Am I Ready to Be an Independent Neuroradiologist? Objective Trends in Neuroradiology Fellows' Performance during the Fellowship Year

References

1. 1.↵
   ACGME Program Requirements for Graduate Medical Education in Neuroradiology. July 1, 2020. https://www.acgme.org/Portals/0/PFAssets/ProgramRequirements/423_Neuroradiology_2020.pdf?ver=2020-06-29-164131-690. Accessed July 15, 2020
2. 2.↵
   2. Chen JY,
   3. Lexa FJ

   . Baseline survey of the neuroradiology work environment in the United States with reported trends in clinical work, nonclinical work, perceptions of trainees, and burnout metrics. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:1284–91 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5215 pmid:28522667

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   2. Shah NA,
   3. Hoch M,
   4. Willis A, et al

   . Correlation among on-call resident study volume, discrepancy rate, and turnaround time. Acad Radiol 2010;17:1190–94 doi:10.1016/j.acra.2010.06.003 pmid:20692621

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   2. Sistrom C,
   3. Deitte L

   . Factors affecting attending agreement with resident early readings of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of the head, neck, and spine. Acad Radiology 2008;15:934–41 doi:10.1016/j.acra.2008.02.013 pmid:18572131

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. Chen PH,
   3. Chen YJ,
   4. Cook TS

   . Capricorn: a Web-based automatic case log and volume analytics for diagnostic radiology residents. Acad Radiol 2015;22:1242–51 doi:10.1016/j.acra.2015.06.011 pmid:26259547

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   Core Team R. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical. Computing. https://www.R-project.org/. Accessed August 1, 2020
7. 7.↵
   2. Giles WL,
   3. Boland EF,
   4. Halpern G

   . Radiologist report turnaround time: impact of pay-for-performance measures. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;195:707–11 doi:10.2214/AJR.09.4164

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   2. Ruutiainen AT,
   3. Scanlon MH,
   4. Itri JN

   . Identifying benchmarks for discrepancy rates in preliminary interpretations provided by radiology trainees at an academic institution. J Am Coll Radiol 2011;8:644–48 doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2011.04.003 pmid:21889753

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. Rosenkrantz AB,
   3. Wang W,
   4. Hughes DR, et al

   . Generalist versus subspecialist characteristics of the U.S. radiologist workforce. Radiology 2018;286:929–37 doi:10.1148/radiol.2017171684 pmid:29173070

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Stern C,
    3. Boehm T,
    4. Burkhardt S, et al

    . Subspecialized radiological reporting expedites turnaround time of radiology reports and increases productivity. Rofo 2018;190:623–29 doi:10.1055/s-0044-100728 pmid:29448291

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    2. Al Yassin A,
    3. Sadaghiani MS,
    4. Mohan S, et al

    . It is about “time”: academic neuroradiologist time distribution for interpreting brain MRIs. Acad Radiol 2018;25:1521–25 doi:10.1016/j.acra.2018.04.014 pmid:29929936

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. England E,
    3. Collins J,
    4. White RD, et al

    . Radiology report turnaround time: effect on resident education. Acad Radiol 2015;22:662–67 doi:10.1016/j.acra.2014.12.023 pmid:25863792

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Huntley JH,
    3. Carone M,
    4. Yousem DM, et al

    . Opportunities for targeted education: critical neuroradiologic findings missed or misinterpreted by residents and fellows. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2015;205:1155–59 doi:10.2214/AJR.15.14905 pmid:26587919

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Patel SH,
    3. Stanton CL,
    4. Miller SG, et al

    . Risk factors for perceptual-versus-interpretative errors in diagnostic neuroradiology. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2019;40:1252–56 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A6125 pmid:31296527

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    2. Olthof AW,
    3. De Groot JC,
    4. Zorgdrager AN, et al

    . Perception of radiology reporting efficacy by neurologists in general and university hospitals. Clin Radiol 2018;73:675.e1–e7 doi:10.1016/j.crad.2018.03.001 pmid:29622361

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. Stankiewicz K,
    3. Cohen M,
    4. Carone M, et al

    . Comparing preliminary and final neuroradiology reports: what factors determine the differences? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:1977–82 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4897 pmid:27469208

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    2. Surrey D,
    3. Sharpe RE Jr.,
    4. Gorniak RJ, et al

    . QRSE: a novel metric for the evaluation of trainee radiologist reporting skills. J Digit Imaging 2013;26:678–82 doi:10.1007/s10278-013-9574-y pmid:23381098

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Verdoorn JT,
    3. Hunt CH,
    4. Luetmer MT, et al

    . Increasing neuroradiology exam volumes on-call do not result in increased major discrepancies in primary reads performed by residents. Open Neuroimag J 2014;8:11–15 doi:10.2174/1874440001408010011 pmid:25646138

    CrossRefPubMed