Differences in the Calculated Transvenous Pressure Drop between Chronic Hydrocephalus and Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Bondurant CP,
   3. Jimenez DF

   . Epidemiology of cerebrospinal fluid shunting. Pediatr Neurosurg 1995;23:254–58; discussion 259 doi:10.1159/000120968 pmid:8688350

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   2. Portnoy HD,
   3. Branch C,
   4. Castro ME

   . The relationship of intracranial venous pressure to hydrocephalus. Childs Nerv Syst 1994;10:29–35 doi:10.1007/BF00313582 pmid:8194060

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   2. Stephensen H,
   3. Tisell M,
   4. Wikkelsö C

   . There is no transmantle pressure gradient in communicating or noncommunicating hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 2002;50:763–73; discussion 771–73 doi:10.1097/00006123-200204000-00016 pmid:11904027

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   2. Eide PK,
   3. Saehle T

   . Is ventriculomegaly in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus associated with a transmantle gradient in pulsatile intracranial pressure? Acta Neurochir (Wein) 2010;152:989–95 doi:10.1007/s00701-010-0605-x pmid:20130957

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. Bateman GA

   . Vascular compliance in normal pressure hydrocephalus. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:1574–85 pmid:11039334

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   2. Bateman GA,
   3. Lechner-Scott J,
   4. Copping R, et al

   . Comparison of the sagittal sinus cross-sectional area between patients with multiple sclerosis, hydrocephalus, intracranial hypertension and spontaneous intracranial hypotension: a surrogate marker of venous transmural pressure? Fluids Barriers CNS 2017;14:18 doi:10.1186/s12987-017-0066-1 pmid:28679427

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. Bateman GA,
   3. Siddique SH

   . Cerebrospinal fluid absorption block at the vertex in chronic hydrocephalus: obstructed arachnoid granulations or elevated venous pressure? Fluids Barriers CNS 2014;11:11 doi:10.1186/2045-8118-11-11 pmid:24955236

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Bateman GA

   . Arterial inflow and venous outflow in idiopathic intracranial hypertension associated with venous outflow stenosis. J Clin Neurosci 2008;15:402–08 doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2007.03.018 pmid:18242091

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. Atkins T,
   3. Escudier M

   . A Dictionary of Mechanical Engineering. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2013;174
10. 10.↵
    2. Hund S,
    3. Kameneva M,
    4. Antaki J

    . A quasi-mechanistic mathematical representation for blood viscosity. Fluids 2017;2:10 doi:10.3390/fluids2010010

    CrossRef
11. 11.↵
    2. Sutera SP,
    3. Skalak R

    . The history of Poiseuille's law. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics1993;25:1–19 doi:10.1146/annurev.fl.25.010193.000245

    CrossRefWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    2. Fall S,
    3. Pagé G,
    4. Bettoni J, et al

    . Use of phase-contrast MRA to assess intracranial venous sinus resistance to drainage in healthy individuals. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:281–87 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5013 pmid:27932509

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    2. Lekner J

    . Viscous flow through pipes of various cross-sections. Eur J Phys 2007;28:521–27 doi:10.1088/0143-0807/28/3/014

    CrossRef
14. 14.↵
    2. Boddu SR,
    3. Gobin P,
    4. Oliveira C, et al

    . Anatomic measurements of cerebral venous sinuses in idiopathic intracranial hypertension patients. PLos One 2018;13:e0196275 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0196275 pmid:29856739

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Bateman GA,
    3. Lechner-Scott J,
    4. Lea RA

    . A comparison between the pathophysiology of multiple sclerosis and normal pressure hydrocephalus: is pulse wave encephalopathy a component of MS? Fluids Barriers CNS 2016;22;13:18 doi:10.1186/s12987-016-0041-2 pmid:27658732

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. Best CH,
    3. Taylor NB,
    4. Brobeck JR

    . Physiological Basis of Medical Practice. 12th ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1991:147
17. 17.↵
    2. Ekstedt J

    . CSF hydrodynamic studies in man, 2: normal hydrodynamic variables related to CSF pressure and flow. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1978;41:345–53 doi:10.1136/jnnp.41.4.345 pmid:650242

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    2. Andeweg J

    . The anatomy of collateral venous flow from the brain and its value in aetiological interpretation of intracranial pathology. Neuroradiology 1996;38:621–28 doi:10.1007/s002340050321 pmid:8912316

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. 19.↵
    2. Schaller B

    . Physiology of cerebral venous blood flow: from experimental data in animals to normal function in humans. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 2004;46:243–60 doi:10.1016/j.brainresrev.2004.04.005 pmid:15571768

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    2. Olivero WC,
    3. Rekate HL,
    4. Chizeck HJ, et al

    . Relationship between intracranial and sagittal sinus pressure in normal and hydrocephalic dogs. Pediatr Neurosci 1988;14:196–201 doi:10.1159/000120388 pmid:3269540

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    2. Hatt A,
    3. Cheng S,
    4. Tan K, et al

    . MR elastography can be used to measure brain stiffness changes as a result of altered cranial venous drainage during jugular compression. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:1971–77 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4361 pmid:26045579

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
22. 22.↵
    2. Meder JF,
    3. Chiras J,
    4. Roland J, et al

    . Venous territories of the brain. J Neuroradiol 1994;21:118–33 pmid:8014657

    PubMedWeb of Science
23. 23.↵
    2. Perry A,
    3. Graffeo CS,
    4. Fattahi N, et al

    . Clinical correlation of abnormal findings on magnetic resonance elastography in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. World Neurosurg 2017;99:695–700.e1 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2016.12.121 pmid:28063896

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    2. Bateman GA

    . The pathophysiology of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: cerebral ischemia or altered venous hemodynamics? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:198–203 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A0739 pmid:17925373

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
25. 25.↵
    2. Balédent O,
    3. Gondry-Jouet C,
    4. Meyer ME, et al

    . Relationship between cerebrospinal fluid and blood dynamics in healthy volunteers and patients with communicating hydrocephalus. Invest Radiol 2004;39:45–55 doi:10.1097/01.rli.0000100892.87214.49 pmid:14701988

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
26. 26.↵
    2. Kim H,
    3. Jeong EJ,
    4. Park DH, et al

    . Finite element analysis of periventricular lucency in hydrocephalus: extravasation or transependymal CSF absorption? J Neurosurg 2016;124:334–41 doi:10.3171/2014.11.JNS141382 pmid:26274984

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    2. Miyagami M,
    3. Nakamura S,
    4. Moriyasu N

    . Ventricular enlargement in experimental occlusion of superior sagittal sinus in reference to histopathological findings (author's transl) [in Japanese]. No Shinkei Geka 1975;3:947–54 pmid:1240615

    PubMed
28. 28.↵
    2. Hladky SB,
    3. Barrand MA

    . Mechanisms of fluid movement into, through and out of the brain: evaluation of the evidence. Fluids Barriers CNS 2014;11:26 doi:10.1186/2045-8118-11-26 pmid:25678956

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    2. Castejón OJ

    . Submicroscopic pathology of human and experimental hydrocephalic cerebral cortex. Folia Neuropathol 2010;48:159–74 pmid:20925000

    PubMed
30. 30.↵
    2. Ahmed RM,
    3. Wilkinson M,
    4. Parker GD, et al

    . Transverse sinus stenting for idiopathic intracranial hypertension: a review of 52 patients and of model predictions. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:1408–14 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2575 pmid:21799038

    Abstract/FREE Full Text