Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Review ArticleReview Articles
Open Access

Motion-Compensation Techniques in Neonatal and Fetal MR Imaging

C. Malamateniou, S.J. Malik, S.J. Counsell, J.M. Allsop, A.K. McGuinness, T. Hayat, K. Broadhouse, R.G. Nunes, A.M. Ederies, J.V. Hajnal and M.A. Rutherford
American Journal of Neuroradiology June 2013, 34 (6) 1124-1136; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A3128
C. Malamateniou
aFrom the Robert Steiner MRI Unit (C.M., S.J.M., S.J.C., J.M.A., A.K.M., T.H., K.B., R.G.N., J.V.H., M.A.R.), Imaging Sciences Department, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
bDepartment of Medical Imaging Technology (C.M.), Technological Educational Institute of Athens, Athens, Greece
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S.J. Malik
aFrom the Robert Steiner MRI Unit (C.M., S.J.M., S.J.C., J.M.A., A.K.M., T.H., K.B., R.G.N., J.V.H., M.A.R.), Imaging Sciences Department, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S.J. Counsell
aFrom the Robert Steiner MRI Unit (C.M., S.J.M., S.J.C., J.M.A., A.K.M., T.H., K.B., R.G.N., J.V.H., M.A.R.), Imaging Sciences Department, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J.M. Allsop
aFrom the Robert Steiner MRI Unit (C.M., S.J.M., S.J.C., J.M.A., A.K.M., T.H., K.B., R.G.N., J.V.H., M.A.R.), Imaging Sciences Department, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A.K. McGuinness
aFrom the Robert Steiner MRI Unit (C.M., S.J.M., S.J.C., J.M.A., A.K.M., T.H., K.B., R.G.N., J.V.H., M.A.R.), Imaging Sciences Department, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
T. Hayat
aFrom the Robert Steiner MRI Unit (C.M., S.J.M., S.J.C., J.M.A., A.K.M., T.H., K.B., R.G.N., J.V.H., M.A.R.), Imaging Sciences Department, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
K. Broadhouse
aFrom the Robert Steiner MRI Unit (C.M., S.J.M., S.J.C., J.M.A., A.K.M., T.H., K.B., R.G.N., J.V.H., M.A.R.), Imaging Sciences Department, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R.G. Nunes
aFrom the Robert Steiner MRI Unit (C.M., S.J.M., S.J.C., J.M.A., A.K.M., T.H., K.B., R.G.N., J.V.H., M.A.R.), Imaging Sciences Department, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
bDepartment of Medical Imaging Technology (C.M.), Technological Educational Institute of Athens, Athens, Greece
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A.M. Ederies
cInstitute of Biophysics and Biomedical Engineering (R.G.N.), Faculty of Sciences, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J.V. Hajnal
aFrom the Robert Steiner MRI Unit (C.M., S.J.M., S.J.C., J.M.A., A.K.M., T.H., K.B., R.G.N., J.V.H., M.A.R.), Imaging Sciences Department, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M.A. Rutherford
aFrom the Robert Steiner MRI Unit (C.M., S.J.M., S.J.C., J.M.A., A.K.M., T.H., K.B., R.G.N., J.V.H., M.A.R.), Imaging Sciences Department, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Fig 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 1.

    T1-weighted (A), T2-weighted (B), and diffusion-weighted (C) axial MR brain images of a 5-day-old full-term neonate without motion artifacts acquired at 1.5T.

  • Fig 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 2.

    T1-weighted (A), T2-weighted (B), and diffusion-weighted (C) axial MR brain images of a 14-day-old full-term neonate acquired at 1.5T. Motion artifacts in the form of high-signal-intensity ghosts can be seen.

  • Fig 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 3.

    T1-weighted gradient-echo axial brain images at 1.5T (TR, 142 ms; TE, 6 ms; section thickness, 4 mm; scanning time, 16 seconds) of a 28-week-old fetus without motion artifacts after a successful breath-hold (A) and with motion artifacts after an incomplete breath-hold (B). Breathing artifacts appear in the form of high-signal ghosts in the operator-selected phase-encoding direction and severely degrade image quality.

  • Fig 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 4.

    Successive snapshots of a cine bFFE acquisition obtained at 1.5T (TR, 3.21 ms; TE, 1.59 ms; slab thickness, 30–40 mm; scanning duration, 30 seconds for 100 dynamic scans) of a 25-week-old fetus moving inside the uterus. The range and direction of movement of the fetal head (red star) and body and legs (dotted lines) at 6 (A), 12 (B), 18 (C), 24 (D), and 30 (E) seconds can be appreciated.

  • Fig 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 5.

    Successive axially planned sections of a single-shot fast-spin-echo acquisition at 1.5T (TR, 1000 ms; TE, 127 ms; section thickness, 4 mm; scanning duration, 26 seconds) of a 32-week-old fetus (E) with significant fetal motion occurring during data acquisition and resulting in blurring (C, J, M), contrast changes (P), and ultimately signal void when motion is extreme (B). Please note that though sections were planned in the axial plane, fetal movement resulted in plane transposition in the produced images (A–P) (fetal brain is circumscribed in red to distinguish it from neighboring maternal tissues).

  • Fig 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 6.

    Ringing artifacts (arrow) at the back of the brain of a 4-week-old full-term neonate on an axial maximum intensity projection of an optimized neonatal MR angiography protocol79 acquired at 3T. Ringing artifacts occur due to data undersampling, and should not be confused with motion-artifacts ghosts.

  • Fig 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 7.

    The effect of varying imaging-acquisition parameters such as TR (A) and motion characteristics (varying speed of motion, [B] and varying amplitude of motion [C]) on motion artifacts appearance, compared with the nonmotion status (first column). Note that the longer the TR (A) (range, 25–1000 ms) and the faster the motion (measured in cycles/minute; range, 12–48 cycles/min) (B), the farther apart the ghosts appear; also the bigger the amplitude of motion (measured in centimeters; range, 1–3 cm), the brighter is the ghost and the longer, its trace (C).

  • Fig 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 8.

    The effect of in-plane motion (side-to-side head nodding or “nodding no,” first column), through-plane motion (up and down head nodding or “nodding yes,” second column), random motion (combination of in-plane and through-plane motion, third column), and different motion intensities (top row: mild motion; bottom row: severe motion) on image quality of axial T2-weighted fast spin-echo acquisitions of a healthy adult volunteer. Through-plane severe patient motion is detrimental to image quality.

  • Fig 9.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 9.

    A sequence diagram for a spin-echo (top) and fast spin-echo sequence with an echo-train length or number of refocusing 180° pulses of 3 (bottom), which significantly decreases scanning time from 2-and-a-half minutes to 1 minute. ACQ indicates data acquisition.

  • Fig 10.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 10.

    A sequence diagram for gradient-echo (top) and EPI sequences with an EPI factor (or number of gradient reversals) of 12 (bottom), which significantly decreases scanning time from 1 minute to 6 seconds. ACQ indicates data acquisition.

  • Fig 11.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 11.

    An axial T1-weighted gradient-echo breath-hold acquisition of the fetal brain (A) and a motion-resistant axial T1-weighted free-breathing SNAPIR (Snapshot Inversion Recovery) acquisition of the same fetal patient acquired at 34 weeks' gestation at 1.5T. (B) Sections were anatomically matched for comparison. Depiction of anatomic structures (cerebral cortex, ventricular system) is improved with the optimized SNAPIR acquisition compared with the breath-hold protocol.

  • Fig 12.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 12.

    Readout gradient diagrams and k-space sampling strategies for different data-truncation techniques such as partial echo and half-Fourier compared with full-echo. ky indicates the y-axis of the k-space; kx, the x-axis of the k-space. With partial echo or half-Fourier, scanning time can be reduced.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 34 (6)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 34, Issue 6
1 Jun 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Motion-Compensation Techniques in Neonatal and Fetal MR Imaging
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
C. Malamateniou, S.J. Malik, S.J. Counsell, J.M. Allsop, A.K. McGuinness, T. Hayat, K. Broadhouse, R.G. Nunes, A.M. Ederies, J.V. Hajnal, M.A. Rutherford
Motion-Compensation Techniques in Neonatal and Fetal MR Imaging
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jun 2013, 34 (6) 1124-1136; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3128

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Motion-Compensation Techniques in Neonatal and Fetal MR Imaging
C. Malamateniou, S.J. Malik, S.J. Counsell, J.M. Allsop, A.K. McGuinness, T. Hayat, K. Broadhouse, R.G. Nunes, A.M. Ederies, J.V. Hajnal, M.A. Rutherford
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jun 2013, 34 (6) 1124-1136; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3128
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • Introduction and Scope
    • Patient Motion
    • Motion Artifacts
    • Postprocessing
    • Conclusion and Future Directions
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Automated 3D reconstruction of the fetal thorax in the standard atlas space from motion-corrupted MRI stacks for 21-36 weeks GA range
  • In utero diffusion tensor imaging of the fetal brain: a reproducibility study
  • 'Feed and wrap' or sedate and immobilise for neonatal brain MRI?
  • Choice of Diffusion Tensor Estimation Approach Affects Fiber Tractography of the Fornix in Preterm Brain
  • Crossref (98)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • MRI of the Neonatal Brain: A Review of Methodological Challenges and Neuroscientific Advances
    Jessica Dubois, Marianne Alison, Serena J. Counsell, Lucie Hertz‐Pannier, Petra S. Hüppi, Manon J.N.L. Benders
    Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 2021 53 5
  • Computational neuroanatomy of baby brains: A review
    Gang Li, Li Wang, Pew-Thian Yap, Fan Wang, Zhengwang Wu, Yu Meng, Pei Dong, Jaeil Kim, Feng Shi, Islem Rekik, Weili Lin, Dinggang Shen
    NeuroImage 2019 185
  • Exploring early human brain development with structural and physiological neuroimaging
    Lana Vasung, Esra Abaci Turk, Silvina L. Ferradal, Jason Sutin, Jeffrey N. Stout, Banu Ahtam, Pei-Yi Lin, P. Ellen Grant
    NeuroImage 2019 187
  • An efficient total variation algorithm for super-resolution in fetal brain MRI with adaptive regularization
    Sébastien Tourbier, Xavier Bresson, Patric Hagmann, Jean-Philippe Thiran, Reto Meuli, Meritxell Bach Cuadra
    NeuroImage 2015 118
  • Feed and Wrap MRI Technique in Infants
    Nina K. Antonov, Carrie B. Ruzal-Shapiro, Kimberly D. Morel, William S. Millar, Sudha Kashyap, Christine T. Lauren, Maria C. Garzon
    Clinical Pediatrics 2017 56 12
  • Strategies to minimize sedation in pediatric body magnetic resonance imaging
    Camilo Jaimes, Michael S. Gee
    Pediatric Radiology 2016 46 6
  • Techniques for minimizing sedation in pediatric MRI
    Su‐Zhen Dong, Ming Zhu, Dorothy Bulas
    Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 2019 50 4
  • Fetal MRI: A technical update with educational aspirations
    Ali Gholipour, Judith A. Estroff, Carol E. Barnewolt, Richard L. Robertson, P. Ellen Grant, Borjan Gagoski, Simon K. Warfield, Onur Afacan, Susan A. Connolly, Jeffrey J. Neil, Adam Wolfberg, Robert V. Mulkern
    Concepts in Magnetic Resonance Part A 2014 43 6
  • Deformable Slice-to-Volume Registration for Motion Correction of Fetal Body and Placenta MRI
    Alena Uus, Tong Zhang, Laurence H. Jackson, Thomas A. Roberts, Mary A. Rutherford, Joseph V. Hajnal, Maria Deprez
    IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 2020 39 9
  • Neonatal brain MRI segmentation: A review
    Chelli N. Devi, Anupama Chandrasekharan, V.K. Sundararaman, Zachariah C. Alex
    Computers in Biology and Medicine 2015 64

More in this TOC Section

  • An Atlas of Neonatal Neurovascular Imaging Anatomy as Depicted with Microvascular Imaging: The Intracranial Arteries
  • An Atlas of Neonatal Neurovascular Imaging Anatomy as Depicted with Microvascular Imaging: The Intracranial Veins
  • Clinical Translation of Hyperpolarized 13C Metabolic Probes for Glioma Imaging
Show more Review articles

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire