Interaction of Developmental Venous Anomalies with Resting-State Functional MRI Measures

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Bartsch AJ,
   3. Homola G,
   4. Biller A, et al

   . Diagnostic functional MRI: illustrated clinical applications and decision-making. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006;23:921–32 doi:10.1002/jmri.20579 pmid:16649199

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   2. Leuthardt EC,
   3. Allen M,
   4. Kamran M, et al

   . Resting-state blood oxygen level-dependent functional MRI: a paradigm shift in preoperative brain mapping. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 2015;93:427–39 doi:10.1159/000442424 pmid:26784290

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   2. Gabriel M,
   3. Brennan NP,
   4. Peck KK, et al

   . Blood oxygen level dependent functional magnetic resonance imaging for presurgical planning. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2014;24:557–71 doi:10.1016/j.nic.2014.07.003 pmid:25441500

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   2. Bandettini PA

   . Twenty years of functional MRI: the science and the stories. Neuroimage 2012;62:575–88 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.04.026 pmid:22542637

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. Zhang D,
   3. Raichle ME

   . Disease and the brain's dark energy. Nat Rev Neurol 2010;6:15–28 doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2009.198 pmid:20057496

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   2. van den Heuvel MP,
   3. Hulshoff Pol HE

   . Exploring the brain network: a review on resting-state fMRI functional connectivity. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2010;20:519–34 doi:10.1016/j.euroneuro.2010.03.008 pmid:20471808

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. Barkhof F,
   3. Haller S,
   4. Rombouts SA

   . Resting-state functional MR imaging: a new window to the brain. Radiology 2014;272:29–49 doi:10.1148/radiol.14132388 pmid:24956047

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Lee MH,
   3. Smyser CD,
   4. Shimony JS

   . Resting-state fMRI: a review of methods and clinical applications. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:1866–72 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3263 pmid:22936095

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   2. Lv H,
   3. Wang Z,
   4. Tong E, et al

   . Resting-state functional MRI: everything that nonexperts have always wanted to know. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2018;39:1390–99 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5527 pmid:29348136

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    2. Leuthardt EC,
    3. Guzman G,
    4. Bandt SK, et al

    . Integration of resting state functional MRI into clinical practice: a large single institution experience. PLoS One 2018;13:e0198349 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0198349 pmid:29933375

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    2. Hou BL,
    3. Bhatia S,
    4. Carpenter JS

    . Quantitative comparisons on hand motor functional areas determined by resting state and task BOLD fMRI and anatomical MRI for pre-surgical planning of patients with brain tumors. Neuroimage Clin 2016;11:378–87 doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2016.03.003 pmid:27069871

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Parker Jones O,
    3. Voets NL,
    4. Adcock JE, et al

    . Resting connectivity predicts task activation in pre-surgical populations. Neuroimage Clin 2016;13:378–85 doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2016.12.028 pmid:28123949

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Lu J,
    3. Zhang H,
    4. Hameed NU, et al

    . An automated method for identifying an independent component analysis-based language-related resting-state network in brain tumor subjects for surgical planning. Sci Rep 2017;7:13769 doi:10.1038/s41598-017-14248-5 pmid:29062010

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Branco P,
    3. Seixas D,
    4. Deprez S, et al

    . Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging for language preoperative planning. Front Hum Neurosci 2016;10:11 doi:10.3389/fnhum.2016.00011 pmid:26869899

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Kollndorfer K,
    3. Fischmeister FP,
    4. Kasprian G, et al

    . A systematic investigation of the invariance of resting-state network patterns: is resting-state fMRI ready for pre-surgical planning? Front Hum Neurosci 2013;7:95 doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00095 pmid:23532457

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. Sundermann B,
    3. Herr D,
    4. Schwindt W, et al

    . Multivariate classification of blood oxygen level-dependent fMRI data with diagnostic intention: a clinical perspective. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:848–55 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3713 pmid:24029388

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    2. Wolfers T,
    3. Buitelaar JK,
    4. Beckmann CF, et al

    . From estimating activation locality to predicting disorder: a review of pattern recognition for neuroimaging-based psychiatric diagnostics. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2015;57:328–49 doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.08.001 pmid:26254595

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Rathore S,
    3. Habes M,
    4. Iftikhar MA, et al

    . A review on neuroimaging-based classification studies and associated feature extraction methods for Alzheimer's disease and its prodromal stages. Neuroimage 2017;155:530–48 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.03.057 pmid:28414186

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    2. de Vos F,
    3. Koini M,
    4. Schouten TM, et al

    . A comprehensive analysis of resting state fMRI measures to classify individual patients with Alzheimer's disease. Neuroimage 2018;167:62–72 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.11.025 pmid:29155080

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    2. Elliott L,
    3. Sharp K,
    4. Alfaro-Almagro F, et al

    . Genome-wide association studies of brain structure and function in the UK biobank. bioRxiv 2018:178806 doi:10.1101/178806

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
21. 21.↵
    2. Kim SG,
    3. Ogawa S

    . Biophysical and physiological origins of blood oxygenation level-dependent fMRI signals. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2012;32:1188–206 doi:10.1038/jcbfm.2012.23 pmid:22395207

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    2. Langner S,
    3. Buelow R,
    4. Fleck S, et al

    . Management of intracranial incidental findings on brain MRI. Rofo 2016;188:1123–33 doi:10.1055/s-0042-111075 pmid:27433969

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    2. Sandeman EM,
    3. Hernandez Mdel C,
    4. Morris Z, et al

    . Incidental findings on brain MR imaging in older community-dwelling subjects are common but serious medical consequences are rare: a cohort study. PLoS One 2013;8:e71467 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0071467 pmid:23967214

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    2. Bos D,
    3. Poels MM,
    4. Adams HH, et al

    . Prevalence, clinical management, and natural course of incidental findings on brain MR images: the population-based Rotterdam scan study. Radiology 2016;281:507–15 doi:10.1148/radiol.2016160218 pmid:27337027

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    2. Morris Z,
    3. Whiteley WN,
    4. Longstreth WT Jr., et al

    . Incidental findings on brain magnetic resonance imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2009;339:b3016 doi:10.1136/bmj.b3016 pmid:19687093

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
26. 26.↵
    2. Vernooij MW,
    3. Ikram MA,
    4. Tanghe HL, et al

    . Incidental findings on brain MRI in the general population. N Engl J Med 2007;357:1821–28 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa070972 pmid:17978290

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
27. 27.↵
    2. Borra RJ,
    3. Sorensen AG

    . Incidental findings in brain MRI research: what do we owe our subjects? J Am Coll Radiol 2011;8:848–52 doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2011.08.009 pmid:22137002

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    2. Lasjaunias P,
    3. Burrows P,
    4. Planet C

    . Developmental venous anomalies (DVA): the so-called venous angioma. Neurosurg Rev 1986;9:233–42 doi:10.1007/BF01743138 pmid:3550523

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
29. 29.↵
    2. Lee M,
    3. Kim MS

    . Image findings in brain developmental venous anomalies. J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg 2012;14:37–43 doi:10.7461/jcen.2012.14.1.37 pmid:23210028

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    2. Sarwar M,
    3. McCormick WF

    . Intracerebral venous angioma: case report and review. Arch Neurol 1978;35:323–25 doi:10.1001/archneur.1978.00500290069012 pmid:646686

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
31. 31.↵
    2. Ruíz DS,
    3. Yilmaz H,
    4. Gailloud P

    . Cerebral developmental venous anomalies: current concepts. Ann Neurol 2009;66:271–83 doi:10.1002/ana.21754 pmid:19798638

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
32. 32.↵
    2. Jung HN,
    3. Kim ST,
    4. Cha J, et al

    . Diffusion and perfusion MRI findings of the signal-intensity abnormalities of brain associated with developmental venous anomaly. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:1539–42 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3900 pmid:24651815

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
33. 33.↵
    2. Teuber A,
    3. Sundermann B,
    4. Kugel H, et al

    . MR imaging of the brain in large cohort studies: feasibility report of the population- and patient-based BiDirect study. Eur Radiol 2017;27:231–38 doi:10.1007/s00330-016-4303-9 pmid:27059857

    CrossRefPubMed
34. 34.↵
    2. Teismann H,
    3. Wersching H,
    4. Nagel M, et al

    . Establishing the bidirectional relationship between depression and subclinical arteriosclerosis: rationale, design, and characteristics of the BiDirect study. BMC Psychiatry 2014;14:174 doi:10.1186/1471-244X-14-174 pmid:24924233

    CrossRefPubMed
35. 35.↵
    2. Beckmann CF,
    3. DeLuca M,
    4. Devlin JT, et al

    . Investigations into resting-state connectivity using independent component analysis. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2005;360:1001–13 doi:10.1098/rstb.2005.1634 pmid:16087444

    CrossRefPubMed
36. 36.↵
    2. Griffanti L,
    3. Douaud G,
    4. Bijsterbosch J, et al

    . Hand classification of fMRI ICA noise components. Neuroimage 2017;154:188–205 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.12.036 pmid:27989777

    CrossRefPubMed
37. 37.↵
    2. Salimi-Khorshidi G,
    3. Douaud G,
    4. Beckmann CF, et al

    . Automatic denoising of functional MRI data: combining independent component analysis and hierarchical fusion of classifiers. Neuroimage 2014;90:449–68 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.11.046 pmid:24389422

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
38. 38.↵
    2. Griffanti L,
    3. Salimi-Khorshidi G,
    4. Beckmann CF, et al

    . ICA-based artefact removal and accelerated fMRI acquisition for improved resting state network imaging. Neuroimage 2014;95:232–47 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.03.034 pmid:24657355

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
39. 39.↵
    2. Smith SM,
    3. Jenkinson M,
    4. Woolrich MW, et al

    . Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. Neuroimage 2004;23(Suppl 1):S208–19 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.051 pmid:15501092

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
40. 40.↵
    2. Jenkinson M,
    3. Beckmann CF,
    4. Behrens TE, et al

    . FSL. Neuroimage 2012;62:782–90 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.015 pmid:21979382

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
41. 41.↵
    2. Jenkinson M,
    3. Bannister P,
    4. Brady M, et al

    . Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images. Neuroimage 2002;17:825–41 doi:10.1006/nimg.2002.1132 pmid:12377157

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
42. 42.↵
    2. Smith SM

    . Fast robust automated brain extraction. Hum Brain Mapp 2002;17:143–55 doi:10.1002/hbm.10062 pmid:12391568

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
43. 43.↵
    2. Beckmann CF,
    3. Smith SM

    . Probabilistic independent component analysis for functional magnetic resonance imaging. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2004;23:137–52 doi:10.1109/TMI.2003.822821 pmid:14964560

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
44. 44.↵
    2. Minka T

    . Automatic choice of dimensionality for PCA: technical report 514. MIT Media Lab Vision and Modeling Group. 2000. https://tminka.github.io/papers/pca/minka-pca.pdf. Accessed April 12, 2017.
45. 45.↵
    2. Hyvärinen A

    . Fast and robust fixed-point algorithms for independent component analysis. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 1999;10:626–34 doi:10.1109/72.761722 pmid:18252563

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
46. 46.↵
    2. Greve DN,
    3. Fischl B

    . Accurate and robust brain image alignment using boundary-based registration. Neuroimage 2009;48:63–72 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.06.060 pmid:19573611

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
47. 47.↵
    2. Lehéricy S,
    3. Biondi A,
    4. Sourour N, et al

    . Arteriovenous brain malformations: is functional MR imaging reliable for studying language reorganization in patients? Initial observations. Radiology 2002;223:672–82 doi:10.1148/radiol.2233010792 pmid:12034934

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
48. 48.↵
    2. Kroll H,
    3. Soares BP,
    4. Saloner D, et al

    . Perfusion-CT of developmental venous anomalies: typical and atypical hemodynamic patterns. J Neuroradiol 2010;37:239–42 doi:10.1016/j.neurad.2009.09.002 pmid:19959233

    CrossRefPubMed
49. 49.↵
    2. Camacho DL,
    3. Smith JK,
    4. Grimme JD, et al

    . Atypical MR imaging perfusion in developmental venous anomalies. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:1549–52 pmid:15502136

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
50. 50.↵
    2. Hanson EH,
    3. Roach CJ,
    4. Ringdahl EN, et al

    . Developmental venous anomalies: appearance on whole-brain CT digital subtraction angiography and CT perfusion. Neuroradiology 2011;53:331–41 doi:10.1007/s00234-010-0739-9 pmid:20652805

    CrossRefPubMed
51. 51.↵
    2. Sharma A,
    3. Zipfel GJ,
    4. Hildebolt C, et al

    . Hemodynamic effects of developmental venous anomalies with and without cavernous malformations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:1746–51 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3516 pmid:23598827

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
52. 52.↵
    2. Iv M,
    3. Fischbein NJ,
    4. Zaharchuk G

    . Association of developmental venous anomalies with perfusion abnormalities on arterial spin labeling and bolus perfusion-weighted imaging. J Neuroimaging 2015;25:243–50 doi:10.1111/jon.12119 pmid:24717021

    CrossRefPubMed
53. 53.↵
    2. Larvie M,
    3. Timerman D,
    4. Thum JA

    . Brain metabolic abnormalities associated with developmental venous anomalies. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:475–80 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4172 pmid:25477358

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
54. 54.↵
    2. Kelly RE Jr.,
    3. Alexopoulos GS,
    4. Wang Z, et al

    . Visual inspection of independent components: defining a procedure for artifact removal from fMRI data. J Neurosci Methods 2010;189:233–45 doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2010.03.028 pmid:20381530

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
55. 55.↵
    2. Murphy K,
    3. Birn RM,
    4. Bandettini PA

    . Resting-state fMRI confounds and cleanup. Neuroimage 2013;80:349–59 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.001 pmid:23571418

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
56. 56.↵
    2. Thomas CG,
    3. Harshman RA,
    4. Menon RS

    . Noise reduction in BOLD-based fMRI using component analysis. Neuroimage 2002;17:1521–37 doi:10.1006/nimg.2002.1200 pmid:12414291

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
57. 57.↵
    2. Beall EB,
    3. Lowe MJ

    . Isolating physiologic noise sources with independently determined spatial measures. Neuroimage 2007;37:1286–300 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.07.004 pmid:17689982

    CrossRefPubMed
58. 58.↵
    2. Perlbarg V,
    3. Bellec P,
    4. Anton JL, et al

    . CORSICA: correction of structured noise in fMRI by automatic identification of ICA components. Magn Reson Imaging 2007;25:35–46 doi:10.1016/j.mri.2006.09.042 pmid:17222713

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
59. 59.↵
    2. Sui J,
    3. Adali T,
    4. Pearlson GD, et al

    . An ICA-based method for the identification of optimal FMRI features and components using combined group-discriminative techniques. Neuroimage 2009;46:73–86 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.01.026 pmid:19457398

    CrossRefPubMed
60. 60.↵
    2. Storti SF,
    3. Formaggio E,
    4. Nordio R, et al

    . Automatic selection of resting-state networks with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Front Neurosci 2013;7:72 doi:10.3389/fnins.2013.00072 pmid:23730268

    CrossRefPubMed
61. 61.↵
    2. Bhaganagarapu K,
    3. Jackson GD,
    4. Abbott DF

    . An automated method for identifying artifact in independent component analysis of resting-state FMRI. Front Hum Neurosci 2013;7:343 doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00343 pmid:23847511

    CrossRefPubMed
62. 62.↵
    2. Tohka J,
    3. Foerde K,
    4. Aron AR, et al

    . Automatic independent component labeling for artifact removal in fMRI. Neuroimage 2008;39:1227–45 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.10.013 pmid:18042495

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
63. 63.↵
    2. De Martino F,
    3. Gentile F,
    4. Esposito F, et al

    . Classification of fMRI independent components using IC-fingerprints and support vector machine classifiers. Neuroimage 2007;34:177–94 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.08.041 pmid:17070708

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
64. 64.↵
    2. Sochat V,
    3. Supekar K,
    4. Bustillo J, et al

    . A robust classifier to distinguish noise from fMRI independent components. PLoS One 2014;9:e95493 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0095493 pmid:24748378

    CrossRefPubMed
65. 65.↵
    2. Caballero-Gaudes C,
    3. Reynolds RC

    . Methods for cleaning the BOLD fMRI signal. Neuroimage 2017;154:128–49 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.12.018 pmid:27956209

    CrossRefPubMed
66. 66.↵
    2. Pereira VM,
    3. Geibprasert S,
    4. Krings T, et al

    . Pathomechanisms of symptomatic developmental venous anomalies. Stroke 2008;39:3201–15 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.521799 pmid:18988912

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
67. 67.↵
    2. Tomycz ND,
    3. Vora NA,
    4. Kanal E, et al

    . Intracranial arterialized venous angioma: case report with new insights from functional brain MRI. Diagn Interv Radiol 2010;16:13–15 doi:10.4261/1305-3825.DIR.1627-08.1 pmid:19813172

    CrossRefPubMed
68. 68.↵
    2. Lowe MJ,
    3. Mock BJ,
    4. Sorenson JA

    . Functional connectivity in single and multislice echoplanar imaging using resting-state fluctuations. Neuroimage 1998;7:119–32 doi:10.1006/nimg.1997.0315 pmid:9558644

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science