Treatment of Poor-Grade Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Trial

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Molyneux AJ,
   3. Kerr RS,
   4. Yu LM, et al.

   , for the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) Collaborative Group. International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion. Lancet 2005;366:809–17

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   2. Kassell NF,
   3. Torner JC,
   4. Haley EC, et al

   . The international cooperative study on the timing of aneurysm surgery. Part 2. Surgical results. J Neurosurg 1990;73:37–47

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   2. Hutchinson PJ,
   3. Power DM,
   4. Tripathi P, et al

   . Outcome from poor grade aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage: which poor grade subarachnoid haemorrhage patients benefit from aneurysm clipping? Br J Neurosurg 2000;14:105–09

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   2. McDougall CG,
   3. Spetzler RF,
   4. Zabramski JM, et al

   . The Barrow ruptured aneurysm trial. J Neurosurg 2012;116:135–44

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   2. Bracard S,
   3. Lebedinsky A,
   4. Anxionnat R, et al

   . Endovascular treatment of Hunt and Hess grade IV and V aneuryms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:953–57

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   2. van Loon J,
   3. Waerzeggers Y,
   4. Wilms G, et al

   . Early endovascular treatment of ruptured cerebral aneurysms in patients in very poor neurological condition. Neurosurgery 2002;50:457–64

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. Weir RU,
   3. Marcellus ML,
   4. Do HM, et al

   . Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage in patients with Hunt and Hess grade 4 or 5: treatment using the Guglielmi detachable coil system. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:585–90

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   2. Jain R,
   3. Deveikis J,
   4. Thompson B

   . Endovascular management of poor-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage in geriatric population. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:596–600

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   2. Bergui M,
   3. Bradac G

   . Acute endovascular treatment of ruptured aneurysms in poor-grade patients. Neuroradiology 2004;46:161–164

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Suzuki S,
    3. Jahan R,
    4. Duckwiler GR, et al

    . Contribution of endovascular therapy to the management of poor-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: clinical and angiographic outcomes. J Neurosurg 2006;105:664–70

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    2. Pereiera A,
    3. Sanchez-Peña P,
    4. Biondi A, et al

    . Predictors of 1 year outcome after coiling for poor-grade subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurocrit Care 2007;7:18–26

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Taylor C,
    3. Robertson F,
    4. Brealey D, et al

    . Outcome in poor grade sub-arachnoid hemorrhage patients treated with acute endovascular coiling of aneurysms and aggressive intensive care. Neurocrit Care 2011;14:341–47

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Laidlaw JD,
    3. Siu KH

    . Poor-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: outcome after treatment with urgent surgery. Neurosurgery 2003;53:1275–80

    PubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Bailes JE,
    3. Spetzler RF,
    4. Hadley MN, et al

    . Management morbidity and mortality of poor-grade aneurysm patients. J Neurosurg 1990;72:559–66

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    2. Hijdra A,
    3. van Gijn J,
    4. Nagelkerke NJ, et al

    . Prediction of delayed cerebral ischemia, rebleeding, and outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke 1988;19:1250–56

    Abstract/FREE Full Text