Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleResearch Perspectives

Acquisition Guidelines and Quality Assessment Tools for Analyzing Neonatal Diffusion Tensor MRI Data

A.M. Heemskerk, A. Leemans, A. Plaisier, K. Pieterman, M.H. Lequin and J. Dudink
American Journal of Neuroradiology August 2013, 34 (8) 1496-1505; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A3465
A.M. Heemskerk
aFrom the Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics (A.M.H., A.P., K.P., J.D.)
bDivision of Pediatric Radiology, Department of Radiology (A.M.H., A.P., M.H.L., J.D.), Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A. Leemans
cImage Sciences Institute (A.L.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A. Plaisier
aFrom the Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics (A.M.H., A.P., K.P., J.D.)
bDivision of Pediatric Radiology, Department of Radiology (A.M.H., A.P., M.H.L., J.D.), Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
K. Pieterman
aFrom the Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics (A.M.H., A.P., K.P., J.D.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M.H. Lequin
bDivision of Pediatric Radiology, Department of Radiology (A.M.H., A.P., M.H.L., J.D.), Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Dudink
aFrom the Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics (A.M.H., A.P., K.P., J.D.)
bDivision of Pediatric Radiology, Department of Radiology (A.M.H., A.P., M.H.L., J.D.), Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 1.

    Anatomic, MD, and FA map of a neonate. A, At 30 weeks' gestational age; B, at term age; and C, after perinatal asphyxia scanned on day 4, with abnormal low signal intensity in the central gray matter on the MD map. Notice the decrease in MD values and increase in FA values between the preterm and a term brain. The MD maps and FA maps are equally scaled for the 3 subjects, respectively, 0–2 × 10−3 mm2/s and 0–1.

  • Fig 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 2.

    Effects of motion and pulsation. A, Almost complete signal loss caused by head motion; B, signal drop-out caused by pulsation; and C, 3-plane view in which the effects of pulsation (arrow) and motion (arrowhead) are visible.

  • Fig 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 3.

    Effects of different tensor estimation methods. Data of 2 datasets are displayed: on the left, data without gross motion artifacts, and on the right, data with gross motion artifacts for one of the gradient directions. Both MD and FA maps are depicted, showing no visible differences for the good dataset and clearly visible differences for the dataset with motion. Especially the FA maps show that the ordinary least-squares (OLS) estimation results in very high FA values that are not related to the known anatomy. In the graphs, the pixel value of the OLS or weighted least-squares (WLS) tensor estimation is plotted against the pixel value of the RESTORE tensor estimation (x-axis), and the line of identity is included. The spread around the line of identity is broader for the dataset, with motion indicating an effect of the tensor estimation method on the resulting FA or MD value. For the graphs, the images were eroded to exclude the outer rim, which contains poor-quality data caused by partial volume effects. Scaling: MD, 0–2 × 10−3 mm2/s; FA, 0–1.

  • Fig 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 4.

    Examples of residuals. A through D, Residuals from a subject with good data quality. Higher residuals are present at the border and in the ventricles. A and B, Axial images; C, coronal view; and D, sagittal view. E and F, Effects of motion and eddy current correction with higher residuals before correction and lower values after correction; G, higher residuals caused by ghosting; H, high residuals caused by susceptibility artifacts; I through L, residuals from a subject with gross motion artifacts showing both sections with low (no motion) and high (motion) residuals. The sagittal view (L) shows a pattern with alternating sections of high and lower residuals. Each subject is individually scaled.

  • Fig 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 5.

    Detection of outliers. A, Percentage of outliers per DWI is a tool to indicate potential problems with the DTI dataset. In this case, DWI 11 and 12 have a high percentage of outliers. B, Percentage outliers per section facilitates easy detection of the problematic sections. During the acquisition of gradient direction 12, several sections are affected by movement of the infant. C and D, Examples of the resulting images; E, nonaffected image. Because of the interleaved section acquisition, there is an alternating pattern for the odd and even sections. Scaling is similar for DWI.

  • Fig 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 6.

    Outlier profile for different datasets. Outliers are only depicted for those sections that contain >1000 voxels with signal intensity. A, Dataset without gross motion artifacts; B, dataset with 1 corrupted gradient direction; C, dataset with multiple corrupted gradient directions. Scaling is for 0–40% outliers.

  • Fig 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 7.

    Quality assessment in 2 term-born neonates with brain pathology. The damaged brain areas have much lower MD (A and E) and apparent high FA (B and F) values. The percentage outliers (C and G) are low and are distributed uniformly. Because the residuals are also dependent on the underlying MD and FA values, they (D and H) are large in the damaged areas. Scaling: MD, 0–2 × 10−3 mm2/s; FA, 0–1; outliers, 0–40%.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1:

    Published DTI acquisition settings for neonates from different groups

    PMAFSNeo CoilTRTEFOVThkImage Resolutionb-ValueNo. b = 0No. DirSedationReference
    40–453−77454818021.41800132+van Pul et al67
    Term3−8400842202.22.20750??±Wintermark et al68
    31–411.5+4000602103.00.8210001?−Arrigoni et al69
    38–413−>3000711501.91.88700530−Oishi et al70
    Term37680822.02.001000742−Wang et al71
    37–431.56000882002.51.561000115+Hasegawa et al72
    40–4437465542.01.401000132+de Bruine et al73
    Term1.5+4047592103.00.82100016−Righini et al74
    24–33/TEA1.5+70001003.01.4060016−Bonifacio et al75
    24–33/TEA1.5+49001041603.01.30600/700112−Bonifacio et al75
    Term35200732.02.00100016−Gilmore et al76
    25–321.5+9150982003.00.781000125−Dudink et al77
    35–421.5−5888922202.32.00600132−Liu et al78
    39–411.5−7000741802.21.40700115+Skiold et al5
    Term1.5−80001002403.01.88700110−Malik et al79
    Term1.5−60001062302.50.9011001644−Rose et al80
    38–453−8000792242.01.75750115±Anjari et al13
    301.5+1172590.52203.00.86750325−Erasmus MC – Sophia
    Term1.5+1172585.62203.00.661000325−Erasmus MC – Sophia
    • Note:—Image resolution is all squared (mm); b-values are s/mm2.

    • PMA indicates postmenstrual age at image acquisition (weeks); TEA, term equivalent age; FS, field strength (T); TR, repetition time (ms); TE, echo time (ms); FOV, field of view (mm); Thk, section thickness (mm); No. Dir, number of diffusion encoding directions; +, used; and −, not used; Neo, neonatal; Erasmus MC-Sophia is the hospital where the authors are affiliated.

    • View popup
    Table 2:

    Outliers in a small pilot study (27 preterm infants scanned at 30 weeks' gestational age)

    >10% Outliers>30% Outliers>50% Outliers
    No. of subjects >10 sections271510
    No. of subjects >20 sections26101
    Mean No. of sections with outliers50159
    Range No. of sections with outliers17–791–380–24
    Mean percentage of sections with outliers9.52.91.7
    Range of percentage of sections with outliers3.3–15.70.2–7.00.0–4.4
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 34 (8)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 34, Issue 8
1 Aug 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Acquisition Guidelines and Quality Assessment Tools for Analyzing Neonatal Diffusion Tensor MRI Data
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
A.M. Heemskerk, A. Leemans, A. Plaisier, K. Pieterman, M.H. Lequin, J. Dudink
Acquisition Guidelines and Quality Assessment Tools for Analyzing Neonatal Diffusion Tensor MRI Data
American Journal of Neuroradiology Aug 2013, 34 (8) 1496-1505; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3465

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Acquisition Guidelines and Quality Assessment Tools for Analyzing Neonatal Diffusion Tensor MRI Data
A.M. Heemskerk, A. Leemans, A. Plaisier, K. Pieterman, M.H. Lequin, J. Dudink
American Journal of Neuroradiology Aug 2013, 34 (8) 1496-1505; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3465
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • DTI of the Neonate
    • Setup for Imaging Neonates
    • Resolution, TR, TE
    • General DTI Acquisition Considerations
    • Diffusion Weighting
    • Motion
    • Temperature
    • Processing
    • Motion/Distortion Correction
    • Estimation of the Tensor
    • Quality Assurance
    • Data Analysis
    • DTI Quality and Pathology
    • Conclusions
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Perinatal development of structural thalamocortical connectivity
  • White Matter Extension of the Melbourne Childrens Regional Infant Brain Atlas: M-CRIB-WM
  • Cerebellar Growth Impairment Characterizes School-Aged Children Born Preterm without Perinatal Brain Lesions
  • Choice of Diffusion Tensor Estimation Approach Affects Fiber Tractography of the Fornix in Preterm Brain
  • Crossref (24)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • Automated processing pipeline for neonatal diffusion MRI in the developing Human Connectome Project
    Matteo Bastiani, Jesper L.R. Andersson, Lucilio Cordero-Grande, Maria Murgasova, Jana Hutter, Anthony N. Price, Antonios Makropoulos, Sean P. Fitzgibbon, Emer Hughes, Daniel Rueckert, Suresh Victor, Mary Rutherford, A. David Edwards, Stephen M. Smith, Jacques-Donald Tournier, Joseph V. Hajnal, Saad Jbabdi, Stamatios N. Sotiropoulos
    NeuroImage 2019 185
  • REKINDLE: Robust extraction of kurtosis INDices with linear estimation
    Chantal M.W. Tax, Willem M. Otte, Max A. Viergever, Rick M. Dijkhuizen, Alexander Leemans
    Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2015 73 2
  • A new neonatal cortical and subcortical brain atlas: the Melbourne Children's Regional Infant Brain (M-CRIB) atlas
    Bonnie Alexander, Andrea L. Murray, Wai Yen Loh, Lillian G. Matthews, Chris Adamson, Richard Beare, Jian Chen, Claire E. Kelly, Sandra Rees, Simon K. Warfield, Peter J. Anderson, Lex W. Doyle, Alicia J. Spittle, Jeanie L.Y. Cheong, Marc L. Seal, Deanne K. Thompson
    NeuroImage 2017 147
  • Neonatal Brain Tissue Classification with Morphological Adaptation and Unified Segmentation
    Richard J. Beare, Jian Chen, Claire E. Kelly, Dimitrios Alexopoulos, Christopher D. Smyser, Cynthia E. Rogers, Wai Y. Loh, Lillian G. Matthews, Jeanie L. Y. Cheong, Alicia J. Spittle, Peter J. Anderson, Lex W. Doyle, Terrie E. Inder, Marc L. Seal, Deanne K. Thompson
    Frontiers in Neuroinformatics 2016 10
  • Moderate and late preterm infants exhibit widespread brain white matter microstructure alterations at term-equivalent age relative to term-born controls
    Claire E. Kelly, Jeanie L. Y. Cheong, Lillian Gabra Fam, Alexander Leemans, Marc L. Seal, Lex W. Doyle, Peter J. Anderson, Alicia J. Spittle, Deanne K. Thompson
    Brain Imaging and Behavior 2016 10 1
  • Fast and accurate Slicewise OutLIer Detection (SOLID) with informed model estimation for diffusion MRI data
    Viljami Sairanen, A. Leemans, C.M.W. Tax
    NeuroImage 2018 181
  • Inter-site harmonization based on dual generative adversarial networks for diffusion tensor imaging: application to neonatal white matter development
    Jie Zhong, Ying Wang, Jie Li, Xuetong Xue, Simin Liu, Miaomiao Wang, Xinbo Gao, Quan Wang, Jian Yang, Xianjun Li
    BioMedical Engineering OnLine 2020 19 1
  • Differential vulnerability of white matter structures to experimental infantile hydrocephalus detected by diffusion tensor imaging
    Ramin Eskandari, Osama Abdullah, Cameron Mason, Kelley E. Lloyd, Amanda N. Oeschle, James P. McAllister
    Child's Nervous System 2014 30 10
  • Brain Development From Newborn to Adolescence: Evaluation by Neurite Orientation Dispersion and Density Imaging
    Xueying Zhao, Jingjing Shi, Fei Dai, Lei Wei, Boyu Zhang, Xuchen Yu, Chengyan Wang, Wenzhen Zhu, He Wang
    Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 2021 15
  • White matter alterations of the corticospinal tract in adults born very preterm and/or with very low birth weight
    Alina Jurcoane, Marcel Daamen, Lukas Scheef, Josef G. Bäuml, Chun Meng, Afra M. Wohlschläger, Christian Sorg, Barbara Busch, Nicole Baumann, Dieter Wolke, Peter Bartmann, Elke Hattingen, Henning Boecker
    Human Brain Mapping 2016 37 1

More in this TOC Section

  • Hot Topics in Research: Preventive Neuroradiology in Brain Aging and Cognitive Decline
  • Evidence Levels for Neuroradiology Articles: Low Agreement among Raters
  • Imaging Biomarkers in Ischemic Stroke Clinical Trials: An Opportunity for Rigor
Show more RESEARCH PERSPECTIVES

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire