Patient Outcomes and Cerebral Infarction after Ruptured Anterior Communicating Artery Aneurysm Treatment

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Connolly ES Jr.,
   3. Rabinstein AA,
   4. Carhuapoma JR, et al

   . Guidelines for the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2012;43:1711–37 doi:10.1161/STR.0b013e3182587839 pmid:22556195

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   2. Hadjivassiliou M,
   3. Tooth CL,
   4. Romanowski CA, et al

   . Aneurysmal SAH: cognitive outcome and structural damage after clipping or coiling. Neurology 2001;56:1672–77 doi:10.1212/WNL.56.12.1672 pmid:11425932

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   2. Wong GK,
   3. Nung RC,
   4. Sitt JC, et al

   . Location, infarct load, and 3-month outcomes of delayed cerebral infarction after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke 2015;46:3099–104 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.010844 pmid:26419967

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   2. Mayer SA,
   3. Kreiter KT,
   4. Copeland D, et al

   . Global and domain-specific cognitive impairment and outcome after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurology 2002;59:1750–58 doi:10.1212/01.WNL.0000035748.91128.C2 pmid:12473764

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   2. Molyneux AJ,
   3. Kerr RS,
   4. Yu LM, et al

   . International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion. Lancet 2005;366:809–17 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67214-5 pmid:16139655

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   2. Bornstein RA,
   3. Weir BK,
   4. Petruk KC, et al

   . Neuropsychological function in patients after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurgery 1987;21:651–54 doi:10.1227/00006123-198711000-00008 pmid:3696396

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. Sonesson B,
   3. Ljunggren B,
   4. Säveland H, et al

   . Cognition and adjustment after late and early operation for ruptured aneurysm. Neurosurgery 1987;21:279–87 doi:10.1227/00006123-198709000-00001 pmid:3670571

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   2. Ljunggren B,
   3. Sonesson B,
   4. Säveland H, et al

   . Cognitive impairment and adjustment in patients without neurological deficits after aneurysmal SAH and early operation. J Neurosurg 1985;62:673–79 doi:10.3171/jns.1985.62.5.0673 pmid:3989590

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   2. Brisman JL,
   3. Song JK,
   4. Newell DW

   . Cerebral aneurysms. N Engl J Med 2006;355:928–39 doi:10.1056/NEJMra052760 pmid:16943405

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    2. Heit JJ,
    3. Gonzalez RG,
    4. Sabbag D, et al

    . Detection and characterization of intracranial aneurysms: a 10-year multidetector CT angiography experience in a large center. J Neurointerv Surg 2016;8:1168–72 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-012082 pmid:26553878

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    2. Chan A,
    3. Ho S,
    4. Poon WS

    . Neuropsychological sequelae of patients treated with microsurgical clipping or endovascular embolization for anterior communicating artery aneurysm. Eur Neurol 2002;47:37–44 doi:10.1159/000047945 pmid:11803191

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    2. Martinaud O,
    3. Perin B,
    4. Gérardin E, et al

    . Anatomy of executive deficit following ruptured anterior communicating artery aneurysm. Eur J Neurol 2009;16:595–601 doi:10.1111/j.1468-1331.2009.02546.x pmid:19236465

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Fontanella M,
    3. Perozzo P,
    4. Ursone R, et al

    . Neuropsychological assessment after microsurgical clipping or endovascular treatment for anterior communicating artery aneurysm. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2003;145:867–72; discussion 872 doi:10.1007/s00701-003-0111-5 pmid:14577008

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    2. Proust F,
    3. Martinaud O,
    4. Gérardin E, et al

    . Quality of life and brain damage after microsurgical clip occlusion or endovascular coil embolization for ruptured anterior communicating artery aneurysms: neuropsychological assessment. J Neurosurg 2009;110:19–29 doi:10.3171/2008.3.17432 pmid:18928356

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    2. Mendez MF,
    3. Adams NL,
    4. Lewandowski KS

    . Neurobehavioral changes associated with caudate lesions. Neurology 1989;39:349–54 doi:10.1212/WNL.39.3.349 pmid:2927642

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    2. Mizuta H,
    3. Motomura N

    . Memory dysfunction in caudate infarction caused by Heubner's recurring artery occlusion. Brain Cogn 2006;61:133–38 doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2005.11.002 pmid:16510225

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    2. Mortimer AM,
    3. Steinfort B,
    4. Faulder K, et al

    . Rates of local procedural-related structural injury following clipping or coiling of anterior communicating artery aneurysms. J Neurointerv Surg 2016;8:256–64 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011620 pmid:25646130

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    2. Molyneux A,
    3. Kerr R,
    4. Stratton I, et al

    . International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial. Lancet 2002;360:1267–74 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11314-6 pmid:12414200

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. 19.↵
    2. Scott RB,
    3. Eccles F,
    4. Molyneux AJ, et al

    . Improved cognitive outcomes with endovascular coiling of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: neuropsychological outcomes from the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT). Stroke 2010;41:1743–47 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.585240 pmid:20616321

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    2. Austin PC

    . An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivariate Behav Res 2011;46:399–424 doi:10.1080/00273171.2011.568786 pmid:21818162

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. 21.↵
    R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Version 3.0.1. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2013
22. 22.↵
    2. Vilkki JS,
    3. Juvela S,
    4. Siironen J, et al

    . Relationship of local infarctions to cognitive and psychosocial impairments after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurgery 2004;55:790–802; discussion 802–03 doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000137629.17424.6D pmid:15458587

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    2. Rabinstein AA,
    3. Weigand S,
    4. Atkinson JL, et al

    . Patterns of cerebral infarction in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke 2005;36:992–97 doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000163090.59350.5a pmid:15831836

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
24. 24.↵
    2. Krings T,
    3. Willmes K,
    4. Becker R, et al

    . Silent microemboli related to diagnostic cerebral angiography: a matter of operator's experience and patient's disease. Neuroradiology 2006;48:387–93 doi:10.1007/s00234-006-0074-3 pmid:16586116

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    2. Mugikura S,
    3. Kikuchi H,
    4. Fujii T, et al

    . MR imaging of subcallosal artery infarct causing amnesia after surgery for anterior communicating artery aneurysm. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:2293–301 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4057 pmid:25082820

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
26. 26.↵
    2. Zunon-Kipre Y,
    3. Peltier J,
    4. Haidara A, et al

    . Microsurgical anatomy of distal medial striate artery (recurrent artery of Heubner). Surg Radiol Anat 2012;34:15–20 doi:10.1007/s00276-011-0888-5 pmid:22116404

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    2. Maga P,
    3. Tomaszewski KA,
    4. Skrzat J, et al

    . Microanatomical study of the recurrent artery of Heubner. Ann Anat 2013;195:342–50 doi:10.1016/j.aanat.2013.03.011 pmid:23701902

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    2. Lanzino G,
    3. Murad MH,
    4. d'Urso PI, et al

    . Coil embolization versus clipping for ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a meta-analysis of prospective controlled published studies. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:1764–68 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3515 pmid:23578672

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
29. 29.↵
    2. Li H,
    3. Pan R,
    4. Wang H, et al

    . Clipping versus coiling for ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke 2013;44:29–37 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.663559 pmid:23238862

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
30. 30.↵
    2. McDougall CG,
    3. Spetzler RF,
    4. Zabramski JM, et al

    . The Barrow Ruptured Aneurysm Trial. J Neurosurg 2012;116:135–44 doi:10.3171/2011.8.JNS101767 pmid:22054213

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
31. 31.↵
    2. Ayling OG,
    3. Ibrahim GM,
    4. Drake B, et al

    . Operative complications and differences in outcome after clipping and coiling of ruptured intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg 2015;123:621–28 doi:10.3171/2014.11.JNS141607 pmid:26047409

    CrossRefPubMed
32. 32.↵
    2. Mavaddat N,
    3. Kirkpatrick PJ,
    4. Rogers RD, et al

    . Deficits in decision-making in patients with aneurysms of the anterior communicating artery. Brain 2000;123 (Pt 10):2109–17 doi:10.1093/brain/123.10.2109 pmid:11004127

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science