananja B,
   2. Zhu C,
   3. Colip CG, et al

   . Image-quality assessment of 3D intracranial vessel wall MRI using DANTE or DANTE-CAIPI for blood suppression and imaging acceleration. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2022;43:837–43 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A7531 pmid:35618420

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   1. Eun DI,
   2. Jang R,
   3. Ha WS, et al

   . Deep-learning-based image quality enhancement of compressed sensing magnetic resonance imaging of vessel wall: comparison of self-supervised and unsupervised approaches. Sci Rep 2020;10:1395 doi:10.1038/s41598-020-69932-w pmid:32811848

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Hokamura M,
    2. Uetani H,
    3. Nakaura T, et al

    . Exploring the impact of super-resolution deep learning on MR angiography image quality. Neuroradiology 2024;66:217–26 doi:10.1007/s00234-023-03271-1 pmid:38148334

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Jung W,
    2. Lee HS,
    3. Seo M, et al

    . MR-self Noise2Noise: self-supervised deep learning-based image quality improvement of submillimeter resolution 3D MR images. Eur Radiol 2023;33:2686–98 doi:10.1007/s00330-022-09243-y pmid:36378250

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Brain ME,
    2. Amukotuwa S,
    3. Bammer R

    . Deep learning denoising reconstruction enables faster T2-weighted FLAIR sequence acquisition with satisfactory image quality. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2024;68:377–84 doi:10.1111/1754-9485.13649 pmid:38577926

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Estler A,
    2. Hauser TK,
    3. Mengel A, et al

    . Deep learning accelerated image reconstruction of fluid-attenuated inversion recovery sequence in brain imaging: reduction of acquisition time and improvement of image quality. Acad Radiol 2024;31:180–86 doi:10.1016/j.acra.2023.05.010 pmid:37280126

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Hammernik K,
    2. Klatzer T,
    3. Kobler E, et al

    . Learning a variational network for reconstruction of accelerated MRI data. Magn Reson Med 2018;79:3055–71 doi:10.1002/mrm.26977 pmid:29115689

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Wei H,
    2. Yoon JH,
    3. Jeon SK, et al

    . Enhancing gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI: a synergistic approach with deep learning CAIPIRINHA-VIBE and optimized fat suppression techniques. Eur Radiol 2024 Mar 16. [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1007/s00330-024-10693-9 pmid:38492004

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Sullivan GM,
    2. Artino A Jr.

    . Analyzing and interpreting data from Likert-type scales. J Grad Med Educ 2013;5:541–42 doi:10.4300/JGME-5-4-18 pmid:24454995

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Zhou Z,
    2. Chen S,
    3. Balu N, et al

    . Neural network enhanced 3D turbo spin echo for MR intracranial vessel wall imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 2021;78:7–17 doi:10.1016/j.mri.2021.01.004 pmid:33548457

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Li L,
    2. Miller KL,
    3. Jezzard P

    . DANTE-prepared pulse trains: a novel approach to motion-sensitized and motion-suppressed quantitative magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med 2012;68:1423–38 doi:10.1002/mrm.24142 pmid:22246917

    CrossRefPubMed