Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

ReplyLetter

Reply:

R.K.S. Rathore and R.K. Gupta
American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2013, 34 (5) E60; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A3578
R.K.S. Rathore
aDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R.K. Gupta
bDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Fortis Memorial Research Institute Gurgaon, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

We thank Paula Alcaide-Leon and Álex Rovira for their interest in our work.1 In a given a time-series model involving a number of parameters, it is reasonable to expect that a determination of the parameters by using very few time points may result in erroneous estimates due to noise in the data. However, if one uses enough time points, the computations are expected to be relatively error-free; the inclusion of too many time points need not result in any better estimates.

Furthermore, if the model describes the data (ie, it is applicable), the variability in the parameter estimates using variable time points should only be random. A systematic variation in estimated parameter with respect to variable time points is indicative of an inadequacy of the model to describe the data.

The generalized tracer kinetic model (GTKM) given by Embedded Image is a 2-compartment model used by the commenting authors.

To resolve the persistence of uptake, researchers are using a model that assumes unidirectional exchange (ie, from the capillary plasma to the extracellular extravascular space [EES]2⇓–4), which essentially consists of the Patlak model: Embedded Image describing a pure contrast uptake voxel.

The actual situation, however, appears to be best described by the 3-compartment leaky tracer kinetic model (LTKM)5: Embedded Image presented in Rathore et al6,7 and Sahoo et al.8

LTKM reduces to GTKM if the leakage space is absent (λtr = 0); and it reduces to the Patlak model in the absence of a permeable space (ktr = 0).

The systematic variability of the tracer kinetic parameters using GTKM and its cessation using LTKM is considered at length in Sahoo et al.5

In short, it not necessary to prolong the observations until the washout phase, and a study of approximately 3 minutes is quite adequate. What is needed is to use the correct model in which the constancy of the parameters is restored to its original state. For further discussion of LTKM, readers may refer to Sahoo et al.5

We used only an in-house-developed code for our computations.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Gupta RK,
    2. Awasthi R,
    3. Garg RK,
    4. et al
    . T1-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced MR evaluation of different stages of neurocysticercosis and its relationship with serum MMP-9 expression. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012 Nov 22. [Epub ahead of print]
  2. 2.↵
    1. Sourbron SP,
    2. Buckley DL
    . Tracer kinetic modeling in MRI: estimating perfusion and capillary permeability. Phys Med Biol 2012;57:R1–33
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Li KL,
    2. Zhu XP,
    3. Checkley DR,
    4. et al
    . Simultaneous mapping of blood volume and endothelial permeability surface area product in gliomas using iterative analysis of first-pass dynamic contrast enhanced MRI data. Br J Radiol 2003;76:39–50
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Patlak CS,
    2. Blasberg RG,
    3. Fenstermacher JD
    . Graphical evaluation of blood-to-brain transfer constants from multiple-time uptake data. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1983;3:1–7
    CrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Sahoo P,
    2. Rathore RK,
    3. Awasthi R,
    4. et al
    . Subcompartmentalization of extracellular extravascular space (EES) into permeability and leaky space with local arterial input function (AIF) results in improved discrimination between high- and low-grade glioma using dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2013 Feb 6. [Epub ahead of print]
  6. 6.↵
    1. Rathore RKS,
    2. Sahoo P,
    3. Awasthi R,
    4. et al
    . A modified generalized tracer kinetic model for perfusion parameters in DCE-MRI for high grade intracranial mass lesions. In: Proceedings of the Nineteenth Annual Meeting of the International Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; May 6–13, 2011
  7. 7.↵
    1. Rathore RKS,
    2. Gupta RK,
    3. Sahoo P,
    4. et al
    . DCE-MRI using a three compartment leaky tracer kinetic model (LTKM) for whole body applications. In: Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Meeting of the International Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Melbourne, Australia; May 5–11, 2012
  8. 8.↵
    1. Sahoo P,
    2. Awasthi R,
    3. Rathore RKS,
    4. et al
    . Effects of AIF selection and pharmacokinetic model selection on discrimination of chronic infective from chronic inflammatory knee arthritis using DCE-MRI. In: Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Meeting of the International Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Melbourne, Australia; May 5–11, 2012
  • © 2013 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 34 (5)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 34, Issue 5
1 May 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Reply:
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
R.K.S. Rathore, R.K. Gupta
Reply:
American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2013, 34 (5) E60; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3578

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Reply:
R.K.S. Rathore, R.K. Gupta
American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2013, 34 (5) E60; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3578
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR: Importance of Reaching the Washout Phase
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref (2)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • A prospective trial of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI perfusion and fluorine-18 FDG PET-CT in differentiating brain tumor progression from radiation injury after cranial irradiation
    Vaios Hatzoglou, T. Jonathan Yang, Antonio Omuro, Igor Gavrilovic, Gary Ulaner, Jennifer Rubel, Taylor Schneider, Kaitlin M. Woo, Zhigang Zhang, Kyung K. Peck, Kathryn Beal, Robert J. Young
    Neuro-Oncology 2016 18 6
  • Dynamic Contrast‐Enhanced MRI in Low‐Grade Versus Anaplastic Oligodendrogliomas
    Julio Arevalo‐Perez, Amanuel A. Kebede, Kyung K. Peck, Eli Diamond, Andrei I. Holodny, Marc Rosenblum, Jennifer Rubel, Joshua Gaal, Vaios Hatzoglou
    Journal of Neuroimaging 2016 26 3

More in this TOC Section

  • Letter to the Editor regarding “Automated Volumetric Software in Dementia: Help or Hindrance to the Neuroradiologist?”
  • Reply:
  • Brain AVM’s Nidus: What if We Hadn’t Understood Anything?
Show more LETTERS

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire