Surgical or Endovascular Treatment of MCA Aneurysms: An Agreement Study

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Alreshidi M,
   2. Cote DJ,
   3. Dasenbrock HH, et al

   . Coiling versus microsurgical clipping in the treatment of unruptured middle cerebral artery aneurysms: a meta-analysis. Neurosurgery 2018;83:879–89 doi:10.1093/neuros/nyx623 pmid:29438551

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.
   1. Berro DH,
   2. L’Allinec V,
   3. Pasco-Papon A, et al

   . Clip-first policy versus coil-first policy for the exclusion of middle cerebral artery aneurysms. J Neurosurgery 2020;133:1124–1131 doi:10.3171/2019.5.JNS19373 pmid:31597117

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Rodriguez-Hernandez A,
   2. Sughrue ME,
   3. Akhavan S, et al

   . Current management of middle cerebral artery aneurysms: surgical results with a “clip first” policy. Neurosurgery 2013;72:415–27 doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182804aa2 pmid:23208060

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   1. Molyneux A,
   2. Kerr R,
   3. Stratton I

   , et al. International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) Collaborative Group. International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial. Lancet 2002;360:1267–74 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11314-6 pmid:12414200

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   1. Molyneux AJ,
   2. Kerr RS,
   3. Yu LM, et al

   ; International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) Collaborative Group. International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion. Lancet 2005;366:809–17 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67214-5 pmid:16139655

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   1. McDougall CG,
   2. Spetzler RF,
   3. Zabramski JM, et al

   . The Barrow Ruptured Aneurysm Trial. J Neurosurg 2012;116:135–44 doi:10.3171/2011.8.JNS101767 pmid:22054213

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   1. Koivisto T,
   2. Vanninen R,
   3. Hurskainen H, et al

   . Outcomes of early endovascular versus surgical treatment of ruptured cerebral aneurysms. Stroke 2000;31:2369–77 doi:10.1161/01.STR.31.10.2369 pmid:11022066

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   1. Raymond J,
   2. Molyneux AJ,
   3. Fox AJ, et al

   ; TEAM Collaborative Group. The TEAM trial: safety and efficacy of endovascular treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms in the prevention of aneurysmal hemorrhage—a randomized comparison with indefinite deferral of treatment in 2002 patients followed for 10 years. Trials 2008;9:43 doi:10.1186/1745-6215-9-43 pmid:18631395

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   1. Darsaut TE,
   2. Keough MB,
   3. Sagga A, et al

   . Surgical or endovascular management of middle cerebral artery aneurysms: a randomized comparison. World Neurosurg 2021;149:e521–34 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2021.01.142 pmid:33556601

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Rothwell PM

    . Subgroup analysis in randomised controlled trials: importance, indications, and interpretation. Lancet 2005;365:176–86 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)17709-5

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    1. Piotin M,
    2. Blanc R,
    3. Spelle L, et al

    . Stent-assisted coiling of intracranial aneurysms. Stroke 2010;41:110–15 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.558114 pmid:19959540

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Cagnazzo F,
    2. Mantilla D,
    3. Lefevre PH, et al

    . Treatment of middle cerebral artery aneurysms with flow-diverter stents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:2289–94 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5388 pmid:28982785

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    1. Pierot L,
    2. Klisch J,
    3. Cognard C, et al

    . Endovascular WEB flow disruption in middle cerebral artery aneurysms: preliminary feasibility, clinical, and anatomical results in a multicenter study. Neurosurgery 2013;73:27–34; discussion 34–25 doi:10.1227/01.neu.0000429860.04276.c1 pmid:23615104

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Raymond J,
    2. Gentric JC,
    3. Darsaut TE, et al

    . Flow diversion in the treatment of aneurysms: a randomized care trial and registry. J Neurosurg 2017;127:454–62 doi:10.3171/2016.4.JNS152662 pmid:27813466

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.
    1. Chapot R,
    2. Mosimann PJ,
    3. Darsaut TE, et al

    . Retreatments must be included in the evaluation of device performance. J Neurointerv Surg 2021;13:e5 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-016619 pmid:32929046

    FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    1. Raymond J,
    2. Darsaut TE

    . Stenting for intracranial aneurysms: how to paint oneself into the proverbial corner. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:1711–13 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2700 pmid:21903913

    FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    1. Darsaut TE,
    2. Keough MB,
    3. Boisseau W, et al

    . Middle Cerebral Artery Aneurysm Trial (MCAAT): a randomized care trial comparing surgical and endovascular management of MCA aneurysm patients. World Neurosurg 2022;160:e49–54 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2021.12.083 pmid:34971833

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Fahed R,
    2. Darsaut TE,
    3. Farzin B, et al

    . Measuring clinical uncertainty as a preliminary step to randomized controlled trials. J Clin Epidemiol 2019;112:96–98 doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.04.011 pmid:31077752

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Fahed R,
    2. Darsaut TE,
    3. Farzin B, et al

    . Measuring clinical uncertainty and equipoise by applying the agreement study methodology to patient management decisions. BMC Med Res Methodol 2020;20:214 doi:10.1186/s12874-020-01095-8 pmid:32842953

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. Kottner J,
    2. Audigé L,
    3. Brorson S, et al

    . Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed. J Clin Epidemiol 2011;64:96–106 doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.03.002 pmid:21130355

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Darsaut TE,
    2. Jack AS,
    3. Kerr RS, et al

    . International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial –ISAT, Part II: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2013;14:156 doi:10.1186/1745-6215-14-156 pmid:23714335

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Darsaut TE,
    2. Findlay JM,
    3. Raymond J

    ; CURES Collaborative Group. The design of the Canadian UnRuptured Endovascular versus Surgery (CURES) trial. Can J Neurol Sci 2011;38:236–41 doi:10.1017/s0317167100011392 pmid:21320826

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. 23.↵
    1. Darsaut TE,
    2. Raymond J

    ; STAT Collaborative Group. The design of the STenting in Aneurysm Treatments (STAT) trial. J Neurointerv Surg 2012;4:178–81 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2011-010065 pmid:21990519

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
24. 24.↵
    1. Raymond J,
    2. Darsaut TE,
    3. Guilbert F, et al

    . Flow diversion in aneurysms trial: the design of the FIAT study. Interv Neuroradiol 2011;17:147–53 doi:10.1177/159101991101700202 pmid:21696651

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    1. Raymond J,
    2. Januel AC,
    3. Iancu D, et al

    . The RISE trial: A Randomized Trial on Intra-Saccular Endobridge devices. Interv Neuroradiol 2020;26:61–67 doi:10.1177/1591019919886412 pmid:31690151

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    1. Feinstein AR,
    2. Cicchetti DV

    . High agreement but low kappa, I: the problems of two paradoxes. J Clin Epidemiol 1990;43:543–49 doi:10.1016/0895-4356(90)90158-L pmid:2348207

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
27. 27.↵
    1. Landis JR,
    2. Koch GG

    . The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159–74 doi:10.2307/2529310 pmid:843571

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
28. 28.↵
    1. Macdonald RL

    . Editorial: Clip or coil? Six years of follow-up in BRAT. J Neurosurg 2015;123:605–07 doi:10.3171/2014.11.JNS142261 pmid:26115466

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    1. Raymond J,
    2. Darsaut TE,
    3. Altman DG

    . Pragmatic trials can be designed as optimal medical care: principles and methods of care trials. J Clin Epidemiol 2014;67:1150–56 doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.04.010 pmid:25042688

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    1. Raymond J,
    2. Fahed R,
    3. Darsaut TE

    . Randomize the first patient. J Neuroradiol 2017;44:291–94 doi:10.1016/j.neurad.2017.03.004 pmid:28478113

    CrossRefPubMed