Plaque Composition as a Predictor of Plaque Ulceration in Carotid Artery Atherosclerosis: The Plaque At RISK Study

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Petty GW,
   2. Brown RD Jr.,
   3. Whisnant JP, et al

   . Ischemic stroke subtypes: a population-based study of incidence and risk factors. Stroke 1999;30:2513–16 doi:10.1161/01.str.30.12.2513 pmid:10582970

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   1. Imbesi SG,
   2. Kerber CW

   . Why do ulcerated atherosclerotic carotid artery plaques embolize? A flow dynamics study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1998;19:761–66 pmid:9576670

   Abstract
3. 3.↵
   Randomised trial of endarterectomy for recently symptomatic carotid stenosis: final results of the MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST). Lancet 1998;351:1379–87 pmid:9593407

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   1. Qureshi AI,
   2. Alexandrov AV,
   3. Tegeler CH, et al

   ; Society of Vascular and Interventional Neurology. Guidelines for screening of extracranial carotid artery disease: a statement for healthcare professionals from the multidisciplinary practice guidelines committee of the American Society of Neuroimaging; cosponsored by the Society of Vascular and Interventional Neurology. J Neuroimaging 2007;17:19–47 doi:10.1111/j.1552-6569.2006.00085.x pmid:17238868

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   1. Rothwell PM,
   2. Eliasziw M,
   3. Gutnikov SA, et al

   . Analysis of pooled data from the randomised controlled trials of endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis. Lancet 2003;361:107–16 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12228-3 pmid:12531577

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators, et al. Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med 1991;325:445–53 pmid:1852179

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   Carotid Surgery Trial: interim results for symptomatic patients with severe (70–99%) or with mild (0–29%) carotid stenosis—European Carotid Surgery Trialists’ Collaborative Group. Lancet 1991;337:1235–43 pmid:1674060

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   1. Zhao H,
   2. Zhao X,
   3. Liu X, et al

   . Association of carotid atherosclerotic plaque features with acute ischemic stroke: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Eur J Radiol 2013;82:e465-70 doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.04.014 pmid:23680156

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Takaya N,
   2. Yuan C,
   3. Chu B, et al

   . Association between carotid plaque characteristics and subsequent ischemic cerebrovascular events: a prospective assessment with MRI—initial results. Stroke 2006;37:818–23 doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000204638.91099.91 pmid:16469957

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    1. Altaf N,
    2. Daniels L,
    3. Morgan PS, et al

    . Detection of intraplaque hemorrhage by magnetic resonance imaging in symptomatic patients with mild to moderate carotid stenosis predicts recurrent neurological events. J Vasc Surg 2008;47:337–42 doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2007.09.064 pmid:18164171

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    1. Gupta A,
    2. Baradaran H,
    3. Schweitzer AD, et al

    . Carotid plaque MRI and stroke risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke 2013;44:3071–77 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.002551 pmid:23988640

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    1. Schindler A,
    2. Schinner R,
    3. Altaf N, et al

    . Prediction of stroke risk by detection of hemorrhage in carotid plaques: meta-analysis of individual patient data. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2020;13(2 Pt 1):395–406 doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.03.028 pmid:31202755

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    1. Brinjikji W,
    2. Rabinstein AA,
    3. Lanzino G, et al

    . Ultrasound characteristics of symptomatic carotid plaques: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cerebrovasc Dis 2015;40:165–74 doi:10.1159/000437339 pmid:26279159

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Eliasziw M,
    2. Streifler JY,
    3. Fox AJ, et al

    . Significance of plaque ulceration in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis: North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial. Stroke 1994;25:304–08 doi:10.1161/01.str.25.2.304 pmid:8303736

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    1. Cai JM,
    2. Hatsukami TS,
    3. Ferguson MS, et al

    . Classification of human carotid atherosclerotic lesions with in vivo multicontrast magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation 2002;106:1368–73 doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000028591.44554.f9 pmid:12221054

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    1. Rafailidis V,
    2. Chryssogonidis I,
    3. Tegos T, et al

    . Imaging of the ulcerated carotid atherosclerotic plaque: a review of the literature. Insights Imaging 2017;8:213–25 doi:10.1007/s13244-017-0543-8 pmid:28160261

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Anzidei M,
    2. Napoli A,
    3. Zaccagna F, et al

    . Diagnostic accuracy of colour Doppler ultrasonography, CT angiography and blood-pool-enhanced MR angiography in assessing carotid stenosis: a comparative study with DSA in 170 patients (in Italian). Radiol Med 2012;117:54–71 doi:10.1007/s11547-011-0651-3 pmid:21424318

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. van Dijk AC,
    2. Truijman MT,
    3. Hussain B, et al

    . Intraplaque hemorrhage and the plaque surface in carotid atherosclerosis: the Plaque At RISK Study (PARISK). AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:2127–33 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4414 pmid:26251429

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    1. Homburg PJ,
    2. Rozie S,
    3. van Gils MJ, et al

    . Association between carotid artery plaque ulceration and plaque composition evaluated with multidetector CT angiography. Stroke 2011;42:367–72 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.597369 pmid:21183745

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    1. Saba L,
    2. Sanfilippo R,
    3. Sannia S, et al

    . Association between carotid artery plaque volume, composition, and ulceration: a retrospective assessment with MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012;199:151–56 doi:10.2214/AJR.11.6955 pmid:22733906

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Lovett JK,
    2. Gallagher PJ,
    3. Hands LJ, et al

    . Histological correlates of carotid plaque surface morphology on lumen contrast imaging. Circulation 2004;110:2190–97 doi:10.1161/01.CIR.0000144307.82502.32 pmid:15466633

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
22. 22.↵
    1. Underhill HR,
    2. Yuan C,
    3. Yarnykh VL, et al

    . Predictors of surface disruption with MR imaging in asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:487–93 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1842 pmid:19833801

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
23. 23.↵
    1. Xu D,
    2. Hippe DS,
    3. Underhill HR, et al

    . Prediction of high-risk plaque development and plaque progression with the carotid atherosclerosis score. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2014;7:366–73 doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2013.09.022 pmid:24631510

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
24. 24.↵
    1. Truijman MT,
    2. Kooi ME,
    3. van Dijk AC, et al

    . Plaque At RISK (PARISK): prospective multicenter study to improve diagnosis of high-risk carotid plaques. Int J Stroke 2014;9:747–54 doi:10.1111/ijs.12167 pmid:24138596

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial: methods, patient characteristics, and progress. Stroke 1991;22:711–20 doi:10.1161/01.str.22.6.711 pmid:2057968

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
26. 26.↵
    1. de Weert TT,
    2. Cakir H,
    3. Rozie S, et al

    . Intracranial internal carotid artery calcifications: association with vascular risk factors and ischemic cerebrovascular disease. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:177–84 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1301 pmid:18842764

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
27. 27.↵
    1. Kwee RM,
    2. Teule GJ,
    3. van Oostenbrugge RJ, et al

    . Multimodality imaging of carotid artery plaques: 18F-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging. Stroke 2009;40:3718–24 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.564088 pmid:19875738

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
28. 28.↵
    1. Cappendijk VC,
    2. Heeneman S,
    3. Kessels AG, et al

    . Comparison of single-sequence T1WI TFE MRI with multisequence MRI for the quantification of lipid-rich necrotic core in atherosclerotic plaque. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008;27:1347–55 doi:10.1002/jmri.21360 pmid:18504754

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    1. Kwee RM,
    2. van Engelshoven JM,
    3. Mess WH, et al

    . Reproducibility of fibrous cap status assessment of carotid artery plaques by contrast-enhanced MRI. Stroke 2009;40:3017–21 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.555052 pmid:19556528

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
30. 30.↵
    1. Takaya N,
    2. Cai J,
    3. Ferguson MS, et al

    . Intra- and interreader reproducibility of magnetic resonance imaging for quantifying the lipid-rich necrotic core is improved with gadolinium contrast enhancement. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006;24:203–10 doi:10.1002/jmri.20599 pmid:16739123

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
31. 31.↵
    1. Cappendijk VC,
    2. Cleutjens KB,
    3. Heeneman S, et al

    . In vivo detection of hemorrhage in human atherosclerotic plaques with magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004;20:105–10 doi:10.1002/jmri.20060 pmid:15221815

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
32. 32.↵
    1. Bitar R,
    2. Moody AR,
    3. Leung G, et al

    . In vivo 3D high-spatial-resolution MR imaging of intraplaque hemorrhage. Radiology 2008;249:259–67 doi:10.1148/radiol.2491071517 pmid:18796681

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
33. 33.↵
    1. Wu Z,
    2. Yang C,
    3. Tang D

    . In vivo serial MRI-based models and statistical methods to quantify sensitivity and specificity of mechanical predictors for carotid plaque rupture: location and beyond. J Biomech Eng 2011;133:064503 doi:10.1115/1.4004189 pmid:21744932

    CrossRefPubMed