Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Advancing NeuroMRI with High-Relaxivity Contrast Agents
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Advancing NeuroMRI with High-Relaxivity Contrast Agents
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates


Improved Turnaround Times | Median time to first decision: 12 days

Research ArticleLevel 1 EBM Expedited Publication
Open Access

Transforaminal versus Intra-Articular Facet Corticosteroid Injections for the Treatment of Cervical Radiculopathy: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Study

N.J. Bureau, T. Moser, J.H. Dagher, D. Shedid, M. Li, P. Brassard and B.E. Leduc
American Journal of Neuroradiology August 2014, 35 (8) 1467-1474; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4026
N.J. Bureau
aFrom the Department of Radiology (N.J.B., T.M.)
bResearch Center (N.J.B., T.M.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
T. Moser
aFrom the Department of Radiology (N.J.B., T.M.)
bResearch Center (N.J.B., T.M.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J.H. Dagher
eInstitut de réadaptation Gingras-Lindsay-de-Montréal (J.H.D.), Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D. Shedid
cDepartment of Surgery (D.S.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Li
fDepartment of Surgery (M.L.), Division of Neurosurgery, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P. Brassard
gDivision of Clinical Epidemiology (P.B.), McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
B.E. Leduc
dDivision of Neurosurgery, and Department of Medicine (B.E.L.), Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 1.

    A, CT-guided transforaminal corticosteroid injection. The needle is positioned in the posterolateral aspect of the foramen with contrast media flowing in the foramen. B, CT-guided intra-articular facet corticosteroids injection. The needle is positioned in the facet joint. Contrast media injection confirms an intracapsular distribution.

  • Fig 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 2.

    Flow diagram of the progress of subjects through the phases of the study.

  • Fig 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 3.

    Relative Visual Analog Scale pain score differences between intra-articular facet and transforaminal corticosteroid injections, according to the VAS baseline value with adjustments for age, sex, and employment status. The intention-to-treat (A) and as-treated (B) analyses are presented. Error bars indicate 2-sided 95% CIs. Squares indicate mean differences. The dotted vertical line marks the 15% margin of noninferiority. LCL indicates lower confidence limit; UCL, upper confidence limit.

  • Fig 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 4.

    Medication Quantitative Scale scores with time adjusted for age, sex, and employment status, for the intra-articular facet and transforaminal corticosteroid injections groups. The intention-to-treat (A) and as-treated (B) analyses are presented. Error bars indicate 2-sided 95% CIs.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1:

    Baseline characteristics of subjects (per randomization) treated with either transforaminal or intra-articular facet corticosteroid injections

    VariablesGroupsP Value
    IFSITFSI
    Subjects (No.)2828
    Sex (No.) (%).059
        Male8 (29)15 (54)
        Female20 (71)13 (46)
    Age (yr) (mean) (range)44 ± 8.3 (26–60)52 ± 11.1 (29–72).007
    Duration of pain (mo) (mean) (range)14 ± 20 (1–84)17 ± 21 (1–84).649
    Imaging findings (No.) (%).357
        Disk herniation12 (43)7 (25)
        Spondylosis14 (50)20 (71)
        Spondylosis/disk herniation2 (7)1 (4)
    Level of injection (No.) (%).566
        C3–C41 (4)0 (0)
        C4–C51 (4)3 (11)
        C5–C616 (57)15 (53)
        C6–C710 (35)10 (36)
    Side of injection (No.) (%).284
        Right13 (46)17 (61)
        Left15 (54)11 (39)
    VAS (0–100) (mean) (range)61 ± 17 (23–95)63 ± 18 (17–85).691
    NDI (0–50) (mean) (range)21 ± 8 (10–44)19 ± 7 (5–30).301
    Employment status (No.) (%).030
        Working12 (42.9)16 (57.1)
        Retired1 (3.6)4 (14.3)
        Not working15 (53.5)8 (28.6)
            On sick leave with insurance10 (35.71)4 (14.29)
            On sick leave without insurance0 (0.00)2 (7.14)
            Workers' compensation4 (14.29)0 (0.00)
            On welfare1 (3.57)2 (7.14)
    • View popup
    Table 2:

    Pain severity and Neck Disability Index scores for intra-articular facet and transforaminal corticosteroid injections

    VariableGroups
    IFSITFSI
    Subjects (No.)
        It2828
        At2927
    VAS% (mean) (95% CI)
        It45.3 (21.4–69.2)9.8 (+11.5–31.2)
        At37.0 (9.2–64.7)17.8 (+6.6–42.2)
    NDI% (mean) (95% CI)
        It24.3 (+2.9–51.5)9.6 (+15.2–34.4)
        At20.7 (+6.2–47.6)12.8 (+11.2–36.7)
    • Note:—VAS% indicates the relative difference between postintervention and baseline VAS pain scores; NDI%, the relative difference between postintervention and baseline Neck Disability Index scores; It, intention-to-treat analysis; At, as-treated analysis.

    • View popup
    Table 3:

    Pain severity subgroup analysis of the etiologic imaging findings for intra-articular facet and transforaminal corticosteroid injections

    VariableSubgroups
    Disk Herniation ± SpondylosisSpondylosis
    IFSITFSIIFSITFSI
    Subjects (No.)
        It1481420
        At1391618
    VAS% (mean) (95% CI)
        It65.0 (31.2–98.9)8.0 (+20.2–36.2)30.1 (0.4–59.7)+1.6 (+33.7–30.4)
        At46.5 (9.4–83.6)22.7 (+6.6–51.9)23.6 (+6.7–53.9)5.6 (+27.1–38.2)
    • Note:—VAS% indicates the relative difference between postintervention and baseline VAS pain scores; It, intention-to-treat analysis; At, as-treated analysis.

    • View popup
    Table 4:

    Pain severity scores for intra-articular facet and transforaminal corticosteroid injections according to the baseline score

    Variable and Baseline VAS Pain Score (0–100)Groups
    IFSITFSI
    Subjects (No.)
        It2828
        At2927
    VAS% (mean) (95% CI)
        20
            It53.3 (4.0–102.7)+83.4 (+132.8 to +34.0)
            At41.6 (17.1–100.3)+70.6 (+128.5 to +12.7)
        40
            It49.5 (16.7–82.4)+39.4 (+72.1 to +6.6)
            At39.4 (0.6–78.2)+28.9 (+66.9–9.2)
        60
            It45.8 (21.8–69.8)4.6 (+17.2–26.5)
            At37.2 (9.4–65.0)12.9 (+12.0–37.8)
        80
            It42.0 (11.6–72.4)48.7 (23.3–74.0)
            At35.0 (+0.3–70.4)54.6 (25.2–84.0)
        95
            It39.1 (2.7–80.9)81.7 (46.0–117.3)
            At33.4 (15.6–82.3)86.0 (44.1–127.8)
    • Note:—VAS% indicates the relative difference between postintervention and baseline VAS pain scores; It, intention-to-treat analysis; At, as-treated analysis.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 35 (8)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 35, Issue 8
1 Aug 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Transforaminal versus Intra-Articular Facet Corticosteroid Injections for the Treatment of Cervical Radiculopathy: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
N.J. Bureau, T. Moser, J.H. Dagher, D. Shedid, M. Li, P. Brassard, B.E. Leduc
Transforaminal versus Intra-Articular Facet Corticosteroid Injections for the Treatment of Cervical Radiculopathy: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Study
American Journal of Neuroradiology Aug 2014, 35 (8) 1467-1474; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4026

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Transforaminal versus Intra-Articular Facet Corticosteroid Injections for the Treatment of Cervical Radiculopathy: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Study
N.J. Bureau, T. Moser, J.H. Dagher, D. Shedid, M. Li, P. Brassard, B.E. Leduc
American Journal of Neuroradiology Aug 2014, 35 (8) 1467-1474; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4026
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Consensus practice guidelines on interventions for cervical spine (facet) joint pain from a multispecialty international working group
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Are There Differences between Macrocyclic Gadolinium Contrast Agents for Brain Tumor Imaging? Results of a Multicenter Intraindividual Crossover Comparison of Gadobutrol with Gadoteridol (the TRUTH Study)
  • A Randomized Trial Comparing Balloon Kyphoplasty and Vertebroplasty for Vertebral Compression Fractures due to Osteoporosis
  • Effect of the CT Table Strap on Radiation Exposure and Image Quality during Cervical Spine CT
Show more LEVEL 1 EBM EXPEDITED PUBLICATION

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire