Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleExtracranial Vascular

Selective-versus-Standard Poststent Dilation for Carotid Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

O. Petr, W. Brinjikji, M.H. Murad, B. Glodny and G. Lanzino
American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2017, 38 (5) 999-1005; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5103
O. Petr
aFrom the Departments of Neurologic Surgery (O.P., G.L.)
eNeurosurgery (O.P.), Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for O. Petr
W. Brinjikji
bRadiology (W.B., G.L.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for W. Brinjikji
M.H. Murad
cDivision of Preventive Medicine (M.H.M.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for M.H. Murad
B. Glodny
dDepartments of Radiology (B.G.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for B. Glodny
G. Lanzino
aFrom the Departments of Neurologic Surgery (O.P., G.L.)
bRadiology (W.B., G.L.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for G. Lanzino
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Ricotta JJ 2nd.,
    2. Piazza M
    . Carotid endarterectomy or carotid artery stenting? Matching the patient to the intervention. Perspect Vasc Surg Endovasc Ther 2010;22:124–36 doi:10.1177/1531003510381136 pmid:20858617
    CrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Ederle J,
    2. Bonati LH,
    3. Dobson J, et al
    ; CAVATAS Investigators. Endovascular treatment with angioplasty or stenting versus endarterectomy in patients with carotid artery stenosis in the Carotid and Vertebral Artery Transluminal Angioplasty Study (CAVATAS): long-term follow-up of a randomised trial. Lancet Neurol 2009;8:898–907 doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70228-5 pmid:19717345
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    1. Ederle J,
    2. Dobson J,
    3. Featherstone RL, et al
    ; International Carotid Stenting Study investigators. Carotid artery stenting compared with endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis (International Carotid Stenting Study): an interim analysis of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2010;375:985–97 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60239-5 pmid:20189239
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.↵
    1. Yadav JS,
    2. Wholey MH,
    3. Kuntz RE, et al
    ; Stenting and Angioplasty with Protection in Patients at High Risk for Endarterectomy Investigators. Protected carotid-artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 2004;351:1493–501 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa040127 pmid:15470212
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. 5.↵
    1. Brott TG,
    2. Hobson RW 2nd.,
    3. Howard G, et al
    ; CREST Investigators. Stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid-artery stenosis. N Engl J Med 2010;363:11–23 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0912321 pmid:20505173
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med 1991;325:445–53 doi:10.1056/NEJM199108153250701 pmid:1852179
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. 7.↵
    1. Kachel R
    . Results of balloon angioplasty in the carotid arteries. J Endovasc Surg 1996;3:22–30 pmid:8798123
    CrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Gil-Peralta A,
    2. Mayol A,
    3. Marcos JR, et al
    . Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of the symptomatic atherosclerotic carotid arteries: results, complications, and follow-up. Stroke 1996;27:2271–73 doi:10.1161/01.STR.27.12.2271 pmid:8969792
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Kerber CW,
    2. Cromwell LD,
    3. Loehden OL
    . Catheter dilatation of proximal carotid stenosis during distal bifurcation endarterectomy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1980;1:348–49 pmid:6779610
    FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Ferguson GG,
    2. Eliasziw M,
    3. Barr HW, et al
    . The North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial: surgical results in 1415 patients. Stroke 1999;30:1751–58 doi:10.1161/01.STR.30.9.1751 pmid:10471419
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Phatouros CC,
    2. Higashida RT,
    3. Malek AM, et al
    . Carotid artery stent placement for atherosclerotic disease: rationale, technique, and current status. Radiology 2000;217:26–41 doi:10.1148/radiology.217.1.r00oc2526 pmid:11012420
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    1. Mathur A,
    2. Dorros G,
    3. Iyer SS, et al
    . Palmaz stent compression in patients following carotid artery stenting. Cathet Cardiovasc Diag 1997;41:137–40 pmid:9184284
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. 13.↵
    1. Martin JB,
    2. Pache JC,
    3. Treggiari-Venzi M, et al
    . Role of the distal balloon protection technique in the prevention of cerebral embolic events during carotid stent placement. Stroke 2001;32:479–84 pmid:11157186
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Manninen HI,
    2. Räsänen HT,
    3. Vanninen RL, et al
    . Stent placement versus percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of human carotid arteries in cadavers in situ: distal embolization and findings at intravascular US, MR imaging and histopathologic analysis. Radiology 1999;212:483–92 doi:10.1148/radiology.212.2.r99au48483 pmid:10429707
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. 15.↵
    1. Vos JA,
    2. van den Berg JC,
    3. Ernst SM, et al
    . Carotid angioplasty and stent placement: comparison of transcranial Doppler US data and clinical outcome with and without filtering cerebral protection devices in 509 patients. Radiology 2005;234:493–99 doi:10.1148/radiol.2342040119 pmid:15616120
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. 16.↵
    1. Gupta R,
    2. Abou-Chebl A,
    3. Bajzer CT, et al
    . Rate, predictors, and consequences of hemodynamic depression after carotid artery stenting. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:1538–43 doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2005.08.079 pmid:16630988
    FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Howell M,
    2. Krajcer Z,
    3. Dougherty K, et al
    . Correlation of periprocedural systolic blood pressure changes with neurological events in high-risk carotid stent patients. J Endovasc Ther 2002;9:810–16 doi:10.1177/152660280200900614 pmid:12546582
    CrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Park BD,
    2. Divinagracia T,
    3. Madej O, et al
    . Predictors of clinically significant postprocedural hypotension after carotid endarterectomy and carotid angioplasty with stenting. J Vasc Surg 2009;50:526–33 doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2009.05.005 pmid:19700091
    CrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Qazi U,
    2. Obeid TE,
    3. Enwerem N, et al
    . The effect of ballooning following carotid stent deployment on hemodynamic stability. J Vasc Surg 2014;59:756–60 doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2013.09.027 pmid:24342066
    CrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Ghandehari K,
    2. Edraki K,
    3. Karimi M, et al
    . Complications of angioplasty and stenting of cervicocerebral arteries in Iran. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann 2010;18:49–53 doi:10.1177/0218492309355598 pmid:20124297
    CrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Ielasi A,
    2. Latib A,
    3. Godino C, et al
    . Clinical outcomes following protected carotid artery stenting in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. J Endovasc Ther 2010;17:298–307 doi:10.1583/09-2997.1 pmid:20557166
    CrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Micari A,
    2. Stabile E,
    3. Cremonesi A, et al
    . Carotid artery stenting in octogenarians using a proximal endovascular occlusion cerebral protection device: a multicenter registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2010;76:9–15 doi:10.1002/ccd.22503 pmid:20578188
    CrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Montorsi P,
    2. Galli S,
    3. Ravagnani P, et al
    . Randomized trial of predilation versus direct stenting for treatment of carotid artery stenosis. Int J Cardiol 2010;138:233–38 doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2008.08.012 pmid:18793813
    CrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Stabile E,
    2. Salemme L,
    3. Sorropago G, et al
    . Proximal endovascular occlusion for carotid artery stenting: results from a prospective registry of 1,300 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;55:1661–67 doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2009.11.079 pmid:20394868
    FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Almekhlafi MA,
    2. Couillard PL,
    3. Pandya A, et al
    . Outcomes after carotid angioplasty and stenting in symptomatic octogenarians. Can J Neurol Sci 2011;38:446–51 doi:10.1017/S0317167100011859 pmid:21515504
    CrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Satya K,
    2. Dougherty K,
    3. Lee VV, et al
    . Determinants and outcomes of asystole during carotid artery stenting. J Endovasc Ther 2011;18:513–17 doi:10.1583/11-3516R.1 pmid:21861740
    CrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Kimiagar I,
    2. Gur AY,
    3. Auriel E, et al
    . Long-term follow-up of patients after carotid stenting with or without distal protective device in a single tertiary medical center. Vasc Endovasc Surg 2012;46:536–41 doi:10.1177/1538574412457471 pmid:22903330
    CrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Mazzaccaro D,
    2. Occhiuto MT,
    3. Stegher S, et al
    . Long-term results of carotid artery stenting in patients 80 years and older. Perspect Vasc Surg Endovasc Ther 2012;24:49–54 doi:10.1177/1531003512459913 pmid:22965950
    CrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Mohammadian R,
    2. Sohrabi B,
    3. Mansourizadeh R, et al
    . Unprotected carotid artery stenting: complications in 6 months follow-up. Neuroradiology 2012;54:225–30 doi:10.1007/s00234-011-0867-x pmid:21479568
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  30. 30.↵
    1. Dumont TM,
    2. Wach MM,
    3. Mokin M, et al
    . Perioperative complications after carotid artery stenting: a contemporary experience from the University at Buffalo neuroendovascular surgery team. Neurosurgery 2013;73:689–93; discussion 693–94 doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000000077 pmid:23842555
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  31. 31.↵
    1. Lago A,
    2. Parkhutik V,
    3. Tembl JI, et al
    . Diabetes does not affect outcome of symptomatic carotid stenosis treated with endovascular techniques. Eur Neurol 2013;69:263–69 doi:10.1159/000346000 pmid:23429066
    CrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Ullery BW,
    2. Orlova K,
    3. Shang EK, et al
    . Results of carotid angioplasty and stenting are equivalent for critical versus high-grade lesions in patients deemed high risk for carotid endarterectomy. J Surg Res 2013;185:21–26 doi:10.1016/j.jss.2013.07.027 pmid:23953786
    CrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Biggs NG,
    2. Rangarajan S,
    3. McClure DN
    . Has carotid artery stenting found its place? A 10-year regional centre perspective. ANZ J Surg 2016;86:179–83 doi:10.1111/ans.12517 pmid:24456223
    CrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Hernández-Fernández F,
    2. Parrilla G,
    3. Garcia-Villalba B, et al
    . Comparison between proximal versus distal protection devices in 287 cases of carotid revascularization using angioplasty and stenting: periprocedure complications, morbidity, and mortality. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2014;37:639–45 doi:10.1007/s00270-013-0714-z: pmid:23912495
    CrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    1. Morgan CE,
    2. Lee CJ,
    3. Chin JA, et al
    . High-risk anatomic variables and plaque characteristics in carotid artery stenting. Vasc Endovascular Surg 2014;48:452–59 doi:10.1177/1538574414551577 pmid:25252921
    CrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    1. Cohen JE,
    2. Gomori JM,
    3. Itshayek E, et al
    . Ischemic complications after tailored carotid artery stenting in different subpopulations with high-grade stenosis: feared but rare. J Clin Neurosci 2015;22:189–94 doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2014.09.005 pmid:25444995
    CrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    1. Ogata A,
    2. Sonobe M,
    3. Kato N, et al
    . Carotid artery stenting without post-stenting balloon dilatation. J Neurointerv Surg 2014;6:517–20 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-010873 pmid:24014467
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  38. 38.↵
    1. Oteros Fernandez R,
    2. Jimenez-Gomez E,
    3. Bravo-Rodriguez F, et al
    . Unprotected carotid artery stenting in symptomatic patients with high-grade stenosis: results and long-term follow-up in a single-center experience. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1285–91 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2951 pmid:22422184
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  39. 39.↵
    1. Tallarita T,
    2. Rabinstein AA,
    3. Cloft H, et al
    . Are distal protection devices ‘protective’ during carotid angioplasty and stenting? Stroke 2011;42:1962–66 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.607820 pmid:21566230
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  40. 40.↵
    1. Mansour OY,
    2. Weber J,
    3. Niesen W, et al
    . Carotid angioplasty and stenting without protection devices: safety and efficacy concerns–single center experience. Clin Neuroradiol 2011;21:65–73 doi:10.1007/s00062-011-0057-6 pmid:21562830
    CrossRefPubMed
  41. 41.↵
    1. González A,
    2. Gil-Peralta A,
    3. Mayol A, et al
    . Internal carotid artery stenting in patients with near occlusion: 30-day and long-term outcome. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:252–58 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2285 pmid:21051515
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  42. 42.↵
    1. DerSimonian R,
    2. Laird N
    . Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1986;7:177–88 doi:10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2 pmid:3802833
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  43. 43.↵
    1. Altman DG,
    2. Bland JM
    . Interaction revisited: the difference between two estimates. BMJ 2003;326:219 doi:10.1136/bmj.326.7382.219 pmid:12543843
    FREE Full Text
  44. 44.↵
    1. Higgins JP,
    2. Thompson SG,
    3. Deeks JJ, et al
    . Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003;327:557–60 doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557 pmid:12958120
    FREE Full Text
  45. 45.↵
    1. Higgins JP,
    2. Thompson SG
    . Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 2002;21:1539–58 doi:10.1002/sim.1186 pmid:12111919
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  46. 46.↵
    1. Rubartelli P,
    2. Brusa G,
    3. Arrigo A, et al
    . Transcranial Doppler monitoring during stenting of the carotid bifurcation: evaluation of two different distal protection devices in preventing embolization. J Endovasc Ther 2006;13:436–42 doi:10.1583/05-1804MR.1 pmid:16928156
    CrossRefPubMed
  47. 47.↵
    1. Ackerstaff RG,
    2. Suttorp MJ,
    3. van den Berg JC, et al
    ; Antonius Carotid Endarterectomy, Angioplasty, and Stenting Study Group. Prediction of early cerebral outcome by transcranial Doppler monitoring in carotid bifurcation angioplasty and stenting. J Vasc Surg 2005;41:618–24 doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2005.01.034 pmid:15874925
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  48. 48.↵
    1. Park B,
    2. Shapiro D,
    3. Dahn M, et al
    . Carotid artery angioplasty with stenting and postprocedure hypotension. Am J Surg 2005;190:691–95 doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.07.004 pmid:16226941
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  49. 49.
    1. Morrish W,
    2. Grahovac S,
    3. Douen A, et al
    . Intracranial hemorrhage after stenting and angioplasty of extracranial carotid stenosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:1911–16 pmid:11110546
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  50. 50.
    1. Ahmadi R,
    2. Schillinger M,
    3. Lang W, et al
    . Carotid artery stenting in older patients: is age a risk factor for poor outcome? J Endovasc Ther 2002;9:559–65 doi:10.1177/152660280200900501 pmid:12431135
    CrossRefPubMed
  51. 51.
    1. Criado FJ,
    2. Lingelbach JM,
    3. Ledesma DF, et al
    . Carotid artery stenting in a vascular surgery practice. J Vasc Surg 2002;35:430–34 doi:10.1067/mva.2002.121209 pmid:11877688
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  52. 52.
    1. Hobson RW 2nd.,
    2. Lal BK,
    3. Chakhtoura EY, et al
    . Carotid artery closure for endarterectomy does not influence results of angioplasty-stenting for restenosis. J Vasc Surg 2002;35:435–38 doi:10.1067/mva.2002.122022 pmid:11877689
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  53. 53.
    1. Kao HL,
    2. Lin LY,
    3. Lu CJ, et al
    . Long-term results of elective stenting for severe carotid artery stenosis in Taiwan. Cardiology 2002;97:89–93 doi:10.1159/000057678 pmid:11978955
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  54. 54.
    Antonius Carotid Endaterectomy, Angioplasty, and Stenting Study Group. Transcranial Doppler monitoring in angioplasty and stenting of the carotid bifurcation. J Endovasc Ther 2003;10:702–10 doi:10.1177/152660280301000404 pmid:14533974
    CrossRefPubMed
  55. 55.
    1. Cernetti C,
    2. Reimers B,
    3. Picciolo A, et al
    . Carotid artery stenting with cerebral protection in 100 consecutive patients: immediate and two-year follow-up results. Ital Heart J 2003;4:695–700 pmid:14664282
    PubMed
  56. 56.
    1. Cremonesi A,
    2. Manetti R,
    3. Setacci F, et al
    . Protected carotid stenting: clinical advantages and complications of embolic protection devices in 442 consecutive patients. Stroke 2003;34:1936–41 doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000081000.23561.61 pmid:12843347
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  57. 57.
    1. Tsuura M,
    2. Terada T,
    3. Matsumoto H, et al
    . Clinical results of stenting for cervical internal carotid stenoses. Interv Neuroradiol 2003;9:133–36 pmid:20591242
    CrossRefPubMed
  58. 58.
    1. Wholey MH,
    2. Wholey MH,
    3. Tan WA, et al
    . A comparison of balloon-mounted and self-expanding stents in the carotid arteries: immediate and long-term results of more than 500 patients. J Endovasc Ther 2003;10:171–81 doi:10.1177/152660280301000203 pmid:12877596
    CrossRefPubMed
  59. 59.
    1. Eskandari MK,
    2. Longo GM,
    3. Vijungco JD, et al
    . Does carotid stenting measure up to endarterectomy? A vascular surgeon's experience. Arch Surg 2004;139:734–38 doi:10.1001/archsurg.139.7.734 pmid:15249405
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  60. 60.
    1. Faries PL,
    2. Dayal R,
    3. Clair DG, et al
    . Continuity in the treatment of carotid artery disease: results of a carotid stenting program initiated by vascular surgeons. Ann Vasc Surg 2004;18:669–76 doi:10.1007/s10016-004-0101-y pmid:15599624
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  61. 61.
    1. Kastrup A,
    2. Schulz JB,
    3. Raygrotzki S, et al
    . Comparison of angioplasty and stenting with cerebral protection versus endarterectomy for treatment of internal carotid artery stenosis in elderly patients. J Vasc Surg 2004;40:945–51 doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2004.08.022 pmid:15557909
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  62. 62.
    1. Sadato A,
    2. Satow T,
    3. Ishii A, et al
    . Use of a large angioplasty balloon for predilation is a risk factor for embolic complications in protected carotid stenting. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2004;44:337–42; discussion 343 doi:10.2176/nmc.44.337 pmid:15347209
    CrossRefPubMed
  63. 63.
    1. Bonaldi G,
    2. Aiazzi L,
    3. Baruzzi F, et al
    . Angioplasty and stenting of the cervical carotid bifurcation under filter protection: a prospective study in a series of 53 patients. J Neuroradiol 2005;32:109–17 doi:10.1016/S0150-9861(05)83125-6 pmid:15984402
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  64. 64.
    1. Cayne NS,
    2. Faries PL,
    3. Trocciola SM, et al
    . Carotid angioplasty and stent-induced bradycardia and hypotension: impact of prophylactic atropine administration and prior carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg 2005;41:956–61 doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2005.02.038 pmid:15944593
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  65. 65.
    1. Coppi G,
    2. Moratto R,
    3. Silingardi R, et al
    . PRIAMUS: proximal flow blockage cerebral protection during carotid stenting—results from a multicenter Italian registry. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 2005;46:219–27 pmid:15956919
    PubMed
  66. 66.
    1. Eskandari MK,
    2. Longo GM,
    3. Matsumura JS, et al
    . Carotid stenting done exclusively by vascular surgeons: first 175 cases. Ann Surg 2005;242:431–36; discussion 436–38 pmid:16135929
    PubMedWeb of Science
  67. 67.
    1. Kadkhodayan Y,
    2. Derdeyn CP,
    3. Cross DT 3rd., et al
    . Procedure complications of carotid angioplasty and stent placement without cerebral protection devices. Neurosurg Focus 2005;18:e1 pmid:15669795
    PubMed
  68. 68.
    1. Li SM,
    2. Li D,
    3. Ling F, et al
    . Carotid artery stenting: experience of a single institute in China. Interv Neuroradiol 2005;11:205–12 pmid:20584476
    PubMed
  69. 69.
    1. Lin PH,
    2. Bush RL,
    3. Peden EK, et al
    . Carotid artery stenting with neuroprotection: assessing the learning curve and treatment outcome. Am J Surg 2005;190:850–57 doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.08.008 pmid:16307933
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  70. 70.
    1. Longo GM,
    2. Kibbe MR,
    3. Eskandari MK
    . Carotid artery stenting in octogenarians: is it too risky? Ann Vasc Surg 2005;19:812–16 doi:10.1007/s10016-005-7977-z pmid:16200469
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  71. 71.
    1. Reimers B,
    2. Sievert H,
    3. Schuler GC, et al
    . Proximal endovascular flow blockage for cerebral protection during carotid artery stenting: results from a prospective multicenter registry. J Endovasc Ther 2005;12:156–65 doi:10.1583/04-1400MR.1 pmid:15823062
    CrossRefPubMed
  72. 72.
    1. Chaer RA,
    2. Derubertis BG,
    3. Trocciola SM, et al
    . Safety and efficacy of carotid angioplasty and stenting in high-risk patients. Am Surg 2006;72:694–98; discussion 698–99 pmid:16913312
    PubMedWeb of Science
  73. 73.
    1. Faries PL,
    2. Trocciola SM,
    3. De Rubertis B, et al
    . Hemodynamic instability after carotid artery angioplasty and stening is associated with increased age and female gender. Vas Dis Management 2006;3:200–05
  74. 74.
    1. Gröschel K,
    2. Ernemann U,
    3. Schulz JB, et al
    . Statin therapy at carotid angioplasty and stent placement: effect on procedure-related stroke, myocardial infarction, and death. Radiology 2006;240:145–51 doi:10.1148/radiol.2401050603 pmid:16793975
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  75. 75.
    1. Halabi M,
    2. Gruberg L,
    3. Pitchersky S, et al
    . Carotid artery stenting in surgical high-risk patients. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2006;67:513–18 doi:10.1002/ccd.20640 pmid:16534816
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  76. 76.
    1. Kwon BJ,
    2. Han MH,
    3. Kang HS, et al
    . Protection filter-related events in extracranial carotid artery stenting: a single-center experience. J Endovasc Ther 2006;13:711–22 doi:10.1583/06-1900.1 pmid:17154708
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  77. 77.
    1. Nano G,
    2. Dalainas I,
    3. Bianchi P, et al
    . Ballooning-induced bradycardia during carotid stenting in primary stenosis and restenosis. Neuroradiology 2006;48:533–36 doi:10.1007/s00234-006-0096-x pmid:16670918
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  78. 78.
    1. Cotroneo AR,
    2. Iezzi R
    . Cutting balloon angioplasty (CBA) versus conventional balloon angioplasty (PTA) in the pre-dilatation of carotid artery stenosis: our preliminary experience. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2007;30:1210–17 doi:10.1007/s00270-007-9171-x pmid:17909883
    CrossRefPubMed
  79. 79.
    1. Criado E,
    2. Fontcuberta J,
    3. Orgaz A, et al
    . Transcervical carotid stenting with carotid artery flow reversal: 3-year follow-up of 103 stents. J Vasc Surg 2007;46:864–69 doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2007.07.028 pmid:17980271
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  80. 80.
    1. Kawarada O,
    2. Yokoi Y,
    3. Takemoto K, et al
    . Double-wire technique in balloon-protected carotid artery stenting. J Interv Cardio 2007;20:55–62 doi:10.1111/j.1540-8183.2007.00218.x pmid:17300405
    CrossRefPubMed
  81. 81.
    1. Lin PH,
    2. Zhou W,
    3. Kougias P, et al
    . Factors associated with hypotension and bradycardia after carotid angioplasty and stenting. J Vasc Surg 2007;46:846–53; discussion 853–54 doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2007.07.020 pmid:17980268
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  82. 82.
    1. Maynar M,
    2. Baldi S,
    3. Rostagno R, et al
    . Carotid stenting without use of balloon angioplasty and distal protection devices: preliminary experience in 100 cases. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:1378–83 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A0543 pmid:17698546
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  83. 83.
    1. Van der Heyden J,
    2. Suttorp MJ,
    3. Bal ET, et al
    . Staged carotid angioplasty and stenting followed by cardiac surgery in patients with severe asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis: early and long-term results. Circulation 2007;116:2036–42 doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.658625 pmid:17938290
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  84. 84.
    1. Younis GA,
    2. Gupta K,
    3. Mortazavi A, et al
    . Predictors of carotid stent restenosis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2007;69:673–82 doi:10.1002/ccd.20809 pmid:17351931
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  85. 85.
    1. AbuRahma AF,
    2. Bates MC,
    3. Eads K, et al
    . Safety and efficacy of carotid angioplasty/stenting in 100 consecutive high surgical risk patients: immediate and long-term follow-up. Vasc Endovasc Surg 2008;42:433–39 doi:10.1177/1538574408318477 pmid:8583300
    CrossRefPubMed
  86. 86.
    1. Bussière M,
    2. Pelz DM,
    3. Kalapos P, et al
    . Results using a self-expanding stent alone in the treatment of severe symptomatic carotid bifurcation stenosis. J Neurosurg 2008;109:454–60 doi:10.3171/JNS/2008/109/9/0454 pmid:18759576
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  87. 87.
    1. Bussière M,
    2. Lownie SP,
    3. Lee D, et al
    . Hemodynamic instability during carotid artery stenting: the relative contribution of stent deployment versus balloon dilation. J Neurosurg 2009;110:905–12 doi:10.3171/2008.9.JNS08509 pmid:19231933
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  88. 88.
    1. Buszman P,
    2. Debiński M,
    3. Gruszka A, et al
    . Early and late outcomes of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of cephalad arteries. Kardiol Pol 2008;66:233–42, discussion 243 pmid:18393110
    PubMed
  89. 89.
    1. Castriota F,
    2. de Campos Martins EC,
    3. Setacci C, et al
    . Cutting balloon angioplasty in percutaneous carotid interventions. J Endovasc Ther 2008;15:655–62 doi:10.1583/08-2408.1 pmid:19090627
    CrossRefPubMed
  90. 90.
    1. Cieri E,
    2. De Rango P,
    3. Maccaroni MR, et al
    . Is haemodynamic depression during carotid stenting a predictor of peri-procedural complications? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2008;35:399–404 doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2007.10.020 pmid:18178113
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  91. 91.
    1. Diehm N,
    2. Katzen BT,
    3. Dick F, et al
    . Influence of stent type on hemodynamic depression after carotid artery stent placement. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2008;19:23–30 doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2007.09.020 pmid:18192464
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  92. 92.
    1. Henry M,
    2. Henry I,
    3. Polydorou A, et al
    . Carotid angioplasty and stenting in octogenarians: is it safe? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2008;72:309–17 doi:10.1002/ccd.21574 pmid:18729151
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  93. 93.
    1. Pieniazek P,
    2. Musialek P,
    3. Kablak-Ziembicka A, et al
    . Carotid artery stenting with patient- and lesion-tailored selection of the neuroprotection system and stent type: early and 5-year results from a prospective academic registry of 535 consecutive procedures (TARGET-CAS). J Endovasc Ther 2008;15:249–62 doi:10.1583/07-2264.1 pmid:18540694
    CrossRefPubMed
  94. 94.
    1. Roffi M,
    2. Greutmann M,
    3. Schwarz U, et al
    . Flow impairment during protected carotid artery stenting: impact of filter device design. J Endovasc Ther 2008;15:103–09 doi:10.1583/07-2252.1 pmid:18254671
    CrossRefPubMed
  95. 95.
    1. Velez CA,
    2. White CJ,
    3. Reilly JP, et al
    . Carotid artery stent placement is safe in the very elderly (> or =80 years). Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2008;72:303–08 doi:10.1002/ccd.21635 pmid:18726941
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  96. 96.
    1. Brown KE,
    2. Usman A,
    3. Kibbe MR, et al
    . Carotid stenting using tapered and nontapered stents: associated neurological complications and restenosis rates. Ann Vasc Surg 2009;23:439–45 doi:10.1016/j.avsg.2008.11.007 pmid:19128933
    CrossRefPubMed
  97. 97.
    1. Goldstein LJ,
    2. Khan HU,
    3. Sambol EB, et al
    . Carotid artery stenting is safe and associated with comparable outcomes in men and women. J Vasc Surg 2009;49:315–23; discussion 323–24 doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2008.08.110 pmid:19216949
    CrossRefPubMed
  98. 98.
    1. Simonetti G,
    2. Gandini R,
    3. Versaci F, et al
    . Carotid artery stenting: findings based on 8 years' experience [in English, Italian]. Radiol Med 2009;114:95–110 doi:10.1007/s11547-008-0326-x pmid:18820992
    CrossRefPubMed
  99. 99.
    1. Theron J,
    2. Venturi C,
    3. Reul J, et al
    . Immediate and 30-day clinical outcome of patients treated with the TwinOne cerebral protection system: multicenter experience in 217 cases. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2009;32:1139–45 doi:10.1007/s00270-009-9686-4 pmid:19730937
    CrossRefPubMed
  100. 100.
    1. Veselka J,
    2. Cerná D,
    3. Zimolová P, et al
    . Feasibility, safety, and early outcomes of direct carotid artery stent implantation with use of the FilterWire EZ Embolic Protection System. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2009;73:733–38 doi:10.1002/ccd.21936 pmid:19198010
    CrossRefPubMed
  101. 101.
    1. Chung C,
    2. Cayne NS,
    3. Adelman MA, et al
    . Improved hemodynamic outcomes with glycopyrrolate over atropine in carotid angioplasty and stenting. Perspect Vasc Surg Endovasc Ther 2010;22:164–70 doi:10.1177/1531003510388277 pmid:21098497
    CrossRefPubMed
  102. 102.
    1. Shabaneh B,
    2. Dougherty K,
    3. Hernandez E, et al
    . Catheter aspiration thrombectomy during carotid stenting is safe and potentially efficacious: a pilot retrospective study. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 2010;51:865–72 pmid:21124284
    PubMed
  103. 103.
    1. Knur R
    . Carotid artery stenting with distal filter protection: single-center experience in high-surgical-risk patients. Heart Vessels 2011;26:125–30 doi:10.1007/s00380-010-0002-7 pmid:21052692
    CrossRefPubMed
  104. 104.
    1. Mak CS,
    2. Chambers BR,
    3. Clark DJ, et al
    . Multidisciplinary approach to carotid stenting. Intern Med J 2011;41:789–94 doi:10.1111/j.1445-5994.2010.02285.x pmid:20561100
    CrossRefPubMed
  105. 105.
    1. Mendiz OA,
    2. Sampaolesi AH,
    3. Londero HF, et al
    . Initial experience with transradial access for carotid artery stenting. Vasc Endovasc Surg 2011;45:499–503 doi:10.1177/1538574411405547 pmid:21844492
    CrossRefPubMed
  106. 106.
    1. Rizwan Khalid M,
    2. Khalid F,
    3. Farooqui FA, et al
    . Can experienced physicians with high peripheral interventional volume but low carotid artery stenting (CAS) volume achieve low complication rates during CAS? EuroIntervention 2011;6:744–47 doi:10.4244/EIJV6I6A126 pmid:21205599
    CrossRefPubMed
  107. 107.
    1. Wu YM,
    2. Wong HF,
    3. Chen YL, et al
    . Carotid stenting of asymptomatic and symptomatic carotid artery stenoses with and without the use of a distal embolic protection device. Acta Cardiol 2011;66:453–58 doi:10.2143/AC.66.4.2126593 pmid:21894801
    CrossRefPubMed
  108. 108.
    1. Harada K,
    2. Morioka J,
    3. Higa T, et al
    . Significance of combining distal filter protection and a guiding catheter with temporary balloon occlusion for carotid artery stenting: clinical results and evaluation of debris capture. Ann Vasc Surg 2012;26:929–36 doi:10.1016/j.avsg.2012.04.022 pmid:22944567
    CrossRefPubMed
  109. 109.
    1. Moratto R,
    2. Veronesi J,
    3. Silingardi R, et al
    . Urgent carotid artery stenting with technical modifications for patients with transient ischemic attacks and minor stroke. J Endovasc Ther 2012;19:627–35 doi:10.1583/JEVT-12-3852MR.1 pmid:23046328
    CrossRefPubMed
  110. 110.
    1. Kessler I,
    2. Gory B,
    3. Macian F, et al
    . Carotid artery stenting in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis: a single-center series. J Neuroradiol 2013;40:38–44 doi:10.1016/j.neurad.2012.03.003 pmid:22633044
    CrossRefPubMed
  111. 111.
    1. Miyawaki S,
    2. Maeda K
    . Surgical treatment for cervical carotid artery stenosis in the elderly: importance of perioperative management of ischemic cardiac complications. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2014;54:120–25 doi:10.2176/nmc.oa2012-0436 pmid:24257501
    CrossRefPubMed
  112. 112.
    1. Shinozaki N,
    2. Ogata N,
    3. Ikari Y
    . Plaque protrusion detected by intravascular ultrasound during carotid artery stenting. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2014;23:2622–25 doi:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2014.06.007 pmid:25304722
    CrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 38 (5)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 38, Issue 5
1 May 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Selective-versus-Standard Poststent Dilation for Carotid Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
O. Petr, W. Brinjikji, M.H. Murad, B. Glodny, G. Lanzino
Selective-versus-Standard Poststent Dilation for Carotid Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2017, 38 (5) 999-1005; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A5103

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Selective-versus-Standard Poststent Dilation for Carotid Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
O. Petr, W. Brinjikji, M.H. Murad, B. Glodny, G. Lanzino
American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2017, 38 (5) 999-1005; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A5103
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATION:
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Reply:
  • Selective Poststent Balloon Angioplasty for Carotid Stenting
  • Crossref (8)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • A systematic review and meta-analysis of predilation and postdilation in transfemoral carotid artery stenting
    Behrad Ziapour, Marc L. Schermerhorn, Mark D. Iafrati, Luis B. Suarez, Shahab TourSavadkohi, Payam Salehi
    Journal of Vascular Surgery 2020 72 1
  • Angiographic Patterns and Outcomes Achieved by Proximal Balloon Occlusion in Symptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis Stenting
    Cyril Dargazanli, Mehdi Mahmoudi, Matteo Cappucci, François-Louis Collemiche, Julien Labreuche, Othmane Habza, Grégory Gascou, Pierre-Henri Lefèvre, Omer Eker, Isabelle Mourand, Nicolas Gaillard, Mahmoud Charif, Imad Derraz, Caroline Arquizan, Vincent Costalat
    Clinical Neuroradiology 2020 30 2
  • Poststent ballooning during transcarotid artery revascularization
    Hanaa Dakour-Aridi, Christina L. Cui, Andrew Barleben, Marc L. Schermerhorn, Jens Eldrup-Jorgensen, Mahmoud B. Malas
    Journal of Vascular Surgery 2021 73 6
  • Direct Cervical Carotid Stenting and Angioplasty of Right Internal Carotid Artery and Brachiocephalic Artery Ostial Stenoses With Flow Reversal: 2-Dimensional Operative Video
    Leonardo Rangel-Castilla, Elad I Levy, Adnan H Siddiqui
    Operative Neurosurgery 2019 16 2
  • Early Stent Patency After Endovascular Therapy for Tandem or Isolated Carotid Steno-Occlusive Disease
    Hesham E. Masoud, Thanh N. Nguyen, Joseph P. Broderick
    Stroke 2023 54 1
  • Safety Evaluation of Primary Carotid Stenting: Transcranial Doppler and MRI
    David M. Pelz, Stephen P. Lownie, Urooj F. Iftikhar, Claudio Munoz, Pablo Lopez-Ojeda, Reza Azarpazhooh
    Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques 2023 50 5
  • Reply:
    O. Petr, W. Brinjikji, M.H. Murad, B. Glodny, G. Lanzino
    American Journal of Neuroradiology 2017 38 11
  • Selective Poststent Balloon Angioplasty for Carotid Stenting
    D.M. Pelz, S.P. Lownie
    American Journal of Neuroradiology 2017 38 11

More in this TOC Section

  • Proximal Vertebral Artery Variants and Embryology
  • High-Risk Plaque Features in Carotid MRI
  • Nonstenotic Carotid Plaques and Stroke Review
Show more EXTRACRANIAL VASCULAR

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire