Compacting a Single Flow Diverter versus Overlapping Flow Diverters for Intracranial Aneurysms: A Computational Study

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Sadasivan C,
   3. Cesar L,
   4. Seong J, et al

   . An original flow diversion device for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: evaluation in the rabbit elastase-induced model. Stroke 2009;40:952–58 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.533760 pmid:19150864

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   2. Kulcsár Z,
   3. Houdart E,
   4. Bonafé A, et al

   . Intra-aneurysmal thrombosis as a possible cause of delayed aneurysm rupture after flow-diversion treatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:20–25 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2370 pmid:21071538

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   2. Szikora I,
   3. Berentei Z,
   4. Kulcsar Z, et al

   . Treatment of intracranial aneurysms by functional reconstruction of the parent artery: the Budapest experience with the Pipeline Embolization Device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:1139–47 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2023 pmid:20150304

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   2. Nelson PK,
   3. Lylyk P,
   4. Szikora I, et al

   . The Pipeline embolization device for the intracranial treatment of aneurysms trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:34–40 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2421 pmid:21148256

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   2. Becske T,
   3. Kallmes DF,
   4. Saatci I, et al

   . Pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms: results from a multicenter clinical trial. Radiology 2013;267:858–68 doi:10.1148/radiol.13120099 pmid:23418004

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   2. Kim M,
   3. Levy EI,
   4. Meng H, et al

   . Quantification of hemodynamic changes induced by virtual placement of multiple stents across a wide-necked basilar trunk aneurysm. Neurosurgery 2007;61:1305–12; discussion 1312–13 doi:10.1227/01.neu.0000306110.55174.30 pmid:18162911

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   2. Damiano RJ,
   3. Ma D,
   4. Xiang J, et al

   . Finite element modeling of endovascular coiling and flow diversion enables hemodynamic prediction of complex treatment strategies for intracranial aneurysm. J Biomech 2015;48:3332–40 doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.06.018 pmid:26169778

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Tan LA,
   3. Keigher KM,
   4. Munich SA, et al

   . Thromboembolic complications with Pipeline Embolization Device placement: impact of procedure time, number of stents and pre-procedure P2Y12 reaction unit (PRU) value. J Neurointerv Surg 2015;7:217–21 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011111 pmid:24553344

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   2. Tse MM,
   3. Yan B,
   4. Dowling RJ, et al

   . Current status of Pipeline embolization device in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a review. World Neurosurg 2013;80:829–35 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2012.09.023 pmid:23041067

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    2. Makoyeva A,
    3. Bing F,
    4. Darsaut TE, et al

    . The varying porosity of braided self-expanding stents and flow diverters: an experimental study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:596–602 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3234 pmid:22878007

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    2. Shapiro M,
    3. Raz E,
    4. Becske T, et al

    . Variable porosity of the Pipeline embolization device in straight and curved vessels: a guide for optimal deployment strategy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:727–33 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3742 pmid:24072622

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    2. Ma D,
    3. Dumont TM,
    4. Kosukegawa H, et al

    . High fidelity virtual stenting (HiFiVS) for intracranial aneurysm flow diversion: in vitro and in silico. Ann Biomed Eng 2013;41:2143–56 doi:10.1007/s10439-013-0808-4 pmid:23604850

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Ma D,
    3. Xiang J,
    4. Choi H, et al

    . Enhanced aneurysmal flow diversion using a dynamic push-pull technique: an experimental and modeling study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:1779–85 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3933 pmid:24763414

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    2. Xiang J,
    3. Ma D,
    4. Snyder KV, et al

    . Increasing flow diversion for cerebral aneurysm treatment using a single flow diverter. Neurosurgery 2014;75:286–94; discussion 294 doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000000409 pmid:24867201

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Gentric JC,
    3. Salazkin I,
    4. Gevry G, et al

    . Compaction of flow diverters improves occlusion of experimental wide-necked aneurysms. J Neurointerv Surg 2016;8:1072–77 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-012016 pmid:26453605

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    2. Antiga L,
    3. Piccinelli M,
    4. Botti L, et al

    . An image-based modeling framework for patient-specific computational hemodynamics. Med Biol Eng Comput 2008;46:1097–112 doi:10.1007/s11517-008-0420-1 pmid:19002516

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    2. Eller JL,
    3. Dumont TM,
    4. Sorkin GC, et al

    . The Pipeline embolization device for treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Expert Rev Med Devices 2014;11:137–50 doi:10.1586/17434440.2014.877188 pmid:24506298

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Ma D,
    3. Dargush GF,
    4. Natarajan SK, et al

    . Computer modeling of deployment and mechanical expansion of neurovascular flow diverter in patient-specific intracranial aneurysms. J Biomech 2012;45:2256–63 doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.06.013 pmid:22818662

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    2. Lieber BB,
    3. Sadasivan C

    . Endoluminal scaffolds for vascular reconstruction and exclusion of aneurysms from the cerebral circulation. Stroke 2010;41:S21–25 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.595066 pmid:20876497

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    2. Xiang J,
    3. Damiano RJ,
    4. Lin N, et al

    . High-fidelity virtual stenting: modeling of flow diverter deployment for hemodynamic characterization of complex intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg 2015;123:832–40 doi:10.3171/2014.11.JNS14497 pmid:26090829

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    2. Mut F,
    3. Raschi M,
    4. Scrivano E, et al

    . Association between hemodynamic conditions and occlusion times after flow diversion in cerebral aneurysms. J Neurointerv Surg 2015;7:286–90 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-011080 pmid:24696500

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
22. 22.↵
    2. Mut F,
    3. Cebral JR

    . Effects of flow-diverting device oversizing on hemodynamics alteration in cerebral aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:2010–16 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3080 pmid:22555581

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
23. 23.↵
    2. Jabbour P,
    3. Chalouhi N,
    4. Tjoumakaris S, et al

    . The Pipeline Embolization Device: learning curve and predictors of complications and aneurysm obliteration. Neurosurgery 2013;73:113–20; discussion 120 doi:10.1227/01.neu.0000429844.06955.39 pmid:23615106

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science