Efficacy of Skull Plain Films in Follow-up Evaluation of Cerebral Aneurysms Treated with Detachable Coils: Quantitative Assessment of Coil Mass

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   2. Brilstra EH,
   3. Rinkel GJ,
   4. van der Graaf Y, et al

   . Treatment of intracranial aneurysms by embolization with coils: a systematic review. Stroke 1999;30:470–76

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   2. Molyneux A,
   3. Kerr R,
   4. Stratton I, et al

   . International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial. Lancet 2002;360:1267–74

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   2. Sluzewski M,
   3. van Rooij WJ,
   4. Rinkel GJ, et al

   . Endovascular treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms with detachable coils: long-term clinical and serial angiographic results. Radiology 2003;227:720–24

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   2. Sluzewski M,
   3. van Rooij WJ,
   4. Slob MJ, et al

   . Relation between aneurysm volume, packing, and compaction in 145 cerebral aneurysms treated with coils. Radiology 2004;231:653–58

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   2. Raymond J,
   3. Guilbert F,
   4. Weill A, et al

   . Long-term angiographic recurrences after selective endovascular treatment of aneurysms with detachable coils. Stroke 2003;34:1398–403

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   2. Summers PE,
   3. Jarosz JM,
   4. Markus H

   . MR angiography in cerebrovascular disease. Clin Radiol 2001;56:437–56

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. Majoie CB,
   3. Sprengers ME,
   4. van Rooij WJ, et al

   . MR angiography at 3T versus digital subtraction angiography in the follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with detachable coils. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:1349–56

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   2. Hennemeyer CT,
   3. Wicklow K,
   4. Feinberg DA, et al

   . In vitro evaluation of platinum Guglielmi detachable coils at 3 T with a porcine model: safety issues and artifacts. Radiology 2001;219:732–37

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   2. Shellock FG

   . Biomedical implants and devices: assessment of magnetic field interactions with a 3.0-Tesla MR system. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002;16:721–32

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    2. Meléndez JC,
    3. McCrank E

    . Anxiety-related reactions associated with magnetic resonance imaging examinations. JAMA 1993;270:745–47

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    2. Katznelson R,
    3. Djaiani GN,
    4. Minkovich L, et al

    . Prevalence of claustrophobia and magnetic resonance imaging after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 2008;4:487–93

    PubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Lubicz B,
    3. Levivier M,
    4. Sadeghi N, et al

    . Immediate intracranial aneurysm occlusion after embolization with detachable coils: a comparison between MR angiography and intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography. J Neuroradiol 2007;34:190–97

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Takayama K,
    3. Taoka T,
    4. Nakagawa H, et al

    . Usefulness of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for follow-up of coil embolization with the Enterprise stent for cerebral aneurysms. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2011;35:568–72

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Connor SE,
    3. West RJ,
    4. Yates DA

    . The ability of plain radiography to predict intracranial aneurysm occlusion instability during follow-up of endosaccular treatment with Gugliemi detachable coils. Neuroradiology 2001;43:680–86

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Cottier JP,
    3. Bleuzen-Couthon A,
    4. Gallas S, et al

    . Follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with detachable coils: comparison of plain radiographs, 3D time-of-flight MRA and digital subtraction angiography. Neuroradiology 2003;45:818–24

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. Hwang GJ,
    3. Berenstein A,
    4. Niimi Y, et al

    . The accuracy of plain skull x-ray examination as a predictor of recanalization following Guglielmi detachable coil embolisation in the treatment of cerebral aneurysms. Interv Neuroradiol 2000;6:195–202

    PubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Ballinger PW,
    3. Frank ED,
    4. Merrill V

    . Merrill's Atlas of Radiographic Positions and Radiologic Procedures. St. Louis: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2003
18. 18.↵
    2. Parlea L,
    3. Fahrig R,
    4. Holdsworth DW, et al

    . An analysis of the geometry of saccular intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999;20:1079–89

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    2. Shrout PE,
    3. Fleiss JL

    . Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979;86:420–28

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    2. Kim SY,
    3. Lee SS,
    4. Byun JH, et al

    . Malignant hepatic tumors: short-term reproducibility of apparent diffusion coefficients with breath-hold and respiratory-triggered diffusion-weighted MR imaging. Radiology 2010;255:815–23

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    2. Farb RI,
    3. Nag S,
    4. Scott JN, et al

    . Surveillance of intracranial aneurysms treated with detachable coils: a comparison of MRA techniques. Neuroradiology 2005;47:507–15

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    2. Gauvrit JY,
    3. Leclerc X,
    4. Caron S, et al

    . Intracranial aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils: imaging follow-up with contrast-enhanced MR angiography. Stroke 2006;37:1033–37

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
23. 23.↵
    2. Agid R,
    3. Willinsky RA,
    4. Lee SK, et al

    . Characterization of aneurysm remnants after endovascular treatment: contrast-enhanced MR angiography versus catheter digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:1570–74

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
24. 24.↵
    2. Piotin M,
    3. Mandai S,
    4. Murphy KJ, et al

    . Dense packing of cerebral aneurysms: an in vitro study with detachable platinum coils. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:757–60

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
25. 25.↵
    2. Reul J,
    3. Spetzger U,
    4. Weis J, et al

    . Endovascular occlusion of experimental aneurysms with detachable coils: influence of packing density and perioperative anticoagulation. Neurosurgery 1997;41:1160–65, discussion 1165–68

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
26. 26.↵
    2. Byrne JV,
    3. Hope JK,
    4. Hubbard N, et al

    . The nature of thrombosis induced by platinum and tungsten coils in saccular aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1997;18:29–33

    Abstract