Identification of Hostile Hemodynamics and Geometries of Cerebral Aneurysms: A Case-Control Study

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Chien A,
   3. Sayre J,
   4. Viñuela F

   . Comparative morphological analysis of the geometry of ruptured and unruptured aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2011;69:349–56 doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e31821661c3 pmid:21415785

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   2. Greving JP,
   3. Wermer MJ,
   4. Brown RD Jr., et al

   . Development of the PHASES score for prediction of risk of rupture of intracranial aneurysms: a pooled analysis of six prospective cohort studies. Lancet Neurol 2014;13:59–66 doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70263-1 pmid:24290159

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   2. Connolly ES Jr.,
   3. Rabinstein AA,
   4. Carhuapoma JR, et al

   ; American Heart Association Stroke Council, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, Council on Cardiovascular Nursing, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia, Council on Clinical Cardiology. Guidelines for the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2012;43:1711–37 doi:10.1161/STR.0b013e3182587839 pmid:22556195

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   2. Cebral J,
   3. Ollikainen E,
   4. Chung BJ, et al

   . Flow conditions in the intracranial aneurysm lumen are associated with inflammation and degenerative changes of the aneurysm wall. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:119–26 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4951 pmid:27686488

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   2. Frösen J,
   3. Tulamo R,
   4. Paetau A, et al

   . Saccular intracranial aneurysm: pathology and mechanisms. Acta Neuropathol 2012;123:773–86 doi:10.1007/s00401-011-0939-3 pmid:22249619

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   2. Cebral JR,
   3. Castro MA,
   4. Burgess JE, et al

   . Characterization of cerebral aneurysms for assessing risk of rupture by using patient-specific computational hemodynamics models. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:2550–59 pmid:16286400

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   2. Shojima M,
   3. Oshima M,
   4. Takagi K, et al

   . Magnitude and role of wall shear stress on cerebral aneurysm: computational fluid dynamic study of 20 middle cerebral artery aneurysms. Stroke 2004;35:2500–05 doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000144648.89172.0f pmid:15514200

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   2. Xiang J,
   3. Natarajan SK,
   4. Tremmel M, et al

   . Hemodynamic-morphologic discriminants for intracranial aneurysm rupture. Stroke 2011;42:144–52 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.592923 pmid:21106956

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. Cebral JR,
   3. Mut F,
   4. Weir J, et al

   . Quantitative characterization of the hemodynamic environment in ruptured and unruptured brain aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:145–51 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2419 pmid:21127144

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    2. Dhar S,
    3. Tremmel M,
    4. Mocco J, et al

    . Morphology parameters for intracranial aneurysm rupture risk assessment. Neurosurgery 2008;63:185–96; discussion 196–97 doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000316847.64140.81 pmid:18797347

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    2. Sforza DM,
    3. Kono K,
    4. Tateshima S, et al

    . Hemodynamics in growing and stable cerebral aneurysms. J Neurointerv Surg 2016;8:407–12 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011339 pmid:25653228

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    2. Tateshima S,
    3. Tanishita K,
    4. Omura H, et al

    . Intra-aneurysmal hemodynamics during the growth of unruptured aneurysm: in vitro study using longitudinal CT angiogram database. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:622–27 pmid:17416810

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    2. Boussel L,
    3. Rayz V,
    4. McCulloch C, et al

    . Aneurysm growth occurs at region of low wall shear stress: patient-specific correlation of hemodynamics and growth in a longitudinal study. Stroke 2008;39:2997–3002 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.521617 pmid:18688012

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    2. Brinjikji W,
    3. Chung BJ,
    4. Jimenez C, et al

    . Hemodynamic differences between unstable and stable unruptured aneurysms independent of size and location: a pilot study. J Neurointerv Surg 2017;9:376–80 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012327 pmid:27048958

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    2. Kallmes DF

    . Point: CFD—computational fluid dynamics or confounding factor dissemination. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:396–96 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2993 pmid:22268081

    FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    2. Cebral JR,
    3. Castro MA,
    4. Appanaboyina S, et al

    . Efficient pipeline for image-based patient-specific analysis of cerebral aneurysm hemodynamics: technique and sensitivity. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2005;24:457–67 doi:10.1109/TMI.2005.844159 pmid:15822804

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    2. Cebral JR,
    3. Castro MA,
    4. Putman CM, et al

    . Flow-area relationship in internal carotid and vertebral arteries. Physiol Meas 2008;29:585–94 doi:10.1088/0967-3334/29/5/005 pmid:18460763

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Mut F,
    3. Aubry R,
    4. Löhner R, et al

    . Fast numerical solutions of patient-specific blood flows in 3D arterial systems. Int J Num Meth Biomed Eng 2010;26:73–85 doi:10.1002/cnm.1235 pmid:21076685

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    2. Mut F,
    3. Löhner R,
    4. Chien A, et al

    . Computational hemodynamics framework for the analysis of cerebral aneurysms. Int J Num Meth Biomed Eng 2011;27:822–39 doi:10.1002/cnm.1424 pmid:21643491

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    2. Raghavan ML,
    3. Ma B,
    4. Harbaugh RE

    . Quantified aneurysm shape and rupture risk. J Neurosurg 2005;102:355–62 doi:10.3171/jns.2005.102.2.0355 pmid:15739566

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. 21.↵
    2. Niven DJ,
    3. Berthiaume LR,
    4. Fick GH, et al

    . Matched case-control studies: a review of reported statistical methodology. Clin Epidemiol 2012;4:99–110 doi:10.2147/CLEP.S30816 pmid:22570570

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    2. Efron B,
    3. Tibshirani RJ

    . An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall; 1993
23. 23.↵
    2. Wilkinson B

    . A statistical consideration in psychological research. Psychol Bull 1951;48:156–58 doi:10.1037/h0059111 pmid:14834286

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
24. 24.↵
    2. Benjamini Y,
    3. Hochberg Y

    . Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Series B 1995;57:289–300
25. 25.↵
    2. Lv N,
    3. Yu Y,
    4. Xu J, et al

    . Hemodynamic and morphological characteristics of unruptured posterior communicating artery aneurysms with oculomotor nerve palsy. J Neurosurg 2016;125:264–68 doi:10.3171/2015.6.JNS15267 pmid:26636379

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    2. Ramachandran M,
    3. Retarekar R,
    4. Raghavan ML, et al

    . Assessment of image-derived risk factors for natural course of unruptured cerebral aneurysms. J Neurosurg 2016;124:288–95 doi:10.3171/2015.2.JNS142265 pmid:26381246

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    2. Chien A,
    3. Xu M,
    4. Yokota H, et al

    . Nonsphericity index and size ratio identify morphologic differences between growing and stable aneurysms in a longitudinal study of 93 cases. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2018 Jan 25. [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5531 pmid:29371255

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
28. 28.↵
    2. Skodvin TØ,
    3. Evju Ø,
    4. Helland CA, et al

    . Rupture prediction of intracranial aneurysms: a nationwide matched case-control study of hemodynamics at the time of diagnosis. J Neurosurg 2017 Nov 3:1–7. [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.3171/2017.5.JNS17195 pmid:29099302

    CrossRefPubMed