Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Advancing NeuroMRI with High-Relaxivity Contrast Agents
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Advancing NeuroMRI with High-Relaxivity Contrast Agents
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates


Improved Turnaround Times | Median time to first decision: 12 days

Research ArticleNeurointervention

FRED Flow Diverter: A Study on Safety and Efficacy in a Consecutive Group of 50 Patients

H. Luecking, T. Engelhorn, S. Lang, P. Goelitz, S. Kloska, K. Roessler and A. Doerfler
American Journal of Neuroradiology March 2017, 38 (3) 596-602; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5052
H. Luecking
aFrom the Departments of Neuroradiology (H.L., T.E., S.L., P.G., S.K., A.D.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for H. Luecking
T. Engelhorn
aFrom the Departments of Neuroradiology (H.L., T.E., S.L., P.G., S.K., A.D.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for T. Engelhorn
S. Lang
aFrom the Departments of Neuroradiology (H.L., T.E., S.L., P.G., S.K., A.D.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for S. Lang
P. Goelitz
aFrom the Departments of Neuroradiology (H.L., T.E., S.L., P.G., S.K., A.D.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for P. Goelitz
S. Kloska
aFrom the Departments of Neuroradiology (H.L., T.E., S.L., P.G., S.K., A.D.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for S. Kloska
K. Roessler
bNeurosurgery (K.R.), University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for K. Roessler
A. Doerfler
aFrom the Departments of Neuroradiology (H.L., T.E., S.L., P.G., S.K., A.D.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for A. Doerfler
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Brinjikji W,
    2. Rabinstein AA,
    3. Nasr DM, et al
    . Better outcomes with treatment by coiling relative to clipping of unruptured intracranial aneurysms in the United States, 2001–2008. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:1071–75 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2453 pmid:21511860
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Alshekhlee A,
    2. Mehta S,
    3. Edgell RC, et al
    . Hospital mortality and complications of electively clipped or coiled unruptured intracranial aneurysm. Stroke 2010;41:1471–76 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.580647 pmid:20522817
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Molyneux A,
    2. Kerr R,
    3. Stratton I, et al
    ; International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) Collaborative Group. International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial. Lancet 2002;360:1267–74 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11314-6 pmid:12414200
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.↵
    1. Consoli A,
    2. Vignoli C,
    3. Renieri L, et al
    . Assisted coiling of saccular wide-necked unruptured intracranial aneurysms: stent versus balloon. J Neurointerv Surg 2016;8:52–57 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011466 pmid:25428449
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Moret J,
    2. Cognard C,
    3. Weill A, et al
    . The “Remodelling Technique” in the treatment of wide neck intracranial aneurysms: angiographic results and clinical follow-up in 56 cases. Interv Neuroradiol 1997;3:21–35 pmid:20678369
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Shapiro M,
    2. Becske T,
    3. Sahlein D, et al
    . Stent-supported aneurysm coiling: a literature survey of treatment and follow-up. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:159–63 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2719 pmid:22033717
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Briganti F,
    2. Leone G,
    3. Marseglia M, et al
    . Endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms using flow-diverter devices: a systematic review. Neuroradiol J 2015;28:365–75 doi:10.1177/1971400915602803 pmid:26314872
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Zanaty M,
    2. Chalouhi N,
    3. Tjoumakaris SI, et al
    . Flow-diversion panacea or poison? Front Neurol 2014;5:21 doi:10.3389/fneur.2014.00021 pmid:24592254
    CrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Lylyk P,
    2. Miranda C,
    3. Ceratto R, et al
    . Curative endovascular reconstruction of cerebral aneurysms with the Pipeline embolization device: the Buenos Aires experience. Neurosurgery 2009;64:632–42; discussion 642–43; quiz N6 doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000339109.98070.65 pmid:19349825
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. 10.↵
    1. De Vries J,
    2. Boogaarts J,
    3. Van Norden A, et al
    . New generation of flow diverter (Surpass) for unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a prospective single-center study in 37 patients. Stroke 2013;44:1567–77 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.000434 pmid:23686973
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. McAuliffe W,
    2. Wycoco V,
    3. Rice H, et al
    . Immediate and midterm results following treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms with the Pipeline embolization device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:164–70 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2727 pmid:21979492
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Möhlenbruch MA,
    2. Herweh C,
    3. Jestaedt L, et al
    . The FRED flow-diverter stent for intracranial aneurysms: clinical study to assess safety and efficacy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:1155–61 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4251 pmid:25721079
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Byrne JV,
    2. Beltechi R,
    3. Yarnold JA, et al
    . Early experience in the treatment of intra-cranial aneurysms by endovascular flow diversion: a multicentre prospective study. PLoS One 2010;5:pii: e12492 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0012492 pmid:20824070
    CrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Phillips TJ,
    2. Wenderoth JD,
    3. Phatouros CC, et al
    . Safety of the Pipeline embolization device in treatment of posterior circulation aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1225–31 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3166 pmid:22678845
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Becske T,
    2. Kallmes DF,
    3. Saatci I, et al
    . Pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms: results from a multicenter clinical trial. Radiology 2013;267:858–68 doi:10.1148/radiol.13120099 pmid:23418004
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. 16.↵
    1. Nelson PK,
    2. Lylyk P,
    3. Szikora I, et al
    . The Pipeline embolization device for the intracranial treatment of aneurysms trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:34–40 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2421 pmid:21148256
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Pistocchi S,
    2. Blanc R,
    3. Bartolini B, et al
    . Flow diverters at and beyond the level of the circle of Willis for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Stroke 2012;43:1032–38 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.636019 pmid:22282890
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Yu SC,
    2. Kwok CK,
    3. Cheng PW, et al
    . Intracranial aneurysms: midterm outcome of Pipeline embolization device—a prospective study in 143 patients with 178 aneurysms. Radiology 2012;265:893–901 doi:10.1148/radiol.12120422 pmid:22996749
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. 19.↵
    1. D'Urso PI,
    2. Lanzino G,
    3. Cloft HJ, et al
    . Flow diversion for intracranial aneurysms: a review. Stroke 2011; 42:2363–88 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.620328 pmid:21737793
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Kocer N,
    2. Islak C,
    3. Kizilkilic O, et al
    . Flow Re-direction Endoluminal Device in treatment of cerebral aneurysms: initial experience with short-term follow-up results. J Neurosurg 2014;120:1158–71 doi:10.3171/2014.1.JNS131442 pmid:24628615
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. 21.↵
    1. Mpotsaris A,
    2. Skalej M,
    3. Beuing O, et al
    . Long-term occlusion results with SILK flow diversion in 28 aneurysms: do recanalizations occur during follow-up? Interv Neuroradiol 2015;21:300–10 doi:10.1177/1591019915583119 pmid:26015522
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. Kulcsár Z,
    2. Houdart E,
    3. Bonafé A, et al
    . Intra-aneurysmal thrombosis as a possible cause of delayed aneurysm rupture after flow-diversion treatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:20–25 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2370 pmid:21071538
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. Chalouhi N,
    2. Jabbour P,
    3. Daou B, et al
    . A new protocol for anticoagulation with tirofiban during flow diversion. Neurosurgery 2016;78:670–74 doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000001071 pmid:26488330
    CrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Struffert T,
    2. Saake M,
    3. Ott S, et al
    . Intravenous flat detector CT angiography for non-invasive visualisation of intracranial flow diverter: technical feasibility. Eur Radiol 2011;21:1797–801 doi:10.1007/s00330-011-2113 pmid:21720943
    CrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. O'Kelly CJ,
    2. Krings T,
    3. Fiorella D, et al
    . A novel grading scale for the angiographic assessment of intracranial aneurysms treated using flow diverting stents. Interv Neuroradiol 2010;16:133–37 pmid:20642887
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    1. Lubicz B,
    2. Levivier M,
    3. Sadeghi N, et al
    . Immediate intracranial aneurysm occlusion after embolization with detachable coils: a comparison between MR angiography and intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography. J Neuroradiol 2007;34:190–07 doi:10.1016/j.neurad.2007.05.002 pmid:17582496
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  27. 27.↵
    1. Attali J,
    2. Benaissa A,
    3. Soize S, et al
    . Follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated by flow diverter: comparison of three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography (3D-TOF-MRA) and contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CE-MRA) sequences with digital subtraction angiography as the gold standard. J Neurointerv Surg 2016;8:81–86 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011449 pmid:25352582
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  28. 28.↵
    1. Brinjikji W,
    2. Murad MH,
    3. Lanzino G, et al
    . Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with flow diverters: a meta-analysis. Stroke 2013;44:442–47 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.678151 pmid:23321438
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    1. Chiu AH,
    2. Cheung AK,
    3. Wenderoth JD, et al
    . Long-term follow-up results following elective treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms with the Pipeline Embolization Device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:1728–34 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4329 pmid:25999412
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    1. Kim M,
    2. Levy EI,
    3. Meng H, et al
    . Quantification of hemodynamic changes induced by virtual placement of multiple stents across a wide-necked basilar trunk aneurysm. Neurosurgery 2007;61:1305–12; discussion 1312–13 doi:10.1227/01.neu.0000306110.55174.30 pmid:18162911
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  31. 31.↵
    1. Fox B,
    2. Humphries WE,
    3. Doss VT, et al
    . Rupture of giant vertebrobasilar aneurysm following flow diversion: mechanical stretch as a potential mechanism for early aneurysm rupture. J Neurointerv Surg 2015; 7:e37 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011325.rep pmid:25361560
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  32. 32.↵
    1. Park JC,
    2. Lee DH,
    3. Kim JK, et al
    . Microembolism after endovascular coiling of unruptured cerebral aneurysms: incidence and risk factors. J Neurosurg 2016;124:777–83 doi:10.3171/2015.3.JNS142835 pmid:26381257
    CrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Cruz JP,
    2. Marotta T,
    3. O'Kelly C, et al
    . Enhancing brain lesions after endovascular treatment of aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:1954–58 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3976 pmid:24874528
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  34. 34.↵
    1. Valdivia y Alvarado M,
    2. Ebrahimi N,
    3. Benndorf G
    . Study of conformability of the new Leo Plus stent to a curved vascular model using flat-panel detector computed tomography (DynaCT). Neurosurgery 2009; 64(3 suppl):ons130–34; discussion ons134 doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000336304.26756.21 pmid:19240562
    CrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    1. Richter G,
    2. Engelhorn T,
    3. Struffert T, et al
    . Flat panel detector angiographic CT for stent-assisted coil embolization of broad-based cerebral aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:1902–08 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A0697 pmid:17893214
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 38 (3)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 38, Issue 3
1 Mar 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
FRED Flow Diverter: A Study on Safety and Efficacy in a Consecutive Group of 50 Patients
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
H. Luecking, T. Engelhorn, S. Lang, P. Goelitz, S. Kloska, K. Roessler, A. Doerfler
FRED Flow Diverter: A Study on Safety and Efficacy in a Consecutive Group of 50 Patients
American Journal of Neuroradiology Mar 2017, 38 (3) 596-602; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A5052

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
FRED Flow Diverter: A Study on Safety and Efficacy in a Consecutive Group of 50 Patients
H. Luecking, T. Engelhorn, S. Lang, P. Goelitz, S. Kloska, K. Roessler, A. Doerfler
American Journal of Neuroradiology Mar 2017, 38 (3) 596-602; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A5052
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Brazilian FRED Registry: A Prospective Multicenter Study for Brain Aneurysm Treatment--The BRED Study
  • Endosaccular flow disruption: where are we now?
  • Usefulness of Silent MR Angiography for Intracranial Aneurysms Treated with a Flow-Diverter Device
  • On Flow Diversion: The Changing Landscape of Intracerebral Aneurysm Management
  • SAFE study (Safety and efficacy Analysis of FRED Embolic device in aneurysm treatment): 1-year clinical and anatomical results
  • Feasibility, complications, morbidity, and mortality results at 6 months for aneurysm treatment with the Flow Re-Direction Endoluminal Device: report of SAFE study
  • European Multicenter Study for the Evaluation of a Dual-Layer Flow-Diverting Stent for Treatment of Wide-Neck Intracranial Aneurysms: The European Flow-Redirection Intraluminal Device Study
  • Multicenter Experience with FRED Jr Flow Re-Direction Endoluminal Device for Intracranial Aneurysms in Small Arteries
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Prophylactic Endovascular Treatments for CBS
  • Smoking & Aneurysm Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis
  • “Buddy-wire anchoring” technique for TVE
Show more NEUROINTERVENTION

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire