Estimating Flow Direction of Circle of Willis Using Dynamic Arterial Spin-Labeling MR Angiography

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Liebeskind DS

   . Collateral circulation. Stroke 2003;34:2279–84 doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000086465.41263.06 pmid:12881609

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   1. Liebeskind DS

   . Collateral lessons from recent acute ischemic stroke trials. Neurol Res 2014;36:397–402 doi:10.1179/1743132814Y.0000000348 pmid:24641715

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Modic M,
   2. Weinstein M,
   3. Chilcote W, et al

   . Digital subtraction angiography of the intracranial vascular system: comparative study in 55 patients. Am J Roentgenol 1982;138:299–306

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   1. Zhang J,
   2. Wang J,
   3. Geng D, et al

   . Whole-brain CT perfusion and CT angiography assessment of Moyamoya disease before and after surgical revascularization: preliminary study with 256-slice CT. PLoS One 2013;8:e57595 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0057595 pmid:23451248

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Hirooka R,
   2. Ogasawara K,
   3. Inoue T, et al

   . Simple assessment of cerebral hemodynamics using single-slab 3D time-of-flight MR angiography in patients with cervical internal carotid artery steno-occlusive diseases: comparison with quantitative perfusion single-photon emission CT. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:559–63 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1389 pmid:19039042

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   1. Wijesinghe P,
   2. Steinbusch HWM,
   3. Shankar SK, et al

   . Circle of Willis abnormalities and their clinical importance in ageing brains: a cadaveric anatomical and pathological study. J Chem Neuroanat 2020;106:101772 doi:10.1016/j.jchemneu.2020.101772 pmid:32165168

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Rojas-Villabona A,
   2. Pizzini FB,
   3. Solbach T, et al

   . Are dynamic arterial spin-labeling MRA and time-resolved contrast-enhanced MRA suited for confirmation of obliteration following gamma knife radiosurgery of brain arteriovenous malformations? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2021;42:671–78 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A6990 pmid:33541896

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   1. Guan J,
   2. Zhang S,
   3. Zhou Q, et al

   . Usefulness of transcranial Doppler ultrasound in evaluating cervical-cranial collateral circulations. Interv Neurol 2013;2:8–18 doi:10.1159/000354732 pmid:25187781

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Khan MA,
   2. Liu J,
   3. Tarumi T, et al

   . Measurement of cerebral blood flow using phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging and duplex ultrasonography. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2017;37:541–49 doi:10.1177/0271678X16631149 pmid:26873888

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Xu Y,
    2. Fu Y,
    3. Kedziorek D, et al

    . A comparison of time-of-flight MR angiography, contrast-enhanced MR angiography and CT angiography to evaluate vessel area in a rabbit peripheral arterial disease model. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2011;13:P366 doi:10.1186/1532-429X-13-S1-P366

    CrossRef
11. 11.↵
    1. Chen Z,
    2. Zhou Z,
    3. Qi H, et al

    . A novel sequence for simultaneous measurement of whole‐brain static and dynamic MRA, intracranial vessel wall image, and T₁‐weighted structural brain MRI. Magn Reson Med 2021;85:316–25 doi:10.1002/mrm.28431 pmid:32738091

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Suzuki Y,
    2. Fujima N,
    3. van Osch MJP

    . Intracranial 3D and 4D MR angiography using arterial spin labeling: technical considerations. Magn Reson Med Sci 2020;19:294–309 doi:10.2463/mrms.rev.2019-0096 pmid:31761840

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Yan L,
    2. Wang S,
    3. Zhuo Y, et al

    . Unenhanced dynamic MR angiography: high spatial and temporal resolution by using true FISP–based spin tagging with alternating radiofrequency. Radiology 2010;256:270–79 doi:10.1148/radiol.10091543 pmid:20574100

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    1. Shao X,
    2. Zhao Z,
    3. Russin J, et al

    . Quantification of intracranial arterial blood flow using non-contrast enhanced four-dimensional dynamic magnetic resonance angiography. Magn Reson Med 2019;82:449–59 doi:10.1002/mrm.27712 pmid:30847971

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. De Caro J,
    2. Ciacciarelli A,
    3. Tessitore A, et al

    . Variants of the circle of Willis in ischemic stroke patients. J Neurol 2021;268:3799–807 doi:10.1007/s00415-021-10454-4

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Chen L,
    2. Mossa-Basha M,
    3. Sun J, et al

    . Quantification of morphometry and intensity features of intracranial arteries from 3D TOF MRA using the intracranial artery feature extraction (iCafe): a reproducibility study. Magn Reson Imaging 2018;57:293–302 doi:10.1016/j.mri.2018.12.007 pmid:30580079

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Kass M,
    2. Witkin A,
    3. Terzopoulos D

    . Snakes: Active contour models. Int J Comput Vis 1988;1:321–31

    CrossRef
18. 18.↵
    1. Adalı T,
    2. Ortega A

    . Applications of graph theory [scanning the issue]. Proc IEEE 2018;106:784–86

    CrossRef
19. 19.↵
    1. Fushiki T

    . Bootstrap prediction and Bayesian prediction under misspecified models. Bernoulli 2005;11:747–58 doi:10.3150/bj/1126126768

    CrossRefWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    1. Polikar R

    . Ensemble based systems in decision making. IEEE Circuits Syst Mag 2006;6:21–45

    CrossRef
21. 21.↵
    1. Wang J,
    2. Zuo X,
    3. He Y

    . Graph-based network analysis of resting-state functional MRI. Front Syst Neurosci 2010;4:16 doi:10.3389/fnsys.2010.00016 pmid:20589099

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Hejazi S,
    2. Karwowski W,
    3. Farahani FV, et al

    . Graph-based analysis of brain connectivity in multiple sclerosis using functional MRI: a systematic review. Brain Sci 2023;13:246 doi:10.3390/brainsci13020246

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Zhou W,
    2. Lu M,
    3. Li J, et al

    . Functional posterior communicating artery of patients with posterior circulation ischemia using phase contrast magnetic resonance angiography. Exp Ther Med 2019;17:337–43 doi:10.3892/etm.2018.6897 pmid:30651800

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Ahn SH,
    2. d'Esterre CD,
    3. Qazi EM, et al

    . Occult anterograde flow is an under-recognized but crucial predictor of early recanalization with intravenous tissue-type plasminogen activator. Stroke 2015;46:968–75 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.008648 pmid:25700286

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
25. 25.↵
    1. Yan S,
    2. Feng H,
    3. Ma L, et al

    . Predictors of successful endovascular recanalization in patients with symptomatic nonacute intracranial large artery occlusion. BMC Neurol 2023;23:376 doi:10.1186/s12883-023-03424-y pmid:37858051

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    1. Li M,
    2. Zhang J,
    3. Pan J, et al

    . Obstructive coronary artery disease: reverse attenuation gradient sign at CT indicates distal retrograde flow–a useful sign for differentiating chronic total occlusion from subtotal occlusion. Radiology 2013;266:766–72 doi:10.1148/radiol.12121294 pmid:23220898

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    1. Tan IYL,
    2. Demchuk AM,
    3. Hopyan J, et al

    . CT angiography clot burden score and collateral score: correlation with clinical and radiologic outcomes in acute middle cerebral artery infarct. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:525–31

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
28. 28.↵
    1. Eaton RG,
    2. Shah VS,
    3. Dornbos D, et al

    . Demographic age-related variation in circle of Willis completeness assessed by digital subtraction angiography. Brain Circ 2020;6:31–37 doi:10.4103/bc.bc_43_19 pmid:32166198

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    1. Grunwald IQ,
    2. Kulikovski J,
    3. Reith W, et al

    . Collateral automation for triage in stroke: evaluating automated scoring of collaterals in acute stroke on computed tomography scans. Cerebrovasc Dis Basel Dis 2019;47:217–22 doi:10.1159/000500076 pmid:31216543

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    1. Mizutani K,
    2. Arai N,
    3. Toda M, et al

    . A novel flow dynamics study of the intracranial veins using whole brain four-dimensional computed tomography angiography. World Neurosurg 2019;131:e176–85
31. 31.↵
    1. Dunås T,
    2. Holmgren M,
    3. Wåhlin A, et al

    . Accuracy of blood flow assessment in cerebral arteries with 4D flow MRI: Evaluation with three segmentation methods. J Magn Reson Imaging 2019;50:511–18 doi:10.1002/jmri.26641 pmid:30637846

    CrossRefPubMed
32. 32.↵
    1. Wessels L,
    2. Hecht N,
    3. Faust K, et al

    . Complete or partial parent artery sacrifice, effect of vessel-occlusion strategies on complete obliteration of complex aneurysms. World Neurosurg 2021;147:e282–92 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2020.12.050 pmid:33340722

    CrossRefPubMed
33. 33.↵
    1. de Rooij NK,
    2. Velthuis BK,
    3. Algra A, et al

    . Configuration of the circle of Willis, direction of flow, and shape of the aneurysm as risk factors for rupture of intracranial aneurysms. J Neurol 2009;256:45–50 doi:10.1007/s00415-009-0028-x pmid:19221852

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
34. 34.↵
    1. Liu P,
    2. De Vis J,
    3. Lu H

    . Cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) MRI with CO2 challenge: a technical review. NeuroImage 2019;187:104–15 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.03.047 pmid:29574034

    CrossRefPubMed
35. 35.↵
    1. Werner GS,
    2. Ferrari M,
    3. Heinke S, et al

    . Angiographic assessment of collateral connections in comparison with invasively determined collateral function in chronic coronary occlusions. Circulation 2003;107:1972–77 doi:10.1161/01.CIR.0000061953.72662.3A pmid:12665484

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
36. 36.↵
    1. Markl M,
    2. Semaan E,
    3. Stromberg L, et al

    . Importance of variants in cerebrovascular anatomy for potential retrograde embolization in cryptogenic stroke. Eur Radiology 2017;27:4145–52 doi:10.1007/s00330-017-4821-0 pmid:28386716

    CrossRefPubMed
37. 37.↵
    1. Mandell DM,
    2. Han JS,
    3. Poublanc J, et al

    . Quantitative measurement of cerebrovascular reactivity by blood oxygen level-dependent MR imaging in patients with intracranial stenosis: preoperative cerebrovascular reactivity predicts the effect of extracranial-intracranial bypass surgery. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:721–27 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2365 pmid:21436343

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
38. 38.↵
    1. Yamashita S,
    2. Isoda H,
    3. Hirano M, et al

    . Visualization of hemodynamics in intracranial arteries using time-resolved three-dimensional phase-contrast MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007;25:473–78 doi:10.1002/jmri.20828 pmid:17279504

    CrossRefPubMed