Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleInterventional

Percutaneous CT-Guided Skull Biopsy: Feasibility, Safety, and Diagnostic Yield

A. Tomasian, T.J. Hillen and J.W. Jennings
American Journal of Neuroradiology February 2019, 40 (2) 309-312; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5949
A. Tomasian
aFrom the Department of Radiology (A.T.), University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for A. Tomasian
T.J. Hillen
bMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology (T.J.H., J.W.J.), St. Louis, Missouri.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for T.J. Hillen
J.W. Jennings
bMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology (T.J.H., J.W.J.), St. Louis, Missouri.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for J.W. Jennings
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Although percutaneous musculoskeletal biopsies are routinely performed in the axial and appendicular skeleton, there are no published data on the systematic evaluation of the feasibility, safety, and diagnostic accuracy of percutaneous skull biopsy. In certain clinical encounters such as patients with primary skull tumors or patients with known cancer and isolated skull lesions suspected of calvarial metastasis or synchronous primary tumor, percutaneous skull biopsy may be considered a viable option. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, safety profile, and diagnostic yield of percutaneous CT-guided skull biopsy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Percutaneous CT-guided skull biopsy was performed in 14 patients. Patient demographics, cancer history, indication for initial imaging, imaging technique of diagnosis, skull tumor anatomic location, and final histologic diagnosis were documented. Preprocedural imaging of each skull lesion was reviewed to determine tumor size and characteristics. Procedural notes were reviewed to determine the total conscious sedation time or anesthesia time, type of biopsy needle, and the number and length of obtained core specimens. Procedure-related complications were also documented according to the Society of Interventional Radiology classification.

RESULTS: All CT-guided percutaneous skull biopsy procedures were performed as preoperatively planned and were technically successful. Procedures were performed with the patient under conscious sedation in 93% (13/14) of cases. Definitive histologic diagnosis was achieved in 86% (12/14) of cases. There were no acute or delayed procedure-related complications.

CONCLUSIONS: The results of this retrospective initial study suggest that percutaneous CT-guided skull biopsy is feasible with an excellent safety profile, affords a high diagnostic yield for histologic characterization, and may obviate more invasive open skull biopsies.

Skull lesions are uncommonly encountered in clinical practice and are often asymptomatic and discovered incidentally on routine imaging studies acquired for unrelated reasons. Calvarial tumors may also be identified during the work-up of localized symptoms such as pain and palpable masses or defects, as well as on staging studies of other diseases. Primary skull neoplasms comprise approximately 0.8% of all bone tumors, and although benign lesions are reported to be more common than malignant tumors, the exact prevalence of each has not been established.1 Most calvarial lesions have no characteristic imaging features, and correlation of clinical data, particularly a history of cancer, with imaging findings may help direct the diagnostic and therapeutic approach. Most clinical oncology protocols and treatment guidelines require that histologic specimens be obtained for proof of diagnosis, as well as genetic and/or molecular testing. Imaging-guided percutaneous biopsy of bone lesions has gained wide acceptance as the preferred approach in lieu of open biopsies due to its cost-effectiveness, better safety profile, and high diagnostic accuracy.2⇓⇓⇓–6

Although percutaneous biopsies are routinely performed in the axial and appendicular skeleton, there are no published data on the systematic evaluation of the feasibility, safety, and diagnostic accuracy of percutaneous skull biopsy, in part, because there are commonly safer skeletal sites that may be targeted for tissue sampling, particularly in patients with cancer. However, in certain clinical encounters such as patients with primary skull tumors or patients with known cancer and isolated skull lesions suspected of calvarial metastasis or synchronous primary tumor, percutaneous skull biopsy may be considered a viable option.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, safety profile, and diagnostic yield of percutaneous CT-guided skull biopsy.

Materials and Methods

Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology (IRB) approval was obtained to retrospectively review the institutional data base for all patients who underwent percutaneous CT-guided skull biopsy between 2014 and 2018. Informed consent was waived for retrospective participation in the study. Recorded data included patient demographics, cancer history, indication for initial imaging, imaging technique for diagnosis, skull tumor anatomic location, and final histologic diagnosis. Preprocedural imaging of each skull lesion was reviewed to determine tumor size and characteristics (osteolytic, osteoblastic, or mixed). Procedural notes were reviewed to determine the total conscious sedation or anesthesia time, type of biopsy needle, and the number and length of obtained core specimens.

Biopsy Planning and Procedure

To ensure safety and minimize the risk of potential complications, the operator must have detailed knowledge of the skull anatomy, and during periprocedural planning and biopsy, attention should be paid to the critical structures, particularly the skull base neurovascular foramina and canals as well as important components of the temporal bone that may be technically more challenging to access and pose higher risks of complications. The authors recommend preprocedural discussions with neurologic surgery or ear, nose, and throat surgery services in all cases to minimize such potential risks.

Preprocedural imaging was reviewed to determine the optimal biopsy approach in all cases. Written informed consent was obtained before all procedures. All procedures were performed using CT guidance with patients either under conscious sedation using midazolam and fentanyl or general anesthesia and were supervised by 2 attending musculoskeletal radiologists, one with >10 years of experience and the other with >8 years of experience in performing musculoskeletal biopsies. A combination of anatomic landmarks and skin BB markers was used to localize the needle entry site. The implemented measures to reduce the patient radiation dose included decreasing the tube current and gantry rotation time (milliampere-second), decreasing the x-ray beam energy (kilovolt [peak]), increasing the pitch (at a set tube current), central patient positioning at the CT isocenter, and limiting the scan length to the volume of interest. Following the initial guidance scan, which was performed with standard-dose CT parameters for optimal assessment of the ROI, a reduced CT dose protocol was used for the subsequent scans, which included 100 mAs, 100 kV(p), and pitch of 1.0–1.2, with a 2-mm section thickness. Both bone and soft-tissue CT windows were used for needle guidance. Superficial and deep soft-tissue and periosteal anesthesia were achieved with 50:50 dilution of 1% lidocaine and 0.25% bupivacaine.

The procedures were performed using 1 of 2 coaxial biopsy needle systems, each with a 6-cm introducer cannula and a 10-cm biopsy needle: 1) a coaxial battery-powered hand drill with a 10 (11)-ga introducer cannula and 12 (13)-ga inner diamond-tipped needle (Arrow OnControl; Vidacare, Shavano Park, Texas). The inner needle is then exchanged for a 12(13)-ga hollow biopsy needle. This needle system was used in 86% (12/14) of cases; or 2) a coaxial soft-tissue core biopsy system with a13-ga introducer cannula and 14-ga spring-loaded biopsy needle (Bard Marquee, C.R. Bard, Tempe, Arizona; or Achieve, Merit Medical, South Jordan, Utah) was used. The soft-tissue core biopsy system was used if the lesion was entirely osteolytic with extensive cortical destruction or a soft-tissue component. In addition, in cases in which lesion access was achieved with the bone core biopsy system and no specimen could be obtained due to the destructive nature of the mass, a hollow soft-tissue core biopsy needle was placed coaxially through the existing bone core introducer cannula to obtain tissue (Fig 1 and 2).

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

A 58-year-old woman with a history of index finger chondrosarcoma and a right frontal bone mass. Axial CT (A) and FDG-PET/CT (B) images show an aggressive permeative and hypermetabolic bone marrow–replacing lesion in the right frontal bone with an aggressive periosteal reaction (A and B, arrow). Axial CT image during percutaneous biopsy (C) shows positioning of a coaxial bone-biopsy needle within the lesion. The total conscious sedation time was 29 minutes, and histologic evaluation confirmed intraosseous meningioma.

Fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2.

A 65-year-old man with poorly differentiated salivary gland sarcomatoid carcinoma with a left temporal bone lesion. Axial T1-weighted MR imaging (A), CT (B), and technetium 99m methylene diphosphonate SPECT-CT (C) images show an osteolytic bone marrow–replacing lesion with increased radiopharmaceutical uptake in the petrous portion of the left temporal bone (A–C, arrow). Note the surrounding vital tissues. Coronal CT image (D) during percutaneous biopsy shows coaxial positioning of a soft-tissue biopsy needle, through an OnControl bone introducer cannula, within the lesion through the mastoid air cells. The total conscious sedation time was 40 minutes, and histologic evaluation confirmed metastasis from a known primary salivary gland tumor.

Contraindications to imaging-guided skull biopsies included percutaneously inaccessible lesions, coagulopathy (platelet count of <50,000 per microliter and an international normalized ratio of >1.5), and allergy to conscious sedation or general anesthesia medications.

Outcome Assessment

Procedural complications were documented according to Society of Interventional Radiology classification.7 Patients were clinically monitored for a minimum of 2 hours after each procedure for evidence of acute complications, such as hematoma formation or neurologic injury. A follow-up phone call was performed 24 hours following the biopsy by a nurse coordinator, and electronic medical records were also reviewed for evidence of delayed complications within 30 days of the biopsy. Procedures were considered technically successful if the biopsy needle was visualized within the target lesion and core specimens were obtained. Surgical pathology reports were reviewed to assess the diagnostic yield. Negative biopsy results were not pursued further when follow-up imaging confirmed lesion stability or a negative result was considered concordant with a low pretest probability of an aggressive etiology. Surgical pathology reports were also reviewed for the presence of crush artifacts. If crush artifacts were present, the specimen was considered histologically adequate if it could still be used to confirm or exclude the diagnosis in question.

Results

All biopsy procedures were performed as preoperatively planned and were technically successful. According to the Society of Interventional Radiology classification, there were no acute or delayed procedure-related complications. Percutaneous CT-guided skull biopsy was performed on 14 patients (men, n = 5, and women, n = 9) with an age range of 35–84 years. Fifty-seven percent (8/14 patients) of patients had a history of cancer. Indications for imaging included oncologic staging (57%, 8/14 patients), palpable mass (7%, 1/14 patients), cranial nerve dysfunction (7%, 1/14 patients), and imaging for unrelated reasons (incidental diagnosis) (29%, 4/14 patients). Preprocedural imaging included PET/CT (n = 4), MR imaging (n = 7), CT (n = 9), and bone scintigraphy (n = 3), including SPECT (n = 1). Procedures were performed with the patient under conscious sedation in 93% (13/14) of cases and under general anesthesia in 7% (1/14) of cases. The median conscious sedation duration was 40 minutes (range, 27–75 minutes). The median midazolam and fentanyl doses administered were 2.5 mg (range, 1–4 mg) and 150 μg (range, 75–300 μg), respectively. The total anesthesia time was 30 minutes for procedures performed with the patient under general anesthesia. Definitive histologic diagnosis was achieved in 86% (12/14) of cases.

There was no biopsy specimen with crush artifacts. In 1 patient with a palpable left frontal bone mass that was characterized on MR imaging, histologic analysis showed blood products with benign bone and soft tissue that were considered concordant with imaging findings suggestive of hemangioma. In 1 patient with a left frontal bone osteolytic lesion incidentally identified on head CT and subsequently characterized on bone scintigraphy demonstrating increased radiopharmaceutical uptake, histologic analysis showed no evidence of malignancy with benign bone and soft tissue. The lesion remained unchanged on 2-year follow-up imaging; this finding was considered concordant with the biopsy results. The details of the patient cohort including skull lesion anatomic location, tumor size, tumor characteristics, type of biopsy needle, number and length of obtained core specimens, and final histologic diagnosis are shown in the Table.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup

Details of skull lesions, biopsy parameters, and final diagnosisa

Discussion

The results of the present study demonstrate that percutaneous CT-guided skull biopsy is feasible and safe with a high diagnostic yield. Although percutaneous imaging-guided biopsy of musculoskeletal lesions, including appendicular and spinal bone tumors, has been well-established and accepted as a safe and cost-effective approach with high diagnostic accuracy for histologic characterization,2⇓⇓⇓–6 to our knowledge, there is essentially no published literature to date on the systematic evaluation of the safety profile and diagnostic yield of percutaneous imaging-guided skull biopsy. This is, in part, because there are often other skeletal lesions that are safer and less technically challenging to target for biopsy, particularly in oncologic patients. However, with progressively increasing use of routine cross-sectional imaging and oncologic staging imaging in clinical practice, isolated skull lesions in patients with or without a history of cancer may be identified more frequently, and percutaneous tissue sampling of a calvarial lesion may be the only minimally invasive viable option to both establish a new diagnosis such as new or synchronous primary tumor or confirm metastasis. Percutaneous imaging-guided skull biopsy poses a unique challenge due to the proximity of brain tissue, critical facial structures, and vital neurovascular structures in the skull base, which may discourage both clinicians and radiologists from requesting and performing such procedures, respectively.

In this initial experience, all procedures were technically successful with excellent safety profiles, characterized by lack of procedure-related complications according to the Society of Interventional Radiology classification.7 The median conscious sedation duration was 40 minutes (range, 27–75 minutes), which is within the reasonable range for imaging-guided percutaneous bone biopsies.5,6 Diagnostic yield refers to the likelihood that a test or procedure will provide the information needed to establish a diagnosis and is defined as diagnostic results divided by the sum of diagnostic results and nondiagnostic results. Therefore, diagnostic yield is the most direct and accurate representation of the biopsy success rate. In our study, definitive histologic diagnosis was achieved in 86% (12/14) of patients, which directly influenced patients' management by confirming metastasis, new primary tumor, synchronous primary tumor (patient 3), or benign histology (Table). In 2 patients with no definitive histologic diagnosis, biopsy results were considered concordant with imaging features indicating a benign etiology.

The authors used a coaxial bone-biopsy needle system with a battery-powered hand drill in 86% (12/14) of patients (with or without a soft-tissue biopsy needle), which facilitates needle purchase and advancement within the bone by providing the operator greater control over the needle trajectory via recruitment of wrist and hand muscles with more fine-movement capabilities compared with standard manual techniques in which direct pushing and rotation of the biopsy needle knob or handle are implemented and proximal arm and shoulder musculature are used. This system is particularly important in skull biopsies because it results in more accurate targeting of lesions and avoidance of injury to surrounding critical structures. In 2 patients, due to the extensive destructive nature of the target lesions, soft-tissue needles were used to perform the biopsy. In addition, if a skull lesion is accessed with a coaxial bone-biopsy system and the initial biopsy attempt results in no specimen, which is not unusual in destructive osteolytic lesions, the authors recommend coaxial placement of a soft-tissue biopsy needle through the existing bone biopsy introducer cannula for improved sample yield. In 2015, Wallace et al8 reported 2 cases of successful percutaneous CT-guided skull biopsy confirming histologic diagnoses with no complications, and the authors suggested the feasibility and safety of the procedure.

The major limitations of the present study include the retrospective methodology and the small number in the patient cohort.

Conclusions

The results of this retrospective initial study suggest that percutaneous CT-guided skull biopsy is feasible with an excellent safety profile and affords a high diagnostic yield for histologic characterization and may obviate more invasive open-skull biopsies.

Footnotes

  • Disclosures: Travis J. Hillen—UNRELATED: Consultancy: Medtronic. Jack W. Jennings—RELATED: Consulting Fee or Honorarium: Bard, Comments: The consulting was for a device that has not yet gone to market; UNRELATED: Consultancy: Merit, BTG, Medtronic; Payment for Lectures Including Service on Speakers Bureaus: Merit, payment made to individual.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Shah MV,
    2. Haines SJ
    . Pediatric skull, skull base, and meningeal tumors. Neurosurg Clin N Am 1992;3:893–924 doi:10.1016/S1042-3680(18)30634-X pmid:1392583
    CrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Skrzynski MC,
    2. Biermann JS,
    3. Montag A, et al
    . Diagnostic accuracy and charge-savings of outpatient core needle biopsy compared with open biopsy of musculoskeletal tumors. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1996;78:644–49 doi:10.2106/00004623-199605000-00002 pmid:8642019
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Fraser-Hill MA,
    2. Renfrew DL
    . Percutaneous needle biopsy of musculoskeletal lesions, 1: effective accuracy and diagnostic utility. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1992;158:809–12 doi:10.2214/ajr.158.4.1546597 pmid:1546597
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Fraser-Hill MA,
    2. Renfrew DL,
    3. Hilsenrath PE
    . Percutaneous needle biopsy of musculoskeletal lesions, 2: cost-effectiveness. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1992;158:813–18 doi:10.2214/ajr.158.4.1546598 pmid:1546598
    CrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Traina F,
    2. Errani C,
    3. Toscano AJ, et al
    . Current concepts in the biopsy of musculoskeletal tumors: AAOS exhibit selection. Bone Joint Surg Am 2015;97:e7 doi:10.2106/JBJS.N.00661 pmid:25609446
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Wallace AN,
    2. McWilliams SR,
    3. Wallace A, et al
    . Drill-assisted biopsy of the axial and appendicular skeleton: safety, technical success, and diagnostic efficacy. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2016;27:1618–22 doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2016.05.036 pmid:27670996
    CrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Ahmed M,
    2. Solbiati L,
    3. Brace CL, et al
    ; International Working Group on Image-Guided Tumor Ablation, Interventional Oncology Sans Frontières Expert Panel, Technology Assessment Committee of the Society of Interventional Radiology, Standard of Practice Committee of the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe. Image-guided tumor ablation: standardization of terminology and reporting criteria: a 10-year update. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2014;25:1691–705 doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2014.08.027 pmid:25442132
    CrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Wallace AN,
    2. Tomasian A,
    3. Hsi AC, et al
    . CT-guided percutaneous skull biopsy using a drill-assisted system: technical report of two cases. Interv Neuroradiol 2015;21:774–79 doi:10.1177/1591019915609172 pmid:26508092
    CrossRefPubMed
  • Received September 30, 2018.
  • Accepted after revision December 8, 2018.
  • © 2019 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 40 (2)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 40, Issue 2
1 Feb 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Percutaneous CT-Guided Skull Biopsy: Feasibility, Safety, and Diagnostic Yield
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
A. Tomasian, T.J. Hillen, J.W. Jennings
Percutaneous CT-Guided Skull Biopsy: Feasibility, Safety, and Diagnostic Yield
American Journal of Neuroradiology Feb 2019, 40 (2) 309-312; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A5949

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Percutaneous CT-Guided Skull Biopsy: Feasibility, Safety, and Diagnostic Yield
A. Tomasian, T.J. Hillen, J.W. Jennings
American Journal of Neuroradiology Feb 2019, 40 (2) 309-312; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A5949
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref (15)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • Bone Biopsies: What Radiologists Need to Know
    Anderanik Tomasian, Travis J. Hillen, Jack W. Jennings
    American Journal of Roentgenology 2020 215 3
  • MRI-Based Radiomics Differentiates Skull Base Chordoma and Chondrosarcoma: A Preliminary Study
    Erika Yamazawa, Satoshi Takahashi, Masahiro Shin, Shota Tanaka, Wataru Takahashi, Takahiro Nakamoto, Yuichi Suzuki, Hirokazu Takami, Nobuhito Saito
    Cancers 2022 14 13
  • Percutaneous CT-Guided Bone Biopsies: Indications, Feasibility and Diagnostic Yield in the Different Skeletal Sites—From the Skull to the Toe
    Paolo Spinnato, Marco Colangeli, Raffaella Rinaldi, Federico Ponti
    Diagnostics 2023 13 14
  • Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Bone Biopsy: Feasibility, Diagnostic Yield and Technical Notes
    Federico Ponti, Alessio Arioli, Chiara Longo, Marco Miceli, Marco Colangeli, Nicolas Papalexis, Paolo Spinnato
    Diagnostics 2023 13 10
  • Image-Guided Percutaneous Calvarial Biopsy with Low-Dose CT-Fluoroscopy: Technique, Safety, and Utility in 12 Patients
    Sri Hari Sundararajan, Mougnyan Cox, Neda Sedora-Roman, Srirajkumar Ranganathan, Robert Hurst, Bryan Pukenas
    CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology 2022 45 1
  • Percutaneous CT-Guided Biopsy of the Craniovertebral Junction: Safety, Diagnostic Yield, and Technical Notes
    Paolo Spinnato, Eugenio Rimondi, Giancarlo Facchini
    Diagnostics 2022 12 1
  • Percutaneous image-guided sternal biopsy: a cross-institutional retrospective review of diagnostic yield and safety in 50 cases
    Ningcheng Li, Molly A. Wingfield, Megan K. Mills, Brooke R. Beckett, Barry G. Hansford
    Skeletal Radiology 2021 50 3
  • Bone and Soft Tissue Tumors
    Rupert O. Stanborough, Jeremiah R. Long, Hillary W. Garner
    Radiologic Clinics of North America 2022 60 2
  • CT-Guided Radiofrequency Thermal Ablation for the Treatment of Atypical, Early-Onset Osteoid Osteoma in Children Younger than 4 Years Old: Single-Institution Experience and Literature Review
    Nicolas Papalexis, Giuliano Peta, Federico Ponti, Gianmarco Tuzzato, Marco Colangeli, Giancarlo Facchini, Paolo Spinnato
    Diagnostics 2022 12 11
  • Safety and histopathologic yield of percutaneous CT-guided biopsies of the skull base, orbit, and calvarium
    Theodore Betting, John C. Benson, Ajay Madhavan, Darya Shlapak, Padraig Morris, Jonathan Morris, Felix Diehn, Jared Verdoorn, Greta Liebo, Carrie Carr
    Neuroradiology 2024 66 3

More in this TOC Section

  • CT-Guided C2 Dorsal Root Ganglion Radiofrequency Ablation for the Treatment of Cervicogenic Headache: Case Series and Clinical Outcomes
  • Safety, Efficacy, and Durability of Stent-Assisted Coiling Treatment of M2 (Insular) Segment MCA Aneurysms
  • Endovascular Management of Intracranial Dural AVFs: Transvenous Approach
Show more INTERVENTIONAL

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire