Parent Artery Straightening after Flow-Diverter Stenting Improves the Odds of Aneurysm Occlusion

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Pistocchi S,
   2. Blanc R,
   3. Bartolini B, et al

   . Flow diverters at and beyond the level of the circle of Willis for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Stroke 2012;43:1032–38 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.636019 pmid:22282890

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   1. Primiani CT,
   2. Ren Z,
   3. Kan P, et al

   . A2, M2, P2 aneurysms and beyond: results of treatment with Pipeline embolization device in 65 patients. J Neuronterv Surg 2019;11:903–07 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014631 pmid:30674637

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Meng H,
   2. Wang Z,
   3. Kim M, et al

   . Saccular aneurysms on straight and curved vessels are subject to different hemodynamics: implications of intravascular stenting. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:1861–65 pmid:17032857

   PubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   1. Waihrich E,
   2. Clavel P,
   3. Mendes G, et al

   . Influence of anatomic changes on the outcomes of carotid siphon aneurysms after deployment of flow-diverter stents. Neurosurgery 2018;83:1226–33 doi:10.1093/neuros/nyx618 pmid:29444328

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. O’Kelly CJ,
   2. Krings T,
   3. Fiorella D, et al

   . A novel grading scale for the angiographic assessment of intracranial aneurysms treated using flow diverting stents. Interv Neuroradiol 2010;16:133–37 doi:10.1177/159101991001600204 pmid:20642887

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Cicchetti DV,
   2. Shoinralter D,
   3. Tyrer PJ

   . The effect of number of rating scale categories on levels of interrater reliability: a Monte Carlo investigation. Appl Psychol Meas 1985;9:31–36 doi:10.1177/014662168500900103

   CrossRefWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   1. Darsaut TE,
   2. Bing F,
   3. Salazkin I, et al

   . Flow diverters failing to occlude experimental bifurcation or curved sidewall aneurysms: an in vivo study in canines. J Neurosurg 2012;117:37–44 doi:10.3171/2012.4.JNS111916 pmid:22559845

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   1. Fahed R,
   2. Raymond J,
   3. Ducroux C, et al

   . Testing flow diversion in animal models: a systematic review. Neuroradiology 2016;58:375–82 doi:10.1007/s00234-015-1635-0 pmid:26747181

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Fahed R,
   2. Darsaut TE,
   3. Gentric JC, et al

   . Flow diversion: what can clinicians learn from animal models? Neuroradiology 2017;59:255–61 doi:10.1007/s00234-016-1781-z pmid:28243686

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Rouchaud A,
    2. Ramana C,
    3. Brinjikji W, et al

    . Wall apposition is a key factor for aneurysm occlusion after flow diversion: a histologic evaluation in 41 rabbits. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:2087–91 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4848 pmid:27390319

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    1. Fu Y,
    2. Zhang S,
    3. Du H, et al

    . Impact of vessel curvature on neointimal healing after stent implantation as assessed by optical coherence tomography. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018;97:e0518 doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000010518 pmid:29668639

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Can A,
    2. Du R

    . Association of hemodynamic factors with intracranial aneurysm formation and rupture: systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosurgery 2016;78:510–20 doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000001083 pmid:26516819

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Gao B,
    2. Baharoglu MI,
    3. Malek AM

    . Angular remodeling in single stent-assisted coiling displaces and attenuates the flow impingement zone at the neck of intracranial bifurcation aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2013;72:739–48 doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e318286fab3 pmid:23328687

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Xu J,
    2. Wu Z,
    3. Yu Y, et al

    . Combined effects of flow diverting strategies and parent artery curvature on aneurysmal hemodynamics: a CFD study. PLoS One 2015;10:e0138648 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0138648 pmid:26398847

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. King RM,
    2. Chueh JY,
    3. van der Bom IM, et al

    . The effect of intracranial stent implantation on the curvature of the cerebrovasculature. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1657–62 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3062 pmid:22538075

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    1. Huang QH,
    2. Wu YF,
    3. Xu Y, et al

    . Vascular geometry change because of endovascular stent placement for anterior communicating artery aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:1721–25 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2597 pmid:21816920

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    1. Shapiro M,
    2. Raz E,
    3. Becske T, et al

    . Variable porosity of the Pipeline embolization device in straight and curved vessels: a guide for optimal deployment strategy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:727–33 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3742 pmid:24072622

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    1. Ishii A,
    2. Chihara H,
    3. Kikuchi T, et al

    . Contribution of the straightening effect of the parent artery to decreased recanalization in stent-assisted coiling of large aneurysms. J Neurosurg 2017;127:1063–69 doi:10.3171/2016.9.JNS16501 pmid:28009233

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Funakoshi Y,
    2. Imamura H,
    3. Tani S, et al

    . Progressive thrombosis of unruptured aneurysms after coil embolization: analysis of 255 consecutive aneurysms. J Neurointerv Surg 2019;11:1113–17 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-014775 pmid:30975739

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    1. Funakoshi Y,
    2. Imamura H,
    3. Tani S, et al

    . Effect of straightening the parent vessels in stent-assisted coil embolization for anterior communicating artery aneurysms. World Neurosurg 2019;126:e410–16 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2019.02.066 pmid:30822575

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Rajah G,
    2. Narayanan S,
    3. Rangel-Castilla L

    . Update on flow diverters for the endovascular management of cerebral aneurysms. Neurosurg Focus 2017;42:E2 doi:10.3171/2017.3.FOCUS16427 pmid:28565980

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Suzuki T,
    2. Takao H,
    3. Fujimura S, et al

    . Selection of helical braided flow diverter stents based on hemodynamic performance and mechanical properties. J Neurointerv Surg 2017;9:999–1005 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012561 pmid:27646987

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
23. 23.↵
    1. Piergallini L,
    2. Cagnazzo F,
    3. Conte G, et al

    . Virtual simulation with Sim&Size software for Pipeline Flex Embolization: evaluation of the technical and clinical impact. J Neurointerv Surg 2020;12:968–73 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-015813

    Abstract/FREE Full Text