Diagnostic Performance of Routine Brain MRI Sequences for Dural Venous Sinus Thrombosis

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Stam J

   . Thrombosis of the cerebral veins and sinuses. N Engl J Med 2005; 352:1791–98 doi:10.1056/NEJMra042354 pmid:15858188

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   2. Linn J,
   3. Brückmann H

   . Cerebral venous and dural sinus thrombosis: state-of-the-art imaging. Clin Neuroradiol 2010;20:25–37 doi:10.1007/s00062-010-9035-7 pmid:20229204

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   2. Ferro JM,
   3. Canhão P,
   4. Stam J, et al

   ; ISCVT Investigators. Prognosis of cerebral vein and dural sinus thrombosis: results of the International Study on Cerebral Vein and Dural Sinus Thrombosis (ISCVT). Stroke 2004;35:664–70 pmid:14976332

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   2. Ferro JM,
   3. Canhão P,
   4. Stam J, et al

   ; ISCVT Investigators. Delay in the diagnosis of cerebral vein and dural sinus thrombosis: influence on outcome. Stroke 2009;40:3133–38 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.553891 pmid:19608994

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   2. Khandelwal N,
   3. Agarwal A,
   4. Kochhar R, et al

   . Comparison of CT venography with MR venography in cerebral sinovenous thrombosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;187:637–43 pmid:17114562

   PubMed
6. 6.↵
   2. Provenzale JM,
   3. Kranz PG

   . Dural sinus thrombosis: sources of error in image interpretation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;196:23–31 doi:10.2214/AJR.10.5323 pmid:21178043

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. Saindane AM,
   3. Mitchell BC,
   4. Kang J, et al

   . Performance of spin-echo and gradient-echo T1-weighted sequences for evaluation of dural venous sinus thrombosis and stenosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013;201:162–69 doi:10.2214/AJR.12.9095 pmid:23789671

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Sari S,
   3. Verim S,
   4. Hamcan S, et al

   . MRI diagnosis of dural sinus-cortical venous thrombosis: immediate post-contrast 3D GRE T1-weighted imaging versus unenhanced MR venography and conventional MR sequences. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2015;134:44–54 doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2015.04.013 pmid:25938564

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. Altman DG

   . Practical Statistics for Medical Research. London: Chapman and Hall; 1991
10. 10.↵
    2. Coutinho JM,
    3. Ferro JM,
    4. Canhão P, et al

    . Cerebral venous and sinus thrombosis in women. Stroke 2009;40:2356–61 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.54388 pmid:19478226

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    2. Lafitte F,
    3. Boukobza M,
    4. Guichard JP, et al

    . MRI and MRA for diagnosis and follow-up of cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT). Clin Radiol 1997;52:672–79 doi:10.1016/S0009-9260(97)80030-X pmid:9313731

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    2. Towbin A

    . The syndrome of latent cerebral venous thrombosis: its frequency and relation to age and congestive heart failure. Stroke 1973;4:419–30 doi:10.1161/01.STR.4.3.419 pmid:4713031

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    2. Saposnik G,
    3. Barinagarrementeria F,
    4. Brown RD Jr., et al

    ; American Heart Association Stroke Council and the Council on Epidemiology and Prevention. Diagnosis and management of cerebral venous thrombosis: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2011;42:1158–92 doi:10.1161/STR.0b013e31820a8364 pmid:21293023

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    2. Tang PH,
    3. Chai J,
    4. Chan YH, et al

    . Superior sagittal sinus thrombosis: subtle signs on neuroimaging. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2008;37:397–401 pmid:18536826

    PubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Favrole P,
    3. Guichard JP,
    4. Crassard I, et al

    . Diffusion-weighted imaging of intravascular clots in cerebral venous thrombosis. Stroke 2004;35:99–103 pmid:14699171

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    2. Ihn YK,
    3. Jung WS,
    4. Hwang SS

    . The value of T2*-weighted gradient-echo MRI for the diagnosis of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis. Clin Imaging 2013;37:446–450 doi:10.1016/j.clinimag.2012.09.003 pmid:23068055

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Altinkaya N,
    3. Demir S,
    4. Alkan O, et al

    . Diagnostic value of T2*-weighted gradient-echo MRI for segmental evaluation in cerebral venous sinus thrombosis. Clin Imaging 2015;39:15–19 doi:10.1016/j.clinimag.2014.07.002 pmid:25148696

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Hinman JM,
    3. Provenzale JM

    . Hypointense thrombus on T2-weighted MR imaging: a potential pitfall in the diagnosis of dural sinus thrombosis. Eur J Radiol 2002;41:147–52 doi:10.1016/S0720-048X(01)00365-5 pmid:11809544

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    2. Dormont D,
    3. Anxionnat R,
    4. Evrard , et al

    . MRI in cerebral venous thrombosis. J Neuroradiol 1994;21:81–99 pmid:8014661

    PubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    2. Dormont D,
    3. Sag K,
    4. Biondi A, et al

    . Gadolinium-enhanced MR of chronic dural sinus thrombosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1995;16:1347–52 pmid:7677038

    Abstract
21. 21.↵
    2. Leach JL,
    3. Wolujewicz M,
    4. Strub WM

    . Partially recanalized chronic dural sinus thrombosis: findings on MR imaging, time-of-flight MR venography, and contrast-enhanced MR venography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:782–89 pmid:17416839

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
22. 22.↵
    2. Mas JL,
    3. Meder JF,
    4. Meary E, et al

    . Magnetic resonance imaging in lateral sinus hypoplasia and thrombosis. Stroke 1990;21:1350–56 pmid:2396274

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
23. 23.↵
    2. Leach JL,
    3. Jones BV,
    4. Tomsick TA, et al

    . Normal appearance of arachnoid granulations on contrast-enhanced CT and MR of the brain: differentiation from dural sinus disease. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1996;17:1523–32 pmid:8883652

    Abstract
24. 24.↵
    2. Ferro JM,
    3. Morgado C,
    4. Sousa R, et al

    . Interobserver agreement in the magnetic resonance location of cerebral vein and dural sinus thrombosis. Eur J Neurol 2007;14:353–56 doi:10.1111/j.1468-1331.2006.01608.x pmid:17355562

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
25. 25.↵
    2. Idbaih A,
    3. Boukobza M,
    4. Crassard I, et al

    . MRI of clot in cerebral venous thrombosis: high diagnostic value of susceptibility-weighted images. Stroke 2006;37:991–95 doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000206282.85610.ae pmid:16484607

    Abstract/FREE Full Text