Multivariate Analysis of MRI Biomarkers for Predicting Neurologic Impairment in Cervical Spinal Cord Injury

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Bozzo A,
   3. Marcoux J,
   4. Radhakrishna M, et al

   . The role of magnetic resonance imaging in the management of acute spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma 2011;28:1401–11 doi:10.1089/neu.2009.1236 pmid:20388006

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   2. Reier PJ,
   3. Lane MA,
   4. Hall ED, et al

   . Translational spinal cord injury research: preclinical guidelines and challenges. Handb Clin Neurol 2012;109:411–33 doi:10.1016/B978-0-444-52137-8.00026-7 pmid:23098728

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   2. Biering-Sørensen F,
   3. Alai S,
   4. Anderson K, et al

   . Common data elements for spinal cord injury clinical research: a National Institute for Neurological Disorders and Stroke project. Spinal Cord 2015;53:265–77 doi:10.1038/sc.2014.246 pmid:25665542

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   2. Talbott JF,
   3. Whetstone WD,
   4. Readdy WJ, et al

   . The Brain and Spinal Injury Center score: a novel, simple, and reproducible method for assessing the severity of acute cervical spinal cord injury with axial T2-weighted MRI findings. J Neurosurg Spine 2015;23:495–504 doi:10.3171/2015.1.SPINE141033 pmid:26161519

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. Shimada K,
   3. Tokioka T

   . Sequential MR studies of cervical cord injury: correlation with neurological damage and clinical outcome. Spinal Cord 1999;37:410–15 doi:10.1038/sj.sc.3100858 pmid:10432260

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   2. Schaefer DM,
   3. Flanders A,
   4. Northrup BE, et al

   . Magnetic resonance imaging of acute cervical spine trauma. Correlation with severity of neurologic injury. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1989;14:1090–95 doi:10.1097/00007632-198910000-00011 pmid:2588058

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. Ramón S,
   3. Domínguez R,
   4. Ramírez L, et al

   . Clinical and magnetic resonance imaging correlation in acute spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 1997;35:664–73 doi:10.1038/sj.sc.3100490 pmid:9347595

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Miyanji F,
   3. Furlan JC,
   4. Aarabi B, et al

   . Acute cervical traumatic spinal cord injury: MR imaging findings correlated with neurologic outcome–prospective study with 100 consecutive patients. Radiology 2007;243:820–27 doi:10.1148/radiol.2433060583 pmid:17431129

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   2. Mihai G,
   3. Nout YS,
   4. Tovar CA, et al

   . Longitudinal comparison of two severities of unilateral cervical spinal cord injury using magnetic resonance imaging in rats. J Neurotrauma 2008;25:1–18 doi:10.1089/neu.2007.0338 pmid:18355154

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Marciello MA,
    3. Flanders AE,
    4. Herbison GJ, et al

    . Magnetic resonance imaging related to neurologic outcome in cervical spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993;74:940–46

    PubMed
11. 11.↵
    2. Kulkarni MV,
    3. McArdle CB,
    4. Kopanicky D, et al

    . Acute spinal cord injury: MR imaging at 1.5 T. Radiology 1987;164:837–43 doi:10.1148/radiology.164.3.3615885 pmid:3615885

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    2. Freund P,
    3. Weiskopf N,
    4. Ashburner J, et al

    . MRI investigation of the sensorimotor cortex and the corticospinal tract after acute spinal cord injury: a prospective longitudinal study. Lancet Neurol 2013;12:873–81 doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70146-7 pmid:23827394

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Flanders AE,
    3. Spettell CM,
    4. Tartaglino LM, et al

    . Forecasting motor recovery after cervical spinal cord injury: value of MR imaging. Radiology 1996;201:649–55 doi:10.1148/radiology.201.3.8939210 pmid:8939210

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    2. Flanders AE,
    3. Spettell CM,
    4. Friedman DP, et al

    . The relationship between the functional abilities of patients with cervical spinal cord injury and the severity of damage revealed by MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999;20:926–34 pmid:10369368

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    2. Fehlings MG,
    3. Rao SC,
    4. Tator CH, et al

    . The optimal radiologic method for assessing spinal canal compromise and cord compression in patients with cervical spinal cord injury. Part II: Results of a multicenter study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1999;24:605–13 doi:10.1097/00007632-199903150-00023 pmid:10101829

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. Fehlings MG,
    3. Furlan JC,
    4. Massicotte EM, et al

    . Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of maximum canal compromise and spinal cord compression for evaluation of acute traumatic cervical spinal cord injury. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2006;31:1719–25 doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000224164.43912.e6 pmid:16816769

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Collignon F,
    3. Martin D,
    4. Lénelle J, et al

    . Acute traumatic central cord syndrome: magnetic resonance imaging and clinical observations. J Neurosurg 2002;96(1 Suppl):29–33 pmid:11795711

    PubMedWeb of Science
18. 18.↵
    2. Chakeres DW,
    3. Flickinger F,
    4. Bresnahan JC, et al

    . MR imaging of acute spinal cord trauma. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1987;8:5–10 pmid:3101470

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    2. Bondurant FJ,
    3. Cotler HB,
    4. Kulkarni MV, et al

    . Acute spinal cord injury. A study using physical examination and magnetic resonance imaging. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1990;15:161–68 doi:10.1097/00007632-199003000-00002 pmid:2353251

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    2. Andreoli C,
    3. Colaiacomo MC,
    4. Rojas Beccaglia M, et al

    . MRI in the acute phase of spinal cord traumatic lesions: Relationship between MRI findings and neurological outcome. Radiol Med 2005;110:636–45 pmid:16437049

    PubMed
21. 21.↵
    2. Rao SC,
    3. Fehlings MG

    . The optimal radiologic method for assessing spinal canal compromise and cord compression in patients with cervical spinal cord injury. Part I: An evidence-based analysis of the published literature. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1999;24:598–604 doi:10.1097/00007632-199903150-00022 pmid:10101828

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    2. Furlan JC,
    3. Fehlings MG,
    4. Massicotte EM, et al

    . A quantitative and reproducible method to assess cord compression and canal stenosis after cervical spine trauma: a study of interrater and intrarater reliability. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2007;32:2083–91 doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e318145a91c pmid:17762809

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    2. Budde MD,
    3. Kim JH,
    4. Liang HF, et al

    . Axonal injury detected by in vivo diffusion tensor imaging correlates with neurological disability in a mouse model of multiple sclerosis. NMR Biomed 2008;21:589–97 doi:10.1002/nbm.1229 pmid:18041806

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
24. 24.↵
    2. Bresnahan JC,
    3. Beattie MS,
    4. Stokes BT, et al

    . Three-dimensional computer-assisted analysis of graded contusion lesions in the spinal cord of the rat. J Neurotrauma 1991;8:91–101 doi:10.1089/neu.1991.8.91 pmid:1870139

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    2. Tator CH,
    3. Koyanagi I

    . Vascular mechanisms in the pathophysiology of human spinal cord injury. J Neurosurg 1997;86:483–92 doi:10.3171/jns.1997.86.3.0483 pmid:9046306

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
26. 26.↵
    2. Rao J-S,
    3. Zhao C,
    4. Yang ZY, et al

    . Diffusion tensor tractography of residual fibers in traumatic spinal cord injury: a pilot study. J Neuroradiol 2013;40:181–86 doi:10.1016/j.neurad.2012.08.008 pmid:23428240

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    2. Griffin JF,
    3. Davis MC,
    4. Ji JX, et al

    . Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging in a naturally occurring canine model of spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2015;53:278–84 doi:10.1038/sc.2014.244 pmid:25600310

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    2. Kelley BJ,
    3. Harel NY,
    4. Kim CY, et al

    . Diffusion tensor imaging as a predictor of locomotor function after experimental spinal cord injury and recovery. J Neurotrauma 2014;31:1362–73 doi:10.1089/neu.2013.3238 pmid:24779685

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    2. Kim JH,
    3. Loy DN,
    4. Wang Q, et al

    . Diffusion tensor imaging at 3 hours after traumatic spinal cord injury predicts long-term locomotor recovery. J Neurotrauma 2010;27:587–98 doi:10.1089/neu.2009.1063 pmid:20001686

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
30. 30.↵
    2. Mabray MC,
    3. Talbott JF,
    4. Whetstone WD, et al

    . Multidimensional analysis of magnetic resonance imaging predicts early impairment in thoracic and thoracolumbar spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma 2016;33:954–62 doi:10.1089/neu.2015.4093 pmid:26414451

    CrossRefPubMed
31. 31.↵
    2. Ghodadra A,
    3. Alhilali L,
    4. Fakhran S

    . Principal component analysis of diffusion tensor images to determine white matter injury patterns underlying postconcussive headache. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:274–78 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4505 pmid:26405087

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
32. 32.↵
    2. Jolliffe IT,
    3. Cadima J

    . Principal component analysis: a review and recent developments. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci 2016;374:20150202 doi:10.1098/rsta.2015.0202 pmid:26953178

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
33. 33.↵
    2. Linting M,
    3. Meulman JJ,
    4. Groenen PJ, et al

    . Nonlinear principal components analysis: introduction and application. Psychol Methods 2007;12:336–58 doi:10.1037/1082-989X.12.3.336 pmid:17784798

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
34. 34.↵
    2. Linting M,
    3. van der Kooij A

    . Nonlinear principal components analysis with CATPCA: a tutorial. J Pers Assess 2012;94:12–25 doi:10.1080/00223891.2011.627965 pmid:22176263

    CrossRefPubMed
35. 35.↵
    2. Cattell RB

    . The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behav Res 1966;1:245–76 doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10 pmid:26828106

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
36. 36.↵
    2. Kaiser HF

    . The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educ Psychol Meas 1960;20:141–51 doi:10.1177/001316446002000116

    CrossRefWeb of Science
37. 37.↵
    SyndromicPlot: Loadings Plot Generator. https://zenodo.org/record/47079#.WB3iWzdGXMQ. Accessed March 7, 2016.
38. 38.↵
    2. Wilson JR,
    3. Singh A,
    4. Craven C, et al

    . Early versus late surgery for traumatic spinal cord injury: the results of a prospective Canadian cohort study. Spinal Cord 2012;50:840–43 doi:10.1038/sc.2012.59 pmid:22565550

    CrossRefPubMed
39. 39.↵
    2. Fehlings MG,
    3. Vaccaro A,
    4. Wilson JR, et al

    . Early versus delayed decompression for traumatic cervical spinal cord injury: results of the Surgical Timing in Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study (STASCIS). PloS One 2012;7:e32037 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0032037 pmid:22384132

    CrossRefPubMed
40. 40.↵
    2. La Rosa G,
    3. Conti A,
    4. Cardali S, et al

    . Does early decompression improve neurological outcome of spinal cord injured patients? Appraisal of the literature using a meta-analytical approach. Spinal Cord 2004;42:503–12 doi:10.1038/sj.sc.3101627 pmid:15237284

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
41. 41.↵
    2. Wheeler-Kingshott CA,
    3. Hickman SJ,
    4. Parker GJ, et al

    . Investigating cervical spinal cord structure using axial diffusion tensor imaging. Neuroimage 2002;16:93–102 doi:10.1006/nimg.2001.1022 pmid:11969321

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
42. 42.↵
    2. Martin AR,
    3. Aleksanderek I,
    4. Cohen-Adad J, et al

    . Translating state-of-the-art spinal cord MRI techniques to clinical use: a systematic review of clinical studies utilizing DTI, MT, MWF, MRS, and fMRI. Neuroimage Clin 2016;10:192–238 doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2015.11.019 pmid:26862478

    CrossRefPubMed
43. 43.↵
    2. Talbott JF,
    3. Nout-Lomas YS,
    4. Wendland MF, et al

    . Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging characterization of white matter injury produced by axon-sparing demyelination and severe contusion spinal cord injury in rats. J Neurotrauma 2016;33:929–42 doi:10.1089/neu.2015.4102 pmid:26483094

    CrossRefPubMed