Predicting Factors of Angiographic Aneurysm Occlusion after Treatment with the Woven EndoBridge Device: A Single-Center Experience with Midterm Follow-Up

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Pierot L,
   3. Moret J,
   4. Barreau X, et al

   . Safety and efficacy of aneurysm treatment with WEB in the cumulative population of three prospective, multicenter series. J Neurointerv Surg 2018;10:553–59 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013448 pmid:28965106

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   2. Limbucci N,
   3. Leone G,
   4. Rosi A, et al

   . Endovascular treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms by the Woven EndoBridge device (WEB): are there any aspects influencing aneurysm occlusion? World Neurosurg 2018;109:e183–93 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2017.09.136 pmid:28966153

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   2. Pierot L,
   3. Gubucz I,
   4. Buhk JH, et al

   . Safety and efficacy of aneurysm treatment with the WEB: results of the WEBCAST 2 study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:1151–55 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5178 pmid:28450432

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   2. Janot K,
   3. Herbreteau D,
   4. Amelot A, et al

   . Quantitative evaluation of WEB shape modification: a five-year follow-up study. J Neuroradiol 2019 Mar 7. [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1016/j.neurad.2019.02.010 pmid:30853546

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. Pierot L,
   3. Biondi A,
   4. Narata AP, et al

   . Should indications for WEB aneurysm treatment be enlarged? Report of a series of 20 patients with aneurysms in “atypical” locations for WEB treatment. J Neuroradiol 2017;44:203–09 doi:10.1016/j.neurad.2016.12.011 pmid:28262374

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   2. Lescher S,
   3. Du Mesnil de Rochemont R,
   4. Berkefeld J

   . Woven Endobridge (WEB) device for endovascular treatment of complex unruptured aneurysms: a single center experience. Neuroradiology 2016;58:383–90 doi:10.1007/s00234-016-1641-x pmid:26767527

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. Roy D,
   3. Milot G,
   4. Raymond J

   . Endovascular treatment of unruptured aneurysms. Stroke 2001;32:1998–2004 doi:10.1161/hs0901.095600 pmid:11546888

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   2. Pierot L

   . Letter: WEB aneurysm treatment: occlusion stability and “compression.” Neurosurgery 2015;77:E666–67 doi:10.1227/NEU.000000000000088 pmid:261322840

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. Asnafi S,
   3. Rouchaud A,
   4. Pierot L, et al

   . Efficacy and safety of the Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:2287–92 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4900 pmid:27516237

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    2. Kabbasch C,
    3. Goertz L,
    4. Siebert E, et al

    . Factors that determine aneurysm occlusion after embolization with the Woven EndoBridge (WEB). J Neurointerv Surg 2019;11:503–10 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014361 pmid:30355777

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    2. Tateshima S,
    3. Chien A,
    4. Sayre J, et al

    . The effect of aneurysm geometry on the intra-aneurysmal flow condition. Neuroradiology 2010;52:1135–41 doi:10.1007/s00234-010-0687-4 pmid:20373097

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    2. Hope JK,
    3. Byrne JV,
    4. Molyneux AJ

    . Factors influencing successful angiographic occlusion of aneurysms treated by coil embolization. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999;20:391–99 pmid:10219403

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    2. Tan IY,
    3. Agid RF,
    4. Willinsky RA

    . Recanalization rates after endovascular coil embolization in a cohort of matched ruptured and unruptured cerebral aneurysms. Interv Neuroradiol 2011;17:27–35 doi:10.1177/159101991101700106 pmid:21561556

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Bender MT,
    3. Colby GP,
    4. Lin LM, et al

    . Predictors of cerebral aneurysm persistence and occlusion after flow diversion: a single-institution series of 445 cases with angiographic follow-up. J Neurosurg 2018;130:259–67 doi:10.3171/2017.11.JNS171738 pmid:29600915

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Herbreteau D,
    3. Bibi R,
    4. Narata AP, et al

    . Are anatomic results influenced by WEB shape analysis in a prospective, single-center series of 39 patients with aneurysms treated with the WEB. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:2280–86 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4918 pmid:27538903

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    2. Cagnazzo F,
    3. Ahmed R,
    4. Dargazanli C, et al

    . Treatment of wide-neck intracranial aneurysms with the Woven EndoBridge device associated with stenting: a single-center experience. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2019;40:820-26 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A6032 pmid:30975649

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    2. Cognard C,
    3. Januel AC

    . Remnants and recurrences after the use of the WEB intrasaccular device in large-neck bifurcation aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2015;76:522–30; discussion 530 doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000000669 pmid:25710103

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Rouchaud A,
    3. Brinjikji W,
    4. Dai D, et al

    . Autologous adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells improve healing of coiled experimental saccular aneurysms: an angiographic and histopathological study. J Neurointerv Surg 2018;10:60–65 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012867 pmid:28077523

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    2. Cognard C,
    3. Januel AC

    . In reply: WEB aneurysm treatment: occlusion stability and “compression.” Neurosurgery 2015;77:E667–69 doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000000881 pmid:26132285

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    2. Caroff J,
    3. Mihalea C,
    4. Da Ros V, et al

    . A computational fluid dynamics (CFD) study of WEB-treated aneurysms: can CFD predict WEB “compression” during follow-up? J Neuroradiol 2017;44:262–68 doi:10.1016/j.neurad.2017.03.005 pmid:28478112

    CrossRefPubMed