Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleNeurointervention

Predictors of Incomplete Occlusion following Pipeline Embolization of Intracranial Aneurysms: Is It Less Effective in Older Patients?

N. Adeeb, J.M. Moore, M. Wirtz, C.J. Griessenauer, P.M. Foreman, H. Shallwani, R. Gupta, A.A. Dmytriw, R. Motiei-Langroudi, A. Alturki, M.R. Harrigan, A.H. Siddiqui, E.I. Levy, A.J. Thomas and C.S. Ogilvy
American Journal of Neuroradiology December 2017, 38 (12) 2295-2300; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5375
N. Adeeb
aFrom the Neurosurgical Service (N.A., J.M.M., M.W., C.J.G., R.G., A.A.D., R.M.-L., A.A., A.J.T., C.S.O.), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
dDepartment of Neurosurgery (N.A.), Louisiana State University, Shreveport, Louisiana.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for N. Adeeb
J.M. Moore
aFrom the Neurosurgical Service (N.A., J.M.M., M.W., C.J.G., R.G., A.A.D., R.M.-L., A.A., A.J.T., C.S.O.), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for J.M. Moore
M. Wirtz
aFrom the Neurosurgical Service (N.A., J.M.M., M.W., C.J.G., R.G., A.A.D., R.M.-L., A.A., A.J.T., C.S.O.), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for M. Wirtz
C.J. Griessenauer
aFrom the Neurosurgical Service (N.A., J.M.M., M.W., C.J.G., R.G., A.A.D., R.M.-L., A.A., A.J.T., C.S.O.), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for C.J. Griessenauer
P.M. Foreman
bDepartment of Neurosurgery (P.M.F., M.R.H.), University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for P.M. Foreman
H. Shallwani
cDepartment of Neurosurgery (H.S., A.H.S., E.I.L.), State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for H. Shallwani
R. Gupta
aFrom the Neurosurgical Service (N.A., J.M.M., M.W., C.J.G., R.G., A.A.D., R.M.-L., A.A., A.J.T., C.S.O.), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for R. Gupta
A.A. Dmytriw
aFrom the Neurosurgical Service (N.A., J.M.M., M.W., C.J.G., R.G., A.A.D., R.M.-L., A.A., A.J.T., C.S.O.), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for A.A. Dmytriw
R. Motiei-Langroudi
aFrom the Neurosurgical Service (N.A., J.M.M., M.W., C.J.G., R.G., A.A.D., R.M.-L., A.A., A.J.T., C.S.O.), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for R. Motiei-Langroudi
A. Alturki
aFrom the Neurosurgical Service (N.A., J.M.M., M.W., C.J.G., R.G., A.A.D., R.M.-L., A.A., A.J.T., C.S.O.), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for A. Alturki
M.R. Harrigan
bDepartment of Neurosurgery (P.M.F., M.R.H.), University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for M.R. Harrigan
A.H. Siddiqui
cDepartment of Neurosurgery (H.S., A.H.S., E.I.L.), State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for A.H. Siddiqui
E.I. Levy
cDepartment of Neurosurgery (H.S., A.H.S., E.I.L.), State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for E.I. Levy
A.J. Thomas
aFrom the Neurosurgical Service (N.A., J.M.M., M.W., C.J.G., R.G., A.A.D., R.M.-L., A.A., A.J.T., C.S.O.), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for A.J. Thomas
C.S. Ogilvy
aFrom the Neurosurgical Service (N.A., J.M.M., M.W., C.J.G., R.G., A.A.D., R.M.-L., A.A., A.J.T., C.S.O.), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for C.S. Ogilvy
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Flow diversion with the Pipeline Embolization Device (PED) for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms is associated with a high rate of aneurysm occlusion. However, clinical and radiographic predictors of incomplete aneurysm occlusion are poorly defined. In this study, predictors of incomplete occlusion at last angiographic follow-up after PED treatment were assessed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of consecutive aneurysms treated with the PED between 2009 and 2016, at 3 academic institutions in the United States, was performed. Cases with angiographic follow-up were selected to evaluate factors predictive of incomplete aneurysm occlusion at last follow-up.

RESULTS: We identified 465 aneurysms treated with the PED; 380 (81.7%) aneurysms (329 procedures; median age, 58 years; female/male ratio, 4.8:1) had angiographic follow-up, and were included. Complete occlusion (100%) was achieved in 78.2% of aneurysms. Near-complete (90%–99%) and partial (<90%) occlusion were collectively achieved in 21.8% of aneurysms and defined as incomplete occlusion. Of aneurysms followed for at least 12 months (211 of 380), complete occlusion was achieved in 83.9%. Older age (older than 70 years), nonsmoking status, aneurysm location within the posterior communicating artery or posterior circulation, greater aneurysm maximal diameter (≥21 mm), and shorter follow-up time (<12 months) were significantly associated with incomplete aneurysm occlusion at last angiographic follow-up on univariable analysis. However, on multivariable logistic regression, only age, smoking status, and duration of follow-up were independently associated with occlusion status.

CONCLUSIONS: Complete occlusion following PED treatment of intracranial aneurysms can be influenced by several factors related to the patient, aneurysm, and treatment. Of these factors, older age (older than 70 years) and nonsmoking status were independent predictors of incomplete occlusion. While the physiologic explanation for these findings remains unknown, identification of factors predictive of incomplete aneurysm occlusion following PED placement can assist in patient selection and counseling and might provide insight into the biologic factors affecting endothelialization.

ABBREVIATION:

PED
Pipeline Embolization Device

The flow-diverting Pipeline Embolization Device (PED; Covidien, Irvine, California) has become a mainstay for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms.1 The device was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2011 for the treatment of large or giant, wide-neck brain aneurysms along the internal carotid artery in adults.2 Numerous studies have since demonstrated the safety and efficacy of the PED in treating aneurysms with varying morphologies in different anatomic locations.3⇓⇓⇓⇓–8 As the clinical indications for PED placement expand, predictors of radiographic outcomes have become a topic of ongoing investigation. Although 1 study found that fusiform aneurysm morphology and shorter follow-up length were independent predictors of incomplete occlusion, this study was limited by a small sample size and a mean follow-up of 6.1 months.9 The expanding use of PEDs for treating intracranial aneurysms necessitates an evaluation of predictors of incomplete occlusion.

Materials and Methods

A retrospective analysis of consecutive aneurysms treated with PED placement between 2009 and 2016 at 3 academic institutions (Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Department of Neurosurgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham; and State University of New York at Buffalo) in United States was performed. Inclusion criteria consisted of all adult patients with intracranial aneurysms treated with the PED who had undergone angiographic follow-up. Both ruptured and unruptured aneurysms were included; all aneurysm morphologies (ie, saccular, blister, fusiform, dissecting) and intracranial locations were included. Institutional review board approval was obtained at all 3 centers before the commencement of the study. We collected the following information: patient demographics, aneurysm and PED characteristics, procedural complications, and angiographic and functional outcomes.

Procedural Details

Patients received aspirin, 325 mg, and clopidogrel, 75 mg daily, for 3–14 days before the intervention. Platelet function testing was routinely performed with a whole-blood Lumi-Aggregometer (Chrono-Log, Havertown, Pennsylvania), light transmission aggregometry, or the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay (Accumetrics, San Diego, California). Clopidogrel nonresponders were identified on the basis of established cutoff values at the individual institutions, and manufacturers' recommendations were used for guidance. If a patient was identified as a clopidogrel responder, the clopidogrel was continued. If a patient was identified as a clopidogrel nonresponder, the choice to continue the same dose of clopidogrel, administer a 1-time 600-mg clopidogrel boost within the 24 hours before the procedure, or switch to ticagrelor was at the discretion of the interventionalist performing the procedure. Patients undergoing treatment of a ruptured aneurysm received a loading dose of aspirin, 650 mg, and clopidogrel, 600 mg, before the intervention.

Patients underwent local anesthesia with sedation or general anesthesia at the discretion of the individual institutions, and all patients were anticoagulated with heparin throughout the procedure. The type of guide catheter and microcatheter used for PED deployment was at the discretion of the individual institutions. The deployment and apposition of the PED to the ICA wall was documented by fluoroscopy. Dual-antiplatelet therapy was continued for at least 3 months after the procedure, and aspirin was continued indefinitely thereafter.

Angiographic Outcome

Angiographic outcome was assessed with digital subtracted angiography or MR angiography10,11 on the basis of the follow-up protocols at the discretion of each individual institution. In 1 institution, patients were imaged and reviewed at 6 months postprocedure with DSA, then at 2 and 5 years with DSA or MRA. In the second institution, patients were reviewed at 6 and 12 months postprocedure with MRA, then annually until 5 years with MRA. In the third institution, patients were followed at 3 and 6 months postprocedure with MRA, at 12 months with DSA, and then annually until 5 years with MRA. Aneurysm occlusion on follow-up DSA was assessed by the treating interventionalist. Follow-up MRAs were assessed by a radiologist blinded to the clinical history and an interventionalist. Occlusion was categorized as complete occlusion (100%), near-complete occlusion (90%–100%), and partial occlusion (<90%). Both near-complete and partial occlusion were collectively defined as incomplete occlusion.

Outcome

Functional outcome was assessed with the modified Rankin Scale at last follow-up by the interventionalist at each institution.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS 21.0 (IBM, Armonk, New York). In univariable analysis, variables were compared among groups with the nonparametric test for continuous variables and the χ2 test for categoric variables, to identify predictors of incomplete occlusion. Statistical significance was defined as P < .05. Multivariable logistic regression was performed on candidate predictor variables to identify variables independently associated with incomplete occlusion at last angiographic follow-up after controlling for potential confounders.

Results

Baseline and Aneurysm Characteristics

A total of 465 aneurysms treated with PED placement at the 3 institutions were identified. Of these, 380 (81.7%) aneurysms treated by 329 PED procedures (median age, 58 years; female/male ratio, 4.8:1) had angiographic follow-up and were included in this study. Current smoking and multiple aneurysms were present in 25.8% and 45% of procedures, respectively. The pretreatment mRS was 0–2 in 95.4% of procedures and 3–5 in 4.6%. Treatment in the setting of immediate aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage occurred in 3% of procedures. Aneurysms were mostly located along the ICA (83.2%), followed by the posterior circulation (13.4%). Most aneurysms were saccular (67.6%) or fusiform (26.9%). The median maximal diameter and neck size were 7.7 and 4 mm, respectively. A daughter sac was present in 24.7% of aneurysms (Table 1).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1:

Baseline characteristics

Treatment Outcome

A single PED was used in the treatment of 77.5% of procedures, while ≥2 PEDs were placed in 22.5%. The median length of angiographic follow-up was 13.5 months (mean, 19.2 months). At last follow-up, complete occlusion (100%) was achieved in 78.2% of aneurysms, while near-complete occlusion (90%–99%) was achieved in 7.6%, and partial occlusion (< 90%), in 14.2%. Of aneurysms followed for at least 12 months (211 of 380), complete occlusion was achieved in 83.9%. Retreatment was performed in 6.3% of aneurysms and was exclusively endovascular. At last follow-up, the mRS scores improved in 33.4% and worsened in 8.8%; this percentage included patients presenting with aneurysmal SAH. Symptomatic thromboembolic complications were encountered in 5.2% of procedures, and symptomatic hemorrhagic complications, in 1.8%. The mortality rate was 1.2% (4 cases); this was due to either ischemic stroke (2 cases), early postprocedure hemorrhage (1 case), or pretreatment aneurysmal SAH (1 case) (Table 2).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2:

Outcome measures

Predictors of Incomplete Occlusion

On univariable analysis, older age (older than 70 years, P = .002), nonsmoking status (P = .005), aneurysm location within the posterior communicating artery or posterior circulation (P = .01), larger aneurysm maximal diameter (≥21 mm, P = .03), and shorter follow-up time (<12 months, P = .001) were associated with significantly higher rates of incomplete occlusion at last follow-up (On-line Table).

Significant predictors of incomplete occlusion at last follow-up in univariable analysis were further analyzed in multivariable logistic regression. Older age (older than 70 years; OR, 2; 95% CI, 1.1–3.8; P = .03; Figure), nonsmoking status (OR, 2; 95% CI, 1.1–3.9, P = .03), and shorter follow-up time (<12 months; OR, 2; 95% CI, 1.2–3.5; P = .007) were independently associated with a higher rate of incomplete occlusion at last follow-up (Table 3).

FIGURE.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE.

Age-related variation in the rate of complete occlusion following intracranial aneurysm treatment with PEDs.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3:

Multivariable logistic regression for predictors of incomplete occlusion at last follow-up

Discussion

In this study, we report a multicenter experience with PED placement for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms, with a focus on identifying predictors of incomplete occlusion at last angiographic follow-up. Complete occlusion was achieved in 79.7% of cases. Although several patient- and aneurysm-related factors were significantly associated with a higher rate of incomplete aneurysm occlusion on univariable analysis, only age, smoking status, and length of follow-up were independently associated with occlusion status.

Predictors of Aneurysm Occlusion

Predictors of complete occlusion and recanalization following endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms have been recently studied.12⇓–14 Ruptured aneurysms, smaller maximal diameter, smaller neck size, and regular shape were independently associated with complete occlusion.12 Ogilvy et al13 developed a scoring system to predict aneurysm recanalization following coil embolization. Larger maximal diameter (>10 mm), ruptured aneurysm status, the presence of an intra-aneurysmal thrombus, and incomplete obliteration immediately after aneurysm treatment were each associated with a higher risk of recurrence. The presence of assist devices (stents or flow diverters), meanwhile, was associated with a lower risk of recanalization.13,14

Jabbour et al9 reported predictors of incomplete aneurysm occlusion at last follow-up after treatment with PED placement. In their study, fusiform shape (P = .05) and, unsurprisingly, shorter follow-up time (P = .03) were independent predictors of incomplete occlusion. However, only 73 aneurysms had angiographic follow-up, with a mean length of 6.1 months. In our study, with a mean follow-up of 19.2 months, the morphology of the aneurysm had no significant effect on occlusion status. However, shorter follow-up length (<12 months) was significantly associated with a lower occlusion rate, which is consistent with previous reports.9,15,16

Age-Related Variation in Occlusion Rates

A meta-analysis of endovascular coiling of intracranial aneurysms in elderly patients (older than 65 years) reported a 66% complete or near-complete occlusion rate immediately after the procedure, which improved to 74% at 6- to 12-month follow-up and 86% at >12 months.17 This compares poorly with a 90% complete or near-complete immediate occlusion rate following coil embolization of intracranial aneurysms, when all age groups are considered.18,19

In this study, we found that older age (older than 70 years) was a significant predictor of incomplete occlusion at last follow-up. This is the first study to specifically evaluate age and its impact on aneurysm occlusion rates following flow diversion, to our knowledge. There was a tendency for aneurysms to be located within the posterior circulation in this age group compared with younger patients (25% versus 10.9%, P = .001), which may influence this finding. Nevertheless, the difference in occlusion rates remained significant after controlling for aneurysm location, which further supported the independent correlation between older age (older than 70 years) and incomplete occlusion. There was no significant difference in the duration of follow-up in older patients compared with younger patients.

As one might expect, as patients age, the risk of complications appears to increase. Brinjikji et al,20 in a large multicenter study on complications associated with PED placement, found that complication rates rise as the patient age increases. Patients older than 70 years of age had significantly higher rates of neurologic mortality. Increased age was also associated with higher odds of neurologic morbidity.20 Our data found a nonsignificant trend toward increased complications in patients older than 70 years of age.

While the explanation for the lower occlusion rates in the elderly is currently unknown, it is tempting to speculate that this may be due to a deficiency in the endothelial repair pathway. Rouchaud et al21 found that the genes involved in cellular migration and the inflammatory response were upregulated in aneurysms successfully treated with flow diverters in rabbits. Other studies have identified an upregulation of metalloproteinases (critical for endothelial wall remodeling), inflammatory modulators, and growth factors.22 In animal models, complete or near-complete endothelialization, which can occur as rapidly as within the first 7 days, is necessary to ensure complete obliteration of the aneurysm.23 In a histologic study of giant aneurysms that had undergone flow-diversion treatment and had failed to occlude, lack of endothelialization was predominantly found in patients in their 60s.24 It may be that the endothelial cells in the cerebral vasculature have a diminished capacity for regeneration and migration across the flow-diverter surface, similar to the reduction in neural stem cell proliferation and differentiation potential in the aging brain.25,26 While this hypothesis requires further investigation, it raises the tantalizing possibility of coating flow diverters with factors that may enhance endothelialization and may be absent in the cellular milieu of the elderly.

Length of Follow-Up

As was previously discussed, an important physiologic mechanism for aneurysm occlusion following PED treatment is endothelialization along the length of the device, which results in diversion of blood flow away from the aneurysm sac.27 This process is gradual and varies in duration from months to years. Accordingly, longer angiographic follow-ups for aneurysms treated with the PED may be necessary to demonstrate aneurysm occlusion. Prior studies have supported this hypothesis and have found that shorter angiographic follow-up is associated with a decreased aneurysm occlusion rate, with longer duration having the opposite effect.9,15,16

Effect of Cigarette Smoking

Smoking is one of the significant modifiable risk factors for aneurysm formation and increased risk of aneurysm rupture.28⇓–30 Ortiz et al31 have previously reported a correlation between current smoking status and an increased risk of aneurysm recurrence. However, in that study, the authors stratified smoking status into never/nonsmokers and former/current smokers, despite smoking secession decreasing the risk of vascular inflammation and related malformations.32 Therefore, with appropriate stratification of current smoking as a separate category, there was no significant effect on aneurysm recurrence or retreatment after endovascular treatment.12,29 Similarly, Rouchaud et al33 found no significant correlation between smoking status and aneurysm occlusion following PED placement. In our study, smoking was associated with a higher rate of aneurysm occlusion. Although this finding can be attributed to the relatively small sample size, it might also be related to an increased rate of intra-aneurysmal thrombosis. Smoking is a well-known risk factor for thrombus formation in other pathologies, including cancer, cardiac stent thrombosis, and ischemic stroke. It may be that its prothrombotic effects amplify those of the PED.34⇓–36 These findings support an earlier statement by Rouchaud et al33 that smoking status should not be a factor for excluding patients from PED embolization of intracranial aneurysms.

Limitations

We acknowledge that our study is limited by its retrospective nature with all the inherent biases associated with such a study design. Although the inclusion of multiple institutions improves the generalizability of the findings, it introduces variability in patient management, follow-up protocols, imaging studies used, and evaluation of aneurysm occlusion. Moreover, some aneurysm measurements were missing.

Conclusions

Complete occlusion following PED treatment of intracranial aneurysms is influenced by patient characteristics and technical factors. Older age (older than 70 years) and nonsmoking status were independent predictors of incomplete occlusion. While the physiologic explanation for these findings remains unknown, the identification of factors predictive of incomplete aneurysm occlusion following PED placement can help in directing further research on the appropriate clinical use of flow-diversion devices.

Footnotes

  • Nimer Adeeb and Justin M. Moore contributed equally to this work.

  • Disclosures: Adnan H. Siddiqui—UNRELATED: Board Membership: Intersocietal Accreditation Commission; Consultancy: Codman, Medtronic, Guidepoint Global Consulting, Penumbra, Stryker Neurovascular, MicroVention, W.L. Gore and Associates, Three Rivers Medical, Corindus, Amnis Therapeutics, CereVasc, Pulsar Vascular, The Stroke Project, Cerebrotech Medical Systems, Rapid Medical, Neuravi, Silk Road Medical, Rebound Therapeutics Corp, Claret Medical, Comments: also Principal Investigator/National Steering Committees: Penumbra: 3D Separator Trial, COMPASS Trial, INVEST Trial; Covidien (now Medtronic): SWIFT PRIME and SWIFT DIRECT Trials; MicroVention: FRED Trial, CONFIDENCE Study; Codman & Shurtleff: LARGE Trial; MUSC: POSITIVE Trial; Stock/Stock Options: StimMed, Valor Medical, Neuro Technology Investors, Cardinal Health, Medina Medical Systems, Buffalo Technology Partners, International Medical Distribution Partners. Elad I. Levy—UNRELATED: Board Membership: Stryker Neurovascular, NeXtGen Biologics, MEDX, Comments: served on acute ischemic stroke Clinical Advisory Board for Stryker Neurovascular, serve on Advisory Board for NeXtGen Biologics and MEDX; no money; Consultancy: Pulsar Vascular; Payment for Development of Educational Presentations: Covidien, Comments: honorarium for training and lectures; Stock/Stock Options: Intratech Medical, NeXtGEn Biologics, Comments: shareholder/ownership interest; Other: Abbott Vascular, Comments: carotid training sessions for physicians. Ajith J. Thomas—UNRELATED: Consultancy: Stryker Neurovascular, Comments: data safety monitoring board*; Expert Testimony: CRICO, Comments: expert witness, neurovascular. *Money paid to the institution.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. McDowell MM,
    2. Feroze RA,
    3. Ducruet AF
    . Pipeline Embolization Device: long-term outcome data flows in. World Neurosurg 2016;85:6–7 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2015.12.001 pmid:26679263
    CrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    Health C for D and R: Recently-Approved Devices: PipelineTM Embolization Device, P100018. https://www.fda.gov/downloads/AdvisoryCommittees/CommitteesMeetingMaterials/MedicalDevices/MedicalDevicesAdvisoryCommittee/NeurologicalDevicesPanel/UCM442242.pdf. Accessed August 9, 2016.
  3. 3.↵
    1. Adeeb N,
    2. Griessenauer CJ,
    3. Moore J, et al
    . Pipeline embolization device for recurrent cerebral aneurysms after microsurgical clipping. World Neurosurg 2016;93:341–45 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2016.06.065 pmid:27350300
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Becske T,
    2. Kallmes DF,
    3. Saatci I, et al
    . Pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms: results from a multicenter clinical trial. Radiology 2013;267:858–68 doi:10.1148/radiol.13120099 pmid:23418004
    CrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Griessenauer CJ,
    2. Ogilvy CS,
    3. Foreman PM, et al
    . Pipeline Embolization Device for small intracranial aneurysms: evaluation of safety and efficacy in a multicenter cohort. Neurosurgery 2017;80:579–87 doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000001377 pmid:27489165
    CrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Kühn AL,
    2. Hou SY,
    3. Perras M, et al
    . Flow diverter stents for unruptured saccular anterior circulation perforating artery aneurysms: safety, efficacy, and short-term follow-up. J Neurointerv Surg 2015;7:634–40 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011237 pmid:25051964
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Lin N,
    2. Brouillard AM,
    3. Keigher KM, et al
    . Utilization of Pipeline embolization device for treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: US multicenter experience. J Neurointerv Surg 2015;7:808–15 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011320
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Nelson PK,
    2. Lylyk P,
    3. Szikora I, et al
    . The Pipeline embolization device for the intracranial treatment of aneurysms trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:34–40 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2421 pmid:21148256
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Jabbour P,
    2. Chalouhi N,
    3. Tjoumakaris S, et al
    . The Pipeline Embolization Device: learning curve and predictors of complications and aneurysm obliteration. Neurosurgery 2013;73:113–20; discussion 120 doi:10.1227/01.neu.0000429844.06955.39 pmid:23615106
    CrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Attali J,
    2. Benaissa A,
    3. Soize S, et al
    . Follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated by flow diverter: comparison of three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography (3D-TOF-MRA) and contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CE-MRA) sequences with digital subtraction angiography as the gold standard. J Neurointervl Surg 2016;8:81–86 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011449 pmid:25352582
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Boddu SR,
    2. Tong FC,
    3. Dehkharghani S, et al
    . Contrast-enhanced time-resolved MRA for follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with the Pipeline embolization device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:2112–18 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4008 pmid:24994828
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Chen JX,
    2. Lai LF,
    3. Zheng K, et al
    . Influencing factors of immediate angiographic results in intracranial aneurysms patients after endovascular treatment. J Neurol 2015;262:2115–23 doi:10.1007/s00415-015-7824-2 pmid:26100332
    CrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Ogilvy CS,
    2. Chua MH,
    3. Fusco MR, et al
    . Validation of a system to predict recanalization after endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2015;77:168–73; discussion 173–74 doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000000744 pmid:25850603
    CrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Ogilvy CS,
    2. Chua MH,
    3. Fusco MR, et al
    . Stratification of recanalization for patients with endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2015;76:390–95; discussion 395 doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000000651 pmid:25621984
    CrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. O'Kelly CJ,
    2. Spears J,
    3. Chow M, et al
    . Canadian experience with the Pipeline embolization device for repair of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:381–87 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3224 pmid:22859284
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Yu SC,
    2. Kwok CK,
    3. Cheng PW, et al
    . Intracranial aneurysms: midterm outcome of Pipeline embolization device—a prospective study in 143 patients with 178 aneurysms. Radiology 2012;265:893–901 doi:10.1148/radiol.12120422 pmid:22996749
    CrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Sturiale CL,
    2. Brinjikji W,
    3. Murad MH, et al
    . Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms in elderly patients a systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke 2013;44:1897–902 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001524 pmid:23686977
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Ferns SP,
    2. Sprengers ME,
    3. van Rooij WJ, et al
    . Coiling of intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review on initial occlusion and reopening and retreatment rates. Stroke 2009;40:e523–29 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.553099 pmid:19520984
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Pouratian N,
    2. Oskouian RJ Jr.,
    3. Jensen ME, et al
    . Endovascular management of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2006;77:572–78 doi:10.1136/jnnp.2005.078469 pmid:16614015
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Brinjikji W,
    2. Kallmes DF,
    3. Cloft HJ, et al
    . Age-related outcomes following intracranial aneurysm treatment with the Pipeline Embolization Device: a subgroup analysis of the IntrePED registry. J Neurosurg 2016;124:1726–30 doi:10.3171/2015.5.JNS15327 pmid:26544776
    CrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Rouchaud A,
    2. Johnson C,
    3. Thielen E, et al
    . Differential gene expression in coiled versus flow-diverter-treated aneurysms: RNA sequencing analysis in a rabbit aneurysm model. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:1114–21 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4648 pmid:26721773
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. Puffer C,
    2. Dai D,
    3. Ding YH, et al
    . Gene expression comparison of flow diversion and coiling in an experimental aneurysm model. J Neurointerv Surg 2015;7:926–30 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011452 pmid:25332413
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. Kadirvel R,
    2. Ding YH,
    3. Dai D, et al
    . Cellular mechanisms of aneurysm occlusion after treatment with a flow diverter. Radiology 2014;270:394–99 doi:10.1148/radiol.13130796 pmid:24086073
    CrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Szikora I,
    2. Turányi E,
    3. Marosfoi M
    . Evolution of flow-diverter endothelialization and thrombus organization in giant fusiform aneurysms after flow diversion: a histopathologic study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:1716–20 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4336 pmid:26251428
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Madonna R,
    2. Novo G,
    3. Balistreri CR
    . Cellular and molecular basis of the imbalance between vascular damage and repair in ageing and age-related diseases: as biomarkers and targets for new treatments. Mech Ageing Dev 2016;159:22–30 doi:10.1016/j.mad.2016.03.005 pmid:26993150
    CrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Yousef H,
    2. Morgenthaler A,
    3. Schlesinger C, et al
    . Age-associated increase in BMP signaling inhibits hippocampal neurogenesis. Stem Cells 2015;33:1577–88 doi:10.1002/stem.1943 pmid:25538007
    CrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Griessenauer CJ,
    2. Gupta R,
    3. Shi S, et al
    . Collar sign in incompletely occluded aneurysms after Pipeline embolization: evaluation with angiography and optical coherence tomography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:323–26 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5010 pmid:28056454
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  28. 28.↵
    1. Andreasen TH,
    2. Bartek J Jr.,
    3. Andresen M, et al
    . Modifiable risk factors for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke 2013;44:3607–12 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001575 pmid:24193807
    FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    1. Brinjikji W,
    2. Lingineni RK,
    3. Gu CN, et al
    . Smoking is not associated with recurrence and retreatment of intracranial aneurysms after endovascular coiling. J Neurosurg 2015;122:95–100 doi:10.3171/2014.10.JNS141035 pmid:25380112
    CrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Juvela S,
    2. Hillbom M,
    3. Numminen H, et al
    . Cigarette smoking and alcohol consumption as risk factors for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke 1993;24:639–46 doi:10.1161/01.STR.24.5.639 pmid:8488517
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  31. 31.↵
    1. Ortiz R,
    2. Stefanski M,
    3. Rosenwasser R, et al
    . Cigarette smoking as a risk factor for recurrence of aneurysms treated by endosaccular occlusion. J Neurosurg 2008;108:672–75 doi:10.3171/JNS/2008/108/4/0672 pmid:18377244
    CrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Athyros VG,
    2. Katsiki N,
    3. Doumas M, et al
    . Effect of tobacco smoking and smoking cessation on plasma lipoproteins and associated major cardiovascular risk factors: a narrative review. Curr Med Res Opin 2013;29:1263–74 doi:10.1185/03007995.2013.827566 pmid:23879722
    CrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Rouchaud A,
    2. Brinjikji W,
    3. Cloft HJ, et al
    . Smoking does not affect occlusion rates and morbidity-mortality after Pipeline embolization for intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:1122–26 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4664 pmid:26797135
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  34. 34.↵
    1. Aigner A,
    2. Grittner U,
    3. Rolfs A, et al
    . Contribution of established stroke risk factors to the burden of stroke in young adults. Stroke 2017;48:1744–51 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.016599 pmid:28619986
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  35. 35.↵
    1. Lemesle G,
    2. Tricot O,
    3. Meurice T, et al
    . Incident myocardial infarction and very late stent thrombosis in outpatients with stable coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017;69:2149–56 doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2017.02.050 pmid:28449776
    FREE Full Text
  36. 36.↵
    1. Salazar Adum JP,
    2. Fuentes HE,
    3. Lind BB, et al
    . Predictors of active cancer thromboembolic outcomes: mortality associated with calf deep vein thrombosis. Int Angiol 2017 May 24. [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.23736/S0392-9590.17.03846-9 pmid:28541021
    CrossRefPubMed
  • Received February 3, 2017.
  • Accepted after revision July 8, 2017.
  • © 2017 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 38 (12)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 38, Issue 12
1 Dec 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Predictors of Incomplete Occlusion following Pipeline Embolization of Intracranial Aneurysms: Is It Less Effective in Older Patients?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
N. Adeeb, J.M. Moore, M. Wirtz, C.J. Griessenauer, P.M. Foreman, H. Shallwani, R. Gupta, A.A. Dmytriw, R. Motiei-Langroudi, A. Alturki, M.R. Harrigan, A.H. Siddiqui, E.I. Levy, A.J. Thomas, C.S. Ogilvy
Predictors of Incomplete Occlusion following Pipeline Embolization of Intracranial Aneurysms: Is It Less Effective in Older Patients?
American Journal of Neuroradiology Dec 2017, 38 (12) 2295-2300; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A5375

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Predictors of Incomplete Occlusion following Pipeline Embolization of Intracranial Aneurysms: Is It Less Effective in Older Patients?
N. Adeeb, J.M. Moore, M. Wirtz, C.J. Griessenauer, P.M. Foreman, H. Shallwani, R. Gupta, A.A. Dmytriw, R. Motiei-Langroudi, A. Alturki, M.R. Harrigan, A.H. Siddiqui, E.I. Levy, A.J. Thomas, C.S. Ogilvy
American Journal of Neuroradiology Dec 2017, 38 (12) 2295-2300; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A5375
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATION:
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Clinical Outcome of Pipeline Embolization Device with and without Coils to Treat Intracranial Aneurysm: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
  • Patients age impact on stroke risk and intracranial aneurysm occlusion - SCENT Flow Diverter trial on large and giant aneurysms
  • Predictors of aneurysm occlusion after treatment with flow diverters: a systematic literature review
  • Predictors of aneurysm occlusion after treatment with flow diverters: a systematic literature review
  • Predictors of incomplete aneurysm occlusion after treatment with the Pipeline Embolization Device: PREMIER trial 1 year analysis
  • Using angiographic parametric imaging-derived radiomics features to predict complications and embolization outcomes of intracranial aneurysms treated by pipeline embolization devices
  • Neck Location on the Outer Convexity is a Predictor of Incomplete Occlusion in Treatment with the Pipeline Embolization Device: Clinical and Angiographic Outcomes
  • Feasibility study for use of angiographic parametric imaging and deep neural networks for intracranial aneurysm occlusion prediction
  • The FRED for Cerebral Aneurysms of the Posterior Circulation: A Subgroup Analysis of the EuFRED Registry
  • Aneurysm Remnants after Flow Diversion: Clinical and Angiographic Outcomes
  • Acutely Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Treated with Flow-Diverter Stents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
  • European Multicenter Study for the Evaluation of a Dual-Layer Flow-Diverting Stent for Treatment of Wide-Neck Intracranial Aneurysms: The European Flow-Redirection Intraluminal Device Study
  • Crossref (74)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • Acutely Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Treated with Flow-Diverter Stents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    F. Cagnazzo, D.T. di Carlo, M. Cappucci, P.-H. Lefevre, V. Costalat, P. Perrini
    American Journal of Neuroradiology 2018 39 9
  • European Multicenter Study for the Evaluation of a Dual-Layer Flow-Diverting Stent for Treatment of Wide-Neck Intracranial Aneurysms: The European Flow-Redirection Intraluminal Device Study
    M. Killer-Oberpfalzer, N. Kocer, C.J. Griessenauer, H. Janssen, T. Engelhorn, M. Holtmannspötter, J.H. Buhk, T. Finkenzeller, G. Fesl, J. Trenkler, W. Reith, A. Berlis, K. Hausegger, M. Augustin, C. Islak, B. Minnich, M. Möhlenbruch
    American Journal of Neuroradiology 2018 39 5
  • Predictive factors of incomplete aneurysm occlusion after endovascular treatment with the Pipeline embolization device
    Georgios A. Maragkos, Luis C. Ascanio, Mohamed M. Salem, Sricharan Gopakumar, Santiago Gomez-Paz, Alejandro Enriquez-Marulanda, Abhi Jain, Clemens M. Schirmer, Paul M. Foreman, Christoph J. Griessenauer, Peter Kan, Christopher S. Ogilvy, Ajith J. Thomas
    Journal of Neurosurgery 2020 132 5
  • Pipeline Embolization Device for intracranial aneurysms in a large Chinese cohort: factors related to aneurysm occlusion
    Bin Luo, Huibin Kang, Hongqi Zhang, Tianxiao Li, Jianmin Liu, Donglei Song, Yuanli Zhao, Sheng Guan, Aisha Maimaitili, Yunyan Wang, Wenfeng Feng, Yang Wang, Jieqing Wan, Guohua Mao, Huaizhang Shi, Xinjian Yang
    Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders 2020 13
  • Predictors of Complications, Functional Outcome, and Morbidity in a Large Cohort Treated With Flow Diversion
    Ahmad Sweid, Robert M Starke, Nabeel Herial, Nohra Chalouhi, Somnath Das, Michael P Baldassari, Tyler D Alexander, Stavropoula Tjoumakaris, M Reid Gooch, David Hasan, Robert H Rosenwasser, Victor Romo, Pascal Jabbour
    Neurosurgery 2020 87 4
  • Expanding Indications for Flow Diverters: Ruptured Aneurysms, Blister Aneurysms, and Dissecting Aneurysms
    Peter Kan, Ahmad Sweid, Aditya Srivatsan, Pascal Jabbour
    Neurosurgery 2020 86 Supplement_1
  • Feasibility study for use of angiographic parametric imaging and deep neural networks for intracranial aneurysm occlusion prediction
    Mohammad Mahdi Shiraz Bhurwani, Muhammad Waqas, Alexander R Podgorsak, Kyle A Williams, Jason M Davies, Kenneth Snyder, Elad Levy, Adnan Siddiqui, Ciprian N Ionita
    Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery 2020 12 7
  • Comparison of Pipeline Embolization Device and Flow Re-Direction Endoluminal Device Flow Diverters for Internal Carotid Artery Aneurysms: A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study
    Christoph J Griessenauer, Ajith J Thomas, Alejandro Enriquez-Marulanda, Aviraj Deshmukh, Abhi Jain, Christopher S Ogilvy, Naci Kocer, Tobias Engelhorn, Markus Möhlenbruch, Markus Holtmannspötter, Hendrik Janssen, Thomas Finkenzeller, Wolfgang Reith, Michael Sonnberger, Jan-Hendrik Buhk, Clemens M Schirmer, Monika Killer-Oberpfalzer
    Neurosurgery 2019 85 2
  • Experience With the Pipeline Embolization Device for Posterior Circulations Aneurysms: A Multicenter Cohort Study
    Christoph J Griessenauer, Alejandro Enriquez-Marulanda, Philipp Taussky, Arundhati Biswas, Ramesh Grandhi, Sissi Xiang, Tao Hong, Lorenzo Rinaldo, Giuseppe Lanzino, Waleed Brinjikji, Jan-Karl Burkhardt, Peter Kan, Mandeep Ghuman, Victor X D Yang, Karen Chen, Mohammad A Aziz-Sultan, Mohammad Ghorbani, Clemens M Schirmer, Oded Goren, Shamsher S Dalal, Monika Killer-Oberpfalzer, Erasmia Müller-Thies-Broussalis, Matthew J Koch, Christopher J Stapleton, Aman B Patel, Paul M Foreman, Marshall C Cress, Robert A Hirschl, Timo Krings, Hongqi Zhang, Adam A Dmytriw
    Neurosurgery 2020 87 6
  • Predictors of incomplete aneurysm occlusion after treatment with the Pipeline Embolization Device: PREMIER trial 1 year analysis
    Ricardo A Hanel, Andre Monteiro, Peter K Nelson, Demetrius K Lopes, David F Kallmes
    Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery 2022 14 10

More in this TOC Section

  • Contour Neurovascular System: Five Year Follow Up
  • Effect of SARS-CoV2 on Endovascular Thrombectomy
  • Flow diversion for distal circulation aneurysms
Show more NEUROINTERVENTION

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire