Toward Better Understanding of Flow Diversion in Bifurcation Aneurysms

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Becske T,
   3. Kallmes DF,
   4. Saatci I, et al

   . Pipeline for Uncoilable or Failed Aneurysms: results from a multicenter clinical trial. Radiology 2013;267:858–68 doi:10.1148/radiol.13120099 pmid:23418004

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   2. Becske T,
   3. Potts MB,
   4. Shapiro M, et al

   . Pipeline for Uncoilable or Failed Aneurysms: 3-year follow-up results. J Neurosurg 2017;127:81–88 doi:10.3171/2015.6.JNS15311 pmid:27739944

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   2. Becske T,
   3. Brinjikji W,
   4. Potts MB, et al

   . Long-term clinical and angiographic outcomes following Pipeline Embolization Device treatment of complex internal carotid artery aneurysms: five-year results of the Pipeline for Uncoilable or Failed Aneurysms Trial. Neurosurgery 2017;80:40–48 doi:10.1093/neuros/nyw014 pmid:28362885

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   2. Kallmes DF,
   3. Hanel R,
   4. Lopes D, et al

   . International retrospective study of the Pipeline embolization device: a multicenter aneurysm treatment study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:108–15 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4111 pmid:25355814

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   2. Saatci I,
   3. Yavuz K,
   4. Ozer C, et al

   . Treatment of intracranial aneurysms using the Pipeline flow-diverter embolization device: a single-center experience with long-term follow-up results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1436–46 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3246 pmid:22821921

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   2. Patel PD,
   3. Chalouhi N,
   4. Atallah E, et al

   . Off-label uses of the Pipeline Embolization Device: a review of the literature. Neurosurg Focus 2017;42:E4 doi:10.3171/2017.3.FOCUS1742 pmid:28565978

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. Iosif C,
   3. Mounayer C,
   4. Yavuz K, et al

   . Middle cerebral artery bifurcation aneurysms treated by extrasaccular flow diverters: midterm angiographic evolution and clinical outcome. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:310–16 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5022 pmid:27979794

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   2. Colby GP,
   3. Bender MT,
   4. Lin LM, et al

   . Endovascular flow diversion for treatment of anterior communicating artery region cerebral aneurysms: a single-center cohort of 50 cases. J Neurointerv Surg 2017;9:679–85 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012946 pmid:28130501

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   2. Daou B,
   3. Valle-Giler EP,
   4. Chalouhi N, et al

   . Patency of the posterior communicating artery following treatment with the Pipeline Embolization Device. J Neurosurg 2017;126:564–69 doi:10.3171/2016.2.JNS152544 pmid:27153163

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Nossek E,
    3. Zumofen DW,
    4. Setton A, et al

    . Treatment of distal anterior cerebral artery aneurysms with the Pipeline Embolization Device. J Clin Neurosci 2017;35:133–38 doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2016.10.041 pmid:27863970

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    2. Saleme S,
    3. Iosif C,
    4. Ponomarjova S, et al

    . Flow-diverting stents for intracranial bifurcation aneurysm treatment. Neurosurgery 2014;75:623–31; quiz 631 doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000000522 pmid:25121791

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    2. Gawlitza M,
    3. Januel AC,
    4. Tall P, et al

    . Flow diversion treatment of complex bifurcation aneurysms beyond the circle of Willis: a single-center series with special emphasis on covered cortical branches and perforating arteries. J Neurointerv Surg 2016;8:481–87 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-011682 pmid:25878068

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    2. Caroff J,
    3. Neki H,
    4. Mihalea C, et al

    . Flow-diverter stents for the treatment of saccular middle cerebral artery bifurcation aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:279–84 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4540 pmid:26405085

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    2. Cagnazzo F,
    3. Cappucci M,
    4. Dargazanli C, et al

    . Treatment of distal anterior cerebral artery aneurysms with flow-diverter stents: a single-center experience. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2018;39:1100–06 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5615 pmid:29650782

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    2. Fiorella D,
    3. Lylyk P,
    4. Szikora I, et al

    . Curative cerebrovascular reconstruction with the Pipeline Embolization Device: the emergence of definitive endovascular therapy for intracranial aneurysms. J Neurointerv Surg 2009;1:56–65 doi:10.1136/jnis.2009.000083 pmid:21994109

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    2. Shapiro M,
    3. Raz E,
    4. Becske T, et al

    . Building multidevice Pipeline constructs of favorable metal coverage: a practical guide. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:1556–61 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3902 pmid:24676003

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    2. Makoyeva A,
    3. Bing F,
    4. Darsaut TE, et al

    . The varying porosity of braided self-expanding stents and flow diverters: an experimental study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:596–602 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3234 pmid:22878007

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    2. Bing F,
    3. Darsaut TE,
    4. Salazkin I, et al

    . Stents and flow diverters in the treatment of aneurysms: device deformation in vivo may alter porosity and impact efficacy. Neuroradiology 2013;55:85–92 doi:10.1007/s00234-012-1082-0 pmid:22895818

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. 19.↵
    2. Chalouhi N,
    3. Daou B,
    4. Kung D, et al

    . Fate of the ophthalmic artery after treatment with the Pipeline Embolization Device. Neurosurgery 2015;77:581–84; discussion 584 doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000000887 pmid:26191974

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    2. Raz E,
    3. Shapiro M,
    4. Becske T, et al

    . Anterior choroidal artery patency and clinical follow-up after coverage with the Pipeline embolization device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:937–42 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4217 pmid:25572948

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
21. 21.↵
    2. Sforza DM,
    3. Putman CM,
    4. Cebral JR

    . Computational fluid dynamics in brain aneurysms. Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng 2012;28:801–08 doi:10.1002/cnm.1481 pmid:25364852

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    2. Guglielmi G

    . Analysis of the hemodynamic characteristics of brain arteriovenous malformations using electrical models: baseline settings, surgical extirpation, endovascular embolization, and surgical bypass. Neurosurgery 2008;63:1–10; discussion 11 doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000335065.07448.8A pmid:18728563

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    2. Spencer MP,
    3. Reid JM

    . Quantitation of carotid stenosis with continuous-wave (C-W) Doppler ultrasound. Stroke 1979;10:326–30 doi:10.1161/01.STR.10.3.326 pmid:462521

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
24. 24.↵
    2. Baron JC

    . Perfusion thresholds in human cerebral ischemia: historical perspective and therapeutic implications. Cerebrovasc Dis 2001;11(Suppl 1):2–8 pmid:11244194

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
25. 25.↵
    2. Faraci FM,
    3. Heistad DD

    . Regulation of large cerebral arteries and cerebral microvascular pressure. Circ Res 1990;66:8–17 doi:10.1161/01.RES.66.1.8 pmid:2403863

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
26. 26.↵
    2. Shapiro M,
    3. Raz E,
    4. Becske T, et al

    . Variable porosity of the Pipeline embolization device in straight and curved vessels: a guide for optimal deployment strategy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:727–33 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3742 pmid:24072622

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
27. 27.↵
    2. Iosif C,
    3. Berg P,
    4. Ponsonnard S, et al

    . Role of terminal and anastomotic circulation in the patency of arteries jailed by flow-diverting stents: from hemodynamic changes to ostia surface modifications. J Neurosurg 2017;126:1702–13 doi:10.3171/2016.2.JNS152120 pmid:27203141

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    2. Jou LD,
    3. Chintalapani G,
    4. Mawad ME

    . Metal coverage ratio of Pipeline embolization device for treatment of unruptured aneurysms: reality check. Interv Neuroradiol 2016;22:42–48 doi:10.1177/1591019915617315 pmid:26628457

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    2. Brinjikji W,
    3. Lanzino G,
    4. Cloft HJ, et al

    . Patency of the posterior communicating artery after flow diversion treatment of internal carotid artery aneurysms. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2014;120:84–88 doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2014.02.018 pmid:24731582

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    2. Chiu AH,
    3. Cheung AK,
    4. Wenderoth JD, et al

    . Long-term follow-up results following elective treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms with the Pipeline Embolization Device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:1728–34 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4329 pmid:25999412

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
31. 31.↵
    2. Hagen MW,
    3. Girdhar G,
    4. Wainwright J, et al

    . Thrombogenicity of flow diverters in an ex vivo shunt model: effect of phosphorylcholine surface modification. J Neurointerv Surg 2017;9:1006–11 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012612 pmid:27799376

    Abstract/FREE Full Text