Acutely Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Treated with Flow-Diverter Stents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Garrett M,
   3. Spetzler RF

   . Surgical treatment of blister-like aneurysms. World Neurosurg 2012;77:76–77 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2011.07.041 pmid:22405389

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   2. Rouchaud A,
   3. Brinjikji W,
   4. Cloft HJ, et al

   . Endovascular treatment of ruptured blister-like aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis with focus on deconstructive versus reconstructive and flow-diverter treatments. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:2331–39 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4438 pmid:26381557

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   2. Awad AJ,
   3. Mascitelli JR,
   4. Haroun RR, et al

   . Endovascular management of fusiform aneurysms in the posterior circulation: the era of flow diversion. Neurosurg Focus 2017;42:E14 doi:10.3171/2017.3.FOCUS1748 pmid:28565985

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   2. Kallmes DF,
   3. Ding YH,
   4. Dai D, et al

   . A new endoluminal, flow-disrupting device for treatment of saccular aneurysms. Stroke 2007;38:2346–52 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.106.479576 pmid:17615366

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   2. Kallmes DF,
   3. Brinjikji W,
   4. Boccardi E, et al

   . Aneurysm Study of Pipeline in an Observational Registry (ASPIRe). Interv Neurol 2016;5:89–99 doi:10.1159/000446503 pmid:27610126

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   2. Kallmes DF,
   3. Hanel R,
   4. Lopes D, et al

   . International retrospective study of the Pipeline embolization device: a multicenter aneurysm treatment study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:108–15 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4111 pmid:25355814

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   2. Aydin K,
   3. Arat A,
   4. Sencer S, et al

   . Treatment of ruptured blood blister-like aneurysms with flow diverter SILK stents. J Neurointerv Surg 2015;7:202–09 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-011090 pmid:24491271

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   2. Cerejo R,
   3. Bain M,
   4. John S, et al

   . Flow diverter treatment of cerebral blister aneurysms. Neuroradiology 2017;59:1285–90 doi:10.1007/s00234-017-1936-6 pmid:29046918

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. Chalouhi N,
   3. Zanaty M,
   4. Whiting A, et al

   . Treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms with the Pipeline embolization device. Neurosurgery 2015;76:165–72; discussion 172 doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000000586 pmid:25549187

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Chan RS,
    3. Mak CH,
    4. Wong AK, et al

    . Use of the Pipeline embolization device to treat recently ruptured dissecting cerebral aneurysms. Interv Neuroradiol 2014;20:436–41 doi:10.15274/INR-2014-10042 pmid:25207906

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    2. Cruz JP,
    3. O'Kelly C,
    4. Kelly M, et al

    . Pipeline embolization device in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:271–76 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3380 pmid:23064594

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    2. de Barros Faria M,
    3. Castro RN,
    4. Lundquist J, et al

    . The role of the Pipeline embolization device for the treatment of dissecting intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:2192–95 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2671 pmid:21885721

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    2. Duman E,
    3. Coven I,
    4. Yildirim E, et al

    . Endovascular treatment of wide necked ruptured saccular aneurysms with flow-diverter stent. Turk Neurosurg 2017;27:362–67 doi:10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.16324-15.1 pmid:27593785

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Kulcsár Z,
    3. Wetzel SG,
    4. Augsburger L, et al

    . Effect of flow diversion treatment on very small ruptured aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2010;67:789–93 doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000372920.39101.55 pmid:20657324

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    2. Lin N,
    3. Brouillard AM,
    4. Keigher KM, et al

    . Utilization of Pipeline Embolization Device for treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: US multicenter experience. J Neurointerv Surg 2015;7:808–15 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011320 pmid:25230839

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    2. Linfante I,
    3. Mayich M,
    4. Sonig A, et al

    . Flow diversion with Pipeline Embolic Device as treatment of subarachnoid hemorrhage secondary to blister aneurysms: dual-center experience and review of the literature. J Neurointerv Surg 2017;9:29–33 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012287 pmid:27075485

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    2. Lozupone E,
    3. Piano M,
    4. Valvassori L, et al

    . Flow diverter devices in ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a single-center experience. J Neurosurg 2018;128:1037–43 doi:10.3171/2016.11.JNS161937 pmid:28387623

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Maus V,
    3. Mpotsaris A,
    4. Dorn F, et al

    . The use of flow diverter in ruptured, dissecting intracranial aneurysms of the posterior circulation. World Neurosurg 2018;111:e424–33 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2017.12.095 pmid:29277587

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    2. McAuliffe W,
    3. Wenderoth JD

    . Immediate and midterm results following treatment of recently ruptured intracranial aneurysms with the Pipeline embolization device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:487–93 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2797 pmid:22135131

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    2. Möhlenbruch MA,
    3. Herweh C,
    4. Jestaedt L, et al

    . The FRED flow-diverter stent for intracranial aneurysms: clinical study to assess safety and efficacy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:1155–61 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4251 pmid:25721079

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
21. 21.↵
    2. Parthasarathy R,
    3. Gupta V,
    4. Gupta A

    . Safety of Prasugrel loading in ruptured blister like aneurysm treated with a Pipeline device. Br J Radiol 2018;91:20170476 doi:10.1259/bjr.20170476 pmid:29509490

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    2. Peschillo S,
    3. Caporlingua A,
    4. Cannizzaro D, et al

    . Flow diverter stent treatment for ruptured basilar trunk perforator aneurysms. J Neurointerv Surg 2016;8:190–96 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011511 pmid:25516534

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
23. 23.↵
    2. Peschillo S,
    3. Caporlingua A,
    4. Resta MC, et al

    . Endovascular treatment of large and giant carotid aneurysms with flow-diverter stents alone or in combination with coils: a multicenter experience and long-term follow-up. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 2017;13:492–502 doi:10.1093/ons/opx032 pmid:28838114

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    2. Ryan RW,
    3. Khan AS,
    4. Barco R, et al

    . Pipeline flow diversion of ruptured blister aneurysms of the supraclinoid carotid artery using a single-device strategy. Neurosurg Focus 2017;42:E11 doi:10.3171/2017.3.FOCUS1757 pmid:28565992

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    2. Volker M,
    3. Anastasios M,
    4. Jan B, et al

    . Treatment of intracranial aneurysms with the Pipeline Embolization Device only: a single center experience. Neurointervention 2018;13:32–40 doi:10.5469/neuroint.2018.13.1.32 pmid:29535896

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    2. Yang C,
    3. Vadasz A,
    4. Szikora I

    . Treatment of ruptured blood blister aneurysms using primary flow-diverter stenting with considerations for adjunctive coiling: a single-centre experience and literature review. Interv Neuroradiol 2017;23:465–76 doi:10.1177/1591019917720805 pmid:28758550

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    2. Moher D,
    3. Liberati A,
    4. Tetzlaff J, et al

    . Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Int J Surg 2010;8:336–41 doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007 pmid:20171303

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    2. Roy D,
    3. Milot G,
    4. Raymond J

    . Endovascular treatment of unruptured aneurysms. Stroke 2001;32:1998–2004 doi:10.1161/hs0901.095600 pmid:11546888

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
29. 29.↵
    2. O'Kelly CJ,
    3. Krings T,
    4. Fiorella D, et al

    . A novel grading scale for the angiographic assessment of intracranial aneurysms treated using flow diverting stents. Interv Neuroradiol 2010;16:133–37 doi:10.1177/159101991001600204 pmid:20642887

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    2. Wells G,
    3. Shea B,
    4. O'Connell D, et al

    . The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonradomized studies in meta-analyses. Ottawa: Ottawa Hospital Research Institute. 2011. http://www.evidencebasedpublichealth.de/download/Newcastle_Ottawa_Scale_Pope_Bruce.pdf. Accessed March 28, 2018.
31. 31.↵
    2. Brinjikji W,
    3. Murad MH,
    4. Lanzino G, et al

    . Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with flow diverters: a meta-analysis. Stroke 2013;44:442–47 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.678151 pmid:23321438

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
32. 32.↵
    2. Molyneux AJ,
    3. Kerr RS,
    4. Yu LM, et al

    ; International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) Collaborative Group. International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion. Lancet 2005;366:809–17 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67214-5 pmid:16139655

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
33. 33.↵
    2. Cagnazzo F,
    3. Mantilla D,
    4. Rouchaud A, et al

    . Endovascular treatment of very large and giant intracranial aneurysms: comparison between reconstructive and deconstructive techniques—a meta-analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2018;39:852–58 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5591 pmid:29545248

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
34. 34.↵
    2. Madaelil TP,
    3. Moran CJ,
    4. Cross DT 3rd., et al

    . Flow diversion in ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a meta-analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:590–95 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5030 pmid:28007770

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
35. 35.↵
    2. White AC,
    3. Roark CD,
    4. Case DE, et al

    . Factors associated with rerupture of intracranial aneurysms after endovascular treatment: a retrospective review of 11 years experience at a single institution and review of the literature. J Clin Neurosci 2017;44:53–62 doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2017.06.033 pmid:28716568

    CrossRefPubMed
36. 36.↵
    2. Zhao B,
    3. Tan X,
    4. Yang H, et al

    . Stent-assisted coiling versus coiling alone of poor-grade ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a multicenter study. J Neurointerv Surg 2017;9:165–68 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012259 pmid:26951385

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
37. 37.↵
    2. Adeeb N,
    3. Moore JM,
    4. Wirtz M, et al

    . Predictors of incomplete occlusion following Pipeline embolization of intracranial aneurysms: is it less effective in older patients? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:2295–2300 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5375 pmid:28912285

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
38. 38.↵
    2. Renowden SA,
    3. Benes V,
    4. Bradley M, et al

    . Detachable coil embolisation of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a single center study, a decade experience. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2009;111:179–88 doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2008.09.026 pmid:19013012

    CrossRefPubMed
39. 39.↵
    2. Ryu CW,
    3. Park S,
    4. Shin HS, et al

    . Complications in stent-assisted endovascular therapy of ruptured intracranial aneurysms and relevance to antiplatelet administration: a systematic review. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:1682–88 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4365 pmid:26138136

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
40. 40.↵
    2. Lodi YM,
    3. Latorre JG,
    4. El-Zammar Z, et al

    . Stent assisted coiling of the ruptured wide necked intracranial aneurysm. J Neurointerv Surg 2012;4:281–86 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2011-010035 pmid:21990500

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
41. 41.↵
    2. Amenta PS,
    3. Dalyai RT,
    4. Kung D, et al

    . Stent-assisted coiling of wide-necked aneurysms in the setting of acute subarachnoid hemorrhage: experience in 65 patients. Neurosurgery 2012;70:1415–29; discussion 1429 doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e318246a4b1 pmid:22186840

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
42. 42.↵
    2. Guo LM,
    3. Zhou HY,
    4. Xu JW, et al

    . Risk factors related to aneurysmal rebleeding. World Neurosurg 2011;76:292–98; discussion 253–54 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2011.03.025 pmid:21986427

    CrossRefPubMed
43. 43.↵
    2. Alaraj A,
    3. Wallace A,
    4. Mander N, et al

    . Outcome following symptomatic cerebral vasospasm on presentation in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: coiling vs. clipping. World Neurosurg 2010;74:138–42 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2010.05.006 pmid:21300003

    CrossRefPubMed
44. 44.↵
    2. Kazumata K,
    3. Nakayama N,
    4. Nakamura T, et al

    . Changing treatment strategy from clipping to radial artery graft bypass and parent artery sacrifice in patients with ruptured blister-like internal carotid artery aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2014;10(Suppl 1):66–72; discussion 73 doi:10.1227/NEU.000000000000007642 pmid:23842547

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
45. 45.↵
    2. Owen CM,
    3. Montemurro N,
    4. Lawton MT

    . Blister aneurysms of the internal carotid artery: microsurgical results and management strategy. Neurosurgery 2017;80:235–47 doi:10.1227/NEU.000000000000125942 pmid:28173470

    CrossRefPubMed
46. 46.↵
    2. Brinjikji W,
    3. Lanzino G,
    4. Cloft HJ, et al

    . Risk factors for ischemic complications following Pipeline Embolization Device treatment of intracranial aneurysms: results from the IntrePED study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:1673–78 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4807 pmid:27102308

    Abstract/FREE Full Text