Topological Alterations of the Structural Brain Connectivity Network in Children with Juvenile Neuronal Ceroid Lipofuscinosis

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Tournier JD,
   2. Mori S,
   3. Leemans A.

   Diffusion tensor imaging and beyond. Magn Reson Med 2011;65:1532–56 doi:10.1002/mrm.22924 pmid:21469191

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   1. Smith SM,
   2. Jenkinson M,
   3. Johansen-Berg H.

   Tract-based spatial statistics: voxelwise analysis of multi-subject diffusion data. Neuroimage 2006;31:1487–505 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.02.024 pmid:16624579

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   1. Jones DK,
   2. Knösche TR,
   3. Turner R.

   White matter integrity, fiber count, and other fallacies: The do’s and don’ts of diffusion MRI. Neuroimage 2013;73:239–54 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.06.081 pmid:22846632

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   1. Bach M,
   2. Laun FB,
   3. Leemans A, et al

   . Methodological considerations on tract-based spatial statistics (TBSS). Neuroimage 2014;100:358–69 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.06.021 pmid:24945661

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Hagmann P,
   2. Cammoun L,
   3. Gigandet X, et al

   . Mapping the structural core of human cerebral cortex. PLoS Biol 2008;6:e159 doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0060159

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Bullmore ET,
   2. Sporns O.

   Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems. Nat Rev Neurosci 2009;10:186–98 doi:10.1038/nrn2575 pmid:19190637

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   1. Jeurissen B,
   2. Leemans A,
   3. Jones DK, et al

   . Probabilistic fiber tracking using the residual bootstrap with constrained spherical deconvolution. Hum Brain Mapp 2011;32:461–79 doi:10.1002/hbm.21032 pmid:21319270

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   1. Fischl B,
   2. van der Kouwe A,
   3. Destrieux C, et al

   . Automatically parcellating the human cerebral cortex. Cereb Cortex 2004;14:11–22 doi:10.1093/cercor/bhg087 pmid:14654453

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   1. Rubinov M,
   2. Sporns O.

   Complex network measures of brain connectivity: uses and interpretations. Neuroimage 2010;52:1059–69 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.003 pmid:19819337

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    1. Roine T,
    2. Jeurissen B,
    3. Perrone D, et al

    . Reproducibility and intercorrelation of graph theoretical measures in structural brain connectivity networks. Med Image Anal 2019;52:56–67 doi:10.1016/j.media.2018.10.009 pmid:30471463

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. van den Heuvel MP,
    2. Mandl RCW,
    3. Stam CJ, et al

    . Aberrant frontal and temporal complex network structure in schizophrenia: A graph theoretical analysis. J Neurosci 2010;30:15915–26 doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2874-10.2010 pmid:21106830

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    1. Roine U,
    2. Roine T,
    3. Salmi J, et al

    . Abnormal wiring of the connectome in adults with high-functioning autism spectrum disorder. Mol Autism 2015;6:65. doi:10.1186/s13229-015-0058-4 pmid:26677408

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Lo CY,
    2. Wang PN,
    3. Chou KH, et al

    . Diffusion tensor tractography reveals abnormal topological organization in structural cortical networks in Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurosci 2010;30:16876–85 doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4136-10.2010 pmid:21159959

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    1. Boustany RM.

    Lysosomal storage diseases—the horizon expands. Nat Rev Neurol 2013;9:583 doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2013.163 pmid:23938739

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Santavuori P,
    2. Lauronen L,
    3. Kirveskari K, et al

    . Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinoses in childhood. Suppl Clin Neurophysiol 2000;53:443–51 doi:10.1016/S1567-424X(09)70193-X pmid:12741032

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Collins J,
    2. Holder GE,
    3. Herbert H, et al

    . Batten disease: features to facilitate early diagnosis. Br J Ophthalmol 2006;90:1119–24 doi:10.1136/bjo.2006.091637 pmid:16754648

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    1. Spalton DJ,
    2. Taylor DS,
    3. Sanders MD.

    Batten’s disease: an ophthalmological assessment of 26 patients. Br J Ophthalmol 1980;64:726–32 doi:10.1136/bjo.64.10.726 pmid:7426545

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    1. Jalanko A,
    2. Braulke T.

    Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinoses. Biochim Biophys Acta 2009;1793:697–709 doi:10.1016/j.bbamcr.2008.11.004 pmid:19084560

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. 19.↵
    1. Autti T,
    2. Raininko R,
    3. Vanhanen SL.

    MRI of neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis: I. Cranial MRI of 30 patients with juvenile neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis. Neuroradiology 1996;38:476–82 doi:10.1007/bf00607283 pmid:8837098

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    1. Tokola AM,
    2. Salli EK,
    3. Åberg LE, et al

    . Hippocampal volumes in juvenile neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis: a longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging study. Pediatr Neurol 2014;50:158–63 doi:10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2013.10.013 pmid:24411222

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Autti T,
    2. Joensuu R,
    3. Åberg L.

    Decreased T2 signal in the thalami may be a sign of lysosomal storage disease. Neuroradiology 2007;49:571–78 doi:10.1007/s00234-007-0220-6 pmid:17334752

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. 22.↵
    1. Autti T,
    2. Raininko R,
    3. Santavuori P, et al

    . MRI of neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis. II. Postmortem MRI and histopathological study of the brain in 16 cases of neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis of juvenile or late infantile type. Neuroradiology 1997;39:371–77 doi:10.1007/s002340050427 pmid:9189886

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. 23.↵
    1. Roine U,
    2. Roine TJ,
    3. Hakkarainen A, et al

    . Global and widespread local white matter abnormalities in juvenile neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2018;39:1349–54 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5687 pmid:29853519

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
24. 24.↵
    1. Tournier J-D,
    2. Calamante F,
    3. Connelly A.

    Robust determination of the fibre orientation distribution in diffusion MRI: non-negativity constrained super-resolved spherical deconvolution. Neuroimage 2007;35:1459–72 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.02.016 pmid:17379540

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
25. 25.↵
    1. Basser PJ,
    2. Mattiello J,
    3. LeBihan D.

    MR diffusion tensor spectroscopy and imaging. Biophys J 1994;66:259–67 doi:10.1016/S0006-3495(94)80775-1 pmid:8130344

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
26. 26.↵
    1. Jeurissen B,
    2. Leemans A,
    3. Tournier JD, et al

    . Investigating the prevalence of complex fiber configurations in white matter tissue with diffusion magnetic resonance imaging. Hum Brain Mapp 2013;34:2747–66 doi:10.1002/hbm.22099 pmid:22611035

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    Movement Disorder Society Task Force on Rating Scales for Parkinson’s Disease. The Unified Parkinson’s disease rating scale (UPDRS): status and recommendations. Mov Disord 2003;18:738–50 doi:10.1002/mds.10473 pmid:12815652

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
28. 28.↵
    1. Leemans A,
    2. Jones DK.

    The B-matrix must be rotated when correcting for subject motion in DTI data. Magn Reson Med 2009;61:1336–49 doi:10.1002/mrm.21890 pmid:19319973

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
29. 29.↵
    1. Jeurissen B,
    2. Sijbers J, et al

    1. Leemans A

    , Jeurissen B, Sijbers J, et al. ExploreDTI: a graphical toolbox for processing, analyzing, and visualizing diffusion MR data. Proc 17th Sci Meet Int Soc Magn Reson Med 2009;17:3537
30. 30.↵
    1. Irfanoglu MO,
    2. Walker L,
    3. Sarlls J, et al

    . Effects of image distortions originating from susceptibility variations and concomitant fields on diffusion MRI tractography results. Neuroimage 2012;61:275–88 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.02.054 pmid:22401760

    CrossRefPubMed
31. 31.↵
    1. Destrieux C,
    2. Fischl B,
    3. Dale A, et al

    . Automatic parcellation of human cortical gyri and sulci using standard anatomical nomenclature. Neuroimage 2010;53:1–15 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.06.010 pmid:20547229

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
32. 32.↵
    1. Tournier JD,
    2. Calamante F,
    3. Connelly A.

    MRtrix: Diffusion tractography in crossing fiber regions. Int J Imaging Syst Technol 2012;22:53–66 doi:10.1002/ima.22005

    CrossRefWeb of Science
33. 33.↵
    1. Civier O,
    2. Smith RE,
    3. Yeh C, et al

    . Is removal of weak connections necessary for graph-theoretical analysis of dense weighted structural connectomes from diffusion MRI? Neuroimage 2019;194:68–81 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.02.039 pmid:30844506

    CrossRefPubMed
34. 34.↵
    1. Saramäki J,
    2. Kivelä M,
    3. Onnela JP, et al

    . Generalizations of the clustering coefficient to weighted complex networks. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlinear Soft Matter Phys 2007;75(Pt 2):027105
35. 35.↵
    1. Watts DJ,
    2. Strogatz SH.

    Collective dynamics of “small-world” networks. Nature 1998;393:440–42 doi:10.1038/30918 pmid:9623998

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
36. 36.↵
    1. Latora V,
    2. Marchiori M.

    Efficient behavior of small-world networks. Phys Rev Lett 2001;87:198701 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.198701 pmid:11690461

    CrossRefPubMed
37. 37.↵
    1. Freeman LC.

    Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Soc Netw 1978;1:215–39 doi:10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7

    CrossRef
38. 38.↵
    1. Shapleske J,
    2. Rossell SL,
    3. Woodruff PW, et al

    . The planum temporale: a systematic, quantitative review of its structural, functional and clinical significance. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 1999;29:26–49 doi:10.1016/S0165-0173(98)00047-2 pmid:9974150

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
39. 39.↵
    1. Binder JR,
    2. Frost JA,
    3. Hammeke TA, et al

    . Function of the left planum temporale in auditory and linguistic processing. Brain 1996;119:1239–47 doi:10.1093/brain/119.4.1239 pmid:8813286

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
40. 40.↵
    1. Stoeckel C,
    2. Gough PM,
    3. Watkins KE, et al

    . Supramarginal gyrus involvement in visual word recognition. Cortex 2009;45:1091–96 doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2008.12.004 pmid:19232583

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
41. 41.↵
    1. Rushworth MF,
    2. Behrens TE,
    3. Johansen-Berg H.

    Connection patterns distinguish 3 regions of human parietal cortex. Cereb Cortex 2006;16:1418–30 doi:10.1093/cercor/bhj079 pmid:16306320

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
42. 42.↵
    1. Déjerine J.

    Sur un cas de cécité verbale avec agraphie suivi d’autopsie [On a case of verbal blindness with agraphia, followed by autopsy]. Mémoires Société Biol 1891;3:197–201.
43. 43.↵
    1. Devlin JT,
    2. Matthews PM,
    3. Rushworth M.

    Semantic processing in the left inferior prefrontal cortex: a combined functional magnetic resonance imaging and transcranial magnetic stimulation study. J Cogn Neurosci 2003;15:71–84 doi:10.1162/089892903321107837 pmid:12590844

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
44. 44.↵
    1. Catani M,
    2. Jones DK,
    3. Ffytche DH.

    Perisylvian language networks of the human brain. Ann Neurol 2005;57:8–16 doi:10.1002/ana.20319 pmid:15597383

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
45. 45.↵
    1. Poldrack RA,
    2. Wagner AD,
    3. Prull MW, et al

    . Functional specialization for semantic and phonological processing in the left inferior prefrontal cortex 1. Neuroimage 1999;35:15–35 doi:10.1006/nimg.1999.0441

    CrossRef
46. 46.↵
    1. Hartwigsen G,
    2. Baumgaertner A,
    3. Price CJ, et al

    . Phonological decisions require both the left and right supramarginal gyri. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010;107:16494–99 doi:10.1073/pnas.1008121107 pmid:20807747

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
47. 47.↵
    1. Arnett PA,
    2. Swanson SJ,
    3. Hammeke TA.

    Conduction aphasia in multiple sclerosis: a case report with MRI findings. Neurology 1996;47:576–78 doi:10.1212/wnl.47.2.576 pmid:8757043

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
48. 48.↵
    1. Kertesz A,
    2. Lau WK,
    3. Polk M.

    The structural determinants of recovery in Wernicke’s aphasia. Brain Lang 1993;44:153–64 doi:10.1006/brln.1993.1010 pmid:8428309

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
49. 49.↵
    1. Adam M,
    2. Ardinger H,
    3. Pagon R, et al.

    1. Mole SE,
    2. Williams RE

    . Neuronal ceroid-lipofuscinoses. In: Adam M, Ardinger H, Pagon R, et al. eds. GeneReviews. Seattle: University of Washington, 2001
50. 50.↵
    1. Patterson K,
    2. Brown WD,
    3. Wise R, et al

    . The cortical localization of the lexicons: positron emission tomography evidence. Brain 1992;115:1769–82 doi:10.1093/brain/115.6.1769 pmid:1486460

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
51. 51.↵
    1. Price CJ,
    2. Wise RJS,
    3. Watson JDG, et al

    . Brain activity during reading. The effects of exposure duration and task. Brain 1994;117(Pt 6):1255–69 doi:10.1093/brain/117.6.1255 pmid:7820564

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
52. 52.↵
    1. Bookheimer SY,
    2. Zeffiro TA,
    3. Blaxton T, et al

    . Regional cerebral blood flow during object naming and word reading. Hum Brain Mapp 1995;3:93–106 doi:10.1002/hbm.460030206

    CrossRefWeb of Science
53. 53.↵
    1. Machielsen WC,
    2. Rombouts SA,
    3. Barkhof F, et al

    . FMRI of visual encoding: reproducibility of activation. Hum Brain Mapp 2000;9:156–64 doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(200003)9:3<156::AID-HBM4>3.0.CO;2-Q pmid:10739366

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
54. 54.↵
    1. Bogousslavsky J,
    2. Miklossy J,
    3. Deruaz J-P, et al

    . Lingual and fusiform gyri in visual processing: a clinico-pathologic study of superior altitudinal hemianopia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1987;50:607–14 doi:10.1136/jnnp.50.5.607 pmid:3585386

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
55. 55.↵
    1. Brunet E,
    2. Sarfati Y,
    3. Hardy-Baylé MC, et al

    . A PET investigation of the attribution of intentions with a nonverbal task. Neuroimage 2000;11:157–66 doi:10.1006/nimg.1999.0525 pmid:10679187

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
56. 56.↵
    1. Heath S,
    2. McMahon KL,
    3. Nickels L, et al

    . Neural mechanisms underlying the facilitation of naming in aphasia using a semantic task: an fMRI study. BMC Neurosci 2012;13:98 doi:10.1186/1471-2202-13-98 pmid:22882806

    CrossRefPubMed
57. 57.↵
    1. Cho S,
    2. Metcalfe AWS,
    3. Young CB, et al

    . Hippocampal – prefrontal engagement and dynamic causal interactions in the maturation of children’s fact retrieval. J Cogn Neurosci 2012;24:1849–66 doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00246 pmid:22621262

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
58. 58.↵
    1. Isenberg N,
    2. Silbersweig D,
    3. Engelien A, et al

    . Linguistic threat activates the human amygdala. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1999;96:10456–59 doi:10.1073/pnas.96.18.10456 pmid:10468630

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
59. 59.↵
    1. Damasio A,
    2. Yamada T,
    3. Damasio H, et al

    . Central achromatopsia: behavioral, anatomic, and physiologic aspects. Neurology 1980;30:1064. doi:10.1212/wnl.30.10.1064 pmid:6968419

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
60. 60.↵
    1. Meadows JC.

    Disturbed perception of colours associated with localized cerebral lesions. Brain 1974;97:615–32 doi:10.1093/brain/97.1.615 pmid:4547992

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
61. 61.↵
    1. Kanwisher N.

    Domain specificity in face perception. Nat Neurosci 2000;3:759–63 doi:10.1038/77664 pmid:10903567

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
62. 62.↵
    1. Meadows JC.

    The anatomical basis of prosopagnosia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1974;37:489–501 doi:10.1136/jnnp.37.5.489 pmid:4209556

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
63. 63.↵
    1. Damasio AR,
    2. Damasio H,
    3. Van Hoesen GW.

    Prosopagnosia: anatomic basis and behavioral mechanisms. Neurology 1982;32:331 doi:10.1212/wnl.32.4.331 pmid:7199655

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
64. 64.↵
    1. Barton JJS,
    2. Press DZ,
    3. Keenan JP, et al

    . Lesions of the fusiform face area impair perception of facial configuration in prosopagnosia. Neurology 2002;58:71–78 doi:10.1212/wnl.58.1.71 pmid:11781408

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
65. 65.↵
    1. Takahashi N,
    2. Kawamura M.

    Pure topographical disorientation - the anatomical basis of landmark agnosia. Cortex 2002;38:717–25 doi:10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70039-x pmid:12507041

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
66. 66.↵
    1. Tokola AM,
    2. Åberg LE,
    3. Autti TH.

    Brain MRI findings in aspartylglucosaminuria. J Neuroradiol 2015;42:345–57 doi:10.1016/j.neurad.2015.03.003 pmid:26026191

    CrossRefPubMed
67. 67.↵
    1. Autti T,
    2. Hämäläinen J,
    3. Åberg L, et al

    . Thalami and corona radiata in juvenile NCL (CLN3): A voxel-based morphometric study. Eur J Neurol 2007;14:447–50 doi:10.1111/j.1468-1331.2007.01692.x pmid:17388996

    CrossRefPubMed
68. 68.↵
    1. Tournier JD,
    2. Calamante F,
    3. Connelly A.

    Determination of the appropriate b value and number of gradient directions for high-angular-resolution diffusion-weighted imaging. NMR Biomed 2013;26:1775–86 doi:10.1002/nbm.3017 pmid:24038308

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
69. 69.↵
    1. Farquharson S,
    2. Tournier JD,
    3. Calamante F, et al

    . White matter fiber tractography: why we need to move beyond DTI. J Neurosurg 2013;118:1367–77 doi:10.3171/2013.2.JNS121294 pmid:23540269

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
70. 70.↵
    1. Zhang H,
    2. Schneider T,
    3. Wheeler-Kingshott CA, et al

    . NODDI: practical in vivo neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging of the human brain. Neuroimage 2012;61:1000–16 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.03.072 pmid:22484410

    CrossRefPubMed
71. 71.↵
    1. Jeurissen B,
    2. Tournier JD,
    3. Dhollander T, et al

    . Multi-tissue constrained spherical deconvolution for improved analysis of multi-shell diffusion MRI data. Neuroimage 2014;103:411–26 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.07.061 pmid:25109526

    CrossRefPubMed
72. 72.↵
    1. Roine T,
    2. Jeurissen B,
    3. Perrone D, et al

    . Informed constrained spherical deconvolution (iCSD.). Med Image Anal 2015;24:269–81

    CrossRef