Intra-Aneurysmal Pressure and Flow Changes Induced by Flow Diverters: Relation to Aneurysm Size and Shape

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Szikora I,
   2. Nelson PK,
   3. Berentei Z,
   4. et al

   . The potential of flow modification in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Interv Neuroradiol 2008;14(suppl 1):77–80

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   1. Sadasivan C,
   2. Cesar L,
   3. Seong J,
   4. et al

   . Treatment of rabbit elastase-induced aneurysm models by flow diverters: development of quantifiable indexes of device performance using digital subtraction angiography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2009;28:1117–25

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   1. Sadasivan C,
   2. Lieber BB,
   3. Gounis MJ,
   4. et al

   . Angiographic quantification of contrast medium washout from cerebral aneurysms after stent placement. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:1214–21

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   1. Kallmes DF,
   2. Ding YH,
   3. Dai D,
   4. et al

   . A new endoluminal, flow-disrupting device for treatment of saccular aneurysms. Stroke 2007;38:2346–52

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   1. Cebral JR,
   2. Mut F,
   3. Raschi M,
   4. et al

   . Aneurysm rupture following treatment with flow-diverting stents: computational hemodynamics analysis of treatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;32:1–7

   PubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Kulcsár Z,
   2. Houdart E,
   3. Bonafé A,
   4. et al

   . Intra-aneurysmal thrombosis as a possible cause of delayed aneurysm rupture after flow-diversion treatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;23:20–25
7. 7.↵
   1. van Rooij WJ,
   2. Sluzewski M

   . Perforator infarction after placement of a Pipeline flow-diverting stent for an unruptured A1 aneurysm. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:E43–44

   FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   1. Klisch J,
   2. Turk A,
   3. Turner R,
   4. et al

   . Very late thrombosis of flow-diverting constructs after the treatment of large fusiform posterior circulation aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:627–32

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   1. Turowski B,
   2. Macht S,
   3. Kulcsár Z,
   4. et al

   . Early fatal hemorrhage after endovascular cerebral aneurysm treatment with a flow diverter (Silk-Stent): do we need to rethink our concepts? Neuroradiology 2011;53:37–41

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    1. Thevenin D,
    2. Seshadhri S,
    3. Janiga G

    . Impact of stents and flow diverters on hemodynamics in idealized aneurysm models. J Biomech Eng 2011;133:071005
11. 11.↵
    1. Hassan T,
    2. Ahmed YM,
    3. Hassan AA

    . The adverse effects of flow-diverter stent-like devices on the flow pattern of saccular intracranial aneurysm models: computational fluid dynamics study. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2011;153;1633–40

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    1. Tremmel M,
    2. Xiang J,
    3. Natarajan SK,
    4. et al

    . Alteration of intra-aneurysmal hemodynamics for flow diversion using Enterprise and Vision stents. World Neurosurg 2010;74:306–15

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    1. Augsburger L,
    2. Farhat M,
    3. Reymond P,
    4. et al

    . Effect of flow diverter porosity on intraaneurysmal blood flow. Klin Neuroradiol 2009;19:204–14

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Villa-Uriol MC,
    2. Berti G,
    3. Hose DR,
    4. et al

    . @neurIST complex information processing toolchain for the integrated management of cerebral aneurysms. Interface Focus 2011;1:308–19

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    1. Appanaboyina S,
    2. Mut F,
    3. Löhner R,
    4. et al

    . Simulation of intracranial aneurysm stenting: techniques and challenges. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 2009;198:3567–82

    CrossRefWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    1. Hernandez M,
    2. Frangi AF

    . Non-parametric geodesic active regions: method and evaluation for cerebral aneurysms segmentation in 3DRA and CTA. Med Image Anal 2007;11:224–41

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    1. Larrabide I,
    2. Kim M,
    3. Augsburger L,
    4. et al

    . Fast virtual deployment of self-expandable stents: method and in vitro evaluation for intracranial aneurysmal stenting. Med Image Anal 2012;16:721–30

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. 18.↵
    1. Reymond P,
    2. Merenda F,
    3. Perren F,
    4. et al

    . Validation of a one-dimensional model of the systemic arterial tree. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2009;297:H208–22

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    1. Marzo A,
    2. Singh P,
    3. Reymond P,
    4. et al

    . Influence of inlet boundary conditions on the local haemodynamics of intracranial aneurysms. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 2009;12:431–44

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    1. Bernardini A,
    2. Larrabide I,
    3. Morales HG,
    4. et al

    . Influence of different computational approaches for stent deployment on cerebral aneurysm haemodynamics. Interface Focus 2011;1:338–48

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
21. 21.↵
    1. Shojima M,
    2. Oshima M,
    3. Takagi K,
    4. et al

    . Magnitude and role of wall shear stress on cerebral aneurysm: computational fluid dynamic study of 20 middle cerebral artery aneurysms. Stroke 2004;35:2500–05

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
22. 22.↵
    1. Himburg HA,
    2. Grzybowski DM,
    3. Hazel AL,
    4. et al

    . Spatial comparison between wall shear stress measures and porcine arterial endothelial permeability. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2004;286:H1916–22

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
23. 23.↵
    1. Wootton DM,
    2. Ku DN

    . Fluid mechanics of vascular systems, diseases, and thrombosis. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 1999;1:299–329

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
24. 24.↵
    1. Schneiders JJ,
    2. Vanbavel E,
    3. Majoie CB,
    4. et al

    . A flow-diverting stent is not a pressure-diverting stent. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:E1–4

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
25. 25.↵
    1. Hengl TR

    : R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria; R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2009
26. 26.↵
    1. Ishibashi T,
    2. Murayama Y,
    3. Urashima M,
    4. et al

    . Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: incidence of rupture and risk factors. Stroke 2009;40:313–16

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
27. 27.↵
    1. Chatzizisis YS,
    2. Coskun AU,
    3. Jonas M,
    4. et al

    . Role of endothelial shear stress in the natural history of coronary atherosclerosis and vascular remodeling: molecular, cellular, and vascular behavior. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:2379–93

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science