The Efficacy of Shielding Systems for Reducing Operator Exposure during Neurointerventional Procedures: A Real-World Prospective Study

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Sans Merce M,
   3. Korchi AM,
   4. Kobzeva L, et al

   . The value of protective head cap and glasses in neurointerventional radiology. J Neurointerv Surg 2016;8:736–40 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-011703 pmid:26078360

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   2. Kemerink GJ,
   3. Frantzen MJ,
   4. Oei K, et al

   . Patient and occupational dose in neurointerventional procedures. Neuroradiology 2002;44:522–28 doi:10.1007/s00234-002-0780-4 pmid:12070727

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   2. Tavares JB,
   3. Sacadura-Leite E,
   4. Matoso T, et al

   . The importance of protection glasses during neuroangiographies: a study on radiation exposure at the lens of the primary operator. Interv Neuroradiol 2016;22:368–71 doi:10.1177/1591019916628322 pmid:26842605

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   2. Layton KF,
   3. Kallmes DF,
   4. Cloft HJ, et al

   . Radiation exposure to the primary operator during endovascular surgical neuroradiology procedures. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:742–43 pmid:16611756

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   2. Moritake T,
   3. Matsumaru Y,
   4. Takigawa T, et al

   . Dose measurement on both patients and operators during neurointerventional procedures using photoluminescence glass dosimeters. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:1910–17 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1235 pmid:18719037

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   2. Lekovic GP,
   3. Kim LJ,
   4. Gonzalez LF, et al

   . Radiation exposure during endovascular procedures. Neurosurgery 2008;63:ONS81–85; discussion ONS85–86 pmid:18728608

   PubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. Alexander MD,
   3. Oliff MC,
   4. Olorunsola OG, et al

   . Patient radiation exposure during diagnostic and therapeutic interventional neuroradiology procedures. J Neurointerv Surg 2010;2:6–10 doi:10.1136/jnis.2009.000802 pmid:21990551

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   Committee on Health Effects of Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiations. Health Effects of Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiations: Time for Reassessment? National Academy Press: Washington, DC; 1998
9. 9.↵
   2. Thierry-Chef I,
   3. Simon SL,
   4. Land CE, et al

   . Radiation dose to the brain and subsequent risk of developing brain tumors in pediatric patients undergoing interventional neuroradiology procedures. Radiat Res 2008;170:553–65 doi:10.1667/RR1393.1 pmid:18959462

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    2. Orbach DB,
    3. Stamoulis C,
    4. Strauss KJ, et al

    . Neurointerventions in children: radiation exposure and its import. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:650–56 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3758 pmid:24157736

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    2. Venneri L,
    3. Rossi F,
    4. Botto N, et al

    . Cancer risk from professional exposure in staff working in cardiac catheterization laboratory: insights from the National Research Council's Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation VII Report. Am Heart J 2009;157:118–24 doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2008.08.009 pmid:19081407

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    2. Amis ES Jr.,
    3. Butler PF,
    4. Applegate KE, et al

    ; American College of Radiology. American College of Radiology white paper on radiation dose in medicine. J Am Col Radiol 2007;4:272–84 doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2007.03.002 pmid:17467608

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Vano E,
    3. Fernandez JM,
    4. Sanchez RM, et al

    . Patient radiation dose management in the follow-up of potential skin injuries in neuroradiology. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:277–82 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3211 pmid:22859286

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    2. Peterson EC,
    3. Kanal KM,
    4. Dickinson RL, et al

    . Radiation-induced complications in endovascular neurosurgery: incidence of skin effects and the feasibility of estimating risk of future tumor formation. Neurosurgery 2013;72:566–72 doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e318283c9a5 pmid:23269458

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    2. Roguin A,
    3. Goldstein J,
    4. Bar O

    . Brain tumours among interventional cardiologists: a cause for alarm? Report of four new cases from two cities and a review of the literature. EuroIntervention 2012;7:1081–86 doi:10.4244/EIJV7I9A172 pmid:22207231

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    2. Roguin A,
    3. Goldstein J,
    4. Bar O, et al

    . Brain and neck tumors among physicians performing interventional procedures. Am J Cardiol 2013;111:1368–72 doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.12.060 pmid:23419190

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Chohan MO,
    3. Sandoval D,
    4. Buchan A, et al

    . Cranial radiation exposure during cerebral catheter angiography. J Neurointerv Surg 2014;6:633–36 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-010909 pmid:24062257

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    2. Bor D,
    3. Cekirge S,
    4. Türkay T, et al

    . Patient and staff doses in interventional neuroradiology. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2005;117:62–68 pmid:16461524

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    2. Kahn EN,
    3. Gemmete JJ,
    4. Chaudhary N, et al

    . Radiation dose reduction during neurointerventional procedures by modification of default settings on biplane angiography equipment. J Neurointerv Surg 2016;8:819–23 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-011891 pmid:26245735

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    2. Schneider T,
    3. Wyse E,
    4. Pearl MS

    . Analysis of radiation doses incurred during diagnostic cerebral angiography after the implementation of dose reduction strategies. J Neurointerv Surg 2016 Apr 7. [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-012204 pmid:27056919

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
21. 21.↵
    2. Pearl MS,
    3. Torok C,
    4. Wang J, et al

    . Practical techniques for reducing radiation exposure during cerebral angiography procedures. J Neurointerv Surg 2015;7:141–45 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-010982 pmid:24489125

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
22. 22.↵
    2. Honarmand AR,
    3. Shaibani A,
    4. Pashaee T, et al

    . Subjective and objective evaluation of image quality in biplane cerebral digital subtraction angiography following significant acquisition dose reduction in a clinical setting. J Neurointerv Surg 2016 Apr 6. [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012296 pmid:27053704

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    2. Simons GR,
    3. Orrison WW Jr.

    . Use of a sterile, disposable, radiation-absorbing shield reduces occupational exposure to scatter radiation during pectoral device implantation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2004;27:726–29 doi:10.1111/j.1540-8159.2004.00520.x pmid:15189526

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    2. Sawdy JM,
    3. Gocha MD,
    4. Olshove V, et al

    . Radiation protection during hybrid procedures: innovation creates new challenges. J Invasive Cardiol 2009;21:437–40 pmid:19726813

    PubMed
25. 25.↵
    2. Power S,
    3. Mirza M,
    4. Thakorlal A, et al

    . Efficacy of a radiation absorbing shield in reducing dose to the interventionalist during peripheral endovascular procedures: a single centre pilot study. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2015;38:573–78 doi:10.1007/s00270-014-0997-8 pmid:25280954

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    2. Politi L,
    3. Biondi-Zoccai G,
    4. Nocetti L, et al

    . Reduction of scatter radiation during transradial percutaneous coronary angiography: a randomized trial using a lead-free radiation shield. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2012;79:97–102 doi:10.1002/ccd.22947 pmid:21520391

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    2. Murphy JC,
    3. Darragh K,
    4. Walsh SJ, et al

    . Efficacy of the RADPAD protective drape during real world complex percutaneous coronary intervention procedures. Am J Cardiol 2011;108:1408–10 doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.06.061 pmid:21861961

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    2. Kloeze C,
    3. Klompenhouwer EG,
    4. Brands PJ, et al

    . Editor's choice–Use of disposable radiation-absorbing surgical drapes results in significant dose reduction during EVAR procedures. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2014;47:268–72 doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2013.12.008 pmid:24445087

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    2. King JN,
    3. Champlin AM,
    4. Kelsey CA, et al

    . Using a sterile disposable protective surgical drape for reduction of radiation exposure to interventionalists. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;178:153–57 doi:10.2214/ajr.178.1.1780153 pmid:11756110

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
30. 30.↵
    2. Jones MA,
    3. Cocker M,
    4. Khiani R, et al

    . The benefits of using a bismuth-containing, radiation-absorbing drape in cardiac resynchronization implant procedures. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2014;37:828–33 doi:10.1111/pace.12349 pmid:24697669

    CrossRefPubMed
31. 31.↵
    2. Germano JJ,
    3. Day G,
    4. Gregorious D, et al

    . A novel radiation protection drape reduces radiation exposure during fluoroscopy guided electrophysiology procedures. J Invasive Cardiol 2005;17:469–72 pmid:16145234

    PubMed