Survey of the American Society of Neuroradiology Membership on the Use and Value of Intracranial Vessel Wall MRI

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Mossa-Basha M,
   2. Watase H,
   3. Sun J, et al

   . Inter-rater and scan-rescan reproducibility of the detection of intracranial atherosclerosis on contrast-enhanced 3D vessel wall MRI. Br J Radiol 2019;92:20180973 doi:10.1259/bjr.20180973 pmid:30789784

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Tian X,
   2. Tian B,
   3. Shi Z, et al

   . Assessment of intracranial atherosclerotic plaques using 3D black-blood MRI: comparison with 3D time-of-flight MRA and DSA. J Magn Reson Imaging 2021;53:469–78 doi:10.1002/jmri.27341 pmid:32864816

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Mossa-Basha M,
   2. de Havenon A,
   3. Becker KJ, et al

   . Added value of vessel wall magnetic resonance imaging in the differentiation of Moyamoya vasculopathies in a non-Asian cohort. Stroke 2016;47:1782–88 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.013320 pmid:27272486

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   1. Mossa-Basha M,
   2. Hwang WD,
   3. De Havenon A, et al

   . Multicontrast high-resolution vessel wall magnetic resonance imaging and its value in differentiating intracranial vasculopathic processes. Stroke 2015;46:1567–73 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.009037 pmid:25953365

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   1. Mossa-Basha M,
   2. Shibata DK,
   3. Hallam DK, et al

   . Added value of vessel wall magnetic resonance imaging for differentiation of nonocclusive intracranial vasculopathies. Stroke 2017;48:3026–33 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.018227 pmid:29030476

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   1. Fu Q,
   2. Wang Y,
   3. Zhang Y, et al

   . Qualitative and quantitative wall enhancement on magnetic resonance imaging is associated with symptoms of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Stroke 2021;52:213–22 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.029685 pmid:33349014

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Gariel F,
   2. Ben Hassen W,
   3. Boulouis G, et al

   . Increased wall enhancement during follow-up as a predictor of subsequent aneurysmal growth. Stroke 2020;51:1868–72 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.028431 pmid:32397927

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Hartman JB,
   2. Watase H,
   3. Sun J, et al

   . Intracranial aneurysms at higher clinical risk for rupture demonstrate increased wall enhancement and thinning on multicontrast 3D vessel wall MRI. Br J Radiol 2019;92:20180950 doi:10.1259/bjr.20180950 pmid:30653339

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Qiao Y,
   2. Anwar Z,
   3. Intrapiromkul J, et al

   . Patterns and implications of intracranial arterial remodeling in stroke patients. Stroke 2016;47:434–40 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.009955 pmid:26742795

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    1. Li X,
    2. Sun B,
    3. Wang L, et al

    . Association of type 2 diabetes mellitus and glycemic control with intracranial plaque characteristics in patients with acute ischemic stroke. J Magn Reson Imaging 2021;54:655–66 doi:10.1002/jmri.27614 pmid:33786939

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Mossa-Basha M,
    2. Huynh TJ,
    3. Hippe DS, et al

    . Vessel wall MRI characteristics of endovascularly treated aneurysms: association with angiographic vasospasm. J Neurosurg 2018;131:859–67 doi:10.3171/2018.4.JNS172829 pmid:30239313

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Shi Z,
    2. Li J,
    3. Zhao M, et al

    . Progression of plaque burden of intracranial atherosclerotic plaque predicts recurrent stroke/transient ischemic attack: a pilot follow-up study using higher-resolution MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2021;54:560–70 doi:10.1002/jmri.27561 pmid:33600033

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Mandell DM,
    2. Mossa-Basha M,
    3. Qiao Y, et al

    ; Vessel Wall Imaging Study Group of the American Society of Neuroradiology. Intracranial Vessel Wall MRI: Principles and Expert Consensus Recommendations of the American Society of Neuroradiology. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:218–29 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4893 pmid:27469212

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    1. US Census Bureau

    . Census Regions and Divisions of the United States. https://www2.census.gov/geo/pdfs/maps-data/maps/reference/us_regdiv.pdf. 2020. Accessed December 28, 2021
15. 15.↵
    1. Edjlali M,
    2. Guédon A,
    3. Ben Hassen W, et al

    . Circumferential thick enhancement at vessel wall MRI has high specificity for intracranial aneurysm instability. Radiology 2018;289:181–87 doi:10.1148/radiol.2018172879 pmid:29969070

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Qiao Y,
    2. Zeiler SR,
    3. Mirbagheri S, et al

    . Intracranial plaque enhancement in patients with cerebrovascular events on high-spatial-resolution MR images. Radiology 2014;271:534–42 doi:10.1148/radiol.13122812 pmid:24475850

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Sun B,
    2. Wang L,
    3. Li X, et al

    . Intracranial atherosclerotic plaque characteristics and burden associated with recurrent acute stroke: a 3D quantitative vessel wall MRI study. Front Aging Neurosci 2021;13:706544 doi:10.3389/fnagi.2021.706544 pmid:34393761

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Zeiler SR,
    2. Qiao Y,
    3. Pardo CA, et al

    . Vessel wall MRI for targeting biopsies of intracranial vasculitis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2018;39:2034–36 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5801 pmid:30262647

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    1. Sarikaya B,
    2. Colip C,
    3. Hwang WD, et al

    . Comparison of time-of-flight MR angiography and intracranial vessel wall MRI for luminal measurements relative to CT angiography. Br J Radiol 2021;94:20200743 doi:10.1259/bjr.20200743 pmid:33180559

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. Kang N,
    2. Qiao Y,
    3. Wasserman BA

    . Essentials for interpreting intracranial vessel wall MRI results: state of the art. Radiology 2021;300:492–505 doi:10.1148/radiol.2021204096 pmid:34313475

    CrossRefPubMed