Review of 2 Decades of Aneurysm-Recurrence Literature, Part 2: Managing Recurrence after Endovascular Coiling

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Smith GA,
   2. Dagostino P,
   3. Maltenfort MG,
   4. et al

   . Geographic variation and regional trends in adoption of endovascular techniques for cerebral aneurysms. J Neurosurg 2011;114:1768–77

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   1. Molyneux AJ,
   2. Kerr RS,
   3. Birks J,
   4. et al

   . Risk of recurrent subarachnoid haemorrhage, death, or dependence and standardised mortality ratios after clipping or coiling of an intracranial aneurysm in the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT): long-term follow-up. Lancet Neurol 2009;8:427–33

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   1. Guglielmi G,
   2. Vinuela F,
   3. Duckwiler G,
   4. et al

   . Endovascular treatment of posterior circulation aneurysms by electrothrombosis using electrically detachable coils. J Neurosurg 1992;77:515–24

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   1. Ferns SP,
   2. Sprengers ME,
   3. van Rooij WJ,
   4. et al

   . Coiling of intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review on initial occlusion and reopening and retreatment rates. Stroke 2009;40:e523–29

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   1. David CA,
   2. Vishteh AG,
   3. Spetzler RF,
   4. et al

   . Late angiographic follow-up review of surgically treated aneurysms. J Neurosurg 1999;91:396–401

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   1. Tsutsumi K,
   2. Ueki K,
   3. Morita A,
   4. et al

   . Risk of aneurysm recurrence in patients with clipped cerebral aneurysms: results of long-term follow-up angiography. Stroke 2001;32:1191–94

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   1. Brinjikji W,
   2. Rabinstein AA,
   3. Nasr DM,
   4. et al

   . Better outcomes with treatment by coiling relative to clipping of unruptured intracranial aneurysms in the United States, 2001–2008. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:1071–75

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   1. Qureshi AI,
   2. Vazquez G,
   3. Tariq N,
   4. et al

   . Impact of International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial results on treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms in the United States: clinical article. J Neurosurg 2011;114:834–41

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   1. Johnston SC,
   2. Dowd CF,
   3. Higashida RT,
   4. et al

   . Predictors of rehemorrhage after treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: the Cerebral Aneurysm Rerupture After Treatment (CARAT) study. Stroke 2008;39:120–25

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    1. Molyneux A,
    2. Kerr R,
    3. Stratton I,
    4. et al

    . International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial. Lancet 2002;360:1267–74

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    1. Molyneux A,
    2. Kerr R,
    3. Stratton I,
    4. et al

    . International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomized trial. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2002;11:304–14

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Molyneux AJ,
    2. Kerr RS,
    3. Yu LM,
    4. et al

    . International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion. Lancet 2005;366:809–17

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    1. Mitchell P,
    2. Kerr R,
    3. Mendelow AD,
    4. et al

    . Could late rebleeding overturn the superiority of cranial aneurysm coil embolization over clip ligation seen in the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial? J Neurosurg 2008;108:437–42

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    1. Schaafsma JD,
    2. Sprengers ME,
    3. van Rooij WJ,
    4. et al

    . Long-term recurrent subarachnoid hemorrhage after adequate coiling versus clipping of ruptured intracranial aneurysms. Stroke 2009;40:1758–63

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    1. McDougall CG,
    2. Spetzler RF,
    3. Zabramski JM,
    4. et al

    . The Barrow Ruptured Aneurysm Trial. J Neurosurg 2011 Nov 4. [Epub ahead of print]
16. 16.↵
    1. Wiebers DO,
    2. Whisnant JP,
    3. Huston J 3rd.,
    4. et al

    . Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: natural history, clinical outcome, and risks of surgical and endovascular treatment. Lancet 2003;362:103–10

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    1. Naggara ON,
    2. White PM,
    3. Guilbert F,
    4. et al

    . Endovascular treatment of intracranial unruptured aneurysms: systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature on safety and efficacy. Radiology 2010;256:887–97

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. 18.↵
    1. van Rooij WJ,
    2. Sluzewski M,
    3. Beute GN

    . Endovascular treatment of posterior cerebral artery aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:300–05

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    1. Terada T,
    2. Tsuura M,
    3. Matsumoto H,
    4. et al

    . Endovascular treatment of unruptured cerebral aneurysms. Acta Neurochir Suppl 2005;94:87–91

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. Brilstra EH,
    2. Rinkel GJ,
    3. van der Graaf Y,
    4. et al

    . Treatment of intracranial aneurysms by embolization with coils: a systematic review. Stroke 1999;30:470–76

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
21. 21.↵
    1. Murayama Y,
    2. Tateshima S,
    3. Gonzalez NR,
    4. et al

    . Matrix and bioabsorbable polymeric coils accelerate healing of intracranial aneurysms: long-term experimental study. Stroke 2003;34:2031–37

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
22. 22.↵
    1. Slob MJ,
    2. Sluzewski M,
    3. van Rooij WJ,
    4. et al

    . Additional coiling of previously coiled cerebral aneurysms: clinical and angiographic results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:1373–76

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
23. 23.↵
    1. Kang HS,
    2. Han MH,
    3. Kwon BJ,
    4. et al

    . Repeat endovascular treatment in post-embolization recurrent intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2006;58:60–70, discussion 60–70

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
24. 24.↵
    1. Raymond J,
    2. Guilbert F,
    3. Weill A,
    4. et al

    . Long-term angiographic recurrences after selective endovascular treatment of aneurysms with detachable coils. Stroke 2003;34:1398–403

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
25. 25.↵
    1. Eskridge JM,
    2. Song JK

    . Endovascular embolization of 150 basilar tip aneurysms with Guglielmi detachable coils: results of the Food and Drug Administration multicenter clinical trial. J Neurosurg 1998;89:81–86

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
26. 26.↵
    1. Hodgson TJ,
    2. Carroll T,
    3. Jellinek DA

    . Subarachnoid hemorrhage due to late recurrence of a previously unruptured aneurysm after complete endovascular occlusion. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1998;19:1939–41

    Abstract
27. 27.↵
    1. Ferns SP,
    2. Sprengers ME,
    3. van Rooij WJ,
    4. et al

    . Late reopening of adequately coiled intracranial aneurysms: frequency and risk factors in 400 patients with 440 aneurysms. Stroke 2011;42:1331–37

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
28. 28.↵
    1. Tailor J,
    2. Goetz P,
    3. Chandrashekar H,
    4. et al

    . Stability of ruptured intracranial aneurysms treated with detachable coils: is delayed follow-up angiography warranted? Br J Neurosurg 2010;24:405–09

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    1. Gallas S,
    2. Januel AC,
    3. Pasco A,
    4. et al

    . Long-term follow-up of 1036 cerebral aneurysms treated by bare coils: a multicentric cohort treated between 1998 and 2003. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:1986–92

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
30. 30.↵
    1. Plowman RS,
    2. Clarke A,
    3. Clarke M,
    4. et al

    . Sixteen-year single-surgeon experience with coil embolization for ruptured intracranial aneurysms: recurrence rates and incidence of late rebleeding: clinical article. J Neurosurg 2011;114:863–74. Epub 2010 Jul 30

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
31. 31.↵
    1. Wermer MJ,
    2. Buskens E,
    3. van der Schaaf IC,
    4. et al

    . Yield of screening for new aneurysms after treatment for subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurology 2004;62:369–75

    CrossRef
32. 32.↵
    1. Wermer MJ,
    2. Koffijberg H,
    3. van der Schaaf IC

    . Effectiveness and costs of screening for aneurysms every 5 years after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurology 2008;70:2053–62

    CrossRef
33. 33.↵
    1. Cloft HJ,
    2. Joseph GJ,
    3. Dion JE

    . Risk of cerebral angiography in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage, cerebral aneurysm, and arteriovenous malformation: a meta-analysis. Stroke 1999;30:317–20

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
34. 34.↵
    1. Ringer AJ,
    2. Lanzino G,
    3. Veznedaroglu E,
    4. et al

    . Does angiographic surveillance pose a risk in the management of coiled intracranial aneurysms? A multicenter study of 2243 patients. Neurosurgery 2008;63:845–49, discussion 849

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
35. 35.↵
    1. Schaafsma JD,
    2. Koffijberg H,
    3. Buskens E,
    4. et al

    . Cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance angiography versus intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography to follow-up patients with coiled intracranial aneurysms. Stroke 2010;41:1736–42

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
36. 36.↵
    1. Weng HH,
    2. Jao SY,
    3. Yang CY,
    4. et al

    . Meta-analysis on diagnostic accuracy of MR angiography in the follow-up of residual intracranial aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils. Interv Neuroradiol 2008;14(suppl 2):53–63. Epub 2009 Jan 2

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
37. 37.↵
    1. Kaufmann TJ,
    2. Huston J 3rd.,
    3. Cloft HJ,
    4. et al

    . A prospective trial of 3T and 1.5T time-of-flight and contrast-enhanced MR angiography in the follow-up of coiled intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:912–18

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
38. 38.↵
    1. Kwee TC,
    2. Kwee RM

    . MR angiography in the follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils: systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuroradiology 2007;49:703–13

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
39. 39.↵
    1. Sprengers ME,
    2. Schaafsma JD,
    3. van Rooij WJ,
    4. et al

    . Evaluation of the occlusion status of coiled intracranial aneurysms with MR angiography at 3T: is contrast enhancement necessary? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:1665–71

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
40. 40.↵
    1. Campi A,
    2. Ramzi N,
    3. Molyneux AJ,
    4. et al

    . Retreatment of ruptured cerebral aneurysms in patients randomized by coiling or clipping in the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT). Stroke 2007;38:1538–44

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
41. 41.↵
    1. Ringer AJ,
    2. Rodriguez-Mercado R,
    3. Veznedaroglu E,
    4. et al

    . Defining the risk of retreatment for aneurysm recurrence or residual after initial treatment by endovascular coiling: a multicenter study. Neurosurgery 2009;65:311–15, discussion 315

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
42. 42.↵
    1. Renowden SA,
    2. Koumellis P,
    3. Benes V,
    4. et al

    . Retreatment of previously embolized cerebral aneurysms: the risk of further coil embolization does not negate the advantage of the initial embolization. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:1401–04

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
43. 43.↵
    1. Ferns SP,
    2. Majoie CB,
    3. Sluzewski M,
    4. et al

    . Late adverse events in coiled ruptured aneurysms with incomplete occlusion at 6-month angiographic follow-up. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:464–69

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
44. 44.↵
    1. White PM,
    2. Lewis SC,
    3. Gholkar A,
    4. et al

    . Hydrogel-coated coils versus bare platinum coils for the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms (HELPS): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2011;377:1655–62

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
45. 45.↵
    1. Daugherty WP,
    2. Rad AE,
    3. White JB,
    4. et al

    . Observer agreement regarding the necessity of retreatment of previously coiled recurrent cerebral aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:566–69

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
46. 46.↵
    1. Ferns SP,
    2. Nieuwkerk PT,
    3. van Rooij WJ,
    4. et al

    . Long-term MRA follow-up after coiling of intracranial aneurysms: impact on mood and anxiety. Neuroradiology 2011;53:343–48

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
47. 47.↵
    1. Noble AJ,
    2. Baisch S,
    3. Covey J,
    4. et al

    . Subarachnoid hemorrhage patients' fears of recurrence are related to the presence of posttraumatic stress disorder. Neurosurgery 2011;69:323–32, discussion 332–33

    CrossRefPubMed
48. 48.↵
    1. Huttunen T,
    2. von und Zu Fraunberg M,
    3. Koivisto T,
    4. et al

    . Long-term excess mortality of 244 familial and 1502 sporadic one-year survivors of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage compared with a matched Eastern Finnish catchment population. Neurosurgery 2011;68:20–27

    CrossRefPubMed