T1 Mapping for Microstructural Assessment of the Cervical Spinal Cord in the Evaluation of Patients with Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Nouri A,
   2. Tetreault L,
   3. Singh A, et al

   . Degenerative cervical myelopathy: epidemiology, genetics, and pathogenesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2015;40:E675–93 doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000000913 pmid:25839387

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. King JT,
   2. McGinnis KA,
   3. Roberts MS

   . Quality of life assessment with the medical outcomes study short form-36 among patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Neurosurgery 2003;52:113–20; discussion 121 pmid:12493107

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   1. Kalsi-Ryan S,
   2. Karadimas SK,
   3. Fehlings MG

   . Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: the clinical phenomenon and the current pathobiology of an increasingly prevalent and devastating disorder. Neuroscientist 2013;19:409–21 doi:10.1177/1073858412467377 pmid:23204243

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Nurick S

   . The pathogenesis of the spinal cord disorder associated with cervical spondylosis. Brain 1972;95:87–100 doi:10.1093/brain/95.1.87 pmid:5023093

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   1. Gore DR,
   2. Sepic SB,
   3. Gardner GM

   . Roentgenographic findings of the cervical spine in asymptomatic people. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1986;11:521–24 doi:10.1097/00007632-198607000-00003 pmid:3787320

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Ernst CW,
   2. Stadnik TW,
   3. Peeters E, et al

   . Prevalence of annular tears and disc herniations on MR images of the cervical spine in symptom free volunteers. Eur J Radiology 2005;55:409–14 doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2004.11.003 pmid:16129249

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   1. Schneider RC,
   2. Cherry G,
   3. Pantek H

   . The syndrome of acute central cervical spinal cord injury. J Neurosurg 1954;11:546–77 doi:10.3171/jns.1954.11.6.0546 pmid:13222164

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.
   1. Aarabi B,
   2. Hadley MN,
   3. Dhall SS, et al

   . Management of acute traumatic central cord syndrome (ATCCS). Neurosurgery 2013;72(Suppl 2):195–204 doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e318276f64b pmid:23417191

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Brooks NP

   . Central cord syndrome. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2017;28:41–47 doi:10.1016/j.nec.2016.08.002 pmid:27886881

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Martin AR,
    2. Tadokoro N,
    3. Tetreault L, et al

    . Imaging evaluation of degenerative cervical myelopathy. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2018;29:33–45 doi:10.1016/j.nec.2017.09.003 pmid:29173434

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Tracy JA,
    2. Bartleson JD

    . Cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Neurologist 2010;16:176–87 doi:10.1097/NRL.0b013e3181da3a29 pmid:20445427

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    1. Nouri A,
    2. Martin AR,
    3. Mikulis D, et al

    . Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of degenerative cervical myelopathy: a review of structural changes and measurement techniques. Neurosurg Focus 2016;40:E5 doi:10.3171/2016.3.FOCUS1667 pmid:27246488

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Stroman PW,
    2. Wheeler-Kingshott C,
    3. Bacon M, et al

    . The current state-of-the-art of spinal cord imaging: methods. Neuroimage 2014;84:1070–81 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.124 pmid:23685159

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    1. Rindler RS,
    2. Chokshi FH,
    3. Malcolm JG, et al

    . Spinal diffusion tensor imaging in evaluation of preoperative and postoperative severity of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: systematic review of literature. World Neurosurg 2017;99:150–58 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2016.11.141 pmid:27939797

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Henderson E,
    2. McKinnon G,
    3. Lee TY, et al

    . A fast 3D look-locker method for volumetric T1 mapping. Magn Reson Imaging 1999;17:1163–71 doi:10.1016/s0730-725x(99)00025-9 pmid:10499678

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Deoni SCL,
    2. Rutt BK,
    3. Peters TM

    . Rapid combined T1 and T2 mapping using gradient recalled acquisition in the steady state. Magn Reson Med 2003;49:515–26 doi:10.1002/mrm.10407 pmid:12594755

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Wang X,
    2. Joseph AA,
    3. Kalentev O, et al

    . High-resolution myocardial T1 mapping using single-shot inversion recovery fast low-angle shot MRI with radial undersampling and iterative reconstruction. Br J Radiol 2016;89:20160255 doi:10.1259/bjr.20160255 pmid:27759423

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Battiston M,
    2. Schneider T,
    3. Prados F, et al

    . Fast and reproducible in vivo T1 mapping of the human cervical spinal cord. Magn Reson Med 2018;79:2142–48 doi:10.1002/mrm.26852 pmid:28736946

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Koenig SH,
    2. Brown RD,
    3. Spiller M, et al

    . Relaxometry of brain: why white matter appears bright in MRI. Magn Reson Med 1990;14:482–95 doi:10.1002/mrm.1910140306 pmid:2355830

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.
    1. Does MD,
    2. Gore JC

    . Compartmental study of T1 and T2 in rat brain and trigeminal nerve in vivo. Magn Reson Med 2002;47:274–83 doi:10.1002/mrm.10060 pmid:11810670

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Lancaster JL,
    2. Andrews T,
    3. Hardies LJ, et al

    . Three-pool model of white matter. J Magn Reson Imaging 2003;17:1–10 doi:10.1002/jmri.10230 pmid:12500269

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Vymazal J,
    2. Righini A,
    3. Brooks RA, et al

    . T1 and T2 in the brain of healthy subjects, patients with Parkinson disease, and patients with multiple system atrophy: relation to iron content. Radiology 1999;211:489–95 doi:10.1148/radiology.211.2.r99ma53489 pmid:10228533

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. 23.
    1. Gelman N,
    2. Ewing JR,
    3. Gorell JM, et al

    . Interregional variation of longitudinal relaxation rates in human brain at 3.0 T: relation to estimated iron and water contents. Magn Reson Med 2001;45:71–79 doi:10.1002/1522-2594(200101)45:1<71::AID-MRM1011>3.0.CO;2-2 pmid:11146488

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
24. 24.↵
    1. Harkins KD,
    2. Xu J,
    3. Dula AN, et al

    . The microstructural correlates of T1 in white matter. Magn Reson Med 2016;75:1341–45 doi:10.1002/mrm.25709 pmid:25920491

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    1. Steenwijk MD,
    2. Vrenken H,
    3. Jonkman LE, et al

    . High-resolution T1-relaxation time mapping displays subtle, clinically relevant, gray matter damage in long-standing multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2016;22:1279–88 doi:10.1177/1352458515615953 pmid:26564997

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    1. Lommers E,
    2. Simon J,
    3. Reuter G, et al

    . Multiparameter MRI quantification of microstructural tissue alterations in multiple sclerosis. Neuroimage Clin 2019;23:101879 doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101879 pmid:31176293

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    1. Rasoanandrianina H,
    2. Massire A,
    3. Guye M, et al

    . Fast and robust sub-millimetric 3D MP2RAGE-based T1 mapping of the entire cervical cord at 3T. NMR Biomed 2019;32(11):e4142 doi:10.1002/nbm.4142 pmid:31393649

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    1. Maier IL,
    2. Hofer S,
    3. Joseph AA, et al

    . Quantification of spinal cord compression using T1 mapping in patients with cervical spinal canal stenosis: preliminary experience. Neuroimage Clin 2019;21:101639 doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2018.101639 pmid:30553763

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    1. Chiles BW,
    2. Leonard MA,
    3. Choudhri HF, et al

    . Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: patterns of neurological deficit and recovery after anterior cervical decompression. Neurosurgery 1999;44:762–69; discussion 769–70 doi:10.1097/00006123-199904000-00041 pmid:10201301

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
30. 30.↵
    1. Tetreault L,
    2. Kopjar B,
    3. Nouri A, et al

    . The modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association scale: establishing criteria for mild, moderate and severe impairment in patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy. Eur Spine J 2017;26:78–84 doi:10.1007/s00586-016-4660-8 pmid:27342612

    CrossRefPubMed
31. 31.↵
    1. Marques JP,
    2. Kober T,
    3. Krueger G, et al

    . MP2RAGE, a self bias-field corrected sequence for improved segmentation and T1-mapping at high field. Neuroimage 2010;49:1271–81 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.002 pmid:19819338

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
32. 32.↵
    1. Maggioni M,
    2. Katkovnik V,
    3. Egiazarian K, et al

    . Nonlocal transform-domain filter for volumetric data denoising and reconstruction. IEEE Trans Image Process 2013;22:119–33 doi:10.1109/TIP.2012.2210725 pmid:22868570

    CrossRefPubMed
33. 33.↵
    1. De Leener B,
    2. Kadoury S,
    3. Cohen-Adad J

    . Robust, accurate and fast automatic segmentation of the spinal cord. Neuroimage 2014;98:528–36 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.04.051 pmid:24780696

    CrossRefPubMed
34. 34.↵
    1. De Leener B,
    2. Lévy S,
    3. Dupont SM, et al

    . SCT: Spinal Cord Toolbox, an open-source software for processing spinal cord MRI data. Neuroimage 2017;145:24–43 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.10.009 pmid:27720818

    CrossRefPubMed
35. 35.↵
    1. De Leener B,
    2. Fonov VS,
    3. Collins DL, et al

    . PAM50: Unbiased multimodal template of the brainstem and spinal cord aligned with the ICBM152 space. NeuroImage 2018;165:170–79 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.10.041 pmid:29061527

    CrossRefPubMed
36. 36.↵
    1. Fonov VS,
    2. Le Troter A,
    3. Taso M, et al

    . Framework for integrated MRI average of the spinal cord white and gray matter: the MNI–Poly–AMU template. Neuroimage 2014;102:817–27 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.08.057 pmid:25204864

    CrossRefPubMed
37. 37.↵
    1. Muhle C,
    2. Metzner J,
    3. Weinert D, et al

    . Classification system based on kinematic MR imaging in cervical spondylitic myelopathy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1998;19:1763–71 pmid:9802503

    Abstract
38. 38.↵
    1. Dolan RT,
    2. Butler JS,
    3. O’Byrne JM, et al

    . Mechanical and cellular processes driving cervical myelopathy. World J Orthop 2016;7:20–29 doi:10.5312/wjo.v7.i1.20 pmid:26807352

    CrossRefPubMed
39. 39.↵
    1. Bican O,
    2. Minagar A,
    3. Pruitt AA

    . The spinal cord: a review of the functional neuroanatomy. Neurol Clin 2013;31:1–18 doi:10.1016/j.ncl.2012.09.009 pmid:23186894

    CrossRefPubMed
40. 40.↵
    1. Cadotte DW,
    2. Cadotte A,
    3. Cohen-Adad J, et al

    . Characterizing the location of spinal and vertebral levels in the human cervical spinal cord. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:803–10 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4192 pmid:25523587

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
41. 41.↵
    1. Smith SA,
    2. Edden RAE,
    3. Farrell JAD, et al

    . Measurement of T1 and T2 in the cervical spinal cord at 3 Tesla. Magn Reson Med 2008;60:213–19 doi:10.1002/mrm.21596 pmid:18581383

    CrossRefPubMed
42. 42.↵
    1. Cho TA

    . Spinal cord functional anatomy. Continuum (Minneap Minn) 2015;21:13–35 doi:10.1212/01.CON.0000461082.25876.4a pmid:25651215

    CrossRefPubMed
43. 43.↵
    1. Santillan A,
    2. Nacarino V,
    3. Greenberg E, et al

    . Vascular anatomy of the spinal cord. J Neurointerv Surg 2012;4:67–74 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2011-010018 pmid:21990489

    CrossRefPubMed
44. 44.↵
    1. Vrenken H,
    2. Geurts JJ,
    3. Knol DL, et al

    . Whole-brain T1 mapping in multiple sclerosis: global changes of normal-appearing gray and white matter. Radiology 2006;240:811–20 doi:10.1148/radiol.2403050569 pmid:16868279

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
45. 45.↵
    1. Spini M,
    2. Choi S,
    3. Harrison D

    . A comparison of FLAIR and T1 maps from MP2RAGE at 7T for quantifying lesion volume and its correlation to disability in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 2019;92:P5.2–026
46. 46.↵
    1. Guan X,
    2. Fan G,
    3. Wu X, et al

    . Diffusion tensor imaging studies of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a systemic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2015;10:e0117707 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0117707 pmid:25671624

    CrossRefPubMed
47. 47.↵
    1. Gros C,
    2. De Leener B,
    3. Badji A, et al

    . Automatic segmentation of the spinal cord and intramedullary multiple sclerosis lesions with convolutional neural networks. Neuroimage 2019;184:901–15 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.09.081 pmid:30300751

    CrossRefPubMed