Diagnostic Accuracy of High-Resolution Black-Blood MRI in the Evaluation of Intracranial Large-Vessel Arterial Occlusions

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   2. Goyal M,
   3. Menon BK,
   4. van Zwam WH, et al

   ; HERMES collaborators. Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials. Lancet 2016;387:1723–31 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00163-X pmid:26898852

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   2. Ciesienski KL,
   3. Caravan P

   . Molecular MRI of thrombosis. Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Rep 2010;4:77–84 pmid:21253438

   PubMed
3. 3.↵
   2. Korogi Y,
   3. Takahashi M,
   4. Mabuchi N, et al

   . Intracranial vascular stenosis and occlusion: diagnostic accuracy of three-dimensional, Fourier transform, time-of-flight MR angiography. Radiology 1994;193:187–93 doi:10.1148/radiology.193.1.8090890 pmid:8090890

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   2. Ishimaru H,
   3. Ochi M,
   4. Morikawa M, et al

   . Accuracy of pre- and postcontrast 3D time-of-flight MR angiography in patients with acute ischemic stroke: correlation with catheter angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:923–26 pmid:17494671

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   2. Axel L

   . Blood flow effects in magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Annu 1986;237–44
6. 6.↵
   2. Stock KW,
   3. Wetzel S,
   4. Kirsch E, et al

   . Anatomic evaluation of the circle of Willis: MR angiography versus intraarterial digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1996;17:1495–99 pmid:8883648

   Abstract
7. 7.↵
   2. Ginat DT,
   3. Meyers SP

   . Intracranial lesions with high signal intensity on T1-weighted MR images: differential diagnosis. Radiographics 2012;32:499–516 doi:10.1148/rg.322105761 pmid:22411945

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   2. Mandell DM,
   3. Mossa-Basha M,
   4. Qiao Y, et al

   ; Vessel Wall Imaging Study Group of the American Society of Neuroradiology. Intracranial vessel wall MRI: principles and expert consensus recommendations of the American Society of Neuroradiology. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:218–29 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4893 pmid:27469212

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   2. Allen LM,
   3. Hasso AN,
   4. Handwerker J, et al

   . Sequence-specific MR imaging findings that are useful in dating ischemic stroke. Radiographics 2012;32: 1285–97 doi:10.1148/rg.325115760 pmid:22977018

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Lee NJ,
    3. Chung MS,
    4. Jung SC, et al

    . Comparison of high-resolution MR imaging and digital subtraction angiography for the characterization and diagnosis of intracranial artery disease. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:2245–50 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4950 pmid:27659192

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    2. Kim JM,
    3. Jung KH,
    4. Sohn CH, et al

    . High-resolution MR technique can distinguish moyamoya disease from atherosclerotic occlusion. Neurology 2013;80:775–76 doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182825162 pmid:23420895

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Hui FK,
    3. Zhu X,
    4. Jones SE, et al

    . Early experience in high-resolution MRI for large vessel occlusions. J Neurointerv Surg 2015;7:509–16 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011142 pmid:24827065

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    2. Baik SH,
    3. Kwak HS,
    4. Hwang SB, et al

    . Three-dimensional black blood contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in patients with acute ischemic stroke and negative susceptibility vessel sign. Eur J Radiol 2018;102:188–94 doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.03.023 pmid:29685534

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Bai X,
    3. Lv P,
    4. Liu K, et al

    . 3D black-blood luminal angiography derived from high-resolution MR vessel wall imaging in detecting MCA stenosis: a preliminary study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2018;39:1827–32 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5770 pmid:30139751

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    2. Liu Q,
    3. Huang J,
    4. Degnan AJ, et al

    . Comparison of high-resolution MRI with CT angiography and digital subtraction angiography for the evaluation of middle cerebral artery atherosclerotic steno-occlusive disease. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2013;29:1491–98 doi:10.1007/s10554-013-0237-3 pmid:23686460

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. Kim SM,
    3. Ryu CW,
    4. Jahng GH, et al

    . Two different morphologies of chronic unilateral middle cerebral artery occlusion: evaluation using high-resolution MRI. J Neuroimaging 2014;24:460–66 doi:10.1111/jon.12009 pmid:23323598

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Vakil P,
    3. Vranic J,
    4. Hurley MC, et al

    . T1 gadolinium enhancement of intracranial atherosclerotic plaques associated with symptomatic ischemic presentations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:2252–58 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3606 pmid:23828109

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    2. Moody AR

    . Magnetic resonance direct thrombus imaging. J Thromb Haemost 2003;1:1403–09 doi:10.1046/j.1538-7836.2003.00333.x pmid:12871274

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. 19.↵
    2. Degnan AJ,
    3. Gallagher G,
    4. Teng Z, et al

    . MR angiography and imaging for the evaluation of middle cerebral artery atherosclerotic disease. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;331427–35 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2697 pmid:21940802

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    2. Nguyen-Huynh MN,
    3. Wintermark M,
    4. English J, et al

    ., How accurate is CT angiography in evaluating intracranial atherosclerotic disease? Stroke 2008;39:1184–88 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.502906 pmid:18292376

    Abstract/FREE Full Text