Surpass Streamline Flow-Diverter Embolization Device for Treatment of Iatrogenic and Traumatic Internal Carotid Artery Injuries

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   2. Aydin E,
   3. Gok M,
   4. Esenkaya A, et al

   . Endovascular management of iatrogenic vascular injury in the craniocervical region. Turk Neurosurg 2018;28:72–78 doi:10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.18189-16.1 pmid:27593845

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   2. Ciric I,
   3. Ragin A,
   4. Baumgartner C, et al

   . Complications of transsphenoidal surgery: result of a national survey, review of the literature, and personal experience. Neurosurgery 1997;40:225–36; discussion 236–37 doi:10.1097/00006123-199702000-00001 pmid:9007854

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   2. Raymond J,
   3. Hardy J,
   4. Czepko R, et al

   . Arterial injuries in transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenoma; the role of angiography and endovascular treatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1997;18:655–65 pmid:9127026

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   2. Chaloupka JC,
   3. Putman CM,
   4. Citardi MJ, et al

   . Endovascular therapy for the carotid blowout syndrome in head and neck surgical patients: diagnostic and managerial considerations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1996;17:843–52 pmid:8733956

   Abstract
5. 5.↵
   2. De Vries J,
   3. Boogaarts J,
   4. Van Norden A, et al

   . New generation of flow diverter (Surpass) for unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a prospective single-center study in 37 patients. Stroke 2013;44:1567–77 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.000434 pmid:23686973

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   2. Griauzde J,
   3. Gemmete JJ,
   4. Pandey AS, et al

   . Emergency reconstructive endovascular management of intraoperative complications involving the internal carotid artery from trans-sphenoidal surgery. J Neurointervent Surg 2015;7:67–71 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-010878 pmid:24408926

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   2. Pigott TJ,
   3. Holland IM,
   4. Punt JA

   . Carotico-cavernous fistula after trans-sphenoidal hypophysectomy. Br J Neurosurg 1989;3:613–16 doi:10.3109/02688698909002855 pmid:2818855

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Kocer N,
   3. Kizilkilic O,
   4. Albayram S, et al

   . Treatment of iatrogenic internal carotid artery laceration and carotid-cavernous fistula with endovascular stent graft placement. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:442–46 pmid:11901015

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   2. White R,
   3. Krajcer Z,
   4. Johanson M, et al

   . Results of a multicenter trial for the treatment of traumatic vascular injury with a covered stent. J Trauma 2006;60:1189–95; discussion 1195–96 doi:10.1097/01.ta.0000220372.85575.e2 pmid:16766960

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    2. Cockroft KM,
    3. Carew JF,
    4. Trost D, et al

    . Delayed epistaxis resulting from external carotid artery injury requiring embolization: a rare complication of transsphenoidal surgery—case report. Neurosurgery 2000;47:236–39 pmid:10917369

    PubMed
11. 11.↵
    2. Morken MH,
    3. Cappelen J,
    4. Kvistad KA, et al

    . Acute endovascular repair of iatrogenic right internal carotid arterial laceration. Acta Radiol Short Rep 2013;2:2047981613496088 doi:10.1177/2047981613496088 pmid:24198962

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Lancu D,
    3. Lum C,
    4. Ahmed ME, et al

    . Flow diversion in the treatment of carotid injury and carotid-cavernous fistula after transsphenoidal surgery. Interv Neuroradiol 2015;21:346–50 doi:10.1177/1591019915582367 pmid:26015526

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Wakhloo AK,
    3. Lylyk P,
    4. de Vries J, et al

    ; Surpass Study Group. Surpass flow diverter in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a prospective multicenter study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:98–107 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4078 pmid:25125666

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    2. Colby GP,
    3. Lin L,
    4. Caplan JM, et al

    . Flow diversion of large internal carotid artery aneurysms with the Surpass device: impressions and technical nuance from the initial North American experience. J Neurointerv Surg 2016;8:279–86 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-011769 pmid:25987590

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    2. Ogilvy CS,
    3. Motiei-Langroudi R,
    4. Ghorbani M, et al

    . Flow diverter as useful adjunct to traditional endovascular techniques in treatment of direct carotid-cavernous fistulas. World Neurosurg 2017;105:812–17 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2017.06.113 pmid:28647659

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. Seong J,
    3. Wakhloo AK,
    4. Lieber BB

    . In vitro evaluation of flow divertors in an elastase-induced saccular aneurysm model in rabbit. J Biomech Eng 2007;129:863–72 doi:10.1115/1.2800787 pmid:18067390

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Sadasivan C,
    3. Cesar L,
    4. Seong J, et al

    . An original flow diversion device for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: evaluation in the rabbit elastase-induced model. Stroke 2009;40:952–58 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.533760 pmid:19150864

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    2. Chalouhi N,
    3. Zanaty M,
    4. Tjoumakaris S, et al

    . Treatment of blister-like aneurysms with the Pipeline Embolization Device. Neurosurgery 2014;74:527–32 doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000000309 pmid:24553092

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. 19.↵
    2. Rouchaud A,
    3. Brinjikji W,
    4. Cloft HJ, et al

    . Endovascular treatment of ruptured blister-like aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis with focus on deconstructive versus reconstructive and flow-diverter treatments. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:2331–39 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4438 pmid:26381557

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    2. Peitz GW,
    3. Sy CA,
    4. Grandhi R

    . Endovascular treatment of blister aneurysms. J Neurosurg Focus 2017;42:E12 doi:10.3171/2017.3.FOCUS1751 pmid:28565977

    CrossRefPubMed