Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleTechnical Note
Open Access

Pneumatically Driven Finger Movement: A Novel Passive Functional MR Imaging Technique for Presurgical Motor and Sensory Mapping

S. Shriver, K.E. Knierim, J.P. O'Shea, G.H. Glover and A.J. Golby
American Journal of Neuroradiology January 2013, 34 (1) E5-E7; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A2626
S. Shriver
aFrom the Department of Neurosurgery (S.S., K.E.K., J.P.O., A.J.G.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
bDepartment of Marketing (S.S.), Fox School of Business, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
K.E. Knierim
aFrom the Department of Neurosurgery (S.S., K.E.K., J.P.O., A.J.G.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J.P. O'Shea
aFrom the Department of Neurosurgery (S.S., K.E.K., J.P.O., A.J.G.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
G.H. Glover
cDepartment of Radiology (G.H.G.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A.J. Golby
aFrom the Department of Neurosurgery (S.S., K.E.K., J.P.O., A.J.G.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

SUMMARY: Two of the most common reasons for failure to obtain adequate preoperative functional data are inadequate task performance and excessive head motion. With an MR imaging−compatible pneumatically driven manipulandum, passive motor tasks elicited reproducible contralateral activation in the M1 and S1 in 10 healthy controls and 6 patients. The SMA was localized in all healthy controls and in 5 of 6 patients. Head motion was reduced in passive tasks compared with active tasks.

ABBREVIATIONS:

ANOVA
analysis of variance
fMRI
functional MR imaging
BOLD
blood oxygen level−dependent
M1
primary motor cortex
SMA
supplementary motor area
S1
primary somatosensory cortex

fMRI of the motor cortex has been shown to be useful in the presurgical evaluation of patients with brain tumors.1 However, due to lesion-related neurologic deficits, fMRI may be compromised by the patient's inability to successfully perform relevant tasks. Patients with lesions in and around the sensorimotor strip often have pre-existing weakness or sensory deficits that may hinder their performance during standard fMRI sensorimotor tasks such as finger tapping and hand clenching. Moreover, attempts to compensate for this diminished ability may introduce artifacts (eg, head-motion artifacts due to the recruitment of proximal muscles in patients with cortical weakness).2

Any technique used in neurosurgical planning must be able to produce results for single subjects and also to produce activation in motor areas, preferably including the SMA. We present a novel passive-movement task by using a custom-built manipulandum (Mag Design and Engineering, Redwood City, California), which reliably activates the S1, M1, and SMA and reduces overall head motion and task-correlated motion compared with voluntary active-movement paradigms in healthy controls and patients. Previous research has elicited passive BOLD sensorimotor activation in healthy controls3 and sedated pediatric patients.4

Technique

Whole-brain MR imaging was performed on a 3T Excite VH3 MR imaging system with a quadrature head coil (GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, Wisconsin). Participants' heads were immobilized by using soft padding. Conventional structural images and echo-planar functional images were acquired during a 90-minute session.

Ten healthy right-handed volunteers (5 women; mean age, 26.9 years) and 6 neurosurgery patients (4 women; mean, age 41 years) were recruited. Healthy controls performed a series of 4 passive (right/left index-finger tapping, right/left sequential 5-finger tapping), and 6 active (same as the passive tasks, plus right/left hand clenching) hand-movement tasks while undergoing BOLD echo-planar MR imaging. Four of the 6 patients had preoperative motor deficits, which included hand weakness. Diagnoses included oligoastrocytoma, glioblastoma, and recurrent glioma without anaplastic features. Patients were tested with a clinically relevant subset of the battery with passive and active motor tasks. All tasks consisted of twelve 20-second blocks, alternating between movement and rest. A custom-built MR imaging−compatible pneumatically driven finger-moving device was used for all passive tasks (Mag Design and Engineering). Left- and right-handed devices were attached to the subjects' hands by using Velcro straps (Velcro USA, Manchester, New Hampshire). The devices were controlled with E-Prime stimulus software (Psychology Software Tools, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania) and were removed during performance of the active tasks.

During the passive tasks, the subjects were instructed to relax while the manipulandum moved their fingers according to the task parameters. For active tasks, verbal instructions were presented through visual display goggles (Resonance Technology, Northridge, California) to perform the task (“GO”) or to rest (“STOP”).

Functional data were reconstructed and corrected for subject motion by using SPM2 (Wellcome Department of Imaging Neuroscience, London, United Kingdom). Spatial smoothing was not performed to preserve the improved spatial resolution of the high-resolution echo-planar images.5 Differences between stimulus and rest conditions were examined by using analysis of covariance with global signal-intensity and low-frequency components treated as nuisance covariates. Correction for multiple comparisons was performed by using the theory of Gaussian random fields.6 Functional maps were displayed at 3 statistical thresholds: the most stringent, P < .05, corrected for multiple comparisons; a less stringent, P < .001, uncorrected for multiple comparisons; and the least stringent, P < .01, uncorrected.

Head motion was estimated by using the realignment routine in SPM2. The transformation data were then further analyzed by using custom Matlab (MathWorks, Natick, Massachusetts) scripts. For the patients in whom only a subset of tasks was performed, motion parameters were compared between analogous tasks (eg, sequential finger tapping and sequential passive finger movement). Translational and rotational parameters were analyzed separately. The single greatest displacement from each fMRI task was extracted from the SPM2 realignment transformation data by calculating the maximum difference in the absolute values of the realignment parameters between consecutive acquisitions in the time series and analyzed with repeated measures ANOVA with 1 between-subjects factor (controls versus patients) and 1 within-subjects factor (passive versus active). Average motion per TR was also calculated for both translational and rotational movement and subjected to repeated measures ANOVA with 1 between-subjects factor (controls versus patients) and 2 within-subjects factors (task, passive versus active; and direction, x, y, z). The extent to which head motion was correlated with the stimulus frequency was estimated by calculating the value of the power spectrum of the realignment parameters at the stimulation frequency.7 Repeated measures ANOVAs were also performed on the value of the power spectrum.

The data from the passive motor tasks showed contralateral activation in S1 and M1 in all controls and patients. The SMA was activated during the passive tasks in all healthy controls and 5 of 6 patients. fMRI results in healthy controls from the passive tasks were consistent with the analogous active movement tasks with the exception of the passive index finger movement, which tended to have a less robust pattern of activation than the active index finger tapping. Patients' passive tasks also elicited activation comparable with the active tasks (Fig 1). Patients had greater translational head movement than controls (0.44 versus 0.26 mm) [F (1,47) = 24.9] (P < .0001). Passive tasks were associated with less translational movement than active tasks (0.34 versus 0.26 mm) [F (1,47) = 14.1] (P < .001). In addition, there was a significant interaction between task and group, so that patients had a greater decrease in translational movement for the passive tasks compared with the active tasks than controls [F (1,47) = 5.0] (P < .05). Rotational-movement passive tasks resulted in less movement compared with active tasks. In patients, however, there was a trend toward decreased rotational movement during the passive tasks. Patients and controls did not differ significantly in rotational movement, and there was not a significant interaction between group and task. Average translational movements per TR were greater in the patients than the controls [F (1,47) = 59.5] (P < .0001) and were greater also in the y- and z-axes than in the x-axis direction [F (1,47) = 73] (P < .0001).

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Activation maps of pneumatically driven left-index-finger movement (A) and volitional left-index-finger movement (B) from a representative healthy control subject; and pneumatically driven sequential right-finger movement (C) from a representative patient with recurrent low-grade glioma and preoperative weakness in the right hand and leg. Tasks display similar activation of S1 (yellow arrows), M1 (blue arrows), and SMA (green arrows). Figures are shown in radiologic convention.

Discussion

Two of the most common reasons for failure to obtain adequate functional data in previous preoperative fMRI studies of patients have been inadequate task performance and excessive head motion.2 Our preliminary results by using a performance-invariant passive sensorimotor paradigm using a manipulandum showed reproducible activation of the S1, M1, and SMA in individual healthy controls and patients. The use of the manipulandum reduced head motion compared with active tasks. This reduction was greater for patients than for controls. Task-correlated motion was also decreased, though this was only significant in healthy controls.

Multiple studies have shown a good correspondence between presurgical functional imaging findings and postoperative deficits based on the distance of activation from the lesion boundaries.5,8 Many patients with brain tumors or other structural lesions are excluded from functional motor mapping due to their inability to perform relevant tasks. The development of passive tasks can extend the advantages of preoperative fMRI to the subset of neurosurgical candidates with pre-existing deficits. An added advantage of using a passive sensorimotor task is the ability to more precisely control subject performance through standardized tasks, thereby equalizing performance. Standardized tasks rely less on effort or cooperation and thus allow a clearer interpretation of activation maps by decreasing noncontrolled cognitive processes. There is also evidence that the amplitude and frequency of voluntary hand movement influences activation.9⇓–11 In sum, use of a manipulandum as in this study can decrease confounding factors related to subject compliance and task unpredictability that lead to variability in results.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Julie Levesque for technical support and Ben Krasnow for manipulandum development.

Footnotes

  • This study was supported by grants from the Brain Science Foundation (A.J.G.), Brigham and Women's Institute for the Neurosciences (A.J.G.), NIH KO8 NS048063, U41 RR019703, R25 CA89017 (A.J.G.), and NIH RR P41-09784 (G.H.G.).

Indicates open access to non-subscribers at www.ajnr.org

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Schulder M,
    2. Maldjian JA,
    3. Liu WC,
    4. et al
    . Functional image-guided surgery of intracranial tumors located in or near the sensorimotor cortex. J Neurosurg 1998;89:412–18
    PubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Krings T,
    2. Reinges MH,
    3. Erberich S,
    4. et al
    . Functional MRI for presurgical planning: problems, artifacts, and solution strategies. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2001;70:749–60
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Yu N,
    2. Estevez N,
    3. Hepp-Reymond MC,
    4. et al
    . fMRI assessment of upper extremity related brain activation with an MRI-compatible manipulandum. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2011;6:447–55. Epub 2010 Aug 10
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Ogg RJ,
    2. Laningham FH,
    3. Clarke D,
    4. et al
    . Passive range of motion functional magnetic resonance imaging localizing sensorimotor cortex in sedated children. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2009;4:317–22
    CrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Yoo SS,
    2. Talos IF,
    3. Golby AJ,
    4. et al
    . Evaluating requirements for spatial resolution of fMRI for neurosurgical planning. Hum Brain Mapp 2004;21:34–43
    CrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Friston KJ,
    2. Holmes A,
    3. Poline JB,
    4. et al
    . Detecting activations in PET and fMRI: levels of inference and power. Neuroimage 1996;4:223–35
    CrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Hill DL,
    2. Smith AD,
    3. Simmons A,
    4. et al
    . Sources of error in comparing functional magnetic resonance imaging and invasive electrophysiological recordings. J Neurosurg 2000;93:214–23
    PubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Morioka T,
    2. Shigeto H,
    3. Ishibashi H,
    4. et al
    . Magnetic source imaging of the sensory cortex on the surface anatomy MR scanning. Neurol Res 1998;20:235–41
    PubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Rao SM,
    2. Bandettini PA,
    3. Binder JR,
    4. et al
    . Relationship between finger movement rate and functional magnetic resonance signal change in human primary motor cortex. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1996;16:1250–54
    CrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Dai TH,
    2. Liu JZ,
    3. Sahgal V,
    4. et al
    . Relationship between muscle output and functional MRI-measured brain activation. Exp Brain Res 2001;140:290–300
    CrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Berns GS,
    2. Song AW,
    3. Mao H
    . Continuous functional magnetic resonance imaging reveals dynamic nonlinearities of “dose-response” curves for finger opposition. J Neurosci 1999;19:RC17
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  • Received January 13, 2011.
  • Accepted after revision February 27, 2011.
  • © 2013 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 34 (1)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 34, Issue 1
1 Jan 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Pneumatically Driven Finger Movement: A Novel Passive Functional MR Imaging Technique for Presurgical Motor and Sensory Mapping
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
S. Shriver, K.E. Knierim, J.P. O'Shea, G.H. Glover, A.J. Golby
Pneumatically Driven Finger Movement: A Novel Passive Functional MR Imaging Technique for Presurgical Motor and Sensory Mapping
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jan 2013, 34 (1) E5-E7; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2626

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Pneumatically Driven Finger Movement: A Novel Passive Functional MR Imaging Technique for Presurgical Motor and Sensory Mapping
S. Shriver, K.E. Knierim, J.P. O'Shea, G.H. Glover, A.J. Golby
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jan 2013, 34 (1) E5-E7; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2626
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Cortical Activation Through Passive-Motion Functional MRI
  • Crossref (13)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • Challenges and techniques for presurgical brain mapping with functional MRI
    Michael A. Silva, Alfred P. See, Walid I. Essayed, Alexandra J. Golby, Yanmei Tie
    NeuroImage: Clinical 2018 17
  • Cortical Activation Through Passive-Motion Functional MRI
    A.F. Choudhri, R.M. Patel, A. Siddiqui, M.T. Whitehead, J.W. Wheless
    American Journal of Neuroradiology 2015 36 9
  • MRI-compatible pneumatic stimulator for sensorimotor mapping
    Valentina Lolli, Antonin Rovai, Nicola Trotta, Mathieu Bourguignon, Serge Goldman, Niloufar Sadeghi, Veikko Jousmäki, Xavier De Tiège
    Journal of Neuroscience Methods 2019 313
  • Effects of Passive Finger Movement on Cortical Excitability
    Masaki Nakagawa, Ryoki Sasaki, Shota Tsuiki, Shota Miyaguchi, Sho Kojima, Kei Saito, Yasuto Inukai, Hideaki Onishi
    Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 2017 11
  • Clinical Neurophysiology: Basis and Technical Aspects
    Andrew C. Papanicolaou, Roozbeh Rezaie, Panagiotis G. Simos
    2019 160
  • Pneumatic artificial muscle-based stimulator for passive functional magnetic resonance imaging sensorimotor mapping in patients with brain tumours
    Valentina Lolli, Antonin Rovai, Nicola Trotta, Serge Goldman, Niloufar Sadeghi, Florence Lefranc, Veikko Jousmäki, Xavier De Tiège
    Journal of Neuroscience Methods 2021 359
  • Clinical Functional MRI
    Christoph Stippich, Maria Blatow, Meritxell Garcia Alzamora
    2022
  • Identification of proprioceptive thalamocortical tracts in children: comparison of fMRI, MEG, and manual seeding of probabilistic tractography
    Julia Jaatela, Dogu Baran Aydogan, Timo Nurmi, Jaakko Vallinoja, Harri Piitulainen
    Cerebral Cortex 2022 32 17
  • Functional Mapping of the Cerebral Cortex
    Mohammad Fakhri, Lauren J. O’Donnell, Laura Rigolo, Alexandra J. Golby
    2016
  • Intraoperative Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy
    Ferenc A. Jolesz, Alexandra J. Golby, Daniel A. Orringer
    2014

More in this TOC Section

  • 3D Fast Spin-Echo T1 Black-Blood Imaging for the Diagnosis of Cervical Artery Dissection
  • The Kety-Schmidt Technique for Quantitative Perfusion and Oxygen Metabolism Measurements in the MR Imaging Environment
  • A Swine Model to Analyze Arterial Structural Changes Induced by Mechanical Thrombectomy
Show more Technical Notes

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire