Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleNeurointervention

Cerebral Aneurysm Pulsation: Do Iterative Reconstruction Methods Improve Measurement Accuracy In Vivo?

T. Illies, D. Säring, M. Kinoshita, T. Fujinaka, M. Bester, J. Fiehler, N. Tomiyama and Y. Watanabe
American Journal of Neuroradiology November 2014, 35 (11) 2159-2163; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4000
T. Illies
aFrom the Departments of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology (T.I., M.B., J.F.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D. Säring
bMedical Informatics (D.S.), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Kinoshita
cDepartments of Neurosurgery (M.K., T.F.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
T. Fujinaka
cDepartments of Neurosurgery (M.K., T.F.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Bester
aFrom the Departments of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology (T.I., M.B., J.F.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Fiehler
aFrom the Departments of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology (T.I., M.B., J.F.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
N. Tomiyama
dRadiology (N.T., Y.W.), Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Y. Watanabe
dRadiology (N.T., Y.W.), Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Electrocardiogram-gated 4D-CTA is a promising technique allowing new insight into aneurysm pathophysiology and possibly improving risk prediction of cerebral aneurysms. Due to the extremely small pulsational excursions (<0.1 mm in diameter), exact segmentation of the aneurysms is of critical importance. In vitro examinations have shown improvement of the accuracy of vessel delineation by iterative reconstruction methods. We hypothesized that this improvement shows a measurable effect on aneurysm pulsations in vivo.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten patients with cerebral aneurysms underwent 4D-CTA. Images were reconstructed with filtered back-projection and iterative reconstruction. The following parameters were compared between both groups: image noise, absolute aneurysm volumes, pulsatility, and sharpness of aneurysm edges.

RESULTS: In iterative reconstruction images, noise was significantly reduced (mean, 9.8 ± 4.0 Hounsfield units versus 8.0 ± 2.5 Hounsfield units; P = .04), but the sharpness of aneurysm edges just missed statistical significance (mean, 3.50 ± 0.49 mm versus 3.42 ± 0.49 mm; P = .06). Absolute volumes (mean, 456.1 ± 775.2 mm3 versus 461.7 ± 789.9 mm3; P = .31) and pulsatility (mean, 1.099 ± 0.088 mm3 versus 1.095 ± 0.082 mm3; P = .62) did not show a significant difference between iterative reconstruction and filtered back-projection images.

CONCLUSIONS: CT images reconstructed with iterative reconstruction methods show a tendency toward shorter vessel edges but do not affect absolute aneurysm volumes or pulsatility measurements in vivo.

ABBREVIATIONS:

AIDR
adaptive iterative dose reduction
IR
iterative reconstruction
FBP
filtered back-projection
HU
Hounsfield units

Electrocardiogram-gated 4D-CT angiography has been used to analyze the pulsation of cerebral aneurysms.1⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓–7 Insight into aneurysm pathophysiology and improvement of risk prediction of incidental cerebral aneurysms can be expected. The technique is limited by the small pulsational excursions of cerebral aneurysms. If one considers a volume change of 5% within the cardiac cycle, the change in diameter of a spherical aneurysm of 5 mm diameter is on the order of 0.1 mm,1,2 which is below the resolution of CTA. Exact segmentation of the aneurysm is, therefore, critical and of the utmost importance for the correct analysis of pulsations.

In vitro experiments with vascular models have shown that vessel delineation depends on various factors, including intraluminal contrast attenuation, vascular wall thickness, postprocessing, and reconstruction methods.8 Iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithms have gained importance in clinical routine CT because the radiation dose can be reduced significantly while image quality is maintained compared with filtered back-projection (FBP) reconstruction. At a constant radiation dose, IR reduces image blur, enhances edges, and increases image resolution.8⇓–10 Depiction of vessels in the posterior fossa and the spinal canal11,12 is improved in vivo. Moreover, in vitro studies reveal improvement of the accuracy of quantitative measurement of vessel diameters.8

These findings and its overall characteristics make IR an interesting tool for improving the accuracy of pulsation measurements of cerebral aneurysms. To our knowledge, the influence of IR on vessel-volume measurement, especially in 4D-CTA, has not been examined in vivo. We hypothesized that IR methods have a measureable effect on the accuracy of quantification of cerebral aneurysm pulsation in vivo.

Materials and Methods

Patients

Ten patients with unruptured cerebral aneurysms underwent 4D-CTA. Four aneurysms were located at the internal carotid artery; 4, at the middle cerebral artery; 1, at the anterior communicating artery; and 1, at the anterior cerebral artery. The local ethics committee approved the use of the clinical data for research and waived the requirement for written informed consent from patients. Patient data are listed in the Table.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup

Patient characteristics

4D-CTA Acquisition

Retrospectively electrocardiogram-gated CTA was performed on a 320-detector row Aquilion ONE CT scanner (Toshiba Medical Systems, Tokyo, Japan). We used the following parameters: 120-kV tube voltage, 270-mA tube current, 350-ms gantry rotation time, 140-mm z-coverage. Contrast medium (ioversol, Optiray 320 mg I/mL; Covidien Japan, Tokyo, Japan) was injected at 5 mL/s. Timing for the image aquisition was determined with a test injection of 15 mL of contrast medium. For CTA, 50 mL of contrast medium was injected followed by a saline flush. 4D-CTAs were reconstructed with half reconstruction by using FBP and a kernel optimized for intracranial vessel imaging and IR algorithm (adaptive iterative dose reduction [AIDR] 3D) with 10 steps of each 10% of the R-R interval, 512 × 512 image matrix, 0.5-mm section thickness, and 0.39 × 0.39 mm in-plane resolution.

Postprocessing

We used an in-house-developed software as well as ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland) and MeVisLab (MeVis Medical Solutions, Bremen, Germany) for volume measurement, and R (http://www.r-project.org/) and R Studio 0.97 (http://rstudio.org/download/desktop) for statistical analysis.

Noise

Mean and SDs were calculated from circular ROIs in air (400 mm2), brain tissue (200 mm2), and the aneurysm on transversal sections in all phases in FBP and AIDR images. The SDs of the densities within the ROIs were averaged over all timeframes, and their means and SDs were compared between the FBP and AIDR images with t tests as a measure of objective image noise.

Edge Sharpness

For each aneurysm, 1 attenuation profile along a line passing through its center was acquired on axial images. Measurement points were interpolated by using cubic splines. The width of the edge response of the aneurysm wall was defined as the distance between points corresponding to 10% and 90% of the maximum intra-aneurysmal attenuation on the border of the aneurysms. A shorter edge response corresponds to a sharper edge representation. Edge responses were compared between FBP and IR groups (Fig 1).

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

Creation of a line profile across the aneurysms for calculations of edge lengths. The left side shows a right middle cerebral artery aneurysm. A linear region of interest is positioned through the center of the aneurysm. The right side shows a cubic spline function fitted to the measurements for FBP (black) and AIDR (red). Edges are defined as the distance between the 10% and 90% interval of the maximum intra-aneurysmal attenuation (horizontal black lines).

Absolute Volumes and Pulsatility

Datasets were loaded into an in-house-developed postprocessing software. Perivascular tissue was removed with a thresholded segmentation (160–890 Hounsfield units [HU]). On the basis of the segmentation of the aneurysm and the attached vessel system, a single surface model was generated by using the marching cube algorithm. To separate the aneurysm structure from the vessels, the observer manually selected a number of points representing the cutting line at the time point zero. This initial cutting line was transferred automatically to all other time points by using an iterative closest-point approach, to reduce interaction time. Now, the surface model of the aneurysm for each time point was generated on the basis of the transferred cutting lines. For analysis, the absolute volumes and maximum and minimum volumes of the aneurysm surface model within the cardiac cycle were calculated and compared between both groups. Pulsatility was calculated as the ratio of maximum and minimum volumes and was compared between both groups.

Results

Noise

In ROIs placed in the air, mean intensity values were −1040.2 ± 22.2 HU versus −1040.6 ± 22.1 HU (P = .97) and SDs were 9.8 ± 4.0 HU versus 8.0 ± 2.5 HU (P = .04) (FBP versus AIDR). In brain parenchyma, the means were 53.7 ± 5.0 HU versus 53.9 ± 4.8 HU (P = .91) and the SDs were 15.0 ± 3.5 HU versus 11.9 ± 1.9 HU (P = .03) (FBP versus AIDR); and in aneurysms, the means were 433.0 ± 136.1 HU versus 427.0 ± 132.6 HU (P = .89) and the SDs were 20.3 ± 7.4 HU versus 14.6 ± 5.2 HU (P < .001) (FBP versus AIDR).

Edge Sharpness

Mean edge length was 3.50 ± 0.49 mm versus 3.42 ± 0.49 mm (FBP versus AIDR). Bland-Altmann analysis revealed a bias of −0.08 mm (AIDR-FBP, P = .06, paired t test) and limits of agreement between −0.32 and 0.19 mm. Edge sharpness did not correlate significantly with intraluminal attenuation (P = .45, r2 = 0.032) (Fig 2).

Fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2.

Edge lengths compared between AIDR and FBP and edge length compared with intra-aneurysmal attenuation (triangles, left side; dots, right side). On the left side, a Bland-Altman plot shows a small bias of shorter edges in AIDR images. Th right side shows the plot and regression line of edge length and intra-aneurysmal attenuation (P = .45).

Absolute Volumes

Mean aneurysm size was 461.7 ± 789.9 mm3 versus 456.1 ± 775.2 mm3 (FBP versus AIDR). Bland-Altman analysis revealed a bias of −5.6 mm3 (AIDR-FBP, P = .31, paired t test) and limits of agreement of −37.6 and 26.6 mm3 for mean volumes (Fig 3).

Fig 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 3.

Bland-Altman plots of absolute volumes and pulsatility. Left side shows a small bias, with a tendency toward smaller absolute volumes in AIDR images. On the right side, there are no differences in pulsatility between the aneurysms in AIDR and FBP images.

Pulsatility

Mean pulsatility was 1.095 ± 0.082 mm3 versus 1.099 ± 0.088 mm3 (FBP versus AIDR), and Bland-Altman analysis revealed a bias of 0.003 (AIDR-FBP, P = .62, paired t test), with limits of agreement between −0.03 and 0.04 (Fig 4).

Fig 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 4.

Aneurysm of the right middle cerebral artery in a 53-year-old patient (patient 1). CT angiography of the 2 reconstruction methods; acquisition parameters are the same. A, Filtered back-projection. B, Image reconstruction with adaptive iterative dose reduction. Note the smoother appearance of the image, consistent with reduced image noise.

Discussion

Analysis of the pulsations of cerebral aneurysms could improve the understanding of mechanisms involved in their enlargement and rupture and increase the accuracy of risk prediction of unruptured aneurysms. Previous studies found volume changes of cerebral aneurysms within the cardiac cycle of approximately 5%.1 These pulsations did not differ significantly from those of normal cerebral arteries but showed a tendency toward larger values. Due to the small excursions of the aneurysm wall, pulsation analysis is technically challenging and improving its accuracy is demanding. IR methods have been shown to improve measurement precision of vessel diameter in a phantom study, a finding from which aneurysm pulsation analysis could benefit. We compared pulsations of 10 cerebral aneurysms from FBP and AIDR reconstructed datasets to analyze the effect size in vivo. No significant changes were observed in absolute aneurysm volumes and pulsations between images reconstructed with IR and AIDR. However, vessel sharpness, one of AIDR's characteristics for improving measurement accuracy, was increased, a finding that just missed statistical significance.

The aforementioned phantom study investigated the influence of wall thickness, intraluminal attenuation, and the reconstruction method on diameter measurement. In our study, the wall thicknesses of aneurysms were essentially unknown but could be estimated by the results of previous reports. In a pathologically based study, the wall thickness was found to be 0.25 mm for 10-mm13 aneurysms, and an MR imaging–based study found a wall size of 0.6 mm.14 Mean intra-aneurysmal attenuation was 430 HU, ranging from 223 to 555 HU for the aneurysms, due to the capture of the bolus in first-pass 4D-CTA. Of the 9 groups in the phantom study, for the one comparable to our samples with respect to wall thickness (0.5 mm) and intraluminal attenuation (396 HU), a difference in diameter measurement between FBP and IR images could not be proved. While vessel diameters were overestimated with both reconstruction methods, IR reduced measurement errors significantly in larger-diameter vessels and with higher intraluminal attenuation. Our findings in humans reflect these results by showing smaller volumes in all aneurysms in the AIDR group. However, this finding did not reach a statistically significant level. For a small effect size as found in our study, a much larger sample size is needed to achieve sufficient statistical power.

The effect of IR on vessel delineation is attributed to its ability to improve resolution, reduce image noise, and enhance edges.15 The examination of image resolution with respect to the reconstruction method is beyond the scope of this article and has been shown in previous examinations.16 AIDR-reconstructed images expectedly showed reduced overall noise levels, and intra-aneurysmal noise was decreased by 28% (Fig 4). The ability of IR to reduce noise and enhance edges at the same time distinguishes it from FBP reconstruction, which compromises between these as it uses a filter kernel. A quantitative measure for edge sharpness is the length of the attenuation profile at the vessel border, ranging from 10% to 90% of the maximum intraluminal attenuation. The previously described phantom study also examined the influence of wall thickness, intraluminal attenuation, and reconstruction methods on this edge sharpness. IR images showed shorter edges throughout all groups. Edge lengths in our study just missed a statistically significant level but showed a tendency toward shorter values in AIDR-reconstructed images as seen in the phantom study (Fig 2). There, vessels with 0.5-mm walls did not show an edge profile corresponding to the actual vessel wall as was seen in the thicker-walled vessels. The lack of depiction of the wall in thin-walled vessels was attributed to reconstruction blur and might be the major source of the lack of improvement of accuracy in measuring vessel diameters in this group. With an estimated wall thickness of 0.25 mm in aneurysms in vivo, this effect is even more pronounced.

Due to the small sample size, our study lacks the statistical power to draw further conclusions. Hence, the absence of a significantly different absolute volume or pulsation fraction does not translate into a lack of improvement of accuracy by IR in pulsation analysis. The effect size is small, necessitating large study groups. However, further effort should be made because our results show the applicability of the findings of a well-controlled in vitro study that proved the superiority of IR methods in the diameter measurement of vessels. Furthermore, IR methods from different vendors may have variable effects on edge enhancement and could show a larger improvement of accuracy for this specific application.

Conclusions

IR methods do not increase the accuracy of pulsation measurements of cerebral artery aneurysms in vivo. This finding might be mainly due to their small wall size.

Footnotes

  • Disclosures: Till Illies—RELATED: Support for Travel to Meetings for the Study or Other Purposes: Japanese German Radiology Affiliation, Comments: for an exchange to Osaka, Japan. Jens Fiehler—UNRELATED: Consultancy: Codman, Stryker, MicroVention; Grants/Grants Pending: Covidien, Stryker, MicroVention*; Payment for Lectures Including Service on Speakers Bureaus: Codman, Covidien, Stryker, MicroVention, Penumbra; Travel/Accommodations/Meeting Expenses Unrelated to Activities Listed: Covidien. Yoshiyuki Watanabe—RELATED: Grant: Toshiba Medical,* Comments: research fund about radiation dose reduction using 320-detector row CT. *Money paid to the institution.

  • This work was supported by a grant of the Japanese German Radiology Affiliation.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Kuroda J,
    2. Kinoshita M,
    3. Tanaka H, et al
    . Cardiac cycle-related volume change in unruptured cerebral aneurysms: a detailed volume quantification study using 4-dimensional CT angiography. Stroke 2012;43:61–66
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Umeda Y,
    2. Ishida F,
    3. Hamada K, et al
    . Novel dynamic four-dimensional CT angiography revealing 2-type motions of cerebral arteries. Stroke 2011;42:815–18
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Yaghmai V,
    2. Rohany M,
    3. Shaibani A, et al
    . Pulsatility imaging of saccular aneurysm model by 64-slice CT with dynamic multiscan technique. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2007;18:785–88
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Matsumoto M,
    2. Sasaki T,
    3. Suzuki K, et al
    . Visualizing the dynamics of cerebral aneurysms with four-dimensional computed tomographic angiography. Neurosurgery 2006;58:E1003, author reply E1003
    PubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Kato Y,
    2. Hayakawa M,
    3. Sano H, et al
    . Prediction of impending rupture in aneurysms using 4D-CTA: histopathological verification of a real-time minimally invasive tool in unruptured aneurysms. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2004;47:131–35
    CrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Ishida F,
    2. Ogawa H,
    3. Simizu T, et al
    . Visualizing the dynamics of cerebral aneurysms with four-dimensional computed tomographic angiography. Neurosurgery 2005;57:460–71, discussion 460–71
    CrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Hayakawa M,
    2. Katada K,
    3. Anno H, et al
    . CT angiography with electrocardiographically gated reconstruction for visualizing pulsation of intracranial aneurysms: identification of aneurysmal protuberance presumably associated with wall thinning. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:1366–69
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Suzuki S,
    2. Machida H,
    3. Tanaka I, et al
    . Vascular diameter measurement in CT angiography: comparison of model-based iterative reconstruction and standard filtered back projection algorithms in vitro. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013;200:652–57
    CrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Ziegler A,
    2. Köhler T,
    3. Proksa R
    . Noise and resolution in images reconstructed with FBP and OSC algorithms for CT. Med Phys 2007;34:585–98
    CrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Sprawls P
    . AAPM tutorial: CT image detail and noise. Radiographics 1992;12:1041–46
    CrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Machida H,
    2. Takeuchi H,
    3. Tanaka I, et al
    . Improved delineation of arteries in the posterior fossa of the brain by model-based iterative reconstruction in volume-rendered 3D CT angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:971–75
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Machida H,
    2. Tanaka I,
    3. Fukui R, et al
    . Improved delineation of the anterior spinal artery with model-based iterative reconstruction in CT angiography: a clinical pilot study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013;200:442–46
    CrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Steiger HJ,
    2. Aaslid R,
    3. Keller S, et al
    . Strength, elasticity and viscoelastic properties of cerebral aneurysms. Heart Vessels 1989;5:41–46
    CrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Park JK,
    2. Lee CS,
    3. Sim KB, et al
    . Imaging of the walls of saccular cerebral aneurysms with double inversion recovery black-blood sequence. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009;30:1179–83
    CrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Beister M,
    2. Kolditz D,
    3. Kalender WA
    . Iterative reconstruction methods in X-ray CT. Phys Med 2012;28:94–108
    CrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Suzuki S,
    2. Machida H,
    3. Tanaka I, et al
    . Measurement of vascular wall attenuation: comparison of CT angiography using model-based iterative reconstruction with standard filtered back-projection algorithm CT in vitro. Eur J Radiol 2012;81:3348–53
    CrossRefPubMed
  • Received January 21, 2014.
  • Accepted after revision April 14, 2014.
  • © 2014 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 35 (11)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 35, Issue 11
1 Nov 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Cerebral Aneurysm Pulsation: Do Iterative Reconstruction Methods Improve Measurement Accuracy In Vivo?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
T. Illies, D. Säring, M. Kinoshita, T. Fujinaka, M. Bester, J. Fiehler, N. Tomiyama, Y. Watanabe
Cerebral Aneurysm Pulsation: Do Iterative Reconstruction Methods Improve Measurement Accuracy In Vivo?
American Journal of Neuroradiology Nov 2014, 35 (11) 2159-2163; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4000

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Cerebral Aneurysm Pulsation: Do Iterative Reconstruction Methods Improve Measurement Accuracy In Vivo?
T. Illies, D. Säring, M. Kinoshita, T. Fujinaka, M. Bester, J. Fiehler, N. Tomiyama, Y. Watanabe
American Journal of Neuroradiology Nov 2014, 35 (11) 2159-2163; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4000
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref (7)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • A review on imaging techniques and quantitative measurements for dynamic imaging of cerebral aneurysm pulsations
    L. B. Stam, R. Aquarius, G. A. de Jong, C. H. Slump, F. J. A. Meijer, H. D. Boogaarts
    Scientific Reports 2021 11 1
  • The Position and Role of Four-Dimensional Computed Tomography Angiography in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Spinal Arteriovenous Fistulas
    Satoshi Yamaguchi, Kohei Takemoto, Masaaki Takeda, Yosuke Kajihara, Takafumi Mitsuhara, Manish Kolakshyapati, Kazutoshi Mukada, Kaoru Kurisu
    World Neurosurgery 2017 103
  • Dynamic evaluation of unruptured intracranial aneurysms by 4D-CT angiography: comparison with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and surgical findings
    Liping Yang, Xing Gao, Chao Gao, Shichuan Xu, Shaodong Cao
    BMC Medical Imaging 2023 23 1
  • Reduction of misregistration on cerebral four-dimensional computed tomography angiography images using advanced patient motion correction reconstruction
    Yuki Kunitomi, Yoshiyuki Watanabe, Atsuko Arisawa, Akio Tsukabe, Hisashi Tanaka, Hiroto Takahashi, Takeo Nishida, Manabu Kinoshita, Hajime Nakamura, Noriyuki Tomiyama
    Japanese Journal of Radiology 2016 34 9
  • Feasibility of capturing vessel expansion with 4D‐CTA: Phantom study to determine reproducibility, spatial and temporal resolution
    Sabine M. L. Linden, Lotte B. Stam, René Aquarius, Alessa Hering, Chris L. de Korte, Mathias Prokop, Hieronymus D. Boogaarts, Frederick J. A. Meijer, Luuk J. Oostveen
    Medical Physics 2024 51 10
  • Intracranial Aneurysms
    Waleed Brinjikji, Vivek Gupta, Prasanna Vibhute
    2018
  • In-vivo cerebral artery pulsation assessment with Dynamic computed tomography angiography
    Lotte B. Stam, Sabine M.L. Linden, René Aquarius, Alessa Hering, Luuk J. Oostveen, Frederick J.A. Meijer, Hieronymus D. Boogaarts
    European Journal of Radiology 2025 182

More in this TOC Section

  • Effect of SARS-CoV2 on Endovascular Thrombectomy
  • A Key Factor Shapes LS-DAVFs EVT Outcome
  • MT in Mild LVO Stroke: ASSIST Registry Insights
Show more Neurointervention

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire