Does the Addition of a “Black Bone” Sequence to a Fast Multisequence Trauma MR Protocol Allow MRI to Replace CT after Traumatic Brain Injury in Children?

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Klassen TP,
   3. Reed MH,
   4. Stiell IG, et al

   . Variation in utilization of computed tomography scanning for the investigation of minor head trauma in children: a Canadian experience. Acad Emerg Med 2000;7:739–44 doi:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2000.tb02260.x pmid:10917321

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   2. Roguski M,
   3. Morel B,
   4. Sweeney M, et al

   . Magnetic resonance imaging as an alternative to computed tomography in select patients with traumatic brain injury: a retrospective comparison. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2015;15:529–34 doi:10.3171/2014.10.PEDS14128 pmid:25700122

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   2. Pinto PS,
   3. Poretti A,
   4. Meoded A, et al

   . The unique features of traumatic brain injury in children: review of the characteristics of the pediatric skull and brain, mechanisms of trauma, patterns of injury, complications and their imaging findings–part 1. J Neuroimaging 2012;22:e1–17 doi:10.1111/j.1552-6569.2011.00688.x pmid:22273264

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   2. Pinto PS,
   3. Meoded A,
   4. Poretti A, et al

   . The unique features of traumatic brain injury in children: review of the characteristics of the pediatric skull and brain, mechanisms of trauma, patterns of injury, complications, and their imaging findings–part 2. J Neuroimaging 2012;22:e18–41 doi:10.1111/j.1552-6569.2011.00690.x pmid:22303964

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. Beauchamp MH,
   3. Ditchfield M,
   4. Babl FE, et al

   . Detecting traumatic brain lesions in children: CT versus MRI versus susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI). J Neurotrauma 2011;28:915–27 doi:10.1089/neu.2010.1712 pmid:21501069

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   2. Bosemani T,
   3. Poretti A,
   4. Huisman TA

   . Susceptibility-weighted imaging in pediatric neuroimaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2014;40:530–44 doi:10.1002/jmri.24410 pmid:24925729

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. Schmutz B,
   3. Rahmel B,
   4. McNamara Z, et al

   . Magnetic resonance imaging: an accurate, radiation-free, alternative to computed tomography for the primary imaging and three-dimensional reconstruction of the bony orbit. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014;72:611–18 doi:10.1016/j.joms.2013.08.030 pmid:24268967

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Sigmund GA,
   3. Tong KA,
   4. Nickerson JP, et al

   . Multimodality comparison of neuroimaging in pediatric traumatic brain injury. Pediatr Neurol 2007;36:217–26 doi:10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2007.01.003 pmid:17437903

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. Eley KA,
   3. Watt-Smith SR,
   4. Sheerin F, et al

   . “Black bone” MRI: a potential alternative to CT with three-dimensional reconstruction of the craniofacial skeleton in the diagnosis of craniosynostosis. Eur Radiol 2014;24:2417–26 doi:10.1007/s00330-014-3286-7 pmid:25038852

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Eley KA,
    3. McIntyre AG,
    4. Watt-Smith SR, et al

    . “Black bone” MRI: a partial flip angle technique for radiation reduction in craniofacial imaging. Br J Radiol 2012;85:272–78 doi:10.1259/bjr/95110289 pmid:22391497

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    2. Eley KA,
    3. Watt-Smith SR,
    4. Golding SJ

    . “Black bone” MRI: a potential alternative to CT when imaging the head and neck: report of eight clinical cases and review of the Oxford experience. Br J Radiol 2012;85:1457–64 doi:10.1259/bjr/16830245 pmid:23091288

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    2. Greenes DS,
    3. Schutzman SA

    . Clinical significance of scalp abnormalities in asymptomatic head-injured infants. Pediatr Emerg Care 2001;17:88–92 doi:10.1097/00006565-200104000-00002 pmid:11334100

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    2. Dunning J,
    3. Daly JP,
    4. Lomas JP, et al

    ; Children's head injury algorithm for the prediction of important clinical events study group. Derivation of the children's head injury algorithm for the prediction of important clinical events decision rule for head injury in children. Arch Dis Child 2006;91:885–91 doi:10.1136/adc.2005.083980 pmid:17056862

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    2. Orman G,
    3. Wagner MW,
    4. Seeburg D, et al

    . Pediatric skull fracture diagnosis: should 3D CT reconstructions be added as routine imaging? J Neurosurg Pediatr 2015;16:426–31 doi:10.3171/2015.3.PEDS1553 pmid:26186360

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Schutzman SA,
    3. Greenes DS

    . Pediatric minor head trauma. Ann Emerg Med 2001;37:65–74 pmid:11145776

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    2. Bonfield CM,
    3. Naran S,
    4. Adetayo OA, et al

    . Pediatric skull fractures: the need for surgical intervention, characteristics, complications, and outcomes. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2014;14:205–11 doi:10.3171/2014.5.PEDS13414 pmid:24905840

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Eley KA,
    3. Watt-Smith SR,
    4. Golding SJ

    . “Black bone” MRI: a potential non-ionizing method for three-dimensional cephalometric analysis–a preliminary feasibility study. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2013;42:20130236 doi:10.1259/dmfr.20130236 pmid:24052254

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    2. Powell EC,
    3. Atabaki SM,
    4. Wootton-Gorges S, et al

    . Isolated linear skull fractures in children with blunt head trauma. Pediatrics 2015;135:e851–57 doi:10.1542/peds.2014-2858 pmid:25780067

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    2. Hochstadter E,
    3. Stewart TC,
    4. Alharfi IM, et al

    . Subarachnoid hemorrhage prevalence and its association with short-term outcome in pediatric severe traumatic brain injury. Neurocrit Care 2014;21:505–13 doi:10.1007/s12028-014-9986-7 pmid:24798696

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    2. Tang PH,
    3. Lim CC

    . Imaging of accidental paediatric head trauma. Pediatr Radiol 2009;39:438–46 doi:10.1007/s00247-008-1083-7 pmid:19125244

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    2. Tong KA,
    3. Ashwal S,
    4. Holshouser BA, et al

    . Diffuse axonal injury in children: clinical correlation with hemorrhagic lesions. Ann Neurol 2004;56:36–50 doi:10.1002/ana.20123 pmid:15236400

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science