Measured Head CT/CTA Skin Dose and Intensive Care Unit Patient Cumulative Exposure

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Mokin M,
   3. Kass-Hout T,
   4. Kass-Hout O, et al

   . Intravenous heparin for the treatment of intraluminal thrombus in patients with acute ischemic stroke: a case series. J Neurointerv Surg 2013;5:144–50 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2011-010134 pmid:22345142

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   2. Camargo EC,
   3. Furie KL,
   4. Singhal AB, et al

   . Acute brain infarct: detection and delineation with CT angiographic source images versus nonenhanced CT scans. Radiology 2007;244:541–48 doi:10.1148/radiol.2442061028 pmid:17581888

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   2. Wall BF,
   3. Kendall GM,
   4. Edwards AA, et al

   . What are the risks from medical x-rays and other low dose radiation? Br J Radiol 2006;79:285–94 doi:10.1259/bjr/55733882 pmid:16585719

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   2. Tubiana M,
   3. Feinendegen LE,
   4. Yang C, et al

   . The linear no-threshold relationship is inconsistent with radiation biologic and experimental data. Radiology 2009;251:13–22 doi:10.1148/radiol.2511080671 pmid:19332842

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   2. Wong JM,
   3. Ho AL,
   4. Lin N, et al

   . Radiation exposure in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage: a quality improvement target. J Neurosurg 2013;119:215–20 doi:10.3171/2013.3.JNS12253 pmid:23621604

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   2. Mamourian AC,
   3. Young H,
   4. Stiefel MF

   . Cumulative radiation dose in patients admitted with subarachnoid hemorrhage: a prospective study using a self-developing film badge. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:1787–90 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2192 pmid:20595364

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   2. Koenig TR,
   3. Wolff D,
   4. Mettler FA, et al

   . Skin injuries from fluoroscopically guided procedures: part 1, characteristics of radiation injury. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;177:3–11 doi:10.2214/ajr.177.1.1770003 pmid:11418388

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   2. Balter S,
   3. Hopewell JW,
   4. Miller DL, et al

   . Fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures: a review of radiation effects on patients' skin and hair. Radiology 2010;254:326–41 doi:10.1148/radiol.2542082312 pmid:20093507

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   2. Zhang D,
   3. Cagnon CH,
   4. Villablanca JP, et al

   . Estimating peak skin and eye lens dose from neuroperfusion examinations: use of Monte Carlo based simulations and comparisons to CTDI_vol, AAPM Report No. 111, and ImPACT dosimetry tool values. Med Phys 2013;40:091901 doi:10.1118/1.4816652 pmid:24007152

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Zhang D,
    3. Cagnon CH,
    4. Villablanca JP, et al

    . Peak skin and eye lens radiation dose from brain perfusion CT based on Monte Carlo simulation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012;198:412–17 doi:10.2214/AJR.11.7230 pmid:22268186

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    2. Hoang JK,
    3. Wang C,
    4. Frush DP, et al

    . Estimation of radiation exposure for brain perfusion CT: standard protocol compared with deviations in protocol. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013;201:W730–34 doi:10.2214/AJR.12.10031 pmid:24063388

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    2. Imanishi Y,
    3. Fukui A,
    4. Niimi H, et al

    . Radiation-induced temporary hair loss as a radiation damage only occurring in patients who had the combination of MDCT and DSA. Eur Radiol 2005;15:41–46 doi:10.1007/s00330-004-2459-1 pmid:15351903

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    2. Hirata M,
    3. Sugawara Y,
    4. Fukutomi Y, et al

    . Measurement of radiation dose in cerebral CT perfusion study. Radiat Med 2005;23:97–103 pmid:15827526

    PubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Diekmann S,
    3. Siebert E,
    4. Juran R, et al

    . Dose exposure of patients undergoing comprehensive stroke imaging by multidetector-row CT: comparison of 320-detector row and 64-detector row CT scanners. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:1003–09 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1971 pmid:20110373

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    2. Yamauchi-Kawara C,
    3. Fujii K,
    4. Aoyama T, et al

    . Radiation dose evaluation in multidetector-row CT imaging for acute stroke with an anthropomorphic phantom. Br J Radiol 2010;83:1029–41 doi:10.1259/bjr/52267127 pmid:21088088

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    2. Bauhs JA,
    3. Vrieze TJ,
    4. Primak AN, et al

    . CT dosimetry: comparison of measurement techniques and devices. Radiographics 2008;28:245–53 doi:10.1148/rg.281075024 pmid:18203941

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    2. McCollough CH,
    3. Leng S,
    4. Yu L, et al

    . CT dose index and patient dose: they are not the same thing. Radiology 2011;259:311–16 doi:10.1148/radiol.11101800 pmid:21502387

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. 18.↵
    2. Rong X,
    3. Cody D

    . How accurate is estimating CT skin dose based on CTDI? Med Phys 2010;37:3463 doi:10.1118/1.3469524

    CrossRef
19. 19.↵
    Patient Monitoring Solutions nanoDot Dosimeter [technical specifications]. Glenwood, IL: Landauer Inc; 2010
20. 20.↵
    2. Stecker MS,
    3. Balter S,
    4. Towbin RB, et al

    . Guidelines for patient radiation dose management. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2009;20:S263–73 doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2009.04.037 pmid:19560006

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. 21.↵
    2. Miller DL,
    3. Balter S,
    4. Cole PE, et al

    . Radiation doses in interventional radiology procedures: the RAD-IR study: part II: skin dose. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2003;14:977–90 doi:10.1097/01.RVI.0000084601.43811.CB pmid:12902555

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. 22.↵
    2. Miller DL,
    3. Schueler BA,
    4. Balter S

    . New recommendations for occupational radiation protection. J Am Coll Radiol 2012;9:366–68 doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2012.02.006

    CrossRef
23. 23.↵
    2. Averbeck D

    . Does scientific evidence support a change from the LNT model for low-dose radiation risk extrapolation? Health Phys 2009;97:493–504 doi:10.1097/HP.0b013e3181b08a20 pmid:19820459

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
24. 24.↵
    2. Durand DJ

    . A rational approach to the clinical use of cumulative effective dose estimates. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;197:160–62 doi:10.2214/AJR.10.6195 pmid:21701025

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science