Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleInterventional

Risk Factor Analysis of Recanalization Timing in Coiled Aneurysms: Early versus Late Recanalization

J.P. Jeon, Y.D. Cho, D.H. Yoo, J. Moon, J. Lee, W.-S. Cho, H.-S. Kang, J.E. Kim and M.H. Han
American Journal of Neuroradiology September 2017, 38 (9) 1765-1770; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5267
J.P. Jeon
aFrom the Department of Neurosurgery (J.P.J.), Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for J.P. Jeon
Y.D. Cho
bDepartments of Radiology (Y.D.C., D.H.Y., J.M.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Y.D. Cho
D.H. Yoo
bDepartments of Radiology (Y.D.C., D.H.Y., J.M.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for D.H. Yoo
J. Moon
bDepartments of Radiology (Y.D.C., D.H.Y., J.M.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for J. Moon
J. Lee
cNeurosurgery (J.L., W.-S.C., H.-S.K., J.E.K., M.H.H.), Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for J. Lee
W.-S. Cho
cNeurosurgery (J.L., W.-S.C., H.-S.K., J.E.K., M.H.H.), Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for W.-S. Cho
H.-S. Kang
cNeurosurgery (J.L., W.-S.C., H.-S.K., J.E.K., M.H.H.), Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for H.-S. Kang
J.E. Kim
cNeurosurgery (J.L., W.-S.C., H.-S.K., J.E.K., M.H.H.), Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for J.E. Kim
M.H. Han
cNeurosurgery (J.L., W.-S.C., H.-S.K., J.E.K., M.H.H.), Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for M.H. Han
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Long-term documentation of anatomic and angiographic characteristics pertaining to the timing of recanalization in coiled aneurysms has been insufficient. Our intent was to analyze and compare early and late-phase recanalization after coiling, identifying respective risk factors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 870 coiled saccular aneurysms were monitored for extended periods (mean, 30.8 ± 8.3 months). Medical records and radiologic data were also reviewed, stratifying patients as either early (n = 128) or late (n = 52) recanalization or as complete occlusion (n = 690). Early recanalization was equated with confirmed recanalization within 6 months after the procedure, whereas late recanalization was defined as verifiable recanalization after imaging confirmation of complete occlusion at 6 months. A multinomial regression model served to assess potential risk factors, the reference point being early recanalization.

RESULTS: Posterior circulation (P = .009), subarachnoid hemorrhage at presentation (P = .011), second attempt for recanalized aneurysm (P < .001), and aneurysm size >7 mm (P < .001) emerged as variables significantly linked with early recanalization (versus complete occlusion). Late (versus early) recanalization corresponded with aneurysms ≤7 mm (P = .013), and in a separate subanalysis of lesions ≤7 mm, aneurysms 4–7 mm showed a significant predilection for late recanalization (P = .008). However, the propensity for complete occlusion in smaller lesions (≤7 mm) increased as the size diminished.

CONCLUSIONS: Although long-term complete occlusion after coiling was more likely in aneurysms ≤7 mm, such lesions were more prone to late (versus early) recanalization, particularly those of 4–7 mm in size. Long-term follow-up imaging is thus appropriate in aneurysms >4 mm to detect late recanalization of those formerly demonstrating complete occlusion.

Endovascular coiling is widely used in treating intracranial aneurysms. Despite continued improvement in related techniques and devices, the potential for recanalization remains. Risk factors linked to recanalization have been studied widely through comparative analysis, examining SAH at presentation, larger aneurysms, posterior locations, and other variables.1,2 Coiled aneurysms showing major recanalization are subsequently in need of additional coiling, given the odds of rebleeding. Raymond et al3 found that 46.9% of all recanalizations occurred within 6 months of procedures, with nearly 40% showing major recanalization.4 As a function of the follow-up duration, aneurysm size and neck diameter and initial postembolization status were associated with the recanalization of coiled aneurysms monitored for 17 months.3 However, in coiled aneurysms followed for <17 months, the initial postembolization status emerged as the sole significant risk factor for recanalization. Such a discrepancy may imply that risk factors inherent in aneurysm configuration have a greater long-term impact on recanalization.4,5 Therefore, an association between the timing of recanalization and related risk factors is feasible. Most previous studies in this setting have limited risk factor analysis to patients showing either recanalization or complete occlusion, without considering time to recanalization. In this study, coiled saccular aneurysms were monitored over a longer term to analyze and compare early and late-phase recanalization, thereby identifying respective risk factors.

Materials and Methods

A retrospective analysis of 898 patients (1035 aneurysms) took place, each patient having undergone coil embolization between January 2008 and December 2010 at a single institution. Nonsaccular aneurysms (n = 70), specifically the fusiform/dissection, traumatic, or infectious types, were excluded from this analysis. The study end point was the timing of recanalization (early versus late) during follow-up. Another 66 patients lacking 6-month imaging data (lost to follow-up, 40; vegetative states, 16; deaths, 10) and 29 aneurysms followed for 6 months only were secondarily excluded. Ultimately, 746 patients with 870 saccular intracranial aneurysms who were monitored for more than 12 months met criteria for study enrollment.

In reviewing the medical records, sex, age, clinical presentation (unruptured intracranial aneurysm or SAH), and attempt at embolization (first versus second) were recorded, in addition to histories of hypertension, current smoking, and antiplatelet regimens. Patient angiographic variables included size of aneurysm (overall and at neck)5; circulatory location (anterior [including posterior communicating artery] versus posterior)6; aneurysm type (sidewall versus bifurcation) and depth-to-neck ratio; confirmed stent placement; initial postembolization status (successful occlusion versus residual sac)4; and coil technology (hydrogel-modified [HydroSoft; MicroVention, Tustin, California] or polyglycolic acid/lactide copolymer–coated [Matrix; Boston Scientific, Natick, Massachusetts]). Aneurysms were also grouped according to the extent of bioactive coil used (relative to the collective length of inserted coil) as bare (≤50%) or bioactive (>50%). This study was conducted with the approval of our institutional review boards. The requirement to obtain written informed consent for study participation was waived.

Endovascular Procedure and Angiographic Follow-Up

Most endovascular procedures were conducted under general anesthesia using an Integris V (Philips Healthcare, Best, the Netherlands) scanner in each instance.4 Dual-agent antiplatelet therapy (loading doses [ie, 300 mg each] of clopidogrel and aspirin), given 1 day before procedures, plus additional clopidogrel (75 mg) and aspirin (100 mg) dosing on the mornings of procedures, were administered to patients with unruptured aneurysms for anticipated stent protection.7 In poor responders to clopidogrel, signaled by the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay (Accumetrics, San Diego, California), cilostazol was added. If stent placement was unlikely, antiplatelet medications were not routinely used except in patients receiving such agents for other medical conditions. A bolus of heparin (3000 IU), given upon placement of the femoral arterial sheath, was thereafter sustained by hourly doses (1000 IU), and the activated clotting time was monitored each hour. Continuance of dual antiplatelet therapy was advised for at least 3 months postoperatively, followed by single-agent maintenance for at least 1 year in patients with stents deployed. In the absence of stent placement, antiplatelet therapy was selectively dispensed in instances of prior antiplatelet medication use, coil protrusion, or procedural thromboembolism.

Immediate postembolization angiographic results were graded as follows by using the 3-point Raymond scale: complete occlusion, residual neck, or residual sac. Complete occlusion and small residual neck were considered successful occlusive attempts.4 Follow-up radiologic examinations, performed at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months postprocedure, relied on TOF-MRA, with 3D reconstruction and source images. Additional plain radiography was recommended at postembolization months 1 and 3 in patients presenting with hemorrhage. Conventional angiography was advised if MRA assessment of treated aneurysms was not feasible or if recanalization was suspected by noninvasive diagnostics (such as MRA or plain radiography) to gauge the need for further treatment. Anatomic outcomes in follow-up were categorized by the Raymond scale as follows: complete occlusion and recanalization (minor or major). Early recanalization was equated with confirmed recanalization within 6 months or upon postembolization follow-up imaging at 6 months, whereas late recanalization was defined as verifiable recanalization after imaging confirmation of complete occlusion at 6 months. Two qualified neurointerventionists (Y.D.C. [10 years' experience] and H.-S.K. [15 years' experience]) reviewed the radiologic data. In cases of discrepancy, a consensus was reached by the third interventional neuroradiologist (M.H.H. [>25 years' experience]).

Statistical Analyses

Continuous data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation by using χ2 or Fisher exact test and unpaired t test to assess categoric and continuous variables, respectively. Univariate analysis was applied to evaluate between-group differences (early or late recanalization and stable occlusion). To examine the interrelationships of risk factors, a multinomial regression model was engaged, with early recanalization serving as the reference point. Risk factors differing by group at the P < .10 level were entered into the model. Nagelkerke R2 was measured for explaining variation, which is estimated on the log-likelihood scale. A Kaplan-Meier estimate of cumulative survival (without recanalization) in coiled aneurysms according to aneurysm size was performed. All calculations relied on standard statistical software (SPSS v19; IBM, Armonk, New York), setting significance at P < .05.

Results

Characteristics of Patient Enrollees

A total of 870 coiled saccular aneurysms were monitored for a mean period of 30.8 ± 8.3 months. Female patients accounted for 68.4% (595/870) of the aneurysms, and the mean age of all patients was 57.9 ± 11.0 years. Anterior circulation (n = 802; 92.2%) and bifurcation aneurysms (n = 388; 44.6%) predominated. Successful occlusion as an initial angiographic outcome was achieved in 657 coiled aneurysms (75.5%), with mean aneurysm size estimated at 5.3 ± 3.3 mm. Overall, 712 (81.8%) aneurysms were ≤7 mm. SAH was evident at presentation in 138 cases (15.9%), including 74 recanalized aneurysms (8.5%). In 707 aneurysms (81.3%), the coil inserted qualified as bare (≤50% bioactive). Stents were deployed in 222 instances (25.5%). During the follow-up period, 690 coiled aneurysms displayed complete occlusion, early recanalization was observed in 128 (minor recanalization, n = 45; major recanalization, n = 83), and late recanalization developed in 52 (minor recanalization, n = 34; major recanalization, n = 18). In terms of late recanalization, 31 (59.6%) instances were evident within 6–12 months, 19 (36.5%) within 12–24 months, and 2 (3.9%) within 24–36 months after procedures. Retreatment was recommended for major recanalized aneurysms and was actually performed as follows: 48 (57.8%) occurring early and 11 (61.1%) occurring late. During the follow-up, no patients included in this study experienced SAH or rebleeding. Detailed data on characteristics of the aneurysms in this cohort are shown in Table 1.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1:

Baseline characteristics of study enrollees

Risk Factors of Late Recanalization and Complete Occlusion

In between-group comparisons, female sex, age, history of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, smoking, aneurysm type, depth-to-neck ratio >1, initial postembolization status, and >50% bioactive coil usage did not reach statistical significance. However, aneurysm location, clinical presentation, second embolization for recanalization, aneurysm size >7 mm, and stent deployment differed significantly by group in the univariate analysis (Table 1).

The multinomial regression model further disclosed that posterior circulation (P = .009), SAH presentation (P = .011), required second embolization (P < .001), and aneurysm size >7 mm (P < .001) showed stronger associations with the early recanalization (versus complete occlusion) group (Table 2).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2:

Multinomial logistic regression; late recanalization versus complete occlusion (early recanalization serving as reference)a

In comparing early and late recanalization, a link between aneurysm size >7 mm and early recanalization was apparent, whereas smaller lesions (≤7 mm) were associated with late recanalization (P = .013). Other group variables, such as posterior circulation, SAH presentation, second attempt (in recanalized lesions), antiplatelet agent use, and stent deployment did not differ significantly (Table 2). Further subanalysis of aneurysms ≤7 mm showed a significant relationship between aneurysms 4–7 mm in size and late recanalization (odds ratio, 3.00; P = .008). However, of those aneurysms ≤7 mm, diminishing size and stable occlusion were increasingly linked (On-line Table).

According to the Kaplan-Meier method, the cumulative survival rate without recanalization at 6 months was 90.7% in aneurysms ≤7 mm and 60.8% in aneurysms >7 mm. At 30 months after the procedure, the cumulative survival rate was 84.8% for aneurysms ≤7 mm and 52.8% for aneurysms >7 mm (P < .001) (On-line Fig).

Discussion

Our findings indicate that small-sized aneurysms (≤7 mm) are relatively more susceptible to late (versus early) recanalization, despite a stronger association with complete occlusion. On the other hand, early recanalization correlated with locations in the posterior circulation, SAH presentation, second coiling for recanalization, and aneurysm size >7 mm. In particular, aneurysms ranging from 4–7 mm were more prone to late recanalization. Consequently, small-sized aneurysms >4 mm should be followed long-term for potential delayed recanalization, despite any proof of complete occlusion at midterm follow-up.

Patients presenting with SAH are also more likely to develop recanalization after coiling procedures.3,8 The dynamic nature of ruptured aneurysms and clot lysis appears to promote recanalization. Wardlaw et al9 reported that such aneurysms showed increased cross-sectional area expansibility (mean, 53%) during the cardiac cycle relative to adjacent normal arteries (mean, 20%). Recently, higher saccular pulsatile pressures have also been recorded in ruptured (versus unruptured) lesions,10 and thinner, degenerative arterial walls, with significant macrophage infiltration, have been documented in histologic sections of ruptured aneurysms.11 Mural instability and the increased pulsatile pressure of ruptured aneurysms may thus encourage greater coil compaction than that encountered in unruptured counterparts.12 Lysis of clot may take place as well within thrombus or at rupture sites once related hypercoagulability subsides.8

Of particular importance, an increase in packing attenuation of near 30% may reduce intra-aneurysmal wall shear stress, promoting recanalization.13 The probability of coil compaction declines if aneurysms are more densely packed (>20% in aneurysms <200 mm3; >24% in aneurysms <600 mm3).14 Packing attenuation in our cohort (when excluding recanalized aneurysms) did not differ significantly in patients presenting with (36.3 ± 10.9) or without (36.1 ± 8.8) SAH (P = .859). Nevertheless, SAH proved significantly more frequent in aneurysms marked by early recanalization (versus complete occlusion) (P = .011). Further studies on the mechanism of recanalization in ruptured aneurysms are clearly needed.

Outcomes of the Unruptured Cerebral Aneurysm Study15 have shown an association between aneurysms >7 mm in size and rupture. Relative to aneurysms 3–4 mm in size, larger lesions were at significantly greater risk (5–6 mm: hazard ratio = 1.13, P = .71; 7–9 mm: hazard ratio = 3.35, P < .001; 10–24 mm: hazard ratio = 9.09, P < .001). According to the International Study of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms,16 5-year cumulative rupture rates in anterior circulation aneurysms without previous SAH also varied decisively by lesion size (<7 mm, 0%; 7–12 mm, 2.6%; 13–24 mm, 14.5%). Larger aneurysms also are more likely to recanalize. Cognard et al8 earlier determined that recanalization rates indeed are a function of aneurysm size (2–3 mm, 8.7%; 4–5 mm, 9.0%; and 6–8 mm, 22.0%). In addition, Jeon et al5 have shown an association between large aneurysms (>7 mm) completely occluded in 6-month follow-up images and late recanalization, and reports by Ogilvy et al17 and Niimi et al18 similarly maintain that larger aneurysms (≥10 mm) are prone to recanalization. It is thus evident that large aneurysms are at peril of rupture and postprocedural recanalization. However, recanalization rates in small aneurysms have not been fully detailed, though they are considered to be low. Murayama et al19 have cited a 5.1% overall recanalization rate for small aneurysms 4–10 mm in size with small necks, which was much lower than the 35.3% rate for larger aneurysms. The reported annual recanalization rate in aneurysms ≤7 mm showing complete occlusion at 6-month follow-up is 2.57%.5 After some reflection, a subgroup analysis of our data was performed, examining recanalization rates in lesions <4 mm and in those 4–7 mm. Our findings showed that aneurysms 4–7 mm were more prone to late recanalization. Consequently, small-sized aneurysms >4 mm should be followed long-term for potential delayed recanalization despite confirming complete occlusion at midterm follow-up.

Stents are increasingly used in this setting if greater coil packing and flow diversion are anticipated.20⇓⇓–23 Recanalization rates registered after stent-assisted coil embolization (6.6%–13%)4,24,25 are notably lower than those encountered after simple coil embolization (10.7%–33.6%).3,26 In our investigation, stent deployment differed significantly among 3 groups (early recanalization, n = 45 [45/128, 35.2%]; late recanalization, n = 8 [8/52, 15.4%]; and complete occlusion, n = 169 [169/690, 24.5%] [P = .009]) through univariate analysis. However, stent deployment held no significant association with complete occlusion or late recanalization in a multinomial logistic regression analysis using early recanalization as a reference. Although potential confounding factors related to the high probability of stent deployment in wide-neck aneurysms and the incorporation of arterial branches by aneurysms may have skewed our assessment of this presumptive benefit, Jeon et al20 found that stents conferred no protective effects relative to progressive occlusion in small unruptured aneurysms with residual sac filling (P = .78). Still, after various corrections in the propensity score analysis, stent placement did promote progressive occlusion in coiled aneurysms.20 In our opinion, the impact of stents is better investigated by considering the probability of stent deployment.

Hemodynamic force is another reputed factor in aneurysm recanalization and growth.2 In recanalized aneurysms, maximum wall shear stress and spatially averaged wall shear stress exceed corresponding pretreatment values.27 In addition, completely occluded aneurysms show diminished wall shear stress and flow velocity.28 The efforts of Ortega et al29 indicate that maximum wall shear stress increases at sites of blood flow impingement near remnant necks. Repetitive flow impingement and subsequent wall shear stress increments may thus lead to recanalization,4 particularly in recanalized aneurysms. Our results also show that second attempts for recanalization were done with significantly greater frequency in early recanalized versus completely occluded aneurysms (P < .001), with no statistical difference between the early and late recanalization groups.

The HydroSoft coil was constructed as a platinum coil with an inner core of hydrogel and was designed to improve packing attenuation with low stiffness.30 Lee et al31 reported that the mean packing attenuation of the aneurysms treated with the HydroSoft coil was significantly higher than of those treated with a bare platinum coil (36.0% versus 32.1%; P < .001) without a difference in procedure-related complications. The use of the HydroSoft coil significantly lowered the retreatment rate at 12-month follow-up (adjusted risk ratio, 0.21; 95% CI: 0.07–0.64). Matrix detachable coils are covered with polyglycolic and polylactic acid and designed to enhance clot formation and fibrosis within the aneurysm sac.32 A histology study showed a thick connective tissue formation that demarcated the aneurysm sac from the parent artery.33,34 In our cohort, the number of treated aneurysms using bioactive coil (>50%) was 26/128 (20.3%) in early recanalization, 8/52 (15.4%) in late recanalization, and 129/690 (18.7%) in complete occlusion (P = .743). We speculate that the relative low proportion of bioactive coil (>50%) might lead to insignificant association among the 3 groups.

Although risk factors in recanalization have been well described through comparative studies of stably occluded and recanalized aneurysms, the potential difference between early and late recanalization is perhaps another issue to pursue in devising strategies for patient management. Herein, we have focused on analyzing risk factors with respect to the timing of recanalization. Our findings indicate that aneurysms of 4–7 mm are at significant risk of late recanalization, thereby mandating long-term follow-up.

Unfortunately, selection bias in this large (n = 870) and closely monitored sampling of aneurysms cannot be excluded, given the retrospective nature of this study. Furthermore, use of TOF-MRA in follow-up testing may entail some artifact because of stents obscuring recanalization.20 Although the use of MIP in source images obtained by TOF-MRA has proved effective in estimating recanalization,35 stent artifacts may still obscure instances of minor recanalizations, impacting calculated recanalization rates.20 In addition, coil compaction and recanalization could be more pronounced in patients with small aneurysms who underwent MRA follow-up. On another note, anterior circulatory and unruptured aneurysms in our cohort accounted for 92.2% and 84.1% of lesions, respectively. Thus, lesions of the posterior circulation and ruptured aneurysms were not well represented.5 Finally, and more specifically, recanalization of aneurysms may occur through growth of the lesions themselves, through poorly formed/degraded thrombus, or through failed attempts at reconfiguring the saccular dome or neck.36 More detailed investigations of recanalization are needed to better correlate angiographic outcomes with reciprocating effects of the healing process.

Conclusions

Risk factors related to early recanalization in this study were posterior circulatory location, SAH presentation, second coiling for recanalization, and aneurysm size >7 mm. Although aneurysms ≤7 mm in size were more prone to complete occlusion in long-term follow-up, a relative predisposition to late (versus early) recanalization was apparent, particularly in aneurysms of 4–7 mm. Long-term follow-up imaging is thus advisable in aneurysms >4 mm to exclude progression to recanalization, despite complete occlusion at midterm monitoring.

Footnotes

  • Disclosures: Moon Hee Han—UNRELATED: Consultancy: Microvention*. *Money paid to the institution.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Ries T,
    2. Siemonsen S,
    3. Thomalla G, et al
    . Long-term follow-up of cerebral aneurysms after endovascular therapy prediction and outcome of retreatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:1755–61 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A0649 pmid:17885238
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Park W,
    2. Song Y,
    3. Park KJ, et al
    . Hemodynamic characteristics regarding recanalization of completely coiled aneurysms: computational fluid dynamic analysis using virtual models comparison. Neurointervention 2016;11:30–36 doi:10.5469/neuroint.2016.11.1.30 pmid:26958410
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Raymond J,
    2. Guilbert F,
    3. Weill A, et al
    . Long-term angiographic recurrences after selective endovascular treatment of aneurysms with detachable coils. Stroke 2003;34:1398–403 doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000073841.88563.E9 pmid:12775880
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Jeon JP,
    2. Cho YD,
    3. Rhim JK, et al
    . Fate of coiled aneurysms with minor recanalization at 6 months: rate of progression to further recanalization and related risk factors. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:1490–95 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4763 pmid:26965468
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Jeon JP,
    2. Cho YD,
    3. Rhim JK, et al
    . Extended monitoring of coiled aneurysms completely occluded at 6-month follow-up: late recanalization rate and related risk factors. Eur Radiol 2016;26:3319–26 doi:10.1007/s00330-015-4176-3 pmid:26747259
    CrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Cho YD,
    2. Jeon JP,
    3. Rhim JK, et al
    . Progressive thrombosis of small saccular aneurysms filled with contrast immediately after coil embolization: analysis of related factors and long-term follow-up. Neuroradiology 2015;57:615–23 doi:10.1007/s00234-015-1514-8 pmid:25808124
    CrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Cho YD,
    2. Lee WJ,
    3. Kim KM, et al
    . Stent-assisted coil embolization of posterior communicating artery aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:2171–76 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3541 pmid:23660292
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Cognard C,
    2. Weill A,
    3. Spelle L, et al
    . Long-term angiographic follow-up of 169 intracranial berry aneurysms occluded with detachable coils. Radiology 1999;212:348–56 doi:10.1148/radiology.212.2.r99jl47348 pmid:10429689
    CrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Wardlaw JM,
    2. Cannon JC
    . Color transcranial “power” Doppler ultrasound of intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg 1996;84:459–61 doi:10.3171/jns.1996.84.3.0459 pmid:8609558
    CrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Wardlaw JM,
    2. Cannon J,
    3. Statham PF, et al
    . Does the size of intracranial aneurysms change with intracranial pressure? Observations based on color “power” transcranial Doppler ultrasound. J Neurosurg 1998;88:846–50 doi:10.3171/jns.1998.88.5.0846 pmid:9576252
    CrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Kataoka K,
    2. Taneda M,
    3. Asai T, et al
    . Structural fragility and inflammatory response of ruptured cerebral aneurysms. A comparative study between ruptured and unruptured cerebral aneurysms. Stroke 1999;30:1396–401 doi:10.1161/01.STR.30.7.1396 pmid:10390313
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Tan IY,
    2. Agid RF,
    3. Willinsky RA
    . Recanalization rates after endovascular coil embolization in a cohort of matched ruptured and unruptured cerebral aneurysms. Interv Neuroradiol 2011;17:27–35 doi:10.1177/159101991101700106 pmid:21561556
    CrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Morales HG,
    2. Kim M,
    3. Vivas EE, et al
    . How do coil configuration and packing density influence intra-aneurysmal hemodynamics? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:1935–41 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2635 pmid:21885712
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Sluzewski M,
    2. van Rooij WJ,
    3. Slob MJ, et al
    . Relation between aneurysm volume, packing, and compaction in 145 cerebral aneurysms treated with coils. Radiology 2004;231:653–58 doi:10.1148/radiol.2313030460 pmid:15118115
    CrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Morita A,
    2. Kirino T, et al
    UCAS Japan Investigators, Morita A, Kirino T, et al. The natural course of unruptured cerebral aneurysms in a Japanese cohort. N Engl J Med 2012;366:2474–82 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1113260 pmid:22738097
    CrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Wiebers DO,
    2. Whisnant JP,
    3. Huston J 3rd., et al
    . Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: natural history, clinical outcome, and risks of surgical and endovascular treatment. Lancet 2003;362:103–10 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13860-3 pmid:12867109
    CrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Ogilvy CS,
    2. Chua MH,
    3. Fusco MR, et al
    . Validation of a system to predict recanalization after endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2015;77:168–73; discussion 173–74 doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000000744 pmid:25850603
    CrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Niimi Y,
    2. Song J,
    3. Madrid M, et al
    . Endosaccular treatment of intracranial aneurysms using Matrix coils: early experience and midterm follow-up. Stroke 2006;37:1028–32 doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000206459.73897.a3 pmid:16514098
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Murayama Y,
    2. Nien YL,
    3. Duckwiler G, et al
    . Guglielmi detachable coil embolization of cerebral aneurysms: 11 years' experience. J Neurosurg 2003;98:959–66 doi:10.3171/jns.2003.98.5.0959 pmid:12744354
    CrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Jeon JP,
    2. Cho YD,
    3. Rhim JK, et al
    . Effect of stenting on progressive occlusion of small unruptured saccular intracranial aneurysms with residual sac immediately after coil embolization: a propensity score analysis. J Neurointerv Surg 2016;8:1025–29 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-011947 pmid:26508130
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Lawson MF,
    2. Newman WC,
    3. Chi YY, et al
    . Stent-associated flow remodeling causes further occlusion of incompletely coiled aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2011;69:598–603; discussion 603–04 doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182181c2b pmid:21430583
    CrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Park KY,
    2. Kim BM,
    3. Kim DJ
    . Comparison between balloon-assisted and stent-assisted technique for treatment of unruptured internal carotid artery aneurysms. Neurointervention 2016;11:99–104 doi:10.5469/neuroint.2016.11.2.99 pmid:27621946
    CrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Liu H,
    2. Choe J,
    3. Jung SC, et al
    . Does a low-wall coverage stent have a flow diverting effect in small aneurysms? Neurointervention 2015;10:89–93 doi:10.5469/neuroint.2015.10.2.89 pmid:26389012
    CrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Hwang SK,
    2. Hwang G,
    3. Bang JS, et al
    . Endovascular Enterprise stent-assisted coil embolization for wide-necked unruptured intracranial aneurysms. J Clin Neurosci 2013;20:1276–79 doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2012.11.010 pmid:23830596
    CrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Luo CB,
    2. Teng MM,
    3. Chang FC, et al
    . Stent-assisted coil embolization of intracranial aneurysms: a single center experience. J Chin Med Assoc 2012;75:322–28 doi:10.1016/j.jcma.2012.05.003 pmid:22824046
    CrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Kwon SC,
    2. Kwon OK
    , Korean Unruptured Cerebral Aneurysm Coiling (KUCAC) Investigators. Endovascular coil embolization of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a Korean multicenter study. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2014;156:847–54 doi:10.1007/s00701-014-2033-9 pmid:24610449
    CrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Li C,
    2. Wang S,
    3. Chen J, et al
    . Influence of hemodynamics on recanalization of totally occluded intracranial aneurysms: A patient-specific computational fluid dynamic simulation study. Neurosurg 2012;117:276–83 doi:10.3171/2012.5.JNS111558
    CrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Luo B,
    2. Yang X,
    3. Wang S, et al
    . High shear stress and flow velocity in partially occluded aneurysms prone to recanalization. Stroke 2011;42:745–53 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.593517 pmid:21233477
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    1. Ortega J,
    2. Hartman J,
    3. Rodriguez J, et al
    . Post-treatment hemodynamics of a basilar aneurysm and bifurcation. Ann Biomed Eng 2008;36:1531–46 doi:10.1007/s10439-008-9535-7 pmid:18629647
    CrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Guo XB,
    2. Fan YM,
    3. Zhang JN
    . HydroSoft coil versus HydroCoil for endovascular aneurysm occlusion study: a single center experience. Eur J Radiol 2011;79:e42–46 doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.04.031 pmid:20537831
    CrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Lee JY,
    2. Seo JH,
    3. Lee SJ, et al
    . Mid-term outcome of intracranial aneurysms treated with HydroSoft coils compared to historical controls treated with bare platinum coils: a single-center experience. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2014;156:1687–94 doi:10.1007/s00701-014-2157-y pmid:24975277
    CrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Rossitti S
    . Endovascular coiling of intracranial aneurysms using bioactive coils: a single-center study. Acta Radiol 2007;48:565–76 doi:10.1080/02841850701308360 pmid:17520435
    CrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Szikora I,
    2. Seifert P,
    3. Hanzely Z, et al
    . Histopathologic evaluation of aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils or Matrix detachable microcoils. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:283–88 pmid:16484393
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  34. 34.↵
    1. Gonzalez NR,
    2. Patel AB,
    3. Murayama Y, et al
    . Angiographic evidence of aneurysm neck healing following endovascular treatment with bioactive coils. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:912–14 pmid:15814944
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  35. 35.↵
    1. Cho YD,
    2. Kim KM,
    3. Lee WJ, et al
    . Time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography for follow-up of coil embolization with Enterprise stent for intracranial aneurysm: usefulness of source images. Korean J Radiol 2014;15:161–68 doi:10.3348/kjr.2014.15.1.161 pmid:24497808
    CrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    1. Brinjikji W,
    2. Kallmes DF,
    3. Kadirvel R
    . Mechanisms of healing in coiled intracranial aneurysms: a review of the literature. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:1216–22 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4175 pmid:25430855
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  • Received January 9, 2017.
  • Accepted after revision April 10, 2017.
  • © 2017 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 38 (9)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 38, Issue 9
1 Sep 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Risk Factor Analysis of Recanalization Timing in Coiled Aneurysms: Early versus Late Recanalization
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
J.P. Jeon, Y.D. Cho, D.H. Yoo, J. Moon, J. Lee, W.-S. Cho, H.-S. Kang, J.E. Kim, M.H. Han
Risk Factor Analysis of Recanalization Timing in Coiled Aneurysms: Early versus Late Recanalization
American Journal of Neuroradiology Sep 2017, 38 (9) 1765-1770; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A5267

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Risk Factor Analysis of Recanalization Timing in Coiled Aneurysms: Early versus Late Recanalization
J.P. Jeon, Y.D. Cho, D.H. Yoo, J. Moon, J. Lee, W.-S. Cho, H.-S. Kang, J.E. Kim, M.H. Han
American Journal of Neuroradiology Sep 2017, 38 (9) 1765-1770; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A5267
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Decoding the data: a comment on the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association (AHA/ASA) 2023 Guideline for the Management of patients with Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
  • Predictors of Cerebral Aneurysm Rupture after Coil Embolization: Single-Center Experience with Recanalized Aneurysms
  • Selective compromise of hypoplastic posterior communicating artery variants with aneurysms treatable by coil embolization: clinical and radiologic outcomes
  • Crossref (20)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • Predictors of Cerebral Aneurysm Rupture after Coil Embolization: Single-Center Experience with Recanalized Aneurysms
    Y. Funakoshi, H. Imamura, S. Tani, H. Adachi, R. Fukumitsu, T. Sunohara, Y. Omura, Y. Matsui, N. Sasaki, T. Fukuda, R. Akiyama, K. Horiuchi, S. Kajiura, M. Shigeyasu, K. Iihara, N. Sakai
    American Journal of Neuroradiology 2020 41 5
  • Risk Factors for Recurrence of Intracranial Aneurysm After Coil Embolization: A Meta-Analysis
    Ji Jin, Geng Guo, Yeqing Ren, Biao Yang, Yongqiang Wu, Shule Wang, Yanqi Sun, Xiaogang Wang, Yuxiao Wang, Jianzhong Zheng
    Frontiers in Neurology 2022 13
  • Risk Factors for Recanalization after Coil Embolization
    Karol Wiśniewski, Zbigniew Tyfa, Bartłomiej Tomasik, Piotr Reorowicz, Ernest J. Bobeff, Bartłomiej J. Posmyk, Marlena Hupało, Ludomir Stefańczyk, Krzysztof Jóźwik, Dariusz J. Jaskólski
    Journal of Personalized Medicine 2021 11 8
  • Definitive Treatment With Microsurgical Clipping After Recurrence and Rerupture of Coiled Anterior Cerebral Artery Aneurysms
    Daniel M S Raper, Caleb Rutledge, Ethan A Winkler, Adib A Abla
    Operative Neurosurgery 2020 19 4
  • Development and assessment of machine learning models for predicting recurrence risk after endovascular treatment in patients with intracranial aneurysms
    ShiTeng Lin, Yang Zou, Jue Hu, Lan Xiang, LeHeng Guo, XinPing Lin, DaiZun Zou, Xiaoping Gao, Hui Liang, JianJun Zou, ZhiHong Zhao, XiaoMing Dai
    Neurosurgical Review 2022 45 2
  • Hemodynamic and Morphologic Factors Related to Coil Compaction in Basilar Artery Tip Aneurysms
    Takumi Ishii, Soichiro Fujimura, Hiroyuki Takao, Yuya Uchiyama, Takuma Okudaira, Toshihiro Ishibashi, Katharina Otani, Kostadin Karagiozov, Koji Fukudome, Makoto Yamamoto, Yuichi Murayama
    World Neurosurgery 2021 155
  • In situ crosslinking temperature‐responsive hydrogels with improved delivery, swelling, and elasticity for endovascular embolization
    Derek J. Overstreet, Elizabeth J. Lee, Amrita Pal, Brent L. Vernon
    Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials 2022 110 8
  • Delayed Progression to Major Recanalization in Coiled Aneurysms with Minor Recanalization at 36-Month Follow-up
    Eung Koo Yeon, Young Dae Cho, Dong Hyun Yoo, Su Hwan Lee, Hyun-Seung Kang, Won-Sang Cho, Jeong Eun Kim, Moon Hee Han
    Clinical Neuroradiology 2021 31 2
  • Posterior Communicating Artery-incorporated Internal Carotid-Posterior Communicating Artery Aneurysms Prone to Recur After Coil Embolization
    Ryuta Yasuda, Yoichi Miura, Yume Suzuki, Masanori Tsuji, Masato Shiba, Naoki Toma, Hidenori Suzuki
    World Neurosurgery 2022 162
  • Enigma of what is Known about Intracranial Aneurysm Occlusion with Endovascular Devices
    Adesh Shrivastava, Rakesh Mishra, Luis Rafael Moscote Salazar, Pradeep Chouksey, Sumit Raj, Amit Agrawal
    Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases 2021 30 6

More in this TOC Section

  • CT-Guided C2 Dorsal Root Ganglion Radiofrequency Ablation for the Treatment of Cervicogenic Headache: Case Series and Clinical Outcomes
  • Safety, Efficacy, and Durability of Stent-Assisted Coiling Treatment of M2 (Insular) Segment MCA Aneurysms
  • Endovascular Management of Intracranial Dural AVFs: Transvenous Approach
Show more INTERVENTIONAL

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire