Article Figures & Data
Tables
Author, Year No. of Patients No. Ruptured No. Unruptured Reconstructive Techniques Deconstructive Techniques Mean Follow-Up Jin et al, 200915 42 29 13 9 33 30 Mo Kai et al, 201118 8 0 8 0 8 24 Mo Kashiwazaki et al, 201313 73 45 28 0 73 56 Mo Kim et al, 20117 119 73 46 62 57 13 Mo Luo et al, 200522 10 0 10 0 10 15 Mo Park et al, 200912 27 11 16 27 0 12 Mo Purkayastha et al, 200623 8 8 0 0 8 37 Mo Rabinov et al, 200316 26 21 5 0 26 40 Mo Rho et al, 201324 5 5 0 5 0 40 Mo Suh et al, 200925 11 11 0 11 0 15 Mo Tsuura et al, 199926 12 12 0 0 12 6 Mo Wakhloo et al, 20088 8 2 6 8 0 37 Mo Wang et al, 201327 11 3 8 2 9 10 Mo Yamaura et al, 199928 6 6 0 0 6 12 Mo Yoon et al, 201011 24 6 18 24 0 16 Mo Yuki et al, 200517 29 29 0 0 29 5.3 Days Zhao et al, 201310 57 57 0 57 0 27 Mo Outcome All Patients Deconstructive Reconstructive P Deconstructive versus Reconstructive Event Rate (95% CI) I2 Event Rate (95% CI) I2 Event Rate (95% CI) I2 All patients Immediate occlusion 75.0 (55.0–88.0) 83 88.0 (47.0–98.0) 86 53.0 (31.0–74.0) 71 <.0001 Long-term occlusion 87.0 (74.0–94.0) 82 88.0 (35.0–99.0) 91 81.0 (64.0–91.0) 62 <.0001 Perioperative morbidity 12.0 (9.0–16.0) 0 12.0 (7.0–18.0) 0 4.0 (2.0–10.0) 0 .04 Perioperative mortality 8.0 (6.0–11.0) 0 10.0 (6.0–17.0) 0 4.0 (2.0–10.0) 0 .11 Recurrence 7.0 (5.0–10.0) 0 5.0 (2.0–10.0) 0 5.0 (2.0–11.0) 0 .89 Retreatment 3.0 (2.0–6.0) 0 5.0 (2.0–10.0) 0 3.0 (1.0–8.0) 0 .25 Long-term good clinical outcome 84.0 (65.0–94.0) 89 86.0 (68.0–95.0) 68 92.0 (86.0–95.0) 0 .10 Patients with rupture Immediate occlusion 78.0 (55.0–91.0) 78 94.0 (84.0–98.0) 0 43.0 (18.0–73.0) 57 <.0001 Long-term occlusion 88.0 (83.0–92.0) 0 95.0 (86.0–98.0) 0 83.0 (74.0–90.0) 0 .02 Perioperative morbidity 16.0 (11.0–22.0) 10 14.0 (8.0–23.0) 0 7.0 (3.0–17.0) 0 .82 Perioperative mortality 11.0 (8.0–16.0) 0 13.0 (8.0–22.0) 0 7.0 (3.0–15.0) 0 .82 Rebleed 9.0 (6.0–13.0) 0 9.0 (4.0–20.0) 12 7.0 (3.0–14.0) 0 .75 Recurrence 8.0 (5.0–13.0) 0 6.0 (2.0–13.0) 0 7.0 (2.0–17.0) 1 1.00 Retreatment 5.0 (3.0–8.0) 0 6.0 (2.0–13.0) 0 5.0 (2.0–15.0) 0 .25 Long-term good clinical outcome 79.0 (68.0–87.0) 59 83.0 (62.0–94.0) 64 88.0 (79.0–94.0) 0 .19 Patients without rupture Immediate occlusion 80.0 (48.0–94.0) 74 94.0 (68.0–99.0) 28 57.0 (25.0–84.0) 65 <.0001 Long-term occlusion 86.0 (69.0–94.0) 64 97.0 (81.0–100.0) 0 68.0 (47.0–83.0) 31 <.0001 Perioperative morbidity 6.0 (3.0–12.0) 0 7.0 (2.0–19.0) 0 7.0 (2.0–19.0) 0 .58 Perioperative mortality 4.0 (2.0–9.0) 0 4.0 (1.0–18.0) 0 5.0 (1.0–15.0) 0 1.00 Recurrence 7.0 (4.0–13.0) 0 4.0 (1.0–18.0) 0 7.0 (2.0–20.0) 0 1.00 Retreatment 4.0 (2.0–9.0) 0 4.0 (1.0–18.0) 0 5.0 (1.0–15.0) 0 1.00 Long-term good clinical outcome 95.0 (89.0–98.0) 0 93.0 (76.0–98.0) 0 94.0 (84.0–98.0) 0 1.00
Jump to section
Related Articles
Cited By...
- Reconstructive endovascular treatment for basilar artery trunk aneurysms: complications and clinical and angiography outcomes
- Long term stability of patients undergoing endovascular parent artery occlusion of their intracranial artery
- Flow Diversion of Posterior Circulation Aneurysms: Systematic Review of Disaggregated Individual Patient Data
- The Fate of Unruptured Intracranial Vertebrobasilar Dissecting Aneurysm with Brain Stem Compression According to Different Treatment Modalities
- Flow diverter treatment of intracranial vertebral artery dissecting pseudoaneurysms
- Temporary vertebral artery occlusion after C3 fracture dislocation injury and spontaneous resolution following reduction and instrumented fusion: case report and literature review
- Endovascular treatment for ruptured and unruptured vertebral artery dissecting aneurysms: a meta-analysis