ADC Level is Related to DWI Reversal in Patients Undergoing Mechanical Thrombectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Donnan GA,
   3. Davis SM

   . Breaking the 3 h barrier for treatment of acute ischaemic stroke. Lancet Neurol 2008;7:981–82 doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70230-8 pmid:18940690

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   2. Dávalos A,
   3. Blanco M,
   4. Pedraza S, et al

   . The clinical-DWI mismatch: a new diagnostic approach to the brain tissue at risk of infarction. Neurology 2004;62:2187–92 doi:10.1212/01.WNL.0000130570.41127.EA pmid:15210880

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   2. Lansberg MG,
   3. Thijs VN,
   4. Bammer R, et al

   . The MRA-DWI mismatch identifies patients with stroke who are likely to benefit from reperfusion. Stroke 2008;39:2491–96 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.508572 pmid:18635861

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   2. Li F,
   3. Han SS,
   4. Tatlisumak T, et al

   . Reversal of acute apparent diffusion coefficient abnormalities and delayed neuronal death following transient focal cerebral ischemia in rats. Ann Neurol 1999;46:333–42 doi:10.1002/1531-8249(199909)46:3<333::AID-ANA9>3.0.CO;2-X pmid:10482264

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   2. Labeyrie MA,
   3. Turc G,
   4. Hess A, et al

   . Diffusion lesion reversal after thrombolysis: a MR correlate of early neurological improvement. Stroke 2012;43:2986–91 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.661009 pmid:22996954

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   2. Fiehler J,
   3. Knudsen K,
   4. Kucinski T, et al

   . Predictors of apparent diffusion coefficient normalization in stroke patients. Stroke 2004;35:514–19 doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000114873.28023.C2 pmid:14739409

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   2. Hoehn-Berlage M,
   3. Norris DG,
   4. Kohno K, et al

   . Evolution of regional changes in apparent diffusion coefficient during focal ischemia of rat brain: the relationship of quantitative diffusion NMR imaging to the reduction in cerebral blood flow and metabolic disturbances. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1995;15:1002–11 doi:10.1038/jcbfm.1995.126 pmid:7593332

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   2. Lin W,
   3. Lee JM,
   4. Lee YZ, et al

   . Temporal relationship between apparent diffusion coefficient and absolute measurements of cerebral blood flow in acute stroke patients. Stroke 2003;34:64–70 doi:10.1161/01.str.0000048151.28173.0d pmid:12511752

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   2. Shinoda N,
   3. Hori S,
   4. Mikami K, et al

   . Utility of relative ADC ratio in patient selection for endovascular revascularization of large vessel occlusion. J Neuroradiol 2017;44:185–91 doi:10.1016/j.neurad.2016.12.015 pmid:28411967

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Zaidat OO,
    3. Yoo AJ,
    4. Khatri P, et al

    ; STIR Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (TICI) Task Force. Recommendations on angiographic revascularization grading standards for acute ischemic stroke: a consensus statement. Stroke 2013;44:2650–63 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001972 pmid:23920012

    FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    2. Hirai T,
    3. Sasaki M,
    4. Maeda M, et al

    . Diffusion-weighted imaging in ischemic stroke: effect of display method on observers' diagnostic performance. Acad Radiol 2009;16:305–12 doi:10.1016/j.acra.2008.09.012 pmid:19201359

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Ay H,
    3. Furie KL,
    4. Singhal A, et al

    . An evidence-based causative classification system for acute ischemic stroke. Ann Neurol 2005;58:688–97 doi:10.1002/ana.20617 pmid:16240340

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Hart RG,
    3. Diener HC,
    4. Coutts SB, et al

    ; Cryptogenic Stroke/ESUS International Working Group. Embolic strokes of undetermined source: the case for a new clinical construct. Lancet Neurol 2014;13:429–38 doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70310-7 pmid:24646875

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Campbell BC,
    3. Purushotham A,
    4. Christensen S, et al

    ; EPITHET–DEFUSE Investigators. The infarct core is well represented by the acute diffusion lesion: sustained reversal is infrequent. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2012;32:50–56 doi:10.1038/jcbfm.2011.102 pmid:21772309

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Purushotham A,
    3. Campbell BC,
    4. Straka M, et al

    . Apparent diffusion coefficient threshold for delineation of ischemic core. Int J Stroke 2015;10:348–53 doi:10.1111/ijs.12068 pmid:23802548

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. Meng X,
    3. Fisher M,
    4. Shen Q, et al

    . Characterizing the diffusion/perfusion mismatch in experimental focal cerebral ischemia. Ann Neurol 2004;55:207–12 doi:10.1002/ana.10803 pmid:14755724

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Kidwell CS,
    3. Saver JL,
    4. Mattiello J, et al

    . Thrombolytic reversal of acute human cerebral ischemic injury shown by diffusion/perfusion magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Neurol 2000;47:462–69 doi:10.1002/1531-8249(200004)47:4<462::AID-ANA9>3.0.CO;2-Y pmid:10762157

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. 18.↵
    2. Yoo J,
    3. Choi JW,
    4. Lee SJ, et al

    . Ischemic diffusion lesion reversal after endovascular treatment. Stroke 2019;50:1504–09 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.024263 pmid:31043151

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    2. Thomalla G,
    3. Cheng B,
    4. Ebinger M, et al

    . DWI-FLAIR mismatch for the identification of patients with acute ischaemic stroke within 4.5h of symptom onset (PRE-FLAIR): a multicentre observational study. Lancet Neurol 2011;10:978–86 doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70192-2 pmid:21978972

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    2. DeLaPaz RL,
    3. Shibata D,
    4. Steinberg GK, et al

    . Acute cerebral ischemia in rabbits: correlation between MR and histopathology. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1991;12:89–95 pmid:1704174

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
21. 21.↵
    2. Li F,
    3. Silva MD,
    4. Sotak CH, et al

    . Temporal evolution of ischemic injury evaluated with diffusion-, perfusion-, and T2-weighted MRI. Neurology 2000;54:689–96 doi:10.1212/wnl.54.3.689 pmid:10680805

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
22. 22.↵
    2. Umemura T,
    3. Hachisuka K,
    4. Miyachi H, et al

    . Clinical outcomes of cerebral infarction in nonagenarians compared among four age groups. Neurol Sci 2020;41:2471–76 doi:10.1007/s10072-020-04348-y pmid:32212011

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    2. Diestro JD,
    3. Dmytriw AA,
    4. Broocks G, et al

    . Endovascular thrombectomy for low ASPECTS large vessel occlusion ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Can J Neurol Sci 2020;47:612–19 doi:10.1017/cjn.2020.71 pmid:32299532

    CrossRefPubMed