Parent Artery Curvature Influences Inflow Zone Location of Unruptured Sidewall Internal Carotid Artery Aneurysms

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   2. Strother CM,
   3. Graves VB,
   4. Rappe A

   . Aneurysm hemodynamics: an experimental study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1992;13:1089–95

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   2. Burleson AC,
   3. Strother CM,
   4. Turitto VT

   . Computer modeling of intracranial saccular and lateral aneurysms for the study of their hemodynamics. Neurosurgery 1995;37:774–82; discussion 782–84

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   2. Liou TM,
   3. Liou SN

   . A review on in vitro studies of hemodynamic characteristics in terminal and lateral aneurysm models. Proc Natl Sci Counc Repub China B 1999;23:133–48

   PubMed
4. 4.↵
   2. Hoi Y,
   3. Meng H,
   4. Woodward SH, et al

   . Effects of arterial geometry on aneurysm growth: three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics study. J Neurosurg 2004;101:676–81

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   2. Liou TM,
   3. Chang WC,
   4. Liao CC

   . LDV measurements in lateral model aneurysms of various sizes. Experiments in Fluids 1997;23:317–24

   CrossRef
6. 6.↵
   2. Hassan T,
   3. Timofeev EV,
   4. Saito T, et al

   . A proposed parent vessel geometry-based categorization of saccular intracranial aneurysms: computational flow dynamics analysis of the risk factors for lesion rupture. J Neurosurg 2005;103:662–80

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   2. Cebral JR,
   3. Sheridan M,
   4. Putman CM

   . Hemodynamics and bleb formation in intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:304–10

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   2. Russell JH,
   3. Kelson N,
   4. Barry M, et al

   . Computational fluid dynamic analysis of intracranial aneurysmal bleb formation. Neurosurgery 2013;73:1061–69

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. Gonzalez CF,
   3. Ortega HV,
   4. Moret J

   . Intracranial aneurysms: flow analysis of their origin and progression. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1992;13:181–88

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    2. Graves VB,
    3. Strother CM,
    4. Partington CR, et al

    . Flow dynamics of lateral carotid artery aneurysms and their effects on coils and balloons: an experimental study in dogs. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1992;13:189–96

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    2. Hayakawa M,
    3. Murayama Y,
    4. Duckwiler GR, et al

    . Natural history of the neck remnant of a cerebral aneurysm treated with the Guglielmi detachable coil system. J Neurosurg 2000;93:561–68

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    2. Tateshima S,
    3. Murayama Y,
    4. Villablanca JP, et al

    . In vitro measurement of fluid-induced wall shear stress in unruptured cerebral aneurysms. Stroke 2003;34:187–92

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    2. Schirmer CM,
    3. Malek AM

    . Critical influence of framing coil orientation on intra-aneurysmal and neck region hemodynamics in a sidewall aneurysm model. Neurosurgery 2010;67:1692–702

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    2. Steiger HJ,
    3. Poll A,
    4. Liepsch D, et al

    . Haemodynamic stress in lateral saccular aneurysms: an experimental study. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1987;86:98–105

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Futami K,
    3. Sano H,
    4. Misaki K, et al

    . Identification of the inflow zone of unruptured cerebral aneurysms: comparison of 4D flow MRI and 3D TOF MRA data. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:1363–70

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    2. Szikora I,
    3. Paal G,
    4. Ugron A, et al

    . Impact of aneurysmal geometry on intra-aneurysmal flow: a computerized flow simulation study. Neuroradiology 2008;50:411–21

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Steiger HJ,
    3. Liepsch DW,
    4. Poll A, et al

    . Hemodynamic stress in terminal saccular aneurysms: a laser-Doppler study. Heart Vessels 1988;4:162–69

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Castro MA,
    3. Putman CM,
    4. Cebral JR

    . Computational fluid dynamics modeling of intracranial aneurysms: effects of parent artery segmentation on intra-aneurysmal hemodynamics. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:1703–09

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    2. Imai Y,
    3. Sato K,
    4. Ishikawa T, et al

    . Inflow into saccular cerebral aneurysms at arterial bends. Ann Biomed Eng 2008;36:1489–95

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    2. Meckel S,
    3. Stalder AF,
    4. Santini F, et al

    . In vivo visualization and analysis of 3-D hemodynamics in cerebral aneurysms with flow-sensitized 4-D MR imaging at 3 T. Neuroradiology 2008;50:473–84

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. 21.↵
    2. Boussel L,
    3. Rayz V,
    4. Martin A, et al

    . Phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging measurements in intracranial aneurysms in vivo of flow patterns, velocity fields, and wall shear stress: comparisons with computational fluid dynamics. Magn Reson Med 2009;61:409–17

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. 22.↵
    2. Isoda H,
    3. Ohkura Y,
    4. Kosugi T, et al

    . Comparison of hemodynamics of intracranial aneurysms between MR fluid dynamics using 3D cine phase contrast MRI and MR-based computational fluid dynamics. Neuroradiology 2010;52:913–20

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. 23.↵
    2. Naito T,
    3. Miyachi S,
    4. Matsubara N, et al

    . Magnetic resonance fluid dynamics for intracranial aneurysms: comparison with computed fluid dynamics. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2012;154:993–1001

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    2. Schnell S,
    3. Ansari SA,
    4. Vakil P, et al

    . Three-dimensional hemodynamics in intracranial aneurysms: influence of size and morphology. J Magn Reason Imaging 2014;39:120–31

    CrossRef
25. 25.↵
    2. Lorensen WE,
    3. Cline HE

    . Marching cubes: a high resolution 3D surface construction algorithm. ACM Siggraph Computer Graphics 1987;21:163–69

    CrossRef
26. 26.↵
    2. Shimai H,
    3. Yokota H,
    4. Nakamura S, et al

    . Extraction from biological volume data of a region of interest with nonuniform intensity intensity. In: Proceedings of Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers, Optomechatronic Machine Vision. 2005;6051:605115
27. 27.↵
    2. Dhar S,
    3. Tremmel M,
    4. Mocco J, et al

    . Morphological parameter for intracranial aneurysm rupture risk assessment. Neurosurgery 2008;63:185–96; discussion 196–97

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
28. 28.↵
    2. Raghavan ML,
    3. Ma B,
    4. Harbaugh RE

    . Quantified aneurysm shape and rupture risk. J Neurosurg 2005;102:355–62

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
29. 29.↵
    2. Ujiie H,
    3. Tamano Y,
    4. Sasaki K, et al

    . Is the aspect ratio a reliable index for predicting the rupture of a saccular aneurysm? Neurosurgery 2001;48:495–502, discussion 502–03

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
30. 30.↵
    2. Hoh BL,
    3. Putman CM,
    4. Budzik RF, et al

    . Combined surgical and endovascular techniques of flow alteration to treat fusiform and complex wide-necked intracranial aneurysms that are unsuitable for clipping or coil embolization. J Neurosurg 2001;95:24–35

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
31. 31.↵
    2. Byun HS,
    3. Rhee K

    . CFD modeling of blood flow following coil embolization of aneurysms. Med Eng Phys 2004;26:755–61

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
32. 32.↵
    2. Sforza DM,
    3. Putman CM,
    4. Cebral JR

    . Hemodynamics of cerebral aneurysms. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 2009;41:91–107

    CrossRefPubMed
33. 33.↵
    2. Oshima M,
    3. Torii R,
    4. Kobayashi T, et al

    . Finite element simulation of blood flow in the cerebral artery. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2001;191:661–71

    CrossRef
34. 34.↵
    2. Meng H,
    3. Wang Z,
    4. Kim M, et al

    . Saccular aneurysms on straight and curved vessels are subject to different hemodynamics: implications of intravascular stenting. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:1861–65

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
35. 35.↵
    2. Sato K,
    3. Imai Y,
    4. Ishikawa T, et al

    . The importance of parent artery geometry in intra-aneurysmal hemodynamics. Med Eng Phys 2008;30:774–82

    CrossRefPubMed
36. 36.↵
    2. Hollnagel DI,
    3. Summers PE,
    4. Poulikakos D, et al

    . Comparative velocity investigations in cerebral arteries and aneurysms: 3D phase-contrast MR angiography, laser Doppler velocimetry and computational fluid dynamics. NMR Biomed 2009;22:795–808

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science