Exposing Hidden Truncation-Related Errors in Acute Stroke Perfusion Imaging

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   2. Hacke W,
   3. Furlan AJ,
   4. Al-Rawi Y, et al

   . Intravenous desmoteplase in patients with acute ischaemic stroke selected by MRI perfusion-diffusion weighted imaging or perfusion CT (DIAS-2): a prospective, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Lancet Neurol 2009;8:141–50

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   2. Parsons M,
   3. Spratt N,
   4. Bivard A, et al

   . A randomized trial of tenecteplase versus alteplase for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2012;366:1099–107

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   2. Ma H,
   3. Parsons MW,
   4. Christensen S, et al

   . A multicentre, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled Phase III study to investigate EXtending the time for Thrombolysis in Emergency Neurological Deficits (EXTEND). Int J Stroke 2012;7:74–80

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   2. Kidwell CS,
   3. Jahan R,
   4. Gornbein J, et al

   . A trial of imaging selection and endovascular treatment for ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2013;368:914–23

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   2. Kudo K,
   3. Christensen S,
   4. Sasaki M, et al

   . Accuracy and reliability assessment of CT and MR perfusion analysis software using a digital phantom. Radiology 2013;267:201–11

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   2. Ho CY,
   3. Hussain S,
   4. Alam T, et al

   . Accuracy of CT cerebral perfusion in predicting infarct in the emergency department: lesion characterization on CT perfusion based on commercially available software. Emerg Radiol 2013;20:203–12

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. Murphy BD,
   3. Fox AJ,
   4. Lee DH, et al

   . Identification of penumbra and infarct in acute ischemic stroke using computed tomography perfusion-derived blood flow and blood volume measurements. Stroke 2006;37:1771–77

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   2. Chiu FY,
   3. Kao YH,
   4. Teng MM, et al

   . Validation and absolute quantification of MR perfusion compared with CT perfusion in patients with unilateral cerebral arterial stenosis. Eur J Radiol 2012;81:4087–93

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. Calamante F,
   3. Gadian DG,
   4. Connelly A

   . Delay and dispersion effects in dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI: simulations using singular value decomposition. Magn Reson Med 2000;44:466–73

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Carrera E,
    3. Jones PS,
    4. Iglesias S, et al

    . The vascular mean transit time: a surrogate for the penumbra flow threshold? J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2011;31:1027–35

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    2. Schramm P,
    3. Schellinger PD,
    4. Klotz E, et al

    . Comparison of perfusion computed tomography and computed tomography angiography source images with perfusion-weighted imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging in patients with acute stroke of less than 6 hours' duration. Stroke 2004;35:1652–58

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    2. Deipolyi AR,
    3. Wu O,
    4. Macklin EA, et al

    . Reliability of cerebral blood volume maps as a substitute for diffusion-weighted imaging in acute ischemic stroke. J Magn Reson Imaging 2012;36:1083–87

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Wintermark M,
    3. Flanders AE,
    4. Velthuis B, et al

    . Perfusion-CT assessment of infarct core and penumbra: receiver operating characteristic curve analysis in 130 patients suspected of acute hemispheric stroke. Stroke 2006;37:979–85

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    2. Kamalian S,
    3. Kamalian S,
    4. Maas MB, et al

    . CT cerebral blood flow maps optimally correlate with admission diffusion-weighted imaging in acute stroke but thresholds vary by postprocessing platform. Stroke 2011;42:1923–28

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    2. Lansberg MG,
    3. Straka M,
    4. Kemp S, et al

    . MRI profile and response to endovascular reperfusion after stroke (DEFUSE 2): a prospective cohort study. Lancet Neurol 2012;11:860–67

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    2. Reese TG,
    3. Heid O,
    4. Weisskoff RM, et al

    . Reduction of eddy-current-induced distortion in diffusion MRI using a twice-refocused spin echo. Magn Reson Med 2003;49:177–82

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    2. Collins DL,
    3. Neelin P,
    4. Peters TM, et al

    . Automatic 3D intersubject registration of MR volumetric data in standardized Talairach space. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1994;18:192–205

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. 18.↵
    2. Rosen BR,
    3. Belliveau JW,
    4. Chien D

    . Perfusion imaging by nuclear magnetic resonance. Magn Reson Q 1989;5:263–81

    PubMed
19. 19.↵
    2. Carroll TJ,
    3. Rowley HA,
    4. Haughton VM

    . Automatic calculation of the arterial input function for cerebral perfusion imaging with MR imaging. Radiology 2003;227:593–600

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    2. Rempp KA,
    3. Brix G,
    4. Wenz F, et al

    . Quantification of regional cerebral blood flow and volume with dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 1994;193:637–41

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. 21.↵
    2. Mouridsen K,
    3. Christensen S,
    4. Gyldensted L, et al

    . Automatic selection of arterial input function using cluster analysis. Magn Reson Med 2006;55:524–31

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    2. Rausch M,
    3. Scheffler K,
    4. Rudin M, et al

    . Analysis of input functions from different arterial branches with gamma variate functions and cluster analysis for quantitative blood volume measurements. Magn Reson Imaging 2000;18:1235–43

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    2. Mlynash M,
    3. Eyngorn I,
    4. Bammer R, et al

    . Automated method for generating the arterial input function on perfusion-weighted MR imaging: validation in patients with stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:1479–86

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
24. 24.↵
    2. Østergaard L,
    3. Weisskoff RM,
    4. Chesler DA, et al

    . High resolution measurement of cerebral blood flow using intravascular tracer bolus passages. Part I: mathematical approach and statistical analysis. Magn Reson Med 1996;36:715–25

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
25. 25.↵
    2. Wu O,
    3. Østergaard L,
    4. Weisskoff RM, et al

    . Tracer arrival timing-insensitive technique for estimating flow in MR perfusion-weighted imaging using singular value decomposition with a block-circulant deconvolution matrix. Magn Reson Med 2003;50:164–74

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
26. 26.↵
    2. Sorensen AG,
    3. Copen WA,
    4. Østergaard L, et al

    . Hyperacute stroke: simultaneous measurement of relative cerebral blood volume, relative cerebral blood flow, and mean tissue transit time. Radiology 1999;210:519–27

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
27. 27.↵
    CT Perfusion 4D User Guide. Revision 2. Milwaukee: GE Healthcare Publications; 2011
28. 28.↵
    2. Wintermark M,
    3. Smith WS,
    4. Ko NU, et al

    . Dynamic perfusion CT: optimizing the temporal resolution and contrast volume for calculation of perfusion CT parameters in stroke patients. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:720–29

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
29. 29.↵
    2. Kamena A,
    3. Streitparth F,
    4. Grieser C, et al

    . Dynamic perfusion CT: optimizing the temporal resolution for the calculation of perfusion CT parameters in stroke patients. Eur J Radiol 2007;64:111–18

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    2. Abels B,
    3. Klotz E,
    4. Tomandl BF, et al

    . CT perfusion in acute ischemic stroke: a comparison of 2-second and 1-second temporal resolution. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:1632–39

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
31. 31.↵
    2. Wintermark M,
    3. Albers GW,
    4. Alexandrov AV, et al

    . Acute stroke imaging research roadmap. Stroke 2008;39:1621–28

    Abstract/FREE Full Text